John Adams faced the challenge of following George Washington, who had an almost deity-like stature in American politics. Adams had to navigate the undefined nature of the presidency, which relied heavily on norms and precedents. He was criticized both for diverging from Washington's model and for adhering to it, making his presidency a constant battle to defend the character of the office.
The main thesis of Corey Brettschneider's book is that the American presidency has always had an authoritarian streak, and at critical junctures in history, ordinary citizens have stepped up to check this power. These checks often come from outside traditional institutions, such as courts, and instead rely on democratic constitutional constituencies and recovery presidents who restore norms.
John Adams viewed the presidency as separate from democracy, influenced by Montesquieu's philosophy. He believed the presidency was about stability, not popular sovereignty. This led him to support the Sedition Act, which criminalized criticism of the president, reflecting a monarchical view of the office where dissent was limited.
The Sedition Act criminalized criticism of the president and Congress, effectively attempting to stifle opposition political parties. It was seen as a tool to suppress dissent and prevent the development of multi-party democracy. The Act targeted editors and publishers who criticized the Federalist government, leading to numerous prosecutions for what would now be considered protected speech.
John Adams handled the transition of power gracefully, conceding to Thomas Jefferson despite the election being thrown to the House of Representatives. He ensured his cabinet participated in transition activities and left office before Jefferson's inauguration to avoid being a distraction. This marked the first peaceful transfer of power in U.S. history.
John Adams' presidency teaches the importance of prioritizing country over personal interests, even when it means being unpopular. His willingness to concede power peacefully and his focus on long-term institutional stability are lessons for modern leaders, especially in times of political fragility and contested elections.
Frederick Douglass challenged James Buchanan by advocating for a democratic interpretation of the Constitution, particularly in response to the Dred Scott decision. Douglass argued that the Constitution, when read correctly, supported equal citizenship and opposed slavery, influencing subsequent presidents like Lincoln and Grant to adopt more democratic principles.
The Watergate grand jury played a crucial role in Nixon's downfall by gathering evidence of his crimes and voting to indict him. Although they ultimately passed the evidence to Congress for impeachment, their work revealed the extent of Nixon's wrongdoing and contributed to his resignation. The grand jury's actions underscored the importance of ordinary citizens in holding powerful leaders accountable.
History suggests that ordinary citizens, journalists, and activists have been more effective in checking presidential power than traditional institutions like the courts or Congress. In the face of authoritarian tendencies, it is essential for citizens to claim the Constitution for themselves and push back against violations of democratic principles.
On the fourth anniversary of January 6th, Leah, Melissa & Kate dive deep on presidential power: how the presidency became what it is today, transitions of power, and how we’ve seen checks on the power of the president from unexpected quarters. Joining them are two experts: Lindsay Chervinsky, author of Making the Presidency: John Adams and the Precedents That Forged the Republic)* *and Corey Brettschneider, author of The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It).