Deep Dive
Shownotes Transcript
Want the same expert advice you get from the pros in the store while shopping online at DiscountTire.com? Meet Treadwell, your personal online tire guide that matches you with the perfect tire for your vehicle. Get your best match in one minute or less with Treadwell by Discount Tire. Let's get you taken care of.
This episode is brought to you by Progressive, where drivers who save by switching save nearly $750 on average, plus auto customers qualify for an average of seven discounts. Quote now at Progressive.com to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates.
National average 12-month savings of $744 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential savings will vary, discounts not available in all states and situations.
A more colorful life starts at an Ashley store. From earth tones to vibrant colors, Ashley stores have an array of eye-catching furniture for every room in fun and trending hues that will leave a lasting impression. So it's easier than ever to express your personal style and design a vibrant home that feels just like you. Your more colorful life starts at an Ashley store. Shop in-store or online at ashley.com.
This is Episode 9, Years to Wait. In 2001, newly minted St. Joseph County Special Crimes Unit investigator Craig Whitfield began carefully opening up boxes. In them were pictures, interview transcripts, pieces of evidence, all related to the Pelley family murders. A crime that after 12 years was still puzzlingly unsolved.
It was one of those things where it didn't seem to be clear from the outside looking in what happened. There were a lot of rumors at the time. There seemed like there's always a lot of rumors when a homicide like that occurs. A lot of speculation. People talk. Craig was a retired police detective from Mishawaka, Indiana. He'd applied to work on a new cold case crimes unit that county prosecutor Chris Toth had created.
Prosecutor Chris Toth was starting up a cold case squad. The county had 140 or 150 unsolved homicides, and he felt that it would be beneficial to have a cold case squad, and I applied for that position. And so I was one of two cold case investigators at that time.
Craig now works as a hospital police officer in South Bend. But in 2001, when he took the cold case job, he had 19 years of detective experience and had spent 24 years on the Mishawaka police force. When it came to the Pelley murders, he was taking on a mammoth case, and he knew it. There's intense, intense scrutiny on the case. It's high profile. It was a national story, even before they had social media.
What was your first step in reopening the investigation that many years later? I read all the reports first, went through them, read them a couple times, two or three times, made copies of all the reports, highlighted things I thought was interesting or pertinent, things I wanted to follow up on, people I wanted to talk to, try to drill down on things that people had said or suggested.
And then once I felt like I had a really good understanding of the case, then I pulled all the evidence out to see what was there, see what's missing. What was missing, according to Craig, was follow-up on several pieces of the initial investigation. Most notably, follow-up with witnesses. Some people had been spoken to a few times, some just once, and others not at all. As he was getting his bearings on the case, Craig talked often with John Bowditch, who was a personal friend.
After their conversations, Craig established a mindset. Jeff was a suspect from the beginning. And with that, he set out to see if Jeff really did kill his family. I've read all of Craig's case reports from 2001 and 2002, and I can confirm he did re-interview a lot of people. He tracked down and spoke with everyone who'd given statements to police in 1989. People like Darla, Lynette Greer, Matt Miller, Sheila and Irish Saunders, and Kim Oldenburg.
He even took a hard look at Jonathan Herseg, the guy who Jeff had stolen from prior to the murders. Craig interviewed John twice in one week, just to make sure he wasn't hiding anything. But each time, John adamantly denied any involvement in the Pelley murders, and he said he and Jeff had mended fences weeks before the killings.
In the 12 years that had passed, reports had trickled into the St. Joseph County police from people who claimed John had gotten rid of a bag of bloody clothes for Jeff after the murders. Craig had to ask John about the accusation. But John said all of those stories were false and came from people who used drugs trying to get back at him for petty beefs.
In the end, Craig said he eventually ruled John out as a suspect. We did interview him two or three times. And I think...
He had been interviewed several times by John Bowditch and Mark Senter before. So it wasn't like it was just overlooked. I mean, he was interviewed. Was there ever an alibi established for him that you remember that really made it to go, okay, let's focus elsewhere? Because I didn't see any of that in the reports other than he said he was home or with friends. Well, I want to say that I talked to his friends, you know, and
You can go as far as the evidence will let you go. So without reading my report, I can't really answer that because I don't remember all the detail of the interview. I mean, we talked to so many people. At some point, it became that he was, it didn't make sense again. A lot of things just have to make sense. When you say make sense, that it didn't make sense for him to be a viable suspect? Yeah, at some point, you channel your energy in the direction that the evidence is taking you and
At that point, it didn't make sense that he is that guy that you need to be focusing all your energy on. We focused energy on him, but I think in the end, again, when you look at the bigger picture, if you look at the bigger picture, it circles back to Jeff Pelley. He's the one that had the motive.
By summer 2002, Craig had done a lot of interviews, but none as important as the ones he conducted with Jackie Pelley and Jessica, Jeff's two surviving sisters. Jessica had lived a hard life, bouncing in and out of foster care and struggling with substance use issues. When Craig located her, she'd moved far away from Indiana, was a mother of two kids, and hadn't spoken with Jackie or Jeff in years.
She had no idea that law enforcement suspected Jeff of the murders. In fact, she didn't even know that it was a homicide case. For years, Jessica had been told that Bob was responsible for a murder-suicide. I didn't find out until I was in my 20s, when the detectives came to my house. And how did that all go down? You know, they asked me who I thought had done it, and I said Bob, and they said, there's no way. I was like, what?
They're like, no, he was shot twice. There's no way possible he could have done it. And then my mind automatically went to Jeff. With Craig sitting in her living room more than a decade after her two sisters and mother were gunned down, Jessica thought about a strange interaction she had with Jeff six years after the murders, when she was just 15 years old. It was the last time she'd seen or spoken with him.
I thought it was weird because he called. I don't know how he found out where I was. I don't know how he got the number, but he ended up calling while my foster mom was going through some stuff. So it just was very convenient that he called and said, you know, hey, do you want to come visit? Jeff had invited teenage Jessica to Florida to spend time with him and his new wife, Kim. I remember him having a significant other. So I was like, okay. And then I kind of needed someplace to stay at that point. So I went there for two weeks and
Yep, he picked me up from the airport. I remember going back to his house. You know, he showed me the room I was going to be staying in. And then all of a sudden he just was like, well, who do you think did it? And I was like, uh, your dad? And then he just, he's like, oh, okay. And then kind of dropped it. Like, I didn't think much at the time. I thought it was weird, but, you know, of course he's going to ask me. We haven't seen each other in five years, so...
you know, didn't think much of it at that point. So in that moment when Jeff asks you, who do you think did it? And you say, I think it was your dad. We know that that would have been an opportunity for Jeff to say, well, listen, Jesse, there's really no way because there was no firearm found. Maybe he didn't say that because he thought it would be more damaging to you. But now looking back,
What do you think about the fact that he didn't say that? Do you think he was protecting you or do you think that he was... No. I think he was fishing. I really do. Because why would you just ask that one question and not say anything else? Thinking back, I think he wanted to know if I thought it was him. Craig took the information Jessica gave him and moved on to interview Jackie. By 2002, Jackie had also long left Indiana and was married with kids.
Jackie definitely took a more aggressive approach when it came to cooperating with Craig's investigation. When the two of them finally sat down to talk, Jackie brought a lawyer. I was tired of every time, every time I have been interviewed by the police, things getting twisted around. And so I thought for my own peace of mind, I want to record it and I want somebody else present because I'm just tired of things getting twisted around. And so they...
presented it as, "Oh, hey, we're just here because, you know, we got this cold case unit going on and we're reinvestigating everything." I can tell you that when they left, that the attorney that we had sit in said, "They are absolutely after your brother and they're not looking at anybody else." The noose was tightening around Jeff. Craig was convinced more than ever that Jeff had gotten away with murder, especially when Craig took into account Jeff's 1994 fraud conviction.
Adding to that were letters Craig found stuffed away in the evidence boxes that were handwritten by Bob himself. Bob had penned these messages to Jeff in the years prior to his death. One letter showed how for years Bob had pleaded with Jeff to correct his attitude and behaviors. Here's a voice actor to read a few excerpts from it. October 10th, 1985. Dear Jeff, I know I'm not always as wise as I need to be as a parent.
Indeed, I often wonder if I even qualify as a father. I realize too that I'm not always right, but I do try. Sometimes I feel like running away too, but in my maturity, I know that won't really help anything. I love you. No questions about it, no reservations. I love you. Nothing you might ever do will change that. I know that you've had inner struggles and that things haven't been easy for you since mom's illness began. These are some of the things I expect of you.
1. Complete your chores in a timely manner without me constantly reminding you. 2. Watch your choice of words. This includes crap, shut up, bull, etc. You are intelligent enough to know which words I find offensive and or inappropriate. 3. Show proper respect. Your attitude, actions, and words all reflect your respect or lack of it.
I'm not trying to restrict your creativeness or mold you into someone else. I'm trying to direct you, to help you become all that you can be with the least amount of struggle for you. Finally, understand this. Life is not always easy or fair, but I will always be there to try and help you if you want me to. Love, your dad, and proud of it.
Craig knew that building a circumstantial case against Jeff with a few old letters and a couple of new interviews wasn't going to be enough to file charges. Not by a long shot. Craig needed what investigators had been unable to find for more than a decade. Hard evidence that proved Jeff pulled the trigger inside the parsonage.
Do you want to set your child up for success? IXL Learning is an online learning program for kids covering math, language arts, science, and social studies. IXL is designed to help them really understand and master topics in a fun way. Powered by advanced algorithms, IXL gives the right help to each kid no matter the age or personality. IXL is used in 95 of the top 100 school districts in the U.S.
There's one site for all the kids in your home, pre-K to 12th grade. Kids can even access IXL on the go through the app or on your phone or tablet. No more trying to figure out how to explain math equations or grammar rules yourself. IXL has built-in explanation videos.
And look, my son is only two and a half right now, but I can already tell by the time he is in school, he is going to appreciate having someone explain why something is the way it is. He doesn't like just to be told. So those explanation videos are going to be super helpful. Make an impact on your child's learning. Get IXL now. And CounterClock listeners can get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when they sign up today at ixl.com slash clock.
Visit iXL.com slash clock to get the most effective learning program out there at the best price.
This message is sponsored by Greenlight. A new school year is starting soon, and if you're a parent, you want to make this school year an opportunity for your kids to learn important life skills and continue building independence. For that, there's Greenlight. Greenlight is a debit card and money app for families where kids learn how to save, invest, and spend wisely, and parents can keep an eye on kids' new money habits.
There's even Greenlight's Infinity Plan, which includes the same access to financial literacy education that makes Greenlight a valuable resource for millions of parents and kids. Plus, built-in safety to give you peace of mind. My son is only two and a half, but already he knows what a card is and what it does. He actually took it up to a vending machine the other day, swiped it, and, well, let's just say he's going to be a spender when he's older.
And so Greenlight is the perfect thing for him. There's even a chores feature that lets you reward your kids for honoring their responsibilities around the house. So what are you waiting for? Sign up for Greenlight today and get your first month free when you go to greenlight.com slash counterclock. That's greenlight.com slash counterclock to try Greenlight for free. greenlight.com slash counterclock.
In July 2002, Craig Whitfield typed up an investigative summary of the physical evidence in the Pelley case. By that point, he'd read through all of the police reports from 1989 and, in his opinion, felt the evidence and testimony established that a load of laundry was washed in the Parsonage's machine on April 29th of '89.
In the boxes of evidence, Craig had found items of Jeff's clothing packaged in a brown paper bag with a Lakeville local grocery store logo on the side of it. The name of the store was Anna's Grocery. FBI agents who'd reviewed the bag and all of its contents back in 1989 had made black markings on the side of it indicating chain of custody.
Craig determined that the clothing in the bag had to be the items officers reportedly removed from the Pelley's washing machine, though that was never noted explicitly in any reports. Craig believed the clothing was what Jeff had worn while murdering his family. The articles, according to Craig, were a dark and pink striped shirt, a pair of blue jeans, and two white socks.
Based on what I read, because I wasn't at the original crime scene, I saw all the pictures and read all the reports. But my take on it was that they were washed, they were in the washer. The FBI had found 34 coins and a dollar bill totaling $4.50 in a pocket of the jeans. Alongside the money was a paper receipt for Anna's grocery. You saw the packaging of the blue jeans when you took them from evidence, right?
I think I have a photo, but yeah, I'd love to see it. Yeah. Well, I, yeah. So this is a photo of a state in which the genes and the packaging of the genes were with the receipt and the coins are in that general area. But when you took the blue jeans out of the evidence boxes, how were they packaged? What were indicators to you as what that meant about these blue jeans?
I don't remember exactly how they were packaged. They had been sent to the FBI for examination. And I recall opening the packaging and looking inside just to see what was there. But the one thing that struck me was that the contents of the pocket, it was a bunch of coins and a receipt from the very same day that the murders happened. It had the right date, but there was no time on it, unfortunately.
Photos of this evidence are on our website if you want to take a look. Craig argued that the blue jeans being in the washer was incriminating and enough probable cause to seek Jeff's arrest. Craig believes the money and receipt were left in the pocket because Jeff wore them while murdering his family. Then was in such a rush to take them off and wash them, he forgot to remove the change. It was so odd that if you're going to throw your jeans in the washer,
you're going to know that those coins are in there. And so I think you're really in a rush to throw the jeans in the washer. But when I really thought about that logic, it doesn't make sense. For one, not a single police report from 1989 actually states that a police officer removed blue jeans from the washing machine. In fact, John Pavlikovich's letter to the FBI from May 16th of 1989 does not list blue jeans at all.
It only lists the dark and pink striped shirt and white socks as coming from the washer. And Pavlikovich himself didn't even personally handle those items. He claimed another officer did. Then there's John Bowditch's reports that don't mention blue jeans in the washer either.
There's a lot of talk between officers of, "I was told they were taken from the washing machine. I looked over and saw items being removed." But there isn't a particular officer or sergeant or detective who says, "I took them out, put them in the bag, went straight to the police department." Would it be best if you had somebody saying, "I took them out of the washer, put my initials on them, put them in the bag,
sealed it with evidence tape, made a property receipt on it, and submitted it into a locker for keeping, for secure keeping. So that's always the best thing. So now if you have somebody who says, okay, well, I saw him do that, you know, that's not the best, but it's still not bad. You saw him do it. If somebody saw him do it,
That certainly leaves the door open for the argument. But if somebody saw that person do it and they forgot to put it in the report, then they have some explaining to do. Yeah, I'll say. Adding to my doubt that the jeans were ever in the washer is the fact that no police report ever mentions an Anna's grocery store bag being used to store evidence of the crime scene.
If Craig is so convinced that Jeff wore blue jeans while committing the murders and then threw them in the washing machine, then how did Darla, Dennis Nicodemus, Mark Berger, and Lynette Greer see Jeff in blue jeans when he arrived to change into his tuxedo? Every one of those witnesses told police that they saw Jeff wearing a black Hawaiian shirt and blue jeans on his way to and at Lynette's home. There's also Jeff's own words.
When I went to go to Lynette's house, I changed into a pair of blue jeans and a Hawaiian shirt. But Craig says you can't believe Jeff. He could be lying. But like I said, even if you discount Jeff as a liar, there were several other people who witnessed him wearing his blue jeans after he left the parsonage. Craig is convinced, though, that those eyewitness accounts either aren't accurate or Jeff was wearing a different pair of pants in front of all those people, not blue jeans.
The problem with that, though, is there's never been another pair of pants integral to this case other than the blue jeans. I pressed on with Craig. If the blue jeans were what Jeff wore during the murders and then threw in the washer, how did the coins, as Craig says, stay in the pocket? And even more glaring, why would police at the crime scene have packaged clothing evidence in a paper grocery store bag?
If the jeans go through a cycle in the washer, how do the coins stay in the pocket? And then how is that receipt even readable if they went through a wash cycle? Because it's readable. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I've done it. I've seen coins. I've, you know, left a few coins in my pocket before and they get washed and they're still in there. The pocket gets twisted a little bit and it's all it's trapped in there.
And maybe it depends on what type of ink, you know, with today's receipts, they're heat generated, you know, the type of receipts maybe. But this here is actually ink. And you can tell by looking at it, it's smeared a little bit, but it's still readable, very readable. So it was your determination that that receipt was in the pocket with the coins, not just in the Anna's grocery store bag, like at the bottom or anything like that? No, I mean, I believe it was probably in the pocket. Yeah. Yeah.
Why would evidence that was taken from a washing machine be put into a paper grocery sack? I mean, that doesn't seem like a good way to preserve evidence at all, but is that something that was just commonplace by police officers in 1989? Well, I can't speak for what the investigators at that time did, but biological evidence cannot be put in plastic.
So if there's any biological evidence on the genes, it would need to be put in paper. Why is that? Because it just, it breathes and it won't destroy evidence. A plastic bag? Plastic will. Plastic will, paper won't. Okay. So you get, you get the, there's that breathability, you know, factor built in. But I don't know what they were thinking. I wasn't there, but, and I noticed this here, a bag thing.
It says Anna's Finer Foods on it. I wasn't there, so I don't know if anybody went to Anna's Grocery that day or if Jeff went there. I presume he did because the receipt was what I believe was in his pocket. You might be suggesting that it was in the bag that the evidence was put in. That's exactly what I'm thinking. Mostly because no one in the entire case timeline saw Jeff at Anna's Grocery store on Saturday, April 29th.
Officers in 1989 never visited the store to interview staff and corroborate if Jeff had been there on Saturday to even make the purchase from the receipt. So my next question was, how is it even possible Jeff's blue jeans contained that legible receipt if he never went to the store? Craig couldn't answer that question. Yeah, some things it's easy to corroborate at the time, but then when you try to do it many years later, it's impossible. But as far as...
talking to anybody that actually said, "Yeah, I saw Jeff at Anna's Grocery." I don't recall talking to anybody that said that. I would have to refer back to my reports, but I don't recall anybody saying that they had seen him there. Based on everything I've investigated for over a year in this case, I think Craig made a mistake regarding the blue jeans. Now, I know that's a bold thing for a journalist to say about a seasoned cop, but follow me for just a second.
When you look at the evidence and read the interview transcripts in detail and lay them out side by side, they actually support a scenario where Jeff wore his blue jeans out of the parsonage when he left for prom. It's undisputed that he changed into his tux at Lynette's house and put his street clothes in a bag and eventually that bag went into his trunk.
In my research, I've discovered that Lynette's mother, Rebecca Greer, who was helping the teens get ready for prom, worked at Anna's grocery store in 1989. She very likely could have had an Anna's grocery store bag at her home for Jeff to throw his street clothes into. I also believe the reports and evidence show that when police in '89 searched Jeff's car, they took some of his clothes that were in the trunk.
St. Joseph County police reports vary on when this seizure happened, but in John Pawlikowicz's May 16th letter to the FBI, he wrote that Jerry Rutowski, quote, "found a Hawaiian shirt in the trunk of the suspect's car when apprehended," end quote. For some reason, though, Pawlikowicz didn't mention where Jeff's blue jeans came from.
What I believe is that the Annis Paper grocery store bag always contained Jeff's blue jeans and Hawaiian shirt and was in the trunk of his car. That bag got stored with evidence for years, and when Craig pulled it out in 2002, he believed those were the clothes that came from the washing machine. I think he thought that because there were some vague references in police reports that articles of Jeff's clothing were found in the washer.
Later, when forensic results from the crime lab came back, they stated that no blood was ever found on the blue jeans and they had signs of soiling.
I don't think the blue jeans alone prove Jeff is guilty or innocent one way or the other. I just think this one piece of evidence was misinterpreted when it was reinvestigated. And it's going to be a really big point of contention when authorities go after Jeff for the murders in the next episode. In the end, Craig Whitfield stands by his interpretation of the blue jeans. He believes they were washed and that Jeff wore them to commit the murders.
Craig blames officers bad record keeping in 1989 as to why doubt could exist about whether the jeans were washed or not. In this particular case, this officer probably would have definitely stumbled around trying to explain, you know, how he collected these jeans, this shirt and socks as evidence. Do you think it's within the realm of possibility that perhaps the blue jeans that are in this grocery store bag were worn by Jeff?
out of the home, he changed into his tuxedo, and that these jeans ended up in the trunk of his car and were taken in this bag and put into evidence and maybe just labeled as these are the ones that were taken from the washing machine, but in fact they were taken from some other point in time. Do you think that's within the realm of possibility? I kind of doubt it, only because I think
You're saying they would be put in the trunk of the car with other evidence probably, right? So... Whatever was taken from him when he was questioned or taken from Great America, anything that was taken from him after prom, after everything. Yeah. That's the problem when you don't have the report. You can make up
Whatever you want it to be, you can suggest this or suggest that. The defense can argue whatever they want to argue to take away from the fact that somebody said they saw him take the jeans out of the washer. He didn't say he took the jeans, the officer didn't say he took the jeans from the washer, but somebody said they saw him do it. So it makes it complicated. Very complicated.
The questions I was asking Craig were not ones he had to answer back in 2002. Back then, he forged ahead, claiming the jeans were washed. He wrote up a probable cause statement for Jeff's arrest. It was based on the same circumstantial information that had always existed in the case, plus his theory about the blue jeans.
The prosecutor approved the warrant and on August 10th, 2002, Jeff Pelley was arrested for four counts of first-degree murder, 13 years after the crime. Craig and a SWAT team had surrounded Jeff's home in Florida, but he wasn't there. Jeff, now 30 years old, was actually in Los Angeles, California, coming back from an international work trip. He was coming back from Australia and he was at LAX in Los Angeles and came in and
Customs checked him and he had a warrant, a murder warrant. And so he wasn't that interested in saying much at that point. It was time for Jeff to get a lawyer. He was going down for murder. His motive, he was 17 at the time, he was grounded, and he wanted to attend prom. Next up, the high-profile trial that sealed Jeff's fate and forever changed everything about this case.
Listen to Episode 10, Trial Phase, Part 1, right now. Voters know that bad weather, like storms, lightning, and wind, can turn a fun day on the water into a challenge.
But what if you had satellite-delivered weather data giving you the full picture of what's around you, even when you're offshore and out of cell range? With SiriusXM Marine, get up-to-date weather directly on your boat's display. Features include radar, lightning, marine warnings, wind and wave info, and much more. And for offshore anglers, imagine having a guide that tells you where it might be best to cast your line. Fish mapping does just that. It's 8
fishing-focused features, including fishing recommendations, weed line info, plankton info, and sea surface temperature information can help you find fish faster. Plus, you can add SiriusXM Entertainment and listen to ad-free music, plus sports, talk, comedy, news, and more while you're on the water. Visit SiriusXM.com slash marine to learn more.
A more colorful life starts at an Ashley store. From earth tones to vibrant colors, Ashley stores have an array of eye-catching furniture for every room in fun and trending hues that will leave a lasting impression. So it's easier than ever to express your personal style and design a vibrant home that feels just like you. Your more colorful life starts at an Ashley store. Shop in-store or online at ashley.com.