Is Target a Leveraged Buyout Candidate? + Comcast Cuts the Cord
58:50 Share

Some tag presents the ins and out of caring for your home out uncertainty, self debt, stressing about not knowing where to start in, plans and guides that make IT easy to get home projects done out word art, sorry, with laugh lovers in knowing what to do, when to do IT and who to hire, start Carrying fewer home. We confidence down the the tack today.

How much money do you make?

My name is living into a Better known as your B B F F and your favorite austral early. My podcast network and chill is back and Better than ever for season too. We've got finances experts and your favorite labs answering all those tabo money questions you've been too afraid or to embarrass task with new epsom dropping every wedding day you can watch or listen, sit back and get ready to nett ork and chill.

When did you first hear about rank choice voting? Like how did you become .

aware of that before we left new york? I got to vote in the election for mayor atoms. There's a lot going on up there. Since election day.

we've gotten lots of questions about ring choice voting. Why don't we have IT? What IT change our politics? What even is IT that's this week on explain IT to me. Find this wherever you get your podcasts.

Today's number two hundred and forty three thousand, that's about how many views jack wards commercial for its rebranded logo got. In twenty four hours on youtube battle, I was trying to find a joke that would bring together necrophilia, bestiality and mastering tion. But at this point, IT just feels like i'd be beating a dead horse. 迷人 的。

That's why the people come here at what's going on today. We're discussing an international crisis, a target, why comcast is shutting its cable business.

good being bad bank first. So did you see the new jg la jg.

I listen, you listening, a little sac, I beach, you are just dying to say tagua.

no, I wasn't how I say, because from a different country.

if you ask, another race will find you dead in the boot. I just made that up was prety good. Have I seen? I'm sorry, have I seen?

What have you seen? Jogues, that's how sprout. yeah. Have you seen the new logo?

Nobody, they paced in. Our producers pasted IT in OK.

So please check IT out because everyone's talking about this and you are the marketing professor.

We need your reaction. No, this is a new logo. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

Come on, hold on. I actually use this logo in my class. Look at this thing.

He's out. He's hunting. He's bringing in home to pray for his wife and his kids. His elegant, he's sleek. He's jungle cat. And then they go to this fucking and thing that looks like I was created by A I right? We can process images fifty to sixty times faster and warns, so this is going against our instincts, relates to marketing.

If you are blessed with the logo, like they used to have that visionary metaphor of that incredibly strong, yet elegant, yet powerful jack jis are the only animal that, when hunted is a true story, the only animal that went hunted will perceive their being hunted, and then sprint, circle around and then hunt the hunter. You want to talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of Victory. That is one of the greatest visual metaphors and automobile history. And instead they went to this fucking westworld. This topic, weird.

is awful.

terrible decision.

So what do you think happened in the in the jack a border room? why? Why you think they signed off on this?

What do you think is the strategy here? Like everyone agrees this is the worst rebrand of all time. Why do you think they went ahead of them?

Because they spent a lot of money to design IT and see that's populated with very good looking Young people who wear black, who seem to understand more about design. And they came in and use a bunch of fancy terms like elegant and progressive. And this is more for a modern age.

We need update, and you need to pay us thirty million dollars to redesign all the logos outside the conference stream and all the shit and all the dealerships. By the way, I D just a quick tip, when you're shopping for a car, don't eat. The climb shouter at the lexis september to remember .

event how I would love, but I like this alright.

I had never gets old. You got to recycle the good stuff. You ve got a recycle the good stuff.

I guess I did love anyway.

So I can tell you what I know what happened here without knowing what happened. It's a new cma who's decided but his or her footprint or in print on the company is convince them they needed a new fock and logo because actual work around things like customer acquisition and figuring out digital platforms, and that's real work.

Instead, I hire interbrand or mild from profit to come in and have very compelling, very articulate, very attractive people. Tell you why this logo can note something that foot to a modern age. This is a stupid fucking decision. This is the equivalent of putting shareholder money in the middle, the road, and running over IT .

in X J S, X S, X J R. Their new tag line is copy nothing like this is sort of their boldness brand and the given saying, you know, copy nothing. This is anything but I look at that logo. It's like you copied every single tech starts up that we've seen over the past like five to ten years like this literally is just like classic this topic meet diverse type two d fund where it's all sped down and clean looking kingly it's just IT looks like a tech company.

This is the final nail in .

the cough in a british .

culture point when americans obsession, fetish, master batter fantasies of ai baster. I'm shocked they don't have. I'm shocked it's not java dot AI and they're trying to pretend to be a tech company.

But this is, this is a sense. Look at how beautiful they are. Old logo is.

I want to be that guy out of jungle to sleep and strong fuck with me. Got that. That should is money.

The next, like if I see a super attractive gara gallet f one, i'm going to come up after a few cocktails, a lot of cartels I like. do. That's how you lose your virginity .

in nineteen. That's how we open the show. Let's talk with our weekly review of mock vitals.

The S M, P five hundred was volatile. The dollar climbed biton hit a fresh record above ninety eight thousand dollars. I wouldn't be surprised if IT hits one hundred by the time this eyes, and the yield on ten year treasuries slumped, shifting into the headlines, the justice department proposed a force sale of crime as a potential remedy in the google antitrust case.

The browser, which is approximately three billion monthly active users, could be valued at up to twenty billion dollars. Microstrip gy sold two point six billion dollars worth of convertible bonds to fund its bit going buying spray. The business intelligence firm already owns nearly thirty one billion dollars worth of the cypher currency and plants to buy more over the next three years.

The stock rose to a record high after the sale, and it's up more than six fold year to date. And finally, in video's third quarter, earnings beat analyst expectations with revenue topping thirty five billion dollars that is up ninety four percent from a year earlier. The company also projected revenue for the current quotable jump to thirty seven and half billion dollars, while that forecast was slightly above analyst expectations, the stocks still fell more than two percent after hours. Scott, your thoughts tossing with the D O, J S proposed forced sale of google crime.

Look, I love this. If if you go back in economic history, IT would be very difficult to find an instance where the breakup was not good for the economy, was not good for the tax space, was not good for shareholders, was not good for the employees who now have more companies bidding to rent their labor.

The only stakeholder that loses in a breakup throughout economic history is the individual who wants to sit on the iron throne of all problems, not just west us. I mean, search is essentially and think it's the biggest Grace margin dollar business in the world, and there's one company to dominate that. And if you gave if you took away the data set in the interface of two thirds are mean to have million people who use chrome.

And IT was now a competitor that could offer data and opportunities for other potential search engine. I think that would be good for everybody. I mean, who knows? Someone might come up with a search engine that is not trying to target Young people or that screens on this information, or doesn't bring sunlight to conspiracy theory greater than its organic reach.

I had a real ancient conversation with erh mad, or we did. I don't know. It's on this part of one of my other forty five two bag get on this podcast.

I was not there .

for there ago. Well, you actually, you know, it's funny, didn't not standing jobs anyways. But erik, the former CEO, not of alphabet, a bit of google.

He said something really that really stuck me. He said that individuals should have almost limits free speech, but computers should not have free speech. And that really struck me as an eligant wait to approach the problem. Because when I look at the majority of really vile shit that's trying to polarize ze people or spread conspiracy theory, whenever i've kind of a click on IT and try to figure out who this person is, I find out it's not a person.

It's clearly a bot ah that's using being used to amplify either conspiracy theory or a certain ideology or simply put, IT, it's a bad actor trying to get a ship, posting each other and arguing with each other. So more competition you might find people say why I want a family safe search company. I want to search company that doesn't have does an ad supported such that to take you to the best answer, not to, not to the answer, they can further monodist. Well.

i'm going to disagree with you on your take here. I think you've brought up a lot of important issues, but there are all kind of desperate issues that you're talking about here, like there's the monopoly issue and then there's you the the free speech issue and that the conspiracies issue. Like there are just all these things that we dislike about big tech and about google.

But I mean, let's just focus on what did google actually do wrong here. And if you read through the judge's case, the big thing that the judge identified was the fact that google was paying billions of dollars to other companies, particularly apple, to be the default search engine on those devices. There's a very easy way to address that.

I just just break up their relationship with apple. Just tell them you not allowed to keep paying apple to be your default browser. And now that is something the DJ is supposedly going to recommend as a remedy.

But to add on top of that, the first sale of this asset that is in many ways integral to google's business, IT just doesn't feel like a remedy to me. IT feels more like a punishment. And in my view, if you're going to focus on punishing google, I personally think punishments should come in the form of fines. But the idea of forcing them to sell crime, which, which is dramatically transform one of the most important businesses in america, the online search market, to me just feels like a step too far from government.

I just had this horrific images. I finally get the call from the White house asking me to be secretary, education or commerce secretary. And the calls actually for you, they're just trying to get your name. I think that's a really solid I would argue though that the data from traffic patterns in behavior captured on the front end of the the true access point to the digital world is, is the browser. So the amount of data they get around where people are going, their trends that they can then feed into their search algorithms to Better provide Better targeting for clients to advertise on google, I would think that gives them almost an unassertive advantage. The results in a ninety plus percent share of .

search is huge, but it's also why the product is so good, right? I mean, the data is all part of the business.

What you don't realize with monopoly is you don't know what you're missing. So for example, you know google search is really innovated the last decade. No, all of the innovation has been how to how to turn advertises up by the hills and check more money from them.

IT hasn't been around sumer innovation. So I I would push back and say the monopoly power here, we don't know the innovation were missing. I just don't .

buy IT as a means to breaking them up. And my reaction would be that this this won't hold off and quote, but I agree with you that you perhaps the world would be a Better place if google will broken up. So we move on to microstrip gy, which is absolutely tearing right now. And you're actually friends with the founder, CEO Michael sailor, who is down this podcast before. What are your initial reactions to microstrip gy, which is performing even Better than bitcoin right now somehow?

So i've known Michael for the Better part of twenty years. The guys like crazy, fuck and smart. And every time I meet them, I think I really should buy microstrip gy stock or bit line.

And I have bought none of either. And so I want to find a time machine, go back, find me, kill me, and then kill myself. I mean, I I knew this guy was so bright, but I think that got away from me was, you know, on an old dog.

I believe in corporate governance, in the idea of a CEO taking a publicly traded company that does business intelligence and borrowing lovering up like crazy to buy another IT would be like tim cooks sang. I just believe in gold, and i'm going to put one hundred billion dollars and debt on this company and go by become the largest single owner of gold in the world. And IT just felt so strange to me.

But there is no getting around that. The guy is a fuck and visionary. When I had on the pod two three years ago, bill clam was the eighteen thousand, and IT is Spike from five thousand. And i'm gonna wait to goes down on the five and it's like, trust me on this just by a little bit, this thing is this thing is bullet proof. The long term, it's up five four since and what is microstrip gy.

since i'm not it's it's up six fold in the past year.

It's set up under and twenty three percent of last thirty days and because he takes dead, it's basically microstrip gy has become a levered Better on bitcoin. It's like buying a etf on china that's three x its leveled up. So look, there's just no getting around IT even crypt of skeptics like myself have to acknowledge that I believe that bitcoin has become a credible tangible store value.

It's a specular asset. No doub about IT, but Michael is you know from an q standpoint, he's flying at a different altitude. He saw this in my gosh, you want to talk about balls the size of really big balls. I mean, this guy, this guy basically said, business intelligence, sion's intelligence are levering .

up and we're buying big. Why is microstrip gy up so much more than bit on? I think part of IT is what you said, which is this is like a levered.

I love IT up bitcoin play because they're borrowing money and then using that money to buy more bitcoin. So it's just going to be a more volatile version a bit one right now. But I think there is A A second story here, a second reason why people are so obsessed with microstrip gy right now.

And that is the bitcoin holdings are worth a quarter of the company's entire market cap and they don't have cash, which is why he borrowing money just go buy more bitcoin. And if you look at their earnings reports, they now identify not as a business intelligence firm, which is what this company has always been. They call themselves a, quote, bitcoin treasury company.

And that is the threw line of the entire earnings report. It's like here's our plan to buy more bitcoin. Here's our plan to build out a bitcoin I D network.

Here are the list of conferences, these bitt coin conferences that we will be hosting and attending. Meanwhile, the actual business, the way they make money, is practically treated like a footnote, like IT doesn't seem to matter that much of them. So when I look at what's happening here, I think there are two people buying the stock.

It's one the people making the level play, but then it's two, the people who believe that, you know, if bitcoin is the future, microstrip gy is the leader of that future. This is gonna, the official bitcoin company. They believe that migrants strategy somehow gonna pia near this new space.

My only question would be, in what way will they put in here the bitcoin space? What does that actually look like? It's not very clear to me. The strategy is very vague. It's very hand wave, which is why personally, I don't really .

buy IT if I had been on his board five years ago. And he said, we're levering up to by big coin.

You would have been a nights.

a night, very simple. I would have be them and kicked off the board. I would be resigned because everything I know about corporate governance, I would said, Michael, you're a billionaire if you want to sell your stock and go start a big coin company, have added, but don't don't take your food share for our shareholders.

They think they're investing in a business intelligence company. And I would have been wrong. His shareholders have done extraordinary well.

We'll see. We'll see. I am still with you on that. On that take, I think I think this could end very badly personally. And by the way, producers is message me, citron research just shorted the stock and the shares are off around nine percent as we are speaking right now. So clearly, I am not the only one who skeptical about this company.

I'm with you and you know, the things I don't like about bitcoin are I actually believe in transparency and and I understand that people feel like they should have privacy or related to their money, but you know this asset class has been used in some pretty frightening ways. And um but I I would maybe you could argue that the government's job and people have a right to privacy and this is a longer conversation.

But the reality is he's winning and he's there's just not getting ground at the guy is a visionary. I keep waiting to come down so I can buy a little bit of bit coin, but IT IT does not CoOperating with me. And every time I see a go up.

every day I got is this year is to a be a big day and proof finally.

the celebration that yeah.

okay. That's just quickly move on to the video here I posted. You don't how much to say about these earnings because it's kind of the same story we've seen quarter after quarter of in revenue doubled, profits grew, estimates were beat and then the stock kind of, yes, stumbled, but then hum along. And this is what we've come to expect. I mean, every single quarter in video is absolutely destroys and the market says, okay, that's that sort of what we expected.

The only thing that I would say that struck me, and this is more of a media observation than in investing observation, is that last night, before the earnings, I was just thinking, you know, IT actually doesn't matter what happens in this earnings report, because you and I GTA cover this either way, because this company is just so important at this point. IT makes up seven percent of the entire S. M.

P. It's in practically every american's retirement account. It's just gotten to this point where it's like it's systemic to everything you you can't ignore. IT has to be covered whether or not is interesting.

And then I think the thing jenson, one that really summed IT up on the earnings school, he said, quote, every company in the world seems to be involved in our supply ing. And I think he's right. This is just the world relies on NVIDIA in so many ways. At this point, I think it'll probably go down as one of the great companies of all time.

I mean, if you talk about it's really hard for people to get their head around the value creation here. And that is if you took the entire german stock market, every company, from dame's bans to Simons, the entire german stock market, the entire french stock market, all of the best companies in these respective economies, all of them in videos s market cap, is greater than the entire stock market of these countries.

And if you really think about that, if you think about the amount of human capital investment, government support, people who spend their lives, that these companies is the IP, the customer basis, the global customer basis, take every one of them, every one of them and at them altogether did not work as much as in video. So this is a phenomenon ah we don't know how long I can last yet another fucking amazing asset class that I am not in. I am not in this said, I keep waiting for you to get cheaper. We'll be right .

back after the break with the look at target. You're enjoying the show so far and you haven't subscribed. Be sure to get property markets to follow wherever you get your pot costs.

Support for property markets comes from fund rise. Nearly every major tech company in the S M P. Five hundred was once funded by adventure capital firms. The hard to, however, that the biggest meta funds are almost entirely funded by institutional investors.

So unless you knew a guy who knew a guy, you and ninety nine point nine percent of individual investors did not going to participate in the P R P O growth of any of those blue p companies. And now with the eye revolution that's happening again, almost all the bigger names in A I are still private. Just how to reach you your portfolio.

But the fundraised innovation fund n is changing that it's a more than one hundred and twenty five million r fun. IT holds some of the most exciting preist o tech companies in the world. And it's time specifically for individual investors.

This time you get an early at funding slash markets carefully considered the investment material with foreign stn, including the objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other information can be found in the innovation funds perspectives at fundraised come slash innovation. This is a paid advertisement.

So perfect comes from z biotics. Nothing like cocktails with friends to help you unwind. But now you don't have to choose between a great night or a great day after thanks to z BIOS p alcohol, probiotics, drink.

I cos words genetic o biotic. IT was invented by PH scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. And according disease biodegraders how IT works when you drink alcohol gets converted into a toxic by product in the guy.

It's this by product, not dehydration. That's to blame for a rough next day, free alcohol produces an enzi to break this by product down. Just remember to take the biotics before your first drink of the night.

Drink responsibly and you'll feel your best tomorrow. So I tried this because daddy loves to drink. I like, when took this thing, I had two, maybe three, drinks, and the next time did feel fine.

And I think the key here is that i'm no longer dra eight three, but also also is likely helping flash and get fifteen percent of your first order when you use property and check out z biotics is back to hundred percent money back guarantee. So if you're unsatisfied, any reason we funder money no question audio flash and a check out for fifty percent support for property markets comes from banta. Proving trust is more important than ever, especially when IT comes to security program.

Banta helps centralize program requirements and automates evidence collection for frameworks including soc to, I saw 2001年 hip hop and more。 So you can save time and money and build customer trust. And with fanta, you get continuous visibility into the state of your controls.

Join more than eight thousand global companies, including a last year flow health and cora, who trust found to to manage risk and prove security and real time. Now that's a new way to G R C. Learn more advantage m slash markets. That's vados m flash markets.

We're back with property markets. Target and walmart both reported third quarter earnings. And once again, IT was a tale of two retailers.

Walmart sales rose over five percent to liffy, a position as the top performer retail in the S. P. Five hundred, while targets only rose point three percent.

Walmart also raised its fiscal year guidance for the third time and target lowered its outlook. So the markets response highlighted that contrast. After the earnings call, walmart stock rose three percent.

Meanwhile, target stock fell more than twenty one percent, its worst day since twenty twenty two. The first thing I will note, Scott, is that we have basically told this exact same story before on this podcast. Pretty sure we we call IT the tailor of two retailers.

Um we've seen this before, target slumming and walmart doing really, really well. So what are your reactions to the fact that we're have in a dja zoo position? Let me .

start saying, I love target. I go to the super target and both real, and I think they do a great job. I have not worked with senior management at target.

I had some interaction to c mo, but at one point I had a discount t of interaction with everyone, including the board in the C O. walmart. And it's an exceptional well run company. And what was interesting about this is that they are going after targets, White meat.

And that as target was always a cooler, hiper, Better merchandise, more aspirational version of walmart that you can have value, but you can have a little bit of, a little bit of a little bit size, a little bit, a little bit of saw, a little bit salza on that ship, if you will. And they had their own brands, kind of a Better branding campaign. IT was opposition to work really well.

But wall Marks, common for their, common for their core, I mean, really coming for their heart, in their lungs. And that is the pointed differentiation that a lot of wealthy people who wanted value shop to target. Now go straight to walmart.

automation. Play a big girl here. Walmart is now automating two times their film ment center of volume.

You're on nearby targets is only twenty five percent more automated to walmart has the walmart has the capital in the vision to make huge investments in digital. Some of them didn't pay off. They pay. I think I think they overpaid for jan. They bought bonos, which was a stupid acquisition.

Nice guys, but was just like a key little concept that they anyway, those guys got incredibly like, in my view, about about seventy five percent of walmart increase in market chair this quarter came from households earning over one hundred thousand dollars, which is the demographic typically associated with people shopping at target. So people want convenience and affordability. Walmart in the unlimited deliveries for twelve, twenty five months.

And people, are you focused on spending smart groceries? Were sixty percent of walmart to a sales while the category accounts for less than twenty five percent of target cells. And I would imagine that groceries, while a low margin business, is a more consistent business.

And if you look at the two companies, uh, walmart change at thirty six times earnings target is trading at twelve. And the analogy here that you brought up, which is a really interesting one, is the analogy between a dominant number one in a very distant two. And that is uber and lift and their early similar.

Uber up one hundred and fifty seven percent of the last five years, while lift is down sixty two percent. Actually, I think to see, I think both have outstanding, see a directs, a shy in the CEO at lifted, both impressive people by comparison. Similarly, if you were one marts up one hundred and twenty percent over the last five years, while target is down about four percent.

So this is what I think is onna happen and i'll come back to this um I think targets beginning to look like a juicy lbo target or at a minimum, they're going to have an activist in there. This thing is now cheap enough. It's still as a strong brand in a great, great real estate.

I think if I were to try speculate with the promise, it's the following. When you're dealing with A C P G company or retailer in a deos I coke, pepsi, everyone's compensation mojo DNA is focused on one thing and that is share. You do not give if you're you know if you're pepsy, you do not in your god, seventeen point eight percent share.

If IT goes to seventeen point six as the brand manager, you might get fired. So you become so obsessed share that in in the market also is very focused on your share that you can make the hard decisions that I think you need to make. And I would argue the target just needs to be a dramatically smaller company that's more profitable.

They have one thousand nine hundred hundred stores. IT should probably be a thousand and twelve hundred and cut costs and make this a more profitable smaller business. And I think that would best be done outside of the screening of a publicly traded company.

And when you look at the fact the P. E. Firms have a quarter of a trillion dollars on their baLanced red ready to deploy, when you look at the fact this thing is getting pretty cheap, one of two things is going to happen. We're you're going to see an activist or we're going to see a potential club deal and take private here.

Very interesting. So targets mocket cap is fifty six billion. Its enterprise value is around seventy two billion. If you come for the debt um who's got that money? Oh yes.

I would have to be a club deal but you got IT like I said P S two hundred fifty billion dollars and dry capital and they could finance a lot of IT. Would that still if it's trading at A P E of twelve, that means it's got five billion and earnings so they could probably borrow you know ten to twenty billion of IT and they get a club deal, get a bunch of the biggest players to each come up with ten billion. Yeah, they could get this deal done.

But I think what you're onna have, I mean the three biggest deals, I think in L B O history where H C A A R G R, but none of them have happened in the last several years. But all the moons are lining up for what I think we will be probably the biggest lbo in history. And twenty twenty five, I think they're to be intel this company target.

People say they know walmart bigger, but often times people will mention target in the same breath as walmart. Absolutely target as a fifty six billion dollar cap. Walmart is seven hundred billion. It's crazy. I can tell you a lot of pee guys are sharpening their pencils and looking at the thing and they calling their buddies and say, saying, if they see us down with this, we think we can make this happen.

Are you in for one, five, ten billion in equity? Talking to banks, how much could we finance on this thing? This is there's a lot of people, I would imagine a lot of very smart people looking at this company right now.

I would like to just focus on target, and they are earning the earnings themselves and and then will compare that to warm A T. But just a highlight, what happened to targets for revenue rose just one percent, way below expectations. Profits fell twelve percent, also way below expectations.

And they said, get that there were two main issues they were dealing with. The first issue was the long, short and strike, which we've discuss before there. All these strikes at many of our largest ports in, in, in amErica back in october, and that was a problem in target, said that is a result.

Their free costs and their supply chain costs were a lot higher. Uh, the second issue that they highlighted was consumer demand. So the average ticket size for target customers was down two percent.

They also saw decline, a pretty significant decline in the direction ary spending on the way took a position. That problem is that there is this macro issue in amErica happening among consumers. Consumers in amErica are tight on cash, and so now there is more cautious about spending right now.

okay. Now let's compare that to warm up. Sales rose more than five percent, profits higher than expected. Average ticket size grew more than two percent. And so the story over walmart that they are telling shareholders, and mind you, these earnings calls happen in the same week. So we're looking at what happened to target.

And then immediately following that, with what happened to warm up the stories, is that customers are going to walmart more frequently, and when they do there, also spending more. So this macro boogyman that target seems to be talking about when IT comes to consumer demand. IT supposedly hurting target, for whatever reason.

IT isn't touch hing walmart, walmart doing just fine. And then, you know, the long, short man strike, walmart is the second largest importer of the affected ports from that strike. The only one ahead of IT is L.

G. electronics. IT should have been hit way harder by the strike then target.

But walmart said that, yes, IT was a slight issue, but they managed the inventory well. They only saw a point six percent decline in their inventory level. So in other words, walmart just figured that out.

The consumers SHE wasn't a problem, neither was the long show man struck. So this, again, is a story we've told before. This is the fourth straight quarter in which target has blamed there under performance on something else, whether it's inflation or demand or strikes are in some cases, even shop lifting. And meanwhile, walmart is over performing. They're doing just fine.

So I think the question you have to ask target now is at what point will you publicly recognize that maybe this is your fault, maybe this is an amErica and the consumers doing something wrong, maybe this is you doing something wrong, and maybe you need a drastic change because wall street isn't buying this narrative anymore. There's a reason the stock dropped more than twenty percent. They are just dumb with IT.

So I guess my question to you would be, what does the bedroom do now I think the activist point was a good one. IT seems like i'm sure a lot of activists are coming in here and looking to shake things up. But what you think the conversations in the board room of target are looking like right now.

what is probably going going to happen? And what the board to do is simple. They should fire the C.

E. O. And that is year year analysis is correct at some point.

It's about you, boss, you you know all the problems you are claiming that are these macro systemic issues walmart seems to have figured out. So it's simple here. The dog make melling gets a race and brian cornell gets fired.

He's been the C. E. O at the last ten years.

This company has underperformed dramatically its peer group. And maybe it's not a fault, but add a minimum. They need a fresh change and. The way I look would see us, people say fireroom see us make so much fuck and money, they should be held to .

a higher stand.

And this is what's going to have in the chairman of the board. I would bet in the next couple weeks, really. okay. Well, I I get the time around. This guide is on the Green mile.

He just says IT gets a call in the chairman and says, brian, yeah, you know, love you but we're going to make a change and they are going to give a golden parachute or they give him the ford best as options. But no, he should be. This is an easy one.

He is, in my opinion, after ten years of really mediocre performance, he absolutely deserves to be terminated in my view. Or or lego. And I would i'd be shocked if that didn't happen. And if that doesn't happen, that'll be the first thing on an activist power point deck is the management has vastly under performed. He has I want to be clear, he hasn't been a disaster, but these jobs are fairly kind of what have you done for me lately? And the last five years have not have not been strong.

absolutely. I just take one moment for you rap IT up here to talk about what walmart has done, right? Because, I mean, the stock is up one hundred and twenty percent in the past five years, and I feel like no one saw that coming.

Like walmart has generally been viewed as kind of a dinosaur and more importantly, a shady, competitive to amazon. I mean, I think the story that most people believe was that amazon gona kick the shit out of walmart. But we've done really, really well.

I think the question is, you know, what have they gotten right specifically? And just two things really jump out to me that the worth highlighting. The first is how they invested in econ.

So they made a set more than seven billion dollar investment in twenty twenty two to just revalidated of their technological inflections. And the business is the embers business is tarring it's up twenty seven percent year over year, and you compare that to target, which is up just ten percent. And you mention the fact that they have doubled that automated fulfillment volume.

I think that's really important. So one part of this is their embrace of technology. There are embrace of the internet, which is really paid off.

The second one is pricing, I know if you remember, but earlier this year will not came out with massive discounts when inflation was ripping. And our response was, one, we commended walmart and two, everyone's gona follow suit now. And that is exactly what happened. Target eventually decided to follow up and they offer for their own discounts.

But IT looks like IT was too late, and you always have to give credit to warm t for being so bold on pricing and recognizing that the most important thing is the foot traffic on the trust of their customers, as they said, fuck IT gonna reduce Prices before anyone else does. And IT seems to have really paid off in this culture at least. So there is my to stand out in terms of walmart performance. Hope you have some other observations on what they've got done.

well. So there's guy Bruce from canada economist that turn he taught me a framework that is just kind of change away. I look at shareholder value, and that is all shareholder value comes down to the relationship with the geometry between three lines.

The top line is perceived value. The middle mine is the Price you charge in. The bottom line is the cost.

And there's only two ways to great eroto value. You either increase percy value, Better merchandizing, Better branding, association of innovation, and then a perceive value goes up. You can have a lot of fun. You can either raise the Price, your charging, which creates greater margins because the delay between your costs and the Price go up, or you can leave the Price the same, and you should expand market chairs because the delta between the Price you charging in the pursue value goes up, increasing the value to the consumer in your market cargoes up.

Now the majority of shareholder value, I would argue, is around pushing the top line, the percy value up, right, great spokesperson tiger Williams or campaign, or we are the best, you know, we are tightly associated with this brave new future of A I. So we get a turn of traffic OpenAI and we can raise our Prices. What walmart is done is they brought in this guy's all that every day were trying to push down the cost line.

And then immediately, as soon as able to pull IT down, we pulled down the Price line that we charge consumers. We pass on those cost savings ings to consumer immediately, thereby increasing the delta between our Prices and in our perceived value, which should expand and share, which is exactly what what happened here. And the problem is, i've always told kids coming out of business school, you want to have a bias towards the company doing this increasing perceived value because when you're in the business of pushing down the line, it's purely a business of Operations and scale.

Dog named melon can make multibillion dollar investments in technology that mayor may not pay off to. Trying get cost down ten bps, he can make staggering investment. You see the same dynamic at at uber and lift the number one player has the scale where they can just make more bats.

And in this instance, when you're in the business of pushing the line down with your dell, with your home deepo, with your walmart, it's a business of scale and Operations. And right now, both of those things go to the market leader in the number two, quite Frankly, is is just feeling, is just feeling the pain of how much IT hurts you. One fifteen to the market cap to be the number two.

We'll be right back after the break with the look at calm costs spin off. If you're enjoying the show so far, kit, follow and leave us a review .

on profit markets.

Fox creative, this is advertiser content from zl. When you picture an online scammer, what do you see for the longer time we have these images of somebody sitting crotched over their computer with a hoody on just kind of typing away in the middle night? And honestly, that's not what IT is anymore.

That's E N. Mitchell, a banker turned fraud fighter. These days, online scams look more like crime sync ates than individual can artists, and they're making bank.

Last year, scammer made off with more than ten billion dollars. It's my blowing to see the kind of infrastructure that been built to facilitate scamming at scale. There are hundreds of, not thousands of scamp centres all around the world.

These are very savy business people. These are organized criminal rings. And so once we understand the the magnitude of this problem, we can protect people Better. One chAllenge that fraud fighters like ean face is that scan victims sometimes feel too ashamed to discuss what happened to them. But ian says one of our best differences is simple, we need to talk to each other.

We need to have those awkward conversations around what do you do if you have text messages you don't recognize? What do you do if you start getting asked to send information? More sensitive? Even my own father fell victim to a that could this a smaller dollar scan? But he fell victim.

And we have these conversations all the time, so we are all all at risk, and we all need to work together to protect each other, learn more about how to protect yourself. At box dot com, slash is out. And when using digital payment platforms, remember to only send money to people you know and trust. This is kris wisher and this week on my podcast on with Carry wish er I talk to Sharon in the god he's one of the hosts of incredibly popular radio show, the breakfast club, big podcasting and unofficial surrogate for vice present Harris during the election and he became an unwilling spokesperson for the trump campaign after is used in a very effective and deceptive anti trans ad. Here's a clip from our conversation.

I don't feel like your brain is wired to receive all the opinions at once, like I don't care that much about the opinions of other people who want to take them in daily that we're all in verbally abusive relationships with our song, phones and twitter and axa, whatever you call IT place a big, big role limit. He's a great entrepreneur, a really interesting person. And in twenty twenty five, i'm going to lean in to interviews like this about solutions and not necessarily just the problems.

Our full conversation is out. Now find that wherever you listen to podcast and follow on with careless wisher to hear lots of smart conversations like this one, welcome a small ball with me kini beaching. The eba season is here and all be with you. Break me down the games, the players and the drama. Every japp a euro step on the way the league is Better than it's f been in this season is up for the OK c live up to the hike with the nuggets.

Ts proved that last year was a fluke with the novo nix and car ethon towns break another trophy to new york like times approves to be the most piece for the rest or with the salt to be the first team to repeat champs since the warrior is back in twenty eighteen. Speak at the warriors. Don't worry.

This show isn't your typical warriors lakes and nix hot box. That's why i'll be talking about your team. The rockets impressive Young sea mino's chance is to surprise.

At the top of the west is inDiana, a sleeping in the east. And of course, all the cases all bring some experts, players and coach along maybe some areas every friday on youtube. And whenever you get your podcast.

We're back with profit markets. Its official calm cost is finally cutting the cord. The company is spinning off several of its cable TV networks into a new public entity temporarily named spin co.

This new company will include M S N B C, cnbc, USA, oxygen, e size I and the gulf channel. However, key assets like N B C bravo and streaming platform p ock will remain under the calm cost umbrella. So Scott, you predict this. This is a clip from september of twenty twenty three.

Let's play IT. There needs to be recognition that cable TV assets are no longer teenagers that are going to keep growing, that they're, in fact, ana pop pop and need to be made comfortable. These things are dying and they need to be managed for cash flow, not starved of investment, but stopped a flus nation that these things are ever gone to reignite growth again.

So my prediction is you're going to see one or more players shed their assets into a different hold cow to clean up their story. And also for consolidation and scale, there needs to be a bunch of these things wrap together. So there's one sales rap and checkers of oak selling ads on the cartoon networker would have you and on muck you on fuck the story that his media company is. Now that i've growth but also have declining assets in the same portfolio.

I say I can I can feel you smiling other side of the screen .

and let's be honest, i'm touching my nipples. This is the most turned on. I have been, I mean, granted, I don't know, a single fuck and coin, and i've keep waiting for a video to go back to ten bugs to share.

But let's be honest, the dog is howling on this one. The dog is howling. Yeah, this was like, this was obvious. And effectively what you have is when you miss match families of different generations under one stocktaking er, you have good assets that are growing in the market values as growth or as consumers, not in cash flow. And then you have city businesses that are declining and that but still produce cash flow.

Investors in the market don't know what to do, so what they do as they find the studious assets trading at the lowest multiple, and they are sign that entire multiple of the whole thing. So the devastator of assets in different sort of stages of the lifecycle here creates more clarity and ultimately create a that's greater than the some of its part. So the disposition are clarity around a brand architecture that spins these low performing or declining but high cash ful assets into a separate company is a very good idea.

And then they will have their own currency to go buy A B C or you know gravel five or CNN because everyone, whether it's eiger or is az law, is in the same position. And that to say have some amazing assets that would be valued at x and they have other assets that are valued at point three x. So the market signs that point three to the entire portfolio.

This is a good move. IT will be used potentially as a shell company to go and acquire other declining but high cash, low assets. And I remind people that the second best investment I ever made was in a yellow pages company.

And I was very simple. We knew these things were going away. They were declining at seven, twelve percent year. But there are still a lot of people that want a big fat fuck and book delivered to their home and rural wherever in case they need a paloma, and they still have a diet phone. And these businesses still want a lot of cash form.

What we would do is go by the biggest yellow pages company in the southeast and say, okay, you're fuck, we're fuck, let's be fuck together in the way will do this is will take your ten percent. Your best sales people are going to lay off your entire administrative staff. We're going to close your headquarters now.

And as long as we can cut cost faster, then the revenue declines based on consolidation in the fact we can pick these assets up on the cheap every year. This company um increased as cash flow and this specific company then took a lot of that cash flow and started trying to transition to A C C R M software company. Actually did IT quite well. But consolidation of mature or declining assets can be a great business because typically, these businesses don't go away as quickly as you think they're going to. And as long as you take sort of a private equity cost cutting approach and stop trying to inject boat talks and filling into this thing that to IT under the illusion it's going to look Young again, it's not going to.

So just on your point about depress valuation. So we look at how much revenue these assets actually generate of a calm cause that comes out to around seven billion dollars. Now we don't know what the profitability is exactly.

I think we can assume it's IT is quite profitable, but there are public companies out there that are quite similar to this business in the example we could use as fox corporation, which has a Price to sales multiple of one and a half. So if we would apply the same multiple, this segment is probably worth ten and half billion dollars. And you compare that to the overall market cap of calm costs, which is more than one hundred and sixty billion.

So wall street hates table in the same way that they hated yellow pages. My question to you though, from an investing perspective, you said that yellow pages was one of your best investments. What made you so good big? Did you did you sell your stake at some point at a higher Price? Or was that the fact that cash flows were high and you are receiving direct income? What made IT such a good investment?

So I invested in the company probably the Better part of ten years ago, and you could for a dollar cash for you had to you had to spend two and five dollars on the company. And so we knew these comes were going out of business, but they they weren't going out of business in thirty months. So within three years, the company, just in cash low, could return all of the initial investment to the investors.

Well, and this is what IT comes right down to. It's very similar. Everything we replicates nature or human interaction.

And that is if you have the chance, i'm going to have one because I want to hang out with hot Young people or hard, successful people. I am not going to I don't know the golden girl's reunion. I don't want to hang out with old people.

And we attracted the youth and vigor and growth. And so these Young, vigorous, growing companies get an enormous multiple because we all want to hang out with them, right? So they trade a much higher multiples.

And if you look at the most successful ful businesses, uh, in terms of likelihood of success from the average is fourteen percent. Only one out of seven companies services, but ninety plus percent is senior care homes. If you're willing to go into the business of taking care of seniors, nine not attending these businesses work.

But there's an absence of capital because they're not as fun or sexy. They're not growing. People don't like to be around old people.

It's the same with distressed asset. Everybody wants to hang out with a OpenAI. Everybody wants to hang out with a video. They don't want to be distressed asset. So if you go up and down the stack from Angel to venture to IPO s, to growth, to mature, to declining, to distress, hands down, the most successful, greatest likely out of successful found in the stack in terms of a capital and asked around the light, it's distressed because you can pick up shed at ot pennies on the dollar.

I guess it's interesting to me. I mean, I consider I think that I think like a value investor. I think i'm a value investor. And I guess the thing that i've always felt with distressed assets is IT feels as though what you have to do is you're getting a really good Price. You're buying a really good Price.

But then what do you do with IT? You're sitting with this pile of shit that you could make look a little bit less like a pile of shit. And my assumption has always been okay. Well, you just got a flip IT at some point. But what's interesting about what you described with the other pages is actually IT was a good long term investment because of how profitable IT was and because you could use those profits to then revise the company and turn IT into A C R. M, which is far more sustainable over the long term than what IT was before.

And so I want to continue with this yellow pages analogy, because thing is a good, what do you think the makeup looks like for M S N B C 和 C N B C and saphie and all of these channels？ What does the cr fiction of this spinky? How will that play out?

Do you think I don't have a vision for a new business that they could pour their cash loan to, to turn this to pip with this company? And also, you don't need to do that because these companies, there's just going to be a lot of people watching C M, B, C. In an Andrew ross orkan who is an extraordinary journalist, in j caran, who is not they are going to be watching these things for a long time.

And there's still can be advertisers that want to reach people who are seventy right average age of a ema, B C VR. The conversations and I know this first hand happening with all of these anchors is the following um Chris wallace, we love you, your iconic, you're fantastic. Last year we we you know when we we're trying to convince ourselves, we get inject boat talks and filter into our face, and we have this idea for scene and plus.

And we wanted to take you from fox. We offered you a four or five year deal at eight million a year. That's whatever red, I would bet they said we love you.

You're great. We're willing to pay you a million box year, the salary cuts, the cost cutting. We did an analysis of of how many people we need at this podcast.

We're getting like triple or quadruple the number of views per person than these big from these firms are routed the same place. The anchor share are pilots for for you know for pan am in the seventies, the bang and studies. They're hyper tige, but they know the writings on the wall.

They're going to be making sixty eight thousand dollars working for spirit airlines going from lousianner ashrae pretty soon, even if they don't find another thing. These comes as long as they keep acquiring and consolidating and cut in costs, which they will do, they will figure out a way to return all of that capital to shareholders really quickly because the share Price will be low to buy in and I ll make really good money. I would actually rather I think i'd rather invest in this spin co, then in the core, comcast because it'll be at a lower valuation.

There's a lot of properties. Hey, bob, are you ready to finally sell your shit to us? We'll take IT will will take IT off your hands, will pay you a awful Price, but your stock Price will go up because the mark will be focused on your parks and on disney plus, which are great businesses. Instead of constantly asking you about E S P, N and abc and you having to apologize forward every three months.

I let's put a consorting together, take a majority stake and that's call a dog or a dog dog. It's you like the week head, we'll see the earnings from dell crowd strike and H. P. I will also see the possible al consumption expenditure index for october.

And fascinates on story going to there's a tonic capital on the sidelines. Some stuff is getting cheap. Great, iconic companies is getting cheap. In my beats, two of my favor candidates are now in intel and target and just before we go.

we we'll be recording and ask me anything episode de at the end of year. So please send in your questions for me and Scott to office hours at profit media dot com or you can tag us on social media at proof pod or you can leave us a comment on our youtube channel. Anything is fair game.

Send to cy questions. This episode, reduced by cella and engineered by Benjamin spender associated produce the mice musical. Various are research just algona or research associate.

Robert is our technical director and Catherine Dylan is our executive producer. Thank you for listen to property markets from the vox media podcasts network. If you like what you heard, give us a follow and join us for a fresh take on markets on monday.

And I think what's happened with target, well, yeah hello, okay, classes or a little cost possible skill from l peto. That's right. That's right and was okay. We are worry otg.