We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode You did it, Joe

You did it, Joe

2024/7/22
logo of podcast Today, Explained

Today, Explained

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Andrew Prokop
D
David Axelrod
S
Sean Rameswaram
Topics
Sean Rameswaram: 本期节目讨论了美国民众对拜登退出2024年总统竞选的各种反应,既有悲伤也有认为这是正确决定的声音。此外,节目还探讨了人们对卡马拉·哈里斯能否有效对抗特朗普的疑问,以及对美国是否准备好迎接一位女性和黑人女性总统的担忧。 Andrew Prokop: 拜登退出竞选是具有历史意义的事件,他的竞选活动此前一直比较低迷。这一事件与过去一些丑闻缠身的政治家被迫下台的事件类似,都是因为他们损害了所在政党的利益。拜登在初选期间的表现不佳,且缺乏高调的采访和辩论,导致选民缺乏足够的信息。许多民主党选民在初选期间并不希望拜登竞选连任,但没有其他有影响力的候选人出现。拜登在辞职信中没有明确指出继任者的方案,但在推特上支持卡马拉·哈里斯。拜登对哈里斯的认可对民主党团结起到了重要作用,但并非决定性因素。民主党迅速团结在哈里斯周围,避免了旷日持久的提名过程。民主党可能在提名哈里斯时重复了之前提名拜登时的错误,即没有充分考察候选人的优缺点。民主党人可能会选择一位来自摇摆州的白人男性作为哈里斯的竞选搭档,以吸引摇摆州的选民。哈里斯表示她将竞选总统,并争取获得提名。民主党候选人将在8月19日那一周的民主党全国代表大会上正式确定,并由数千名代表投票选出。哈里斯很可能在民主党全国代表大会之前就获得大部分党内支持,从而避免出现真正的竞争。目前关于哈里斯与特朗普对决的民调结果并不乐观,哈里斯的支持率落后于特朗普。尽管民主党基层对哈里斯的提名感到兴奋,但民调显示她目前处于劣势。哈里斯有可能赢得大选,但目前还远非稳操胜券。 David Axelrod: 我认为拜登退出竞选几乎是不可避免的,尤其是在第一次辩论之后。拜登在第一次辩论中的表现以及特朗普的强势表现,加剧了人们对拜登胜选能力的担忧。特朗普的竞选策略是突出拜登的弱点和自身的优势。奥巴马没有立即支持哈里斯,而是希望在民主党做出选择后,发挥团结党内力量的作用。哈里斯迅速获得了党内支持,这体现了她的政治能力。哈里斯需要尽快选择竞选搭档,因为民主党全国代表大会的时间安排不允许推迟。我理解 Mike Murphy 认为民主党行动过快的观点。哈里斯更容易获得民主党代表的支持,因为这些代表大多是拜登-哈里斯的支持者。哈里斯可能受益于更激烈的竞争,以证明她的胜选能力。如果拜登去年就退出竞选,民主党本来可以进行初选,从而更好地考察候选人。哈里斯已经经历过一定的政治考验,并且在副总统任期内积累了经验。总统竞选是一个极其艰难的过程,没有多少人能够适应这种压力。总统竞选的压力与总统任期的压力相似,哈里斯已经适应了这种压力。哈里斯在副总统任期内积累了经验,了解总统职位的职责。共和党可能会利用移民和通货膨胀等问题攻击哈里斯。哈里斯可以制定自己的竞选策略,避免重蹈拜登的覆辙。哈里斯需要制定自己的竞选策略,并强调自身的优势。哈里斯应该专注于自身优势,而不是仅仅强调其历史意义。强调哈里斯的历史意义会削弱其竞选实力,应该更注重其政策主张。选民更关心的是候选人能否解决他们的问题,而不是候选人的历史意义。哈里斯需要向选民展示她能够理解他们的生活并为他们奋斗。我对哈里斯的竞选前景持乐观态度,并指出哈里斯在24小时内筹集了大量资金。希望比绝望更好,民主党现在拥有了他们昨天所没有的希望。

Deep Dive

Chapters

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Today explained Sean Rahm's firm standing outside of the White House to ask Americans how they feel about a historic moment, their president dropping out of the presidential race. Mixed feelings. I think it's sad. But overall, I think he might be making the right decision. I'm sad to see him drop out, but I think it needed to be done. So I think, like, hopefully it brings out more young voters. Joe Biden is considered as an antichrist. I want him to stay in. This way I know Trump would have won.

Now, it's up in the air. But I just feel like is America ready for a woman and also a black woman? So that's what scares me. I just don't really see Kamala or really anyone else being a viable threat to Trump. Kamala, Kamala. We need the facts, man. I don't know. You know what I mean? I think it's something fishy going on, but, you know, don't quote me. I'm going to quote you. We're going to ask Vox's Andrew Prokop and David Axelrod how they feel on Today Explained. Amen.

This week on Property Markets, we speak with Dan Ives, Managing Director and Senior Equity Research Analyst covering tech at Wedbush Securities. We discuss his reactions to Google's earnings, a bull case for Tesla, and why he's so optimistic about the long-term trajectory of the tech industry. I mean, this is a fourth industrial revolution that's playing out. Now, it's going to have white-knuckle moments and speed bumps along the way, but in terms of the underlying growth,

This is just a start. In our opinion, it's 9 p.m. at the AI party and it goes to 4 a.m. You can find that conversation and many others exclusively on the Prof G Markets podcast. It seems like each news cycle is filled with stories of people testing the boundaries of our laws. To help illuminate the complex legal issues shaping our country, Cafe has assembled a team of legal experts for a new podcast called The

Explained.

2024 Explained. Today Explained here with Vox senior political correspondent Andrew Prokop. Andrew, how was your weekend? Did anything interesting happen? It was pretty quiet. Not much going on. As a political journalist, I got to just relax and spend a lot of time with my family. Oh, so you didn't hear that the president dropped out of the race? Wait, is that what this show is about? What do you think, Andrew? What does this mean? I mean, obviously this is a...

historic, momentous, stunning turn of events. I view it in the context of all that came before it. You think you just fell out of a coconut tree? Which was a campaign that has been pretty sleepy up to this point. Very low public interest, very little apparent happening in both the primaries and the general election until that happened.

Debate happened at an unprecedented early date. It started minutes into the debate and it continues right now. Well, Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff has joined the calls for President Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race. Schiff is the highest ranking Democrat. On the heels of Schumer and Pelosi and Hakeem Jeffries, it feels to me like we are very close to knowing that Joe Biden will no longer be the nominee. And then it's just been

remarkably chaotic roller coaster ride from there. President Joe Biden has withdrawn from the 2024 race. Guys, today is so crazy. Like literally Joe Biden dropped out of the election. Like everything's insane, which means like you can do whatever you want today. The president writing, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as president for the remainder of my term. The move. Crazy.

Has anything like this ever happened before, Andrew? You know, in one sense, this is unprecedented. In the modern era, certainly, no presidential party has changed its apparent nominee so late in the process. People point to Lyndon Johnson choosing to step aside in March 1968 as one precedent. I shall not see and I will not accept.

The nomination of my party for another term as your president. But I also think of the way this played out as quite similar to something that actually happens pretty frequently, which is a scandal-plagued politician begins hurting the party and then faces a...

pressure campaign that could be quick, that could take longer, but designed to force them to step aside. And, you know, that's something we just saw it in New York with Governor Andrew Cuomo in 2021. It also happened with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Governor Eliot Spitzer. New

The idea is that, you know, the primary voters had their say, such as it was with the limited options they were presented with, in part because of the party elites falling behind Joe Biden.

But there is a conceptual problem of what happens when the primary voters make their choice, but new information emerges after the primary. I think everyone knows that if a time traveler sent back a recording of how Donald Trump and Joe Biden's first debate of 2024 went back into 2023, that

I don't think he would have waltzed to the nomination with only token opposition. It was simply not well-planned.

understood or accepted that he would perform so badly. And he tried to prevent that from being known by limiting his availability for high-profile, high-stakes interviews, for avoiding any debates in the primaries. And because of that, the primary voters lacked some information that now the general electorate has. It's also worth mentioning that back during the primaries,

Many polls showed that a large majority of Democratic voters did not think Biden should run for a second term and they would prefer someone else. But nobody else who was significant and credible ended up running. Biden submits a resignation letter to the American people yesterday. In it, he does not lay out a path for his successor, although he does then issue, I believe, a tweet in which he endorses his

his vice president, Kamala Harris. Why didn't he endorse her in the resignation letter? Do we know why there's two statements, essentially? I have no idea. It's an interesting question. There was some uncertainty before this about whether there would be this rapid consolidation of Democratic support around Harris. This could have been, you know,

You know, Biden's endorsement was a big part of this, but, you know, it wasn't the deciding factor necessarily. It's more indicative. All the endorsements we've seen rolling in are more indicative of the mood in the party that they're kind of desperate for unity after the past few weeks of chaos. They don't want a big open process. And the

other credible contenders who would...

one might think, get involved in this process have mostly already endorsed Harris and said they're not interested in going for it this time. Now, this does pose the risk that Democrats are kind of repeating the same mistakes they made with Joe Biden's run in the first place in clearing the field and consolidating around someone whose strengths and weaknesses really have not

been tested yet. If the candidate ends up being Kamala Harris, do we have any idea who her veep will be? Can she pick Joe? Theoretically, she could. I don't see why she would. But I think probably the platonic ideal is like white man in a swing state. This is what Democrats are thinking, not myself. But like they view this as a good balance to Harris at the top of the ticket and the

Like they want someone who swing voters will perceive as as non-threatening and normal. Like this is kind of said in a joking way, but also not necessarily so joking. But people point to Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. Both of those are important swing states.

also in the mix, Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky. What's Vice President Harris saying to potentially allay concerns in her party? She said she's running. She says she's running to win and that she would like to earn the nomination. And...

You know, it's a little vague about how these next steps will actually play out. We all know that the nominee will be put forward and confirmed at the Democratic Convention the week of August 19th and be technically chosen by the Congress.

couple thousand delegates who are attending that convention. But whether they will have a actual choice between multiple competing options who are realistic, who have an actual shot, the reality is that it is entirely possible Harris will lock up the vast majority of

party support well in advance so that there is effectively no real alternative and no realistic alternative wants to even try. Do we have any idea how those potential tickets stack up against the former president and Republican candidate Donald Trump? I don't think the polling right now is worth very much, particularly I don't think the Veep

typically doesn't make much of a difference. But we do have a fair amount of Harris versus Trump polling. And that polling is not fantastic for Harris. It generally shows her losing, just like Biden. Now, the Trump-Harris poll is interesting. They have Trump at 51 percent and Harris at 48 percent. Now, that's lower.

Again, Democrats are tremendously excited right now. They're jubilant, uniting around Harris, the Democratic fundraising platform, ActBlue had a record day raising an enormous amount of money yesterday. ♪

Clearly, the base is very excited about this historic pick and about Harris as a candidate. But if we look at the polling right now, she starts as the underdog. There are arguments she can turn it around and

Sure, she can turn it around. It's certainly possible she could win. But I would caution people not to get too carried away in assuming that she is a surefire winner when that is very far from the case based on the polling we've seen. Vox's Andrew Prokop, Vox.com. And when we're back on Today Explained, Barack Obama's David Axelrod.

Support for today explained comes from Mint Mobile. Thank you, Ryan Reynolds, for all your support. Your monthly phone bill shouldn't fill you with dread. If you're looking to end the terror of overpriced coverage and free up some cash to make this summer a little more special, you might want to check out Mint Mobile. By the way,

by switching to Mint Mobile, you can get three months of premium wireless service for just $15 a month. That's their whole thing, $15 a month. To get this new customer offer and your new three-month premium wireless plan for just $15 a month,

You can go to mintmobile.com slash explain. That's mintmobile.com slash explained. You can cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash explained. $45 upfront payment required, equivalent to $15 per month. New customers on first three-month plan only speed slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan. Additional taxes, fees, and restrictions apply. See Mint Mobile for details.

Support for today explained comes from RAMP, simplifying operations for your business, changing the game. RAMP is a corporate card and spend management software that was designed to help you save time and put money back in your pocket. According to RAMP, RAMP gives finance teams unprecedented control

and insight into company spend. With Ramp, you're able to issue cards to every employee with limits and restrictions. You can also automate expense reporting. Plus, Ramp says that businesses that use their software reported saving an average of 5% their first year. And they say it's easy to use. And they say you can start making payments in less than 15 minutes. And they say this is true whether your business has five employees or 5,000.

And now you can get $250 when you join Ramp. Just go to ramp.com slash explained, ramp.com slash explained, ramp.com slash explained. Cards are issued by Sutton Bank and Celtic Bank members. FDIC terms and conditions do apply, guys.

Support for the show today comes from Delete.me, not like me personally. Delete.me is a service. It finds and removes your personal information that's being sold online by data brokers. Friend of the show, Claire White, actually used Delete.me in the past, so we reached out to her to hear what she thought of the service. They reviewed 2,500 listings that included my address, my name, and my email across the web.

And it was shocking. I did not realize that all of my information was just out there available. You can take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now, at a special discount for our listeners, you can get 20% off your Delete Me plan and

If you go to joindeleteeme.com slash today and use the promo code today at checkout, the only way to get 20% off is to go to joindeleteeme.com slash today and enter the code today at checkout. That's joindeleteeme.com slash today code today. All you folks that are coconut pilled in the comments as you are identifying, buckle up. Ha ha ha.

Today Explained is back with David Axelrod, who some people know as Axe, and people know you from CNN, from your podcast, The Axe Files, from your other podcast, Hacks on Tap, from your years working with President Obama. But they also might know you as one of the many Democratic strategists who was calling for President Biden to step aside. Can I ask how long you have thought that would be the best idea for this ticket? Well, I was pretty lonely. I thought

I think it was about a year, more than a year ago that I said that I thought that it would be hard to explain to the American people why anyone should be president until they're closer to 90 than 80. You know, last fall, after the first wave of very bad battleground states polls came out and the age issue really popped.

I said, you know, this is the last chance for the president to think about whether this is best for him and the country. I will tell you, though, Sean, that I...

When I got the news yesterday, I was very, very sad. I mean, I worked with the president when he was vice president. I was involved in the process of choosing him for vice president. I thought he was a tremendous asset in the White House, always enjoyed being with him, always appreciated the points that he was making. I think history will be a lot kinder to him than voters are right now.

for the things that he's accomplished. And, you know, it was a poignant ending. I think it was also an act of love and patriotism for this country that he decided maybe the best thing for me to do is step aside. I mean, you were part of this movement

mounting call for him to step aside. Did you the whole time think that was actually in the cards? Did you think the party was capable of what it's going through right now? I thought it was almost inevitable after the debate

You know, the debate kind of crystallized what had been a big and growing problem, which was, you know, doubts about his fitness to serve another four years. And those were just not just magnified, but calcified by the debate. And then you had the bookend of Trump and the assassination attempt and, you know, his preternatural life.

marketing instincts to find the precise spot to take the hero pose. And, you know, the two things read

weakness and strength, which was the essence of the Trump message that the world was out of control. Biden's not in command. He's weak. Trump is strong. Vote for Trump. That was their whole campaign. Now they have a complication because they don't have Biden. So it does change the nature of the race. A lot of the people who were calling for Biden to step aside are now jubilant, if not endorsing Vice President Harris. Your friend and former colleague,

Former President Barack Obama has not yet done that. What do you think is going on there? I don't think he wanted to prescribe for the party what the party should do, but rather be available to be a force for pulling the party together once the party made its choice. I think what's very clear as we sit here this morning, the day after the president made his announcement, is

is that Kamala Harris is going to be the nominee of the Democratic Party. I don't think there's any real debate about that. She very quickly consolidated support in a way that should actually inspire some confidence because that's a political task to move quickly and consolidate your support. She did it. She did it very well. And, you know, I think the last of the prospective opponents,

will endorse her today, you know, she'll move on to the business of choosing a vice presidential candidate. So you don't think she's going to do what the Republicans did and wait until the DNC to announce who's going to be on the ticket with her? I don't think she can because they are committed to an early vote of the delegates to nominate the candidates in order to accommodate all the states filing deadlines for the fall ballot.

So they're scheduled to meet next week to codify the ticket. I don't think that they really can put this off until the convention. So I anticipate that, you know, we'll know relatively quickly who the vice presidential nominee is going to be.

You host a podcast with a Republican strategist named Mike Murphy, who's who's anti-Trump. But he's one of the few voices out there right now saying that Democrats should slow their role, that that it's happening too fast with Harris. Do you understand his perspective on that?

I do. I mean, look, I think that she would be the nominee if there were a process or if there were not a process for a variety of reasons. One, that she has more of a relationship with the delegates to the convention. They're Biden-Harris delegates. They were chosen by the Biden campaign.

And so, you know, they're naturally going to gravitate toward her. The composition of those delegates favors her. I think she might have benefited from more of a competition just to...

show that she could win that competition. But I get Mike's point of view. I mean, one of the reasons why I spoke out as early as I did about my concerns about the president moving forward was that had he made this decision last year, we would have had a Democratic primary. And the Democratic primary is how you pressure, primary campaign is how you pressure test these candidates. Remember, Ron DeSantis was viewed as a behemoth

in the fall of 2022. And then he had to go through the battle, the nominating battle, and he ended up not faring as well. You do find out about people through that process. That said, she's, you know, she's been vetted quite a bit. She ran for president. She's been vice president for three and a half years. And Sean, the thing that I would say is,

about her is, you know, having been involved in presidential politics for a really, really long time, not just with Barack Obama, but others, and not just as a strategist, but as a reporter, I can tell you it is a

beastly hard process. It is really, really hard. And no matter what level of politics you're at, there's no level like that. There's no training for it. There's no simulator you can pop into to find out what the pressures of a presidential campaign are like. In many ways, the campaign simulates the sort of relentless pressure that presidents themselves will feel.

She's experienced that. She has been swimming in the deep end of the pool. That to me is a big thing. The other thing is she has, in fact, apprenticed. She has been in those rooms. She has been in those meetings. She knows a lot about what the presidency entails.

That, too, is something that's very hard to learn on the fly. So, you know, I think she's got a lot of arguments on her side for this. I watched the RNC last week. I'm sure you caught some of it, too. I was there. You were there. Even better. Yes. You didn't see me in my Uncle Sam suit? I was watching on C-SPAN. I'm sorry. I betrayed you. Oh, I see. Yeah.

It seems like the Republicans really want to come after Biden and now Harris probably on immigration, on inflation. Does Harris have the same weaknesses as Biden there, if not even more so? Well, they will try to certainly depict her as the immigration czar. And I'm sure they've got about...

a hundred ads in the can on this. But the truth is she's not Joe Biden. She can chart her own course now. I'm old enough to remember the 68 campaign when Lyndon Johnson quit. Ultimately, his vice president, Hubert Humphrey, became the presidential candidate. And the heavy, heavy burden of Vietnam hung over him.

he ended up losing by a point. But he also was like 20 points behind when he got nominated. And if that race had gone another week, I should say he would have won.

So, you know, she needs to chart her own course, talk about what she would do. I think there are also points on this immigration issue that are vulnerabilities for Trump. Are you looking forward to that debate? Oh, yes, I think so. You know, what's interesting is that the addled old man on the platform is not going to be Joe Biden this time. That's...

That's right. Kamala Harris is a historic vice president. She'll be an even more historic president, obviously. Do you think she leans into that or do you think she leans into the issues? She leans into Donald Trump's various criminal battles, what have you. Listen, when Barack Obama was running for president, we never talked about the historic nature of his candidacy because we thought that was obvious. And anybody who could see understood that.

And others might be talking about it. But he always said, I am proudly of the black community, but I'm not limited to it. And I'm not running to be the first black president or the black president. I'm running to be president of the United States. The people who stepped forward and said, you can't bypass her because she's the first black woman vice president. They were diminishing her.

They were diminishing her. The case they should have been making and should be making today is why she is the best candidate, why she has the best chance to win, what she brings to this race. And, you know, I know, like, there's a lot of enthusiasm among some folks about the historic nature of the race. But, you know, there are a lot of voters for whom other things are more important than

And they want to know, are we going to have someone who understands our lives and is fighting for us? And that's the case that she has to make. I think she can make it. And the more she focuses on that, I think the greater her chances of success.

You started saying that the news yesterday made you sad, but you obviously helped turn hope into a political strategy in 2008. Do you feel hopeful right now? I do because I think that what was not a race yesterday is a race today.

And, you know, I see the enthusiasm that the vice president has generated in the first 24 hours. I mean, she raised $46 million in a matter of hours online and small donations. That's a record. It's a gauge of enthusiasm, which has been absent. So, you know, I am encouraged by what I see. You know, it's better to have hope than despair.

Just as a general rule, you might want to write that down for your own life. But it's certainly true in politics. And this morning, a lot of Democrats have hope that they didn't have yesterday morning.

David Axelrod, CNN, Axe Files, Hacks on Tap, Barack Obama. Our show today was produced by Denise Guerra and Miles Bryan. They had help from Matthew Collette, Amina Alsadi, Hadi Mawagdi, Andrea Christen's daughter, and Patrick Boyd. This is Today Explained.