We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode The Promise and Perils of Presidential Power

The Promise and Perils of Presidential Power

2025/1/6
logo of podcast Strict Scrutiny

Strict Scrutiny

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Corey Brettschneider
K
Kate Shaw
L
Lindsay Chervinsky
Topics
Lindsay Chervinsky: 本书探讨了美国总统职位权力演变的历史,特别是第二任总统约翰·亚当斯面临的挑战。由于宪法对总统权力的规定较为模糊,很大程度上依赖于规范、先例和习俗。亚当斯在华盛顿之后执政,面临着效仿或偏离先例都会受到批评的困境。他的总统任期实际上是一场持续的斗争,旨在确保总统职位对其他人有效,并捍卫华盛顿所确立的总统形象。在军事权力方面,华盛顿的个人威望使得他在军事权力方面拥有超乎寻常的影响力,即使这种权力并非明确写入宪法。直到华盛顿去世后,总统作为三军统帅的权力才逐渐明确。在内阁权力方面,早期美国内阁成员的角色存在争议,他们与总统的关系并非完全从属。对“单一行政权理论”的解读与早期美国政府实际运作情况存在差异。建国者们普遍认为总统不应凌驾于法律之上,应受到法律和各部门的制约。华盛顿和亚当斯都非常重视其他政府部门对总统的制衡作用。 在《外国人及煽动叛乱法》方面,虽然该法案具有党派政治目的,但其主要推动力是国会中的极端联邦党人,而非亚当斯总统。当时的社会环境存在真实的暴力威胁,但联邦党人利用这种威胁为政治目的服务。部分被《外国人及煽动叛乱法》针对的编辑和出版商在1800年大选中发挥了关键作用,杰斐逊对此默许。联邦党人对言论自由的理解仅限于防止事先审查,他们认为批评总统是不可接受的。《外国人及煽动叛乱法》案件中,许多起诉都源于对总统的批评,而非暴力威胁。《外国人及煽动叛乱法》旨在压制反对党,阻碍多党民主制度的发展。早期美国历史上存在大量的政治暴力事件,这些事件凸显了民主的脆弱性。早期美国社会暴力事件频发,政治暴力与民众的公民美德共同塑造了美国的民主进程。暴力威胁经常被用来压制言论自由,在评估《煽动叛乱法》时,应关注其针对的是批评而非暴力威胁。麦迪逊对言论自由的坚定承诺使其在维护言论自由方面比杰斐逊更胜一筹。 对美国历史上关键人物的重新审视,展现了他们复杂的人性和行为。历史人物并非完美无缺,他们的行为既有值得称赞之处,也有令人遗憾之处。杰斐逊和麦迪逊等人在意识到自身行为可能造成严重后果时,会尝试纠正错误。亚当斯总统在处理国家事务时,优先考虑国家利益而非个人利益。亚当斯总统在外交政策上优先考虑和平,即使这与部分党内人士的观点相悖。亚当斯总统在权力交接过程中展现了极高的政治素养和责任感。亚当斯总统愿意为了国家利益而牺牲个人声望。亚当斯总统在1800年权力交接过程中展现了长远的眼光和克制。亚当斯总统在卸任后离开白宫的行为,体现了他对权力交接的尊重和对国家长远利益的考量。亚当斯夫人的政治智慧和远见卓识对亚当斯总统的决策产生了重要影响。亚当斯夫人是亚当斯总统最重要的顾问之一,她的政治见解深刻,对亚当斯总统的决策影响重大。 Corey Brettschneider: 本书论证了美国总统制度内在的威胁民主的风险,以及公民通过非传统方式制衡总统权力的重要性。美国总统制度本身就存在威胁民主的潜在风险,历史上多次出现公民通过非传统方式制衡总统权力的情况。亚当斯对总统职位的理解源于孟德斯鸠等人的思想,他认为总统职位不属于民主范畴,而是为了稳定,这导致他对言论自由的限制。亚当斯的《煽动叛乱法》体现了他对言论自由的限制性观点,认为批评总统如同批评君主一样越界。道格拉斯对布坎南总统的挑战,为后来的总统提供了重新解读宪法和维护民主的范例。道格拉斯通过重新解读宪法,反对布坎南总统在《德雷德·斯科特案》中的立场。道格拉斯认为宪法本身并非问题,关键在于对宪法的错误解读。道格拉斯通过强调宪法中的民主原则,反对《德雷德·斯科特案》的判决。道格拉斯对宪法的解读影响了后来的总统和宪法修正案。道格拉斯对林肯总统的宪法解读产生了重要影响,促使林肯最终认识到废除奴隶制的必要性。格兰特总统在维护非裔美国人权利方面发挥了关键作用。 威尔逊总统对种族平等的敌视态度,以及艾达·B·威尔斯和威廉·梦露·特洛特对他的挑战。威尔逊总统的宪法观建立在白人至上主义的基础上,他将种族融合视为阻碍国家效率的因素。威尔逊总统将种族融合视为“摩擦”,认为其阻碍了国家效率。艾达·B·威尔斯和威廉·梦露·特洛特对威尔逊总统的种族歧视政策进行了持续的挑战,尽管当时并未取得成功,但他们的行动为后来的民权运动奠定了基础。水门事件中的大陪审团在尼克松总统下台的过程中发挥了重要作用。水门事件大陪审团成员中的普通民众,在决定是否起诉尼克松总统方面发挥了关键作用。水门事件大陪审团成员最初倾向于起诉尼克松,但最终接受了与检察官达成的协议,将证据移交给国会。对尼克松总统的赦免,掩盖了其罪行的严重性,对美国民主造成了负面影响。检察官的论点与艾利托法官在特朗普诉美国案中的论点类似,都认为追究总统的刑事责任会引发政变。对总统追究刑事责任的顾虑,是错误的逻辑。在当前情况下,最高法院等传统机构可能无法有效制衡总统权力,公民应主动捍卫宪法。公民应主动解读宪法,利用宪法维护自身权利,对抗总统的专制行为。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What challenges did John Adams face as the second president of the United States?

John Adams faced the challenge of following George Washington, who had an almost deity-like stature in American politics. Adams had to navigate the undefined nature of the presidency, which relied heavily on norms and precedents. He was criticized both for diverging from Washington's model and for adhering to it, making his presidency a constant battle to defend the character of the office.

What was the main thesis of Corey Brettschneider's book 'The Presidents and the People'?

The main thesis of Corey Brettschneider's book is that the American presidency has always had an authoritarian streak, and at critical junctures in history, ordinary citizens have stepped up to check this power. These checks often come from outside traditional institutions, such as courts, and instead rely on democratic constitutional constituencies and recovery presidents who restore norms.

How did John Adams view the monarchy, and how did it shape his presidency?

John Adams viewed the presidency as separate from democracy, influenced by Montesquieu's philosophy. He believed the presidency was about stability, not popular sovereignty. This led him to support the Sedition Act, which criminalized criticism of the president, reflecting a monarchical view of the office where dissent was limited.

What role did the Sedition Act play in early American politics?

The Sedition Act criminalized criticism of the president and Congress, effectively attempting to stifle opposition political parties. It was seen as a tool to suppress dissent and prevent the development of multi-party democracy. The Act targeted editors and publishers who criticized the Federalist government, leading to numerous prosecutions for what would now be considered protected speech.

How did John Adams handle the transition of power after losing the 1800 election?

John Adams handled the transition of power gracefully, conceding to Thomas Jefferson despite the election being thrown to the House of Representatives. He ensured his cabinet participated in transition activities and left office before Jefferson's inauguration to avoid being a distraction. This marked the first peaceful transfer of power in U.S. history.

What lessons can be drawn from John Adams' presidency for the modern era?

John Adams' presidency teaches the importance of prioritizing country over personal interests, even when it means being unpopular. His willingness to concede power peacefully and his focus on long-term institutional stability are lessons for modern leaders, especially in times of political fragility and contested elections.

What role did Frederick Douglass play in challenging President James Buchanan?

Frederick Douglass challenged James Buchanan by advocating for a democratic interpretation of the Constitution, particularly in response to the Dred Scott decision. Douglass argued that the Constitution, when read correctly, supported equal citizenship and opposed slavery, influencing subsequent presidents like Lincoln and Grant to adopt more democratic principles.

How did the Watergate grand jury influence the fall of President Richard Nixon?

The Watergate grand jury played a crucial role in Nixon's downfall by gathering evidence of his crimes and voting to indict him. Although they ultimately passed the evidence to Congress for impeachment, their work revealed the extent of Nixon's wrongdoing and contributed to his resignation. The grand jury's actions underscored the importance of ordinary citizens in holding powerful leaders accountable.

What lessons does history offer for the future of American democracy under a second Trump administration?

History suggests that ordinary citizens, journalists, and activists have been more effective in checking presidential power than traditional institutions like the courts or Congress. In the face of authoritarian tendencies, it is essential for citizens to claim the Constitution for themselves and push back against violations of democratic principles.

Chapters
This chapter explores the early development of the US presidency, focusing on the challenges faced by John Adams as the second president after George Washington. It examines the role of precedent and custom in shaping the office and the disputes between Adams and his cabinet regarding presidential powers, particularly in the military and foreign policy.
  • Article II of the Constitution provided a limited framework for the presidency, leaving much to precedent and custom.
  • Disputes between Adams and his cabinet highlighted questions over the role and authority of cabinet secretaries.
  • The power of the president as commander in chief crystallized gradually, influenced by Washington's stature and actions.

Shownotes Transcript

On the fourth anniversary of January 6th, Leah, Melissa & Kate dive deep on presidential power: how the presidency became what it is today, transitions of power, and how we’ve seen checks on the power of the president from unexpected quarters. Joining them are two experts: Lindsay Chervinsky, author of Making the Presidency: John Adams and the Precedents That Forged the Republic)* *and Corey Brettschneider, author of The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It).