cover of episode Is Democracy Holding Up in South Korea?

Is Democracy Holding Up in South Korea?

2025/1/8
logo of podcast State of the World from NPR

State of the World from NPR

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Aurel Croissant
G
Greg Dixon
I
Im Kum-ja
K
Kang Won-taek
K
Klaasso
P
Park Chan-dae
旁白
知名游戏《文明VII》的开场动画预告片旁白。
Topics
Greg Dixon: 韩国总统尹锡悦试图通过宣布戒严来巩固权力,导致该国陷入政治危机。 事件发生在一个月前,至今当局仍未能逮捕被弹劾的总统尹锡悦。该国仍然深陷政治危机之中。 Aurel Croissant: 尹锡悦宣布戒严是‘自我政变’的典型案例,与美国1月6日事件类似,但两者之间也有区别。 韩国宣布戒严是这种自我政变的典型案例。许多韩国人自然会将其与2021年1月6日美国发生的事件进行比较。两者之间的区别在于,美国没有宣布戒严,而是试图推翻选举结果。 韩国的情况与美国1月6日事件的核心特征相似,都是试图阻止其他政府部门履行其宪法职责,并阻止政府问责。执政党和反对党都认为自己是在试图拯救韩国民主,而另一方则试图破坏它。 Im Kum-ja: 我支持尹锡悦总统,我认为他使用戒严是合法的治理工具,是为了保护韩国的自由民主,防止韩国变成共产主义国家。 我出来是因为我担心这个国家。我们需要保护我们国家的自由民主。但是我担心我们会变成一个共产主义国家。我认为总统尹锡悦别无选择,只能使用戒严作为合法的治理工具。 Klaasso: 韩国的民主制度在应对危机方面很强大,但在预防危机方面却很薄弱,因为如果制度有效,尹锡悦根本无法宣布戒严。 韩国的民主制度在应对危机方面很强大,但在预防危机方面却很薄弱。 Kang Won-taek: 韩国政治制度的设计存在问题,总统权力需要重新分配,因为韩国民主化的核心一直是举行公平的总统选举,而该制度已达到极限。 韩国民主化的核心一直是举行公平的民主总统选举。我认为,该制度已经达到了极限。部分问题在于韩国政治制度的设计和构建方式。总统的部分权力现在需要重新分配。关于这个问题的辩论已经持续了好几年了。尹锡悦的自我政变失败的另一个原因是军方拒绝使用武力实施戒严,这与1980年光州事件有关。 Park Chan-dae: 1980年光州事件的历史教训帮助阻止了2024年12月3日的戒严令。 正如我亲身经历了12月3日戒严令引发的内乱一样,我想对这个问题的答案是肯定的:过去能否帮助现在?因为1980年5月拯救了2024年12月。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What event in South Korea is being compared to the January 6, 2021, events in the U.S.?

The declaration of martial law by President Yoon Suk Yeol on December 3rd is being compared to the January 6, 2021, events in the U.S. Both events involved attempts to undermine democratic institutions, though the U.S. event aimed to overturn election results, while Yoon's action targeted an opposition-controlled parliament.

Why did President Yoon Suk Yeol declare martial law in South Korea?

President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law to break the resistance of an opposition-controlled parliament, which he viewed as paralyzing the government. He attempted to use martial law as a tool to maintain or extend his power by undermining checks and balances.

What role did the military play in the failure of Yoon's self-coup?

The military's reluctance to use force to impose martial law was a key factor in the failure of Yoon's self-coup. This hesitation stemmed from the traumatic memory of the 1980 Gwangju massacre, where troops killed around 200 civilians during pro-democracy protests.

How does political polarization affect South Korea's democracy?

Political polarization weakens South Korea's democracy by making it difficult to reach compromises necessary for governance. It also leads to the acceptance of undemocratic behavior by one's own political party, further eroding democratic norms.

What lessons from South Korea's past are influencing its current political crisis?

The 1980 Gwangju massacre, where military forces killed civilians during pro-democracy protests, serves as a critical lesson. The trauma from this event has made the military hesitant to use force against civilians, influencing their response during the recent political crisis.

What is the state of South Korea's democratic institutions according to experts?

South Korea's democratic institutions are strong in reacting to crises but weak in preventing them. The failure of institutional safeguards, such as checks and balances, allowed President Yoon to declare martial law, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities.

What is the significance of civil society in protecting democracy in South Korea?

Civil society acts as the last line of defense for democracy in South Korea. Citizens have a history of mobilizing to protect their rights, drawing lessons from colonial occupation and military dictatorships. This mobilization is crucial when elected representatives fail to uphold democratic principles.

What reforms are being debated to address South Korea's political system?

There is an ongoing debate about redistributing some of the president's powers to address the limitations of South Korea's political system. The current system, focused on fair presidential elections, has reached its limits and requires structural changes to prevent future crises.

Chapters
Following the failed declaration of martial law by impeached President Yoon Song-yeol, South Korea is facing a political crisis. Experts are comparing this event to the January 6th, 2021 events in the U.S., highlighting the attempt to prevent another branch of government from fulfilling its duties. Both ruling and opposition parties claim to be saving Korean democracy.
  • Impeached President Yoon Song-yeol's failed declaration of martial law
  • Comparisons to January 6th, 2021, events in the U.S.
  • Attempt to prevent another branch of government from fulfilling its duties

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Today on State of the World, is democracy holding up in South Korea?

You're listening to State of the World from NPR, the day's most vital international stories up close where they're happening. It's Wednesday, January 8th. I'm Greg Dixon. In South Korea, authorities have so far still not been able to arrest impeached President Yoon Song-yal following his failed declaration of martial law over a month ago. The country remains mired in a political crisis.

Political scientists are studying the health of democracy in South Korea. And as NPR's Anthony Kuhn in Seoul tells us, they're drawing comparisons to recent events in the U.S. Within hours of President Yoon Song-yeol's declaring martial law on December 3rd, the world watched as protesters convened on the parliament.

lawmakers scaled walls and tussled with soldiers. They made it inside the building and voted to overturn the decree. Some experts describe what Yoon did as an attempted self-coup, that is, an attempt by a sitting leader to keep or extend his power by sweeping away checks and balances such as parliaments or election results.

Aurel Croissant is a political scientist at Heidelberg University in Germany. The South Korean declaration of martial law is a textbook example of such a self-coup. For many South Koreans, their experience naturally raises comparisons with January 6, 2021, in the U.S. One difference between the two is that the U.S. did not declare martial law. Instead, it was aimed at overturning election results.

Yoon, meanwhile, tried to break the resistance of an opposition-controlled parliament. The essential feature of the action is similar. The attempt to prevent another branch of government from performing its constitutional duties and holding the government accountable. Both ruling and opposition parties see themselves as trying to save Korean democracy, while the other side is trying to sabotage it.

At a recent rally of Yoon's supporters, 62-year-old housewife Im Kum-ja says she just couldn't stand watching the opposition-controlled parliament paralyze the government. I came out because I was worried about the country. We need to protect our country's liberal democracy. But I am afraid we will turn into a communist country. Im argues that President Yoon had no choice but to use martial law as a legitimate tool of governance.

But Aurel Croissant warns that robust civil societies such as South Korea's are being weakened by political polarization. Polarization is like a virus. We have evidence that under certain circumstances, polarization makes Democrats accept undemocratic behavior by their own political party. It also makes it hard, he adds, to reach compromises that are necessary to run a government and make policies.

The U.S. has praised South Korea's democratic institutions for holding firm. But Klaasso argues that if they had held, Yoon would not have been able to declare martial law even for a few hours. South Korea's democracy is strong in reacting to crisis, but it's very weak in preventing crisis.

One factor is, of course, that the institutional safeguards, the guardrails didn't work. Seoul National University political scientist Kang Won-taek says that part of the problem lies in the way South Korea's political system was designed and built. The core of Korea's democratization so far has been focused on holding fair and democratic elections for president. Kang argues that the system has reached its limits.

and some of the president's powers now need to be redistributed. A debate on this issue has been going on for some years. Another reason Yoon's self-coup failed is that the military balked at using force to impose martial law. One factor in that, Kang says, is the events of May 1980.

South Korea's then-ruling military junta sent troops to crush pro-democracy protests in Gwangju City, killing around 200 civilians. That's all from Gwangju.

It was all because of the incident in Gwangju that claimed so many victims. The soldiers felt extremely ashamed after witnessing the incident in Gwangju. South Korean author Han Kang won the Nobel Prize in Literature last year for books including human acts that dealt with the trauma of Gwangju. In Parliament last month, opposition floor leader Park Chan-dae mentioned two of the questions Han raises about Gwangju.

Can the past help the present? And can the dead save the living? As I experienced the civil strife of the December 3rd martial law decree, he said, I would like to answer yes to the question, can the past help the present? Because May 1980 saved December 2024.

Aurel Croissant notes that South Korea and the U.S. are both representative democracies, where people select representatives to govern for them. When the representatives fail, citizens must mobilize to protect their rights themselves.

Croissant quotes. What Darren Atsumoblo, the Nobel Prize winner in economics, said four years ago, civil society is the last line of defense for democracy. And he's right. South Koreans have been mobilizing for over 100 years, Croissant adds, learning lessons from 35 years of Japanese colonial occupation and more than 25 years of military dictatorships. Anthony Kuhn, NPR News, Seoul. That's the state of the world from NPR. Thanks for listening.

Support for NPR and the following message come from IXL Online. Is your child asking questions on their homework you don't feel equipped to answer? IXL Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age or personality. One subscription gets you everything. One site for all the kids in your home, pre-K to 12th grade.

Make an impact on your child's learning. Get IXL now. And NPR listeners can get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when they sign up today at ixl.com slash NPR.

Support for NPR and the following message come from Rosetta Stone, the perfect app to achieve your language learning goals no matter how busy your schedule gets. It's designed to maximize study time with immersive 10-minute lessons and audio practice for your commute. Plus, tailor your learning plan for specific objectives like travel. Get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off and unlimited access to 25 language courses. Learn more at rosettastone.com slash NPR.

Support for NPR comes from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private corporation funded by the American people.