The declaration of martial law by President Yoon Suk Yeol on December 3rd is being compared to the January 6, 2021, events in the U.S. Both events involved attempts to undermine democratic institutions, though the U.S. event aimed to overturn election results, while Yoon's action targeted an opposition-controlled parliament.
President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law to break the resistance of an opposition-controlled parliament, which he viewed as paralyzing the government. He attempted to use martial law as a tool to maintain or extend his power by undermining checks and balances.
The military's reluctance to use force to impose martial law was a key factor in the failure of Yoon's self-coup. This hesitation stemmed from the traumatic memory of the 1980 Gwangju massacre, where troops killed around 200 civilians during pro-democracy protests.
Political polarization weakens South Korea's democracy by making it difficult to reach compromises necessary for governance. It also leads to the acceptance of undemocratic behavior by one's own political party, further eroding democratic norms.
The 1980 Gwangju massacre, where military forces killed civilians during pro-democracy protests, serves as a critical lesson. The trauma from this event has made the military hesitant to use force against civilians, influencing their response during the recent political crisis.
South Korea's democratic institutions are strong in reacting to crises but weak in preventing them. The failure of institutional safeguards, such as checks and balances, allowed President Yoon to declare martial law, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities.
Civil society acts as the last line of defense for democracy in South Korea. Citizens have a history of mobilizing to protect their rights, drawing lessons from colonial occupation and military dictatorships. This mobilization is crucial when elected representatives fail to uphold democratic principles.
There is an ongoing debate about redistributing some of the president's powers to address the limitations of South Korea's political system. The current system, focused on fair presidential elections, has reached its limits and requires structural changes to prevent future crises.
Today on State of the World, is democracy holding up in South Korea?
You're listening to State of the World from NPR, the day's most vital international stories up close where they're happening. It's Wednesday, January 8th. I'm Greg Dixon. In South Korea, authorities have so far still not been able to arrest impeached President Yoon Song-yal following his failed declaration of martial law over a month ago. The country remains mired in a political crisis.
Political scientists are studying the health of democracy in South Korea. And as NPR's Anthony Kuhn in Seoul tells us, they're drawing comparisons to recent events in the U.S. Within hours of President Yoon Song-yeol's declaring martial law on December 3rd, the world watched as protesters convened on the parliament.
lawmakers scaled walls and tussled with soldiers. They made it inside the building and voted to overturn the decree. Some experts describe what Yoon did as an attempted self-coup, that is, an attempt by a sitting leader to keep or extend his power by sweeping away checks and balances such as parliaments or election results.
Aurel Croissant is a political scientist at Heidelberg University in Germany. The South Korean declaration of martial law is a textbook example of such a self-coup. For many South Koreans, their experience naturally raises comparisons with January 6, 2021, in the U.S. One difference between the two is that the U.S. did not declare martial law. Instead, it was aimed at overturning election results.
Yoon, meanwhile, tried to break the resistance of an opposition-controlled parliament. The essential feature of the action is similar. The attempt to prevent another branch of government from performing its constitutional duties and holding the government accountable. Both ruling and opposition parties see themselves as trying to save Korean democracy, while the other side is trying to sabotage it.
At a recent rally of Yoon's supporters, 62-year-old housewife Im Kum-ja says she just couldn't stand watching the opposition-controlled parliament paralyze the government. I came out because I was worried about the country. We need to protect our country's liberal democracy. But I am afraid we will turn into a communist country. Im argues that President Yoon had no choice but to use martial law as a legitimate tool of governance.
But Aurel Croissant warns that robust civil societies such as South Korea's are being weakened by political polarization. Polarization is like a virus. We have evidence that under certain circumstances, polarization makes Democrats accept undemocratic behavior by their own political party. It also makes it hard, he adds, to reach compromises that are necessary to run a government and make policies.
The U.S. has praised South Korea's democratic institutions for holding firm. But Klaasso argues that if they had held, Yoon would not have been able to declare martial law even for a few hours. South Korea's democracy is strong in reacting to crisis, but it's very weak in preventing crisis.
One factor is, of course, that the institutional safeguards, the guardrails didn't work. Seoul National University political scientist Kang Won-taek says that part of the problem lies in the way South Korea's political system was designed and built. The core of Korea's democratization so far has been focused on holding fair and democratic elections for president. Kang argues that the system has reached its limits.
and some of the president's powers now need to be redistributed. A debate on this issue has been going on for some years. Another reason Yoon's self-coup failed is that the military balked at using force to impose martial law. One factor in that, Kang says, is the events of May 1980.
South Korea's then-ruling military junta sent troops to crush pro-democracy protests in Gwangju City, killing around 200 civilians. That's all from Gwangju.
It was all because of the incident in Gwangju that claimed so many victims. The soldiers felt extremely ashamed after witnessing the incident in Gwangju. South Korean author Han Kang won the Nobel Prize in Literature last year for books including human acts that dealt with the trauma of Gwangju. In Parliament last month, opposition floor leader Park Chan-dae mentioned two of the questions Han raises about Gwangju.
Can the past help the present? And can the dead save the living? As I experienced the civil strife of the December 3rd martial law decree, he said, I would like to answer yes to the question, can the past help the present? Because May 1980 saved December 2024.
Aurel Croissant notes that South Korea and the U.S. are both representative democracies, where people select representatives to govern for them. When the representatives fail, citizens must mobilize to protect their rights themselves.
Croissant quotes. What Darren Atsumoblo, the Nobel Prize winner in economics, said four years ago, civil society is the last line of defense for democracy. And he's right. South Koreans have been mobilizing for over 100 years, Croissant adds, learning lessons from 35 years of Japanese colonial occupation and more than 25 years of military dictatorships. Anthony Kuhn, NPR News, Seoul. That's the state of the world from NPR. Thanks for listening.
Support for NPR and the following message come from IXL Online. Is your child asking questions on their homework you don't feel equipped to answer? IXL Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age or personality. One subscription gets you everything. One site for all the kids in your home, pre-K to 12th grade.
Make an impact on your child's learning. Get IXL now. And NPR listeners can get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when they sign up today at ixl.com slash NPR.
Support for NPR and the following message come from Rosetta Stone, the perfect app to achieve your language learning goals no matter how busy your schedule gets. It's designed to maximize study time with immersive 10-minute lessons and audio practice for your commute. Plus, tailor your learning plan for specific objectives like travel. Get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off and unlimited access to 25 language courses. Learn more at rosettastone.com slash NPR.
Support for NPR comes from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private corporation funded by the American people.