When you think of a successful protest movement, most Americans probably think of the American Civil Rights Movement and the March on Washington in 1963. It was such a joyous day. There was such a broad array of support from whites, Jews, Christians, labor. For those of us who were born in segregation, as I was, to come and see this array of powerful white Americans
That's activist Roger Wilkins recalling the historic day. In 2008, Wilkins and Martin Luther King Jr. biographer Taylor Branch spoke to NPR for the 45th anniversary of that march and Dr. King's famous speech.
The day was a powerful and star-studded event, attracting the likes of singer Harry Belafonte, union leader A. Philip Randolph, and of course, Martin Luther King Jr. But at the time, Branch says, Washington was bracing itself for immense violence as protesters filled the city. They expected riot and mayhem.
to a degree that is almost impossible to apprehend today unless you go back and read the records. Liquor sales were canceled in the District of Columbia for the first time since the end of Prohibition in 1933.
Plasma was stockpiled. Electro surgery was canceled. But of course, that didn't happen. And the March on Washington is remembered as the model of peaceful and effective protest, despite the passion that it brought the hundreds of thousands to Washington that day. You can hear that passion in the voice of John Lewis, then the chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. Those who are there, be patient and wait.
We must say that we cannot be patient. We do not want our freedom gradually, but we want to be free now. And of course, at 5 o'clock that day, I have the pleasure to present to you Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr., standing behind a podium on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered his most famous speech in a line that would come to define the goals of the civil rights movement. I have a dream that my
I have a dream today.
President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act just nine months after the march. A year after that, Johnson signed the National Voting Rights Act of 1965. Consider this. The quest for equality still continues. In the decades since that bright summer day in August 1963, many other Americans have tried to use the model of protest to achieve their political goals. But do protests work? No.
From NPR, I'm Juana Summers.
This message comes from Schwab. At Schwab, how you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own. Plus, get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award-winning service, low costs, and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more.
This message comes from Greenlight. Adults with financial literacy skills have 82% more wealth than those who don't. From swimming lessons to piano classes, parents invest in so many things to enrich kids' lives. But are you investing in their future financial success? With Greenlight, you can teach your kids financial literacy skills like earning, saving, and investing. Start prioritizing their financial education and future today with a risk-free trial at greenlight.com slash NPR.
Support for NPR comes from the Wallace Foundation, an independent, nonpartisan research foundation collaborating with grantees and partners in the arts, school leadership, and youth development. More at wallacefoundation.org. ♪
It's Consider This from NPR. The first hundred days of Donald Trump's second presidential term have been characterized by layoffs of federal workers, questionable deportations of protesters, and his unusual relationship with Elon Musk. And through all of that, there have been protests in different parts of the country. Donald Trump has got to go away!
That's sound from one of the 1,300 hands-off rallies that took place on April 5th. But are those protests changing any minds or changing any policies? Those are questions I put to Harvard Kennedy School of Government political scientist Erica Chenoweth. What is it that makes a protest effective? So the literature really suggests that there are four key things that help social movements in general succeed.
So one of the things is size. So a very large protest is much more likely to get noticed, to demonstrate people power, to have a large symbolic impact, and potentially to begin to shift people's understandings about the stakes of an event or a set of claims that are emerging from it.
A very diverse crowd also suggests that whatever the protesters are saying is something that's widely shared. Protests that are disciplined, that is to say that they stick to their own message and their own plan tactically, are more likely to elicit sympathy or sympathetic views. And the movements that are the most effective are those that begin to shift the loyalties of people in different pillars of support.
As I think about some of the biggest protests that I've seen, at least in my lifetime, they've come from the political left. I'm thinking about things like the Black Lives Matter movement, Me Too, the war in Gaza. I wonder, has that been the case historically?
You know, a prominent paper actually looks at the impacts of the Tea Party protests of April 15th of 2009 on the 2010 midterm elections. So what they did find is that having a Tea Party protest in one's district and having it be a particularly large protest was strongly problematic.
correlated, basically, to whether Tea Party candidates both, you know, won the primaries and then won those elections. And so we see that whether it's on the right or left, there's a pretty consistent story in the role of protests and shifting electoral behavior, even if those
The impacts on elections are modest in terms of the percentage of the vote that might be shifted. And then just about three weeks ago, a paper came out basically arguing that the same story did hold with regard to the Black Lives Matter protests over the summer of 2020 impacting vote share in the 2020 presidential election.
You know, we've largely been backward looking and discussing what makes protests effective or successful. But I am curious because we're in a very different political moment here in the United States where rules and norms are changing and in many cases being ignored. Do you think that the lessons that we've been talking about today apply to the current political moment? I think they do. I don't have any reason to believe that the general principles of what has made democracy movements successful in the past would not apply here.
There are a couple of caveats to that. The first is that the United States is a massive country. The other caveat, though, is that during the period that most of the research has been done about what makes movements succeed, that period was the period of basically U.S. global hegemony. So the sort of post-World War II period is when we saw movement
mass nonviolent civil resistance movements become an important engine driving democratic transitions and the global spread of democracy over the next number of years and decades. But if the United States is not anymore in a position where it is even just representing that it itself is committed to democracy at home and abroad,
then we are in somewhat unchartered territory. I have a question for you about what pushes people to actually take to the streets. You earlier mentioned the example of South Korea, where, of course, there was this dramatic event, this declaration of martial law that happened, and that triggered massive protests. I wonder if
Is it more difficult for protests to gain stream if, say, for instance, rights are the rule of law are infringed on bit by bit rather than with a big catalyzing moment like that one that we've been talking about? I do think that a bright line like that, a catalyzing moment, can really snap people into action. And there's a sense that once you sort of break through that,
whatever was holding the person back from participating, once they break through that barrier, whether it's fear or just apathy or demoralization, that there's actually like no going back. There's no way to predict that.
what types of triggers will lead people to that outcome, but certainly a coup attempt would be one of them or some kind of sudden and shocking usurpation of power. And then there are sort of two others that people have found in the literature that tend to be common triggers. One is a stolen election or an election that obviously is rife with such significant problems that basically nobody believes really the outcome is.
and then incidences of police brutality or brutality by state authorities, which can often trigger demands for accountability. And then if those demands are suppressed, that can then trigger a much broader set of demands by a much broader set of people for justice. We've been speaking with Erica Chenoweth, author and civil resistance researcher. Thank you. Thank you.
This episode was produced by Megan Lim. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sammy Yannigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Juana Summers.
Support for NPR and the following message come from Washington Wise. Decisions made in Washington can affect your portfolio every day. Washington Wise from Charles Schwab is an original podcast that unpacks the stories making news in Washington. Listen at schwab.com slash Washington Wise.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Comcast. Every day, thousands of Comcast engineers and technologists put people at the heart of everything they create. Because when products are designed with people first, they have the power to connect everyone. Visit ComcastCorporation.com to learn more.
Support for this podcast and the following message come from Allianz Travel Insurance. You're so excited to finally make it to Ireland, but the stomach bug you caught in Dublin wasn't exactly on your bucket list. Benefits like emergency medical coverage can have your back. Learn more at allianztravelinsurance.com.