We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode The New Yorker Celebrates a Hundred Years as a Poetry and Fiction Tastemaker

The New Yorker Celebrates a Hundred Years as a Poetry and Fiction Tastemaker

2025/2/4
logo of podcast The New Yorker Radio Hour

The New Yorker Radio Hour

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
Deborah Treisman
K
Kevin Young
Topics
David Remnick:作为《纽约客》的编辑,我见证了杂志百年来在文学领域的贡献,特别是小说和诗歌的发表。我们回顾了过去,并庆祝了这些成就。 Deborah Treisman: 我负责编辑《纽约客》百年小说选集。在选择作品时,我发现即使是天才作家,也并非所有作品都完美无缺。那些被拒稿的著名作家,他们的作品在当时可能确实存在不足。我们应该记住,作品的成功与否,取决于其自身的文学价值和对读者的影响。 此外,人们对《纽约客》小说的刻板印象是:故事通常围绕郊区白人中产阶级已婚男子的生活展开,并以顿悟结尾。但实际上,《纽约客》发表的作品远比这丰富多彩。重新阅读这些作品,我更关注的是它们所反映的时代特征。幽默是时间上过时得最快的东西,很多过去被认为很有趣的作品,现在已经难以理解。 Kevin Young: 我负责编辑《纽约客》百年诗歌选集。我将诗歌选集按一天的时间顺序组织,而非按主题或字母顺序,这样更能体现诗歌之间的联系。1969年的《纽约客》诗歌选集里没有一位有色人种诗人,而我成为《纽约客》历史上第六位发表作品的黑人诗人,这反映了美国诗歌多样性的缺失。诗歌选集的编辑过程并不总是能体现出最佳的包容性,这可能与投稿者的选择有关,也可能与杂志本身的氛围有关。奥登对轻体诗歌的广阔视野启发了我,他将布鲁斯音乐也纳入其中,这让我意识到,很多哈莱姆文艺复兴时期的诗歌也符合《纽约客》的风格。诗歌能够有效地反映社会事件,例如加州山火和新冠疫情,《纽约客》能够快速地发表反映这些事件的诗歌。扎耶夫斯基的诗歌《尝试赞美这残缺的世界》发表于9·11事件后一周的《纽约客》杂志,这首诗歌完美地体现了那段时期美国人的感受,因此被选为诗歌选集的开篇。 从15岁起我就梦想着编辑《纽约客》诗歌百年选集,如今梦想成真。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Valentine's Day is fast approaching, and you don't want to find yourself grabbing a heart-shaped box of chocolates, do you? Why not a smaller box with a heart-shaped sapphire pendant necklace from Jared Jewelers inside? Shop Jared now for select diamond fashion and Italian gold jewelry for your Valentine. After all, life may be like a box of chocolates, but love is like a box with a Jared Jewelers logo on it. This Valentine's Day, be the he who went to Jared.

Now get 40% off select fashion jewelry. Visit jared.com slash radio for details. The only thing anybody's getting done the day after the big game is curing a hangover. At Carl's Jr., we've got what you need to cure that post-party bug. A free Carl's Jr. Hangover Burger. Yeah, free. Jar-boiled and cheesy. Eggs, four strips of bacon, and tripping with sauce. A burger that gets you back in the game.

the game. Secure the cure! Get the Carl's Jr. app, join my rewards, and get the free Carl's Jr. Hangover Burger all day on February 10th. Limit one for my rewards member. Only at participating restaurants on February 10th while supplies last. Visit carlsjr.com slash freeburgerday for terms.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. In February, just a couple of weeks from now, the New Yorker will mark its centenary, a hundred years of publishing. And yet when we began, the New Yorker's founding editor, Harold Ross, saw the magazine almost purely as what he called a comic paper.

Those first issues were light as air. But once Ross made the crucial hire of Catherine White, an editor who insisted on bringing the best of fiction and poetry to the magazine, things changed. And over a century's worth of issues, we've published an immense body of short fiction and poems. I mean, The New Yorker has published in its history close to 14,000 pieces of fiction.

And so you went back and read every single one. And how many poems do we have? Any idea, Kevin? I think you might eclipse us. I think we're at 13,500 or something like that. Deborah Triesman and Kevin Young have just put together two anthologies to celebrate the New Yorker centennial. Deborah has been the magazine's fiction editor and my colleague since 2003.

And she's just edited A Century of Fiction at The New Yorker. Kevin joined us as poetry editor in 2017. He's an amazing poet and the director of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture. And in his spare time, he's edited the new book, A Century of Poetry at The New Yorker. Kevin, you said that when you were growing up, you bought a copy of The New Yorker Book of Poems anthology, which was published in 1969. Yes.

What do you remember about reading that book, about who was included, and maybe at least as much to the point who was not?

Yeah, I remember vividly reading it, and I still have my copy. And it's very neatly underlined in ink, which I wouldn't do now. I think I'm a pencil guy mostly. But, you know, just to see like James Dickey's Falling, for instance, which is sort of this bravura piece that's pages and pages. I'm not sure we would even run something as long as that. But to see it— I would hope that we would. Okay, well, you've heard it, folks. You've heard it, folks. Yeah.

It was actually kind of surprising when you asked me, you know, to do this. I think my first response was I've only wanted to do this since I was 15, you know, like I've been thinking about, you know, this idea. And so it was like kind of a dream come true. And I pulled the book off the shelf and saw my underlines and was so excited. And then I realized there's not one person of color in that whole book.

And then you, who come along so many years later, were only the sixth black poet in our pages. But, you know, 1999, that's a long time. What accounts for that? It was missing a lot of opportunities for the range of American poetry. And it wasn't just African-American poets. It's missing Asian poetry. It's missing the long tradition of Asian poetry or African poetry. You know, it doesn't include that in translation even.

You know, an anthology is – we have the advantage of looking back and selecting and saying, well, that's obvious as Deborah is saying. But it isn't always in the process. And I actually – what is interesting to me is I haven't gone through the archive and figured out is it people didn't send? Because there is a kind of level of –

If it's not welcoming, why would you send your poem there? The beat poets in the 50s, I think they would have found the New Yorker anathema somehow. Right, exactly. The New York school often until then Ashbery's in and then he was in a lot. So that's what's interesting is it isn't one sort of taste only, but you have someone like –

Sister Sonia Sanchez, a wonderful poet, she was taught by Louise Bogan, you know, and that connection to The New Yorker was there for her in the beginning. And so in a way, there is this tie, even though it's not shown in the magazine. So I think there's a lot of interesting connections still. I was over at the New York Public Library yesterday, and one of the archivists showed me some correspondence between

the fiction department, and Jerry Salinger, J.D. Salinger. And the first note is a very curt, no thank you. And suddenly it gets a lot warmer. As a fiction editor, even today, do you live in fear of missing a potential genius? When things come in, what are you always thinking?

Well, I guess the thing to remember is that even geniuses don't always write their best work right off the bat. You know, people make a lot of noise about rejection letters from the New Yorker that went to famous writers or later famous writers. And

They were probably justified, those rejections. And Beatty, 44 rejections before Roger Angel talked to her. I think it was only 13, but he wrote her very detailed letters about what he was exasperated with in her work and encouraging her to do something different. But at least he spotted that she had something fresh and interesting and different, and he encouraged that.

Deborah, there was a period, a long period, where people would refer to the New Yorker story, that there was this thing called the New Yorker short story. What was it and how did that reputation develop, fairly or not? Well, I think generally the cliché is that it's a story about a working man in the suburbs who commutes into the city and –

Cheats on his wife, perhaps, or thinks about it. You know, it's very much about white middle class married life and that it ends with an epiphany. You know, like Irwin Shaw's Girls in Their Summer Dresses, which is just a moment of a husband and wife talking in a bar and he's thinking about marriage.

attractive girls. These things happen. These things happen, right? They're slices of life, not so much narratives. And when you went back and read a whole bunch of these, how did you react to them? Did you admire them more than you thought you would? Were you bored with them? Well, I read them with a different eye because there's so much of their time. And that was also what was interesting in reading

What choice did you make?

I think the latter. I hope, yeah. For the most part. But you know that then you're not representing a large number of works, which meant something at the time, but mean less now. The New Yorker's fiction editor, Deborah Treisman, will continue in a moment.

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. You chose to hit play on this podcast today. Smart choice. Make another smart choice with AutoQuote Explorer to compare rates from multiple car insurance companies all at once. Try it at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Not available in all states or situations. Prices vary based on how you buy.

Here's a way you can support WNYC in our centennial year. Donate your used car. We'll turn your old car into the news and conversation that we've been serving to the community for over 100 years. Many listeners have already donated their cars to WNYC. It's an easy way to support the station, and you'll get a tax deduction. Learn more at WNYC.org slash car.

Have you experienced complications from a Paragard IUD? Keller Postman is here to help. Tap the banner for a free case review. If eligible, you may be entitled to significant compensation. Tap now or visit iudinjury.com slash audio to see if you qualify. This is attorney advertising.

Each morning, it's a new opportunity, a chance to start fresh. Up First from NPR makes each morning an opportunity to learn and to understand. Choose to join the world every morning with Up First, a podcast that hands you everything going on across the globe and down the street, all in 15 minutes or less. Start your day informed and anew with Up First by subscribing wherever you get your podcasts.

The thing that seems to date maybe fastest when I look back at old New Yorkers is humor. I'll read, you know, the supposedly hilarious Alexander Wolcott, and I don't know what the hell he's talking about three-quarters of the time. I think humor is really – it's time-stamped. I mean –

I mostly think that. But I think the really funny, you know, like Dorothy Parker feels very modern and crisp. And sometimes what you're encountering, in my opinion, is a generic kind of of the time humor. Like, you know, at a smoker, you know, in the 50s that, you know, was a hilarious, you know, golf joke. You know, it doesn't really resonate. Was that equivalent to a New Yorker poem?

as it was a New Yorker story? Yeah. I mean, I think especially the 20s, a kind of rhyming, clever poem, quatrains, no doubt, that, you know, comes to a clever conclusion, usually the opposite of what you might have thought. You know, so there's a kind of like

I like going out, but I sure like staying home. Like if only, you know, it's just something kind of like that. But also you saw a lot of light verse, Ogden, Nash, and the like. But some of that is so great. It's so playful with language. So if you got that today, you thought it was successful, in it would go.

I would hope. Do people write it? They don't write it as much. Why? I think I, well, I have Auden's view of light verse. He edited an Oxford anthology of light verse. And one of the things he talks about, he includes the blues in there. And one of the things I think is so clever about that is he has this broad view of light verse as a kind of musical. What's interesting about looking back then, like there's a lot of, you know, Harlem Renaissance poets who were very formal and could have easily fit in those pages. And so that's why it's a little surprising.

Kevin, you went with a different choice on how you organized this book. Maybe you should explain it. Yeah, I wanted to kind of give that sense of the time period and move from the 20s. And I kind of grouped these decades together, especially at the beginning. But I thought if you just marched through it, you'd have a lot of pages of stories.

things that might, you know, not talk to each other in the same way as if you think about theme. And the other anthologies, the previous New Yorker ones, were thematic in different ways or alphabetical. I think the 69 one is my title. It's crazy. What is going on? You don't know where to navigate this thing. Right. So instead I said, well, what about if it's like a day? And so it starts –

with the morning, a morning bell, and then, you know, has a lunch break, and then it has an after work drink, and goes like that. So you intersperse the time, the progression of the day, and it's ingenious, and it really works. You begin the anthology, Kevin, with a poem by a Polish poet. Tell me the story of this poem, when it appeared, and maybe after you do, maybe you could read it for us.

Yeah, this is Try to Praise the Mutilated World by Adam Zagievsky. And it appears in the September 17th issue, which as you know, was the issue right after September 11th.

2001 and to be just a week after September 11th. It was the issue right after 9-11. Which I remember getting. Yeah, with the black cover by Art Spiegelman and Francoise Mouly and long narrative by a lot of reporters about what had happened. It had to start the anthology. There was no way you couldn't sort of frame our current moment and looking back and

without that iconic issue and this iconic poem. So this is Try to Praise the Mutilated World by Adam Zagayevsky. Try to praise the mutilated world, remember June's long days, and wild strawberries, drops of wine, the dew, the nettles that methodically overgrow the abandoned homesteads of exiles.

You must praise the mutilated world. You watched the stylish yachts and ships. One of them had a long trip ahead of it, while salty oblivion awaited others. You've seen the refugees heading nowhere. You've heard the executioners sing joyfully. You should praise the mutilated world.

Remember the moments when we were together in a white room and the curtain fluttered. Return in thought to the concert where music flared. You gathered acorns in the park in autumn and leaves eddied over the earth's scars.

Praise the mutilated world and the gray feather, a thrush lost, and the gentle light that strays and vanishes and returns. I remember it happening. I remember Alice Quinn giving me this thing, and I was like everybody else, a wreck. I had slept in the office half the week and –

I just was – I was a puddle. I was a puddle when I got this thing and we just put it on the back page, which is not normally where we put poems. But I'm thinking about this just now because we've had the fires in California and we just ran a fire poem the very week – it came in literally the day –

or a few days after and we were able to run it. You know, that poem is not in the anthology, but there are a number of poems about COVID and pandemic and what 2020 was like and, you know, the murder of George Floyd. I mean, these are things poetry can do and the magazine can do better than anyone and run a week later. Trevor, how do you see politics filtering or not filtering into the short stories that you read week after week?

Well, I was just thinking about 2016 when our slush pile of submissions was full of satires about Trump. And somehow it was just too direct. It wasn't nuanced. They weren't worked as literature. They weren't good writing in that sense. But then there were quite a few stories a little bit of time later that – in which the Trump presidency was a backdrop.

and its effects were playing out in families or in relationships, and that was really effective. Deborah, I want to ask you about your day-to-day work as a fiction editor. How many stories does The New Yorker get a week? Probably between 100 and 200. That's a lot of stories. It is. So how do you—what's the process of selecting the story? Yeah.

Well, there's myself and three other people in the fiction department, and we're all being sent things. And then there's an unsolicited section of submissions, which are read by our wonderful fiction readers, who will pass along to the editors anything they think is promising. Just for the record, we're reading everything. We're reading everything. Yeah. And you and the great Hannah Eisenman, who you work with, how many poems come in each week? Oh.

I more know the annually about 48,000. Whoa, whoa, whoa. They're shorter than the story. 48,000 poems. Let's say 40, 40. And we publish about 100. 100 a year, yeah. So we do read them, but it is, you know, a slightly smaller group of people reading. And, you know, we have a lot shorter. Yeah, but, you know, they'll send five. They won't send just one. So

You know, I once talked to Alice Quinn about this years ago when I was, you know, just sending to The New Yorker. And she said, you know, I would feel weird if we had less. We have people in a given year. Jory Graham is most likely going to publish a poem. And we could name, I don't know, 20 other or more, as it were, regulars that have been publishing poems in The New Yorker for a while. Same with short story writers. George Saunders arrives with something or Laurie Moore or Edwidge Danica, whatever.

But you're always looking for something new. How does this all work? Usually between 20 and 25 percent of stories in a given year are by people who are publishing in The New Yorker for the first time. So it's quite a high number when you consider that their next story, they're not in that category.

I guess the goal is really just thinking about a story's ambition, what it's trying to be, what effect it's trying to have on the reader, and taking it if it's successful at that. Can you remember a time where you've

Open an envelope and it's somebody that you hadn't heard of and you just, by the end of, you know, half an hour later, you're singing, oh, happy day. Well, can I remember a time when I opened an envelope? Touche and fair enough. Or a PDF and enclosure, fair enough. Absolutely, I can. Absolutely. Yeah. So, you know, one fairly recent case of that is the story that went viral and got the most attention

online that any New Yorker story has ever got, which was Cat Person by Kristen Rupanian, and hit a nerve. And she had not published widely at all. She did not have a book out, but it was a story that spoke to people. The books are a century of fiction and a century of poetry at the New Yorker.

Deborah Treisman, Kevin Young. And I want a little shout out here to Deborah Garrison, who was so wonderful at Knopf and helping us all out. Thank you so much. Happy anniversary. Happy anniversary. That's the New Yorker's fiction editor, Deborah Treisman, along with our poetry editor, Kevin Young. A century of fiction and a century of poetry come out this month. And of course, you can always subscribe at newyorker.com. I'm David Remnick. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. Thanks for joining us and see you next time.

The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Jared Paul. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Sommer. With guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barish, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett.

The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund. This is Ira Flato, host of Science Friday. For over 30 years, the Science Friday team has been reporting high-quality science and technology news, making science fun for curious people by covering everything from the outer reaches of space to the rapidly changing world of AI to the tiniest microbes in our bodies.

Audiences trust our show because they know we're driven by a mission to inform and serve listeners first and foremost. With important news, they won't get anywhere else. And our sponsors benefit from that halo effect. For more information on becoming a sponsor, visit sponsorship.wnyc.org.