The key issue is whether the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the immediate effects of the action it has the power to regulate. This case pits environmental review requirements against corporate interests, especially in the context of drilling and real estate development.
Justice Gorsuch recused himself due to his past ties to oil baron Philip Anschutz, whose company has close connections to Gorsuch. The court’s resolution could have major financial benefits for Anschutz, as his companies have several drilling projects that require environmental review.
The central debate is whether fraud under federal law can occur when a contractor lies about complying with non-economic terms in a contract, such as using a specific type of business, even if there is no economic harm. The female justices were particularly interested in the materiality of the harm, questioning if the contractor's promise of a specific service type is enough to constitute fraud.
The core issue is whether reservists get differential pay when called to service during an emergency, even if the work performed is not related to the emergency. The statute in question specifies differential pay during emergencies, but the interpretation of what constitutes an emergency is in dispute.
The court held that revoking a visa based on a sham marriage determination is a discretionary decision not subject to federal court review, even though courts can review the sham marriage determination if the visa is initially denied on that basis. This decision clarifies the limits of judicial review in visa revocation cases.
The Fifth Circuit en banc court refused to decide the case due to an 8-8 deadlock, which was caused by Judge Jim Ho's refusal to cast a vote. This led to accusations of judicial misconduct and interference, with Judge Oldham and others publicly criticizing Ho's actions.
The D.C. Circuit unanimously rejected TikTok's challenge to the law, which requires TikTok to find a U.S. buyer by January 19, 2024, or face a shutdown. The law is framed as a national security measure, but some critics argue it is aimed at suppressing certain content or views, which could face First Amendment scrutiny.
A Trump judge in the District of North Dakota blocked the Biden administration's rule that allowed DACA recipients to get health insurance on the ACA marketplace. This ruling applies to 19 states and further complicates the status of DACA and the healthcare of its beneficiaries.
Mitch McConnell called any decision by judges to change their retirement plans 'partisan' and an undermining of judicial integrity. This is controversial because it seems hypocritical, given his own efforts to influence judicial appointments and retirements, and it may foster hostility toward judges.
The Montana Supreme Court upheld a preliminary injunction that kept gender-affirming medical care available to minors on current terms while litigation over the state's ban continues. This ruling prevents the immediate enforcement of the ban and allows ongoing care for minors.
Leah, Melissa, and Kate cover some breaking news before recapping last week’s SCOTUS arguments. They also touch on some lower-court opinions and court culture including the Fifth Circuit going buck wild (yet again), KBJ’s Broadway debut, Mitch McConnell’s never-ending hypocrisy, and TikTok’s fate in America.