The Simple Formula to Estimate Renovation Costs (2025 Numbers)
41:44 Share

I know I can get rich if I just pull off this home renovation, but I just don't know how much it's going to cost. If that's a question you've been asking yourself, today we have an answer for you. What's up, everyone? It's Dave here on the BiggerPockets podcast, and today we're diving back into the BiggerPockets forums to answer a whole bunch of questions that you all are asking about your own real estate investing.

Henry Washington is here with me. So we have about 25 years of combined investing experience on this episode. We've got great questions about how to project renovation costs if you've never done one before, when it's time to hire a property manager, whether it's ever okay to create negative cash flow with a refinance and much more. Henry, how are you, man?

I am doing well, sir. How about you? Good. It's been a while since we've done one of these, but these are some good questions. Are you ready to jump in? Yeah, man. I love these episodes. Let's do it. Same. All right. So our first question comes from Chris, who's an investor in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. His question says, I'm looking to get into the burr game and trying to estimate how much renovations will cost for an average distressed two to three bedroom home, 1200 square feet or less.

I keep hearing that costs of labor and supplies are rising, so I'm wondering if 50 grand is reasonable to get a smaller single-family home looking like something you'd see on HGTV. I don't plan on doing any of the work myself. I'd rather stay out of the way and let professionals do their thing.

We'll touch on that HGT thing in just a minute, but let's start with the main question here about just estimating renovation costs. Is this even possible? Like, can you ballpark something as...

as a distressed two to three bedroom home, 1200 square feet. Well, as you asked the question, the answer is yes. Can you ballpark something like renovation costs? Absolutely. Now, if you'd have said, can you ballpark them accurately? Then we'd have to be a little more specific. But in all seriousness, there are several ways that you can ballpark a renovation when you don't have any experience. I had zero.

zero construction experience when I got started. And I still don't know how to do anything, but I at least understand the order of operations now and what looks like it makes sense and what doesn't. And the answer to the question is 50 grand reasonable for a smaller single family home? Yeah, it is. I think that's a reasonable budget. I don't know what you define as like HGTV style finishes, but one of the things you can just do is just take an average cost per square foot, right?

So if you take somewhere between 10 to 20 to $25 a square foot and call that in a cosmetic light renovation, take somewhere between 20 and 35, $40 a square foot and call that kind of like your mid-level renovation. So maybe you're not doing down to the studs, but maybe you're moving a wall or two and completely remodeling a kitchen and a bathroom or something like that. That's a little more than just painting floors.

call that your mid-tier, and then take something upwards of $35,000 to $55,000, $60,000, maybe even $75,000, depending on how much of a remodel you're trying to do. Is it luxury finishes? Is it not, right? And you can call that your high-end. Maybe you're going from down to the studs. Maybe you're moving a kitchen from one side of the house to the other. Those things tend to get a lot more expensive than just remodeling things in place. But you

But you can just take those numbers, multiply them by the square footage of the house, and that should give you a rough estimate of labor and materials cost. Now, is that something that you want to use to make your final offer on the project and base all of your numbers on? No.

I don't think that's what you should be doing with these general estimates. These general estimates are just meant for you as you're analyzing a deal to see if the numbers are even in the realm of possibility for you. And then,

If they are, then once you make an offer, you can go see the house and get a whole lot more specific on that rehab budget and then adjust your offer if you need to. But just for the sake of analyzing a deal like this, yeah, just take a cost per square foot, low, medium, and high, and see if you're in that ballpark. So in this sense, we can try it with this. Just before we go into that, it's just a remarkably helpful framework. Yeah.

I just want to say. And I'm sure if you're in New York or San Francisco, it's probably going to be a little bit different. But for markets like Henry's, and I'm sure most markets, mid-tier markets in the U.S., this makes sense. So what did you say? Mid-tier was $30 to $40 a foot? Yeah. So if we did $35 a square foot times $1,200, what's that? $42,000. Yeah. $42,000. So yeah, he's probably pretty close. All right.

All right. You're going to be on Love It or List It or Flip or Flop or whatever show HGTV is after this. Yeah, I think that's really good. I think the one main thing here, though, that you're probably assuming that I want to call out is

is that you're buying a house without any structural issues, right? This is a house that's probably mostly in decent shape. You don't have foundation issues. You probably don't have a roof caving in. You don't need to completely rebuild part of the house or something like that. You know, the bones are decent enough.

that you're going to be able to do a lot of your work without huge amounts of permitting, without any sort of like specialty trades or anything like that. But that seems pretty good. And I mean, I don't know what you're buying these things for in the Upper Peninsula, but-

To me, if you can burst stuff for under 50 grand and that property is in demand in your area, that's probably a good place to start. And you're probably going to find some decent deals there, I would imagine. Yeah, especially in that Upper Peninsula area. I think there's probably some decent deals. And spending 50K on a renovation, you probably put yourself in a...

a pretty decent position with those low entry price points and pretty decent size rents there. All right, you nailed that one. You just taught people how to be an HGTV flipper in under six minutes, Henry. Congratulations. Take that, Tarek. Yeah, seriously. Going on to question two. This comes from John in Nashville. John asks, to all self-managing landlords that switch to using a property management company,

What caused you to make the switch? Was there a situation that deterred you from self-managing? Were you just looking to gain back your time? Or did you feel like using a property management company could help you better achieve your goals? You're laughing. What are you thinking?

about. I'm thinking about the story my now property manager told me when I was deciding whether or not I wanted to use him. For reference for people, I probably had about 80-ish doors at the time that I turned my portfolio over to property management. You were doing that by yourself, 80? Yeah, yeah. My wife was handling most of the day-to-day. My wife would handle everything up until she actually had to talk to a tenant because of some sort of dispute, then it was my job.

And I've always been a proponent of no one will take care of your properties as good as you will. And so yes, it might be an inconvenience to you, but you'll care more than somebody else. And I wouldn't call myself a normal landlord. I put a whole lot more emphasis on people

Meaning like I truly care about the tenants and I truly care to have a safe, comfortable place to live. And sometimes I'm willing to take a hit in the wallet to do what's right that I feel like what's right for my tenants. And not every landlord will do that. And property management companies definitely don't make money on a business model like that. And so I was hesitant to turn over my portfolio to someone who might not care as much as I do.

And a couple of things that stood out when I chose to work with this property management company. First of all, they don't refer to their tenants as tenants. They call them residents. Those things matter. They matter. I know it kind of sounds like woo-woo, like these little things about...

what you call things and how you refer to people but it does matter and it especially when you hire people that stuff persists through your organization i mean there is a right wrong or indifferent i don't care how you feel there is a stigma you know with the term tenant you know sometimes people see that as somebody who you know maybe they can't afford to buy a house or right like it there's this there's the stigma that doesn't make any sense but it's there

Right. And so the fact that they're calling them residents and that helps the resident feel like they're more a part of this system lets them know that, like, hey, we care about you. We want you to have a good experience. Right. And that those little things make a difference in how a tenant or a resident will take care of your property, pay their rent on time, like all those things matter. Right.

Um, the second thing that stung stuck out to me when I was analyzing it, you know, I told him, he was like, man, I just don't think anyone's going to care about my properties as much as I do. And he said, you're absolutely right. We don't care about your properties as much as you do, but we are way more efficient at this process than you are. And caring is only one piece of the puzzle. Efficiency is arguably more important. He was like,

How long does it take you to turn a unit? And I was like, I don't know. It depends on the unit. He's like, I can tell you exactly how long it takes me to turn a unit. It takes me 10 to 15 days to turn a unit, depending on where it is. Also, you have good contractor relationships. We have the same contractor relationships that you do. So it's not like you're going to lose money having us do a turn. So I'd argue...

that you're already paying for a property manager in the amount of money you're losing per month in inefficiencies. You're just paying a bad one. It's so true. And I was like, you're right. Yeah, it's true. The efficiencies I pick up is going to make me more money.

And that more money that I'm making is basically the salary I was throwing out the window for me being my own bad property manager. Totally, yeah. And the efficiency thing really matters because I've at least noticed in my own investing since I switched to a property manager, and I'll explain why in just a minute, but you do save some money on that, right? So just say you had a $2,000 unit, you're turning that thing, you have two weeks less vacancy, it's $1,000.

That's $1,000. And you could choose then to reinvest into the property. You could pocket that money. You could set it aside as a cash reserve. So if the tenant needs something, you can use that money to care about your property. Instead of using your attention to care about the property, you can use money to care about your property. And money is very efficient for caring about properties. Money is great for caring about properties, yes.

Yeah. And listen, there are pros and cons. And I do recommend people start self-managing. I agree. I am very glad I did that. I did it for 10 years. I will now tell you that I just like real estate better now that I don't self-manage. I also agree with that statement. It's more fun for me because now I get to do the stuff I'm good at and the stuff I like better.

And not be stressed out about the stuff that was bothering me. And I started when I was 23. So I had nothing to do. I could just go. It was very easy for me to just go take care of stuff all the time. We were cashing checks. We were picking them up in person those days. That was fine. But like now I don't want to do it. And I just find it to be much more sustainable. Yeah.

John asks, why did you do it? The reason I made the change is because I moved out of Denver. So I had to do it. I was moving to Europe. And that's been great because, yeah, I now paid 10% of my revenue to a property manager to take care of it. And this property manager is good. It's not he's not like they're not the best, to be honest, but it's good enough. They take care of the tenants, the tenants like them, which is what I care about.

And they're communicative enough. They do a good enough job and allows me to focus on acquiring new properties or renovating properties or doing all the other stuff I do in real estate. And so to me, that is well worth it. But I'm super glad that I self-managed first because I can sort of critique them and coach them and manage them because I know what it's like to manage properties for a long time. Yeah, absolutely. I'm glad I did it first as well. Like just the...

The knowledge you'll gain from doing this process, A, will help you understand what they're doing and if it's necessary. And B, will help you be able to call the BS when the BS flag needs to be thrown. Totally.

you know, been through the process and understand how it goes. Before we move on, I want to mention one thing, because I think a lot of people say, if you hire a property manager, you are going to make less money. And all things being equal, maybe. But if

I would only say that that is true if you're a good property manager. Yes, if you're good at it. Because if you suck at it, you're just not making as much money. I'm sorry. And there are points where I've been bad at it, not because I don't know how to do it, because other parts of your life come up.

Yeah. And you wind up saying, you know, I could efficiently turn this property, but I have something going on in my personal life or my social life or I'm going on vacation. And now it's going to take me six weeks to turn this unit instead of two weeks to turn this unit. And yeah, if I, I cared the most, but I just lost $2,000 because other things came up in my life and I'm just kind of acting too proud to hire someone to do it. So yeah,

There's no right answer. I think both can work, but just think about it for yourself. Like, are you actually making more money doing this yourself or would hiring a professional do better? I think the most important thing that we should mention is that regardless of how you feel about this debate on whether you need property managers or whether you're going to self-manage, you need to underwrite your deals as if you are going to have professional property management when you're making your offers because

because you could be like me and think I'm never going to hire property management because that is 100% how I felt. But things changed, right? Like things changed in my opinion changed. And because I underwrote my deals conservatively and included that expense, even though I wasn't paying that expense, then when I go to hire somebody, I'm not losing money, right? It's not cutting into my profits because I never budgeted for it in the first place. Like you may feel passionately one way or the other, but I'm begging you,

Underwrite it as if you're going to pay for professional property management, and you will never have to worry about that debate. You'll just make more money if you don't hire, if you're doing the job well. 100%. That is great advice. We do have several more questions to get to, but first we have to take a quick break. We'll be right back.

Want to invest in real estate but don't have the time or know the best local markets? Rent to Retirement has you covered. Here's the deal. They've helped thousands of investors just like you find turnkey homes across the best U.S. markets. And best of all, they do all the heavy lifting for you. With over 250 five-star reviews on BiggerPockets, Rent to Retirement experts help you build strategies to retire early through real estate. And right now, Rent to Retirement offers you the best of both worlds.

Thank you.

Text REI to 33777 or visit biggerpockets.com slash retirement to start investing in top cashflow markets today. How many deals have you lost just because you didn't follow up in time or missed a call from a motivated seller while you were on another appointment?

That's where Resimply's new AI agents come in. They answer your calls, make follow-up calls to leads, score motivation, and even coach your sales team automatically. It's like having a virtual team that works 24-7 so you never miss a deal again. Check it out at resimply.com slash biggerpockets. That's R-E-S-I-M-P-L-I dot com slash biggerpockets. Let's talk about a real estate-backed investment with major tax advantages.

car washes. PPR's Opportunity Fund offers accredited investors access to a high-margin, recession-resistant industry with passive income, tax efficiency, and significant upside potential. With operations in prime locations using best-in-class technology managed via a vertically integrated team, this fund is designed to deliver strong, stable returns. Backed by over $1 billion in assets under management, PPR has provided passive returns to thousands of investors since 2007.

Don't miss out. Learn more today at biggerpockets.com slash PPRCAR. That's biggerpockets.com slash PPRCAR. Running out of gas? That's a problem that's avoidable. Owning a rental property without proper landlord insurance? That's a problem that's equally avoidable. Steadily, landlord insurance can help. Steadily offers fast quotes on property and liability coverages that are tailor-made for the real estate investor community.

And they can even compare pricing from multiple carriers for landlords looking to weigh their different options. You can rest easy knowing your investments are secure with Steadily. They're available online 24-7 and they can start coverage as fast as the next day. Visit biggerpockets.com slash landlord insurance to secure your investments with Steadily Insurance. Steadily Insurance, founded by landlords for landlords.

Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. I am here with Henry Washington answering your questions. Our next question comes from Steppen in Phoenix. He wants to know, would you take on this flip or is it too much? Well, I'm already disqualified from answering this question. So it's not on you, Matt.

Steppen says, I found an off-market property in central Phoenix that could be a solid flip or rental, but it definitely needs some work. Purchase price, $285K. That's cheap for Phoenix by my understanding. With a rehab estimate of about $115,000 and an ARV of $500,000. It's a 2-1 main house with an attached 1-1 unit. Oh, I like that.

Roughly 1800 to 2000 square feet. This is not stepping talking just as a reminder, that was two 85 purchase price one 15 as the rehab ARV of 500 step. And then says the renovation list is pretty long roof, a track windows, full interior updates, electrical plumbing, landscaping, basically a full gut, but the location is great. And the layout could work for a flip or a rental with multiple units.

Would you take this on or does it seem like more hassle than it's worth? Curious to hear how you all would approach it. All right, Henry, I see you calculating and doing your flip robot thing over there. Tell us what you're writing down and what calculations you're doing over there. Yeah, I was plugging in these numbers to see, first and foremost, if 285 is a reasonable price to pay.

to do this deal. So you've got a ARV of 500,000. So if you take that ARV of 500,000, when you sell that property, you're gonna have to pay 6% to an agent. So that's 30 grand.

you're going to have to pay about 15 grand in closing. So you're at 45 grand. You're going to pay maybe 12 grand in holding costs. So 57,000 and then another 115 for the renovation. So 57 plus 115 is 172,000. So

you've got 500 grand minus 172, which gives you 328,000. They're saying they're paying 285. So if you subtract 285 from that 328, that gives you a net profit of $43,000. Now I'm not saying $43,000 isn't good money. That's awesome money for me.

If I'm risking 115 in the renovation and only making 43, that's a little too thin for me because $115,000 renovation says there's a whole lot of work to be done. What if I missed something that needs to be done? What if I under budgeted by 20, 30 grand? Well, now my profit goes from 40 down to like 10 to 15. That's just...

And it's probably going to take you six to eight months to do this if you're going to be efficient even. So, you know, this is it's too thin at that price point. And my rule of thumb I've talked about before, I want to make what I put into a home. So if I'm spending one hundred and fifteen, I wouldn't want to make anything less than like 90. If you can uphold that principle that you have of making an 100 percent return, essentially, that's pretty darn good.

It probably doesn't always work out that way, but if you target that, if you aim big and you miss a little bit, you're still going to do just fine. For me, the numbers here don't make sense to me. The risk reward profile is just not right. Absolutely. Like you said, 43 grand is a ton of money. That's not the problem here. It's the amount of effort and the amount of capital that you have to put up and risk that

to make that 43 grand, I think there's just probably easier ways to make 43 grand, I guess is another way of putting it. You can take on an easier project, a less intensive flip, a less risky thing than taking something down to the studs and make 43 grand. I would just keep looking. The only other thing that came to mind, I was curious if this would work as a burr.

Because once that step in said that it was two units, it was a two one main house, a one one unit. Like, could you get this to close to one percent rule after? Probably not. I don't know what this area of Phoenix is. I think to make this work as a brewery, you probably need to get four thousand forty five hundred bucks a month in rent. And I'm guessing in three total bedrooms, you're not getting there. Yeah, they're all in it for four hundred thousand. So you need to be getting four.

you know, four grand a month. And I don't, maybe you may get there, but, but then, you know, you're refinancing at 75% of value. I don't think you'll be able to pull all your money out. You're gonna have to leave some in it. Yeah. You definitely have to leave some in for me. That would be okay. But to answer your question, step in, it seems like, yes, it's more hassle than it's worth.

I would not do this deal at that price. It's not worth it. I would need to subtract $42,000. So I'd pay $240,000, $243,000 for this property. Okay. Well, there's another option. So, Steppen, if you can negotiate this thing down, get into that $240,000 range, $245,000 range, maybe it would be worth it. But it sounds like at this price, it doesn't work.

All right, well, let's move on to our fourth question, which is I'm curious your thoughts on this one. This one is about exclusive agent agreements. The question reads, I want to do fix and flips. I connected with an investor friendly real estate agent. We had a good conversation and now he wants me to sign an exclusive buyer agency compensation agreement.

I plan to purchase a property within one month, so I hope to work with multiple agents and expose myself to as many deals as possible.

Is it a rule that I have to sign the agreement if I work with agents to find the deals? So I'm curious, Henry, if you have one of these. But first, can you just tell everyone what an exclusive agent agreement is? Yeah. So in this sense of the question, exclusive agent agreement, this agent is asking the seller to sign something that says that they will only exclusively work with this real estate agent.

And that protects the agent from you going out and finding another agent and doing deals with other agents. And I do not sign these. I don't sign these at all. And I work with the same real estate agent for almost every transaction. Now,

When I do have a property that my agent either brings me to buy or that my agent is going to sell for me, I will sign an agency agreement for that specific property. Of course. And that just means that I won't work with another agent on that specific property. Those I sign for every property that I'm going to work with that agent on, but it's property specific. So I'm okay signing it property specific. I'm not okay signing it, not tied to a property.

And the reason for that is, well, a couple of reasons. One is if you sign this and then your agent decides to not be as awesome, right? Well, now you're stuck working with this not so awesome agent. They don't have incentive to perform well. The other thing is other agents may bring you deals that can make you money. And now for you to do those deals, you'll have to find a way to bring your agent in on them.

And there may not be room for your agent to be brought in and paid on those deals. And so I think you can work exclusively with an agent. You just have to have some stipulations and there has to be some trust. And so what I do with my agent, I'll happily share with everybody. The agreement I have with the agent that I work with is any deal that I buy direct to seller, he is not involved in. But if I sell that deal, so if I buy something, renovate it and then sell it,

he will list that property. He gets exclusive access to list and sell all of my properties. Now, I haven't signed the document saying that he gets that. That's just the agreement he and I have, a gentleman's agreement, right? So because what he does in exchange for that is when I'm buying properties off market, I still need to know what's the value of those properties.

And so he will help me determine the values of properties that I'm buying, even though I'm not using him as my agent on the purchase. And he's doing that because he knows when I go to sell them, he will get to be the agent that represents me on the sale. He also understands that part of our agreement is that if some other agent brings me a deal that I will use that agent to buy that deal. And if that agent wants me to, I will use that agent to sell that deal because that agent brought me the deal. He brought me the thing that's going to compensate me.

And so we agree that that's fair. And that's just the agreement that he and I have. We didn't, we don't, we didn't have to sign some exclusive agreement in order to have that agreement. So there's going to have to be some trust. And maybe if your agent wants you to sign this agreement, it just means you guys haven't built up the trust in your relationship yet. Maybe you just need to work together some more until you get to a point where he trusts you and you trust him and you just, you know, you have that gentleman's agreement. Yeah.

I think what you have with your agent is entirely fair. And that's kind of like the perfect scenario, right? Like you're giving your agent plenty of business. He's bringing you business. But it's not like you can't make money from other sources. That just doesn't really make sense. And I get it. I do understand from an agent's perspective that they don't want to

waste their time and show people a bunch of properties and then have the buyer go and work with someone else. But at the same time, as an investor, I just don't really see what the benefit is to me to signing an exclusive agreement. There's not one. There isn't one. And so in today's day and age, anything on market, any agent can sell you, right? So

I don't really see why I would sign an exclusive for that because if you're going to giving me good service, I'm going to work with you. Like I'm not going to go shop for other agents for something on market if you're providing me with a good service. But for everything else, like if you're finding pocket listings or off market deals, like I would take those from anyone. Why would I...

limit myself for the amount of deals that I would be able to see. And it's not like I'm leading people on. When an agent sends me a pocket listing, I'll tell them if I'm interested or not. And if they sent me the pocket listing, I'm not going to take it to a different agent. I'm going to use them. But the commodity here is the deal, right? And so I'm going to work with whoever can get me the best deal. That's the way it should be. And look, I know it's annoying to

show houses and end up not getting a deal. I know it's annoying to put in effort and then not be compensated for it on the back end. Unpopular opinion, that's the business you signed up for. It's also every job. That's every job. That's part of the business. And yeah, there are some things that you can do to limit that, but that's going to happen. It's like the cost of doing business for being an agent. Sometimes

those things are going to happen. Yeah. How many times do you negotiate direct to seller with people and it doesn't work out? Pretty much almost all of them. Yeah, exactly. It's a numbers game. I just, I mean, I went, I spent an hour and a half at this guy's house today. Did he want my offer? No, he didn't want my offer.

That's just part of the business. Exactly. It's just part of being in a service industry is like part of what you're doing is sales and testing people out. And as an agent, you have a total right. Like if you don't want to be with someone who you think is a tire kicker, don't work with them.

You don't need to. That's the other end of this. As you become a respected agent and you build out your portfolio, you might not need to work with as many people. And this agent may be at that point in his or her career where she's saying like, you know what? You have to sign this because I have lots of great clients. I don't need you. Fine. That's great. Good for you. But like that, not every agent is going to be able to sort of command that level of

exclusivity and commitment with every type of investor. That's just, it's just not going to work out that way. That is a great point. And I'm glad you brought that up because the other side of this coin is like, we as the investors have to be okay if they don't want to work with us because of that. Like that is, it's not personal, right? Like it's your business. You run it how you want to. If you think you need this in order to run your business the way you want, that's perfectly fine. Then we probably just don't need to work together. There's no hard feelings there. Like

That's just how it is. Go find somebody that will work with you the way you want to be worked with. That's normal. That's okay. Yeah. Well, I'm glad. That's a very reconciliatory tone. Before we go to our break, we'll be right back.

BiggerPockets is hosting a really cool, fun, new deal analysis challenge this week only from June 16th to June 23rd. Here's the deal. If you analyze seven properties using BiggerPockets calculators during that time, you can be entered into a random drawing to win a BiggerPockets Pro membership, a free general admission ticket to BP Con 2025 in Las Vegas, and a $100 gift card to the BiggerPockets bookstore.

Head to biggerpockets.com slash 7deals for all the info on how to enter. Want to invest in real estate but don't have the time or know the best local markets? Rent to Retirement has you covered. Here's the deal. The

They've helped thousands of investors just like you find turnkey homes across the best U.S. markets. And best of all, they do all the heavy lifting for you. With over 250 five-star reviews on BiggerPockets, rent-to-retirement experts help you build strategies to retire early through real estate. And right now, rent-to-retirement.com.

offers some amazing incentives on turnkey new construction properties, like up to $30,000 off new build prices, 0% down loan options, 3.99% interest rates available. Don't miss out. These deals won't last. Text

REI to 33777 or visit biggerpockets.com slash retirement to start investing in top cashflow markets today. Want to earn passive income every month without the hassle of property management? If you're an accredited or high net worth investor, PPR Capital Management offers a proven solution. Since 2007, PPR has helped nearly 2,000 investors earn over $100,000

million in consistent, predictable, passive returns. Headquartered just outside Philadelphia, PPR manages a $1.1 billion diversified portfolio designed to provide steady income and long-term growth. With decades of in-house expertise, their team strategically mitigates risk to help investors achieve their financial goals. See how a PPR fund could fit into your portfolio. Visit biggerpockets.com slash PPR today. That's biggerpockets.com slash PPR.

Missed calls, forgotten follow-ups, cold leads that needed one more touch. Resimply's new AI agents fix all that. They answer inbound calls, make outbound call follow-ups, reply to text, and prioritize hot leads automatically. Check it out at resimply.com slash biggerpockets. That's R-E-S-I-M-P-L-I dot com slash resimply.

Bigger pockets. I started my business because I love what I do. But then I realized I'm also the accountant, the customer service rep, and the full-time marketer. That's why I'm so glad I found Constant Contact. It's like having a mini marketing team that actually gets small businesses.

Want to earn passive income every month without the hassle of property?

If you're an accredited or high net worth investor, PBR Capital Management offers a proven solution. Since 2007, PBR has helped nearly 2,000 investors earn over $100 million in consistent, predictable, passive returns. Headquartered just outside Philadelphia, PBR manages a $1.1 billion diversified portfolio designed to provide steady income and long-term growth.

With decades of in-house expertise, their team strategically mitigates risk to help investors achieve their financial goals. See how a PPR fund could fit into your portfolio. Visit biggerpockets.com slash PPR today. That's biggerpockets.com slash PPR.

Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. Henry and I are answering user questions. This one comes from Dave in Chicago. Dave says, I have four rentals. All are cashflow positive, but I'm running out of capital to buy more. One option is to cash out refi one property that has $400,000 in equity. If I take out 200K, that property will have a negative cashflow of 500 bucks a month.

But the overall portfolio will still be cash flow positive and I'll have capital for another purchase. My goal would be to burr a new property and recycle as much capital as possible. Any thoughts if an individual property can have negative cash flow to provide capital as long as the portfolio as a whole is still positive? I like this question and I like to

talking about portfolio level strategy. Because I feel like we talk a lot about deals, individual deals, but figuring out how to use your whole portfolio to grow, something I love. But Henry, how would you approach this one? Well, first to answer his question, is it okay to do that? I think it can be okay to do that. As long as you know your numbers. In other words, you need to know or at least have a great idea of what your expected return is on the money you're going to go spend to buy more property.

In other words, you need to know, is that money making me more money staying put where it is?

Or is that money making me more money by me pulling it out? It's going to cost me a little bit in negative cashflow. But even if I calculate that negative cashflow and add that to the return I'm going to get from the assets I'm going to buy, is it going to make me more money? I'm like, that's the math you need to do. Nine times out of 10, if you're buying in a cashflow heavy market, yeah, that's going to be fine. And so I don't think there's anything wrong with doing that. Now, is that the approach I would take? No, that's not the approach I would take. I

I wouldn't refinance the property. I would get a line of credit on the equity. So that way I'm not restructuring my loan at a higher price point. I'm keeping my mortgage payment essentially the same. And then that way I will have an additional payment on the HELOC. But that money is only interest only on the money that I actually use and not paying interest on the entire amount from the second I pull it on a refinance. And so that way,

If you go get a line of credit and you get access to, you know, $350,000 on a line of credit, but you only need to use 50 to 75 of it to go buy your next property. Well, you're only paying interest on that 50 to 75.

Because that's all you have out on that line of credit right now versus if you refinance it and you get a new loan at a higher amount, your interest is front loaded in the first five to seven years on that mortgage. And so you're paying a whole lot more for that money and a refinance. So I would just do a line of credit versus going to get a refinance.

That makes a lot of sense, especially if you're doing the burst strategy where you're going to be coming out of pocket for a lot of renovation costs. Like you could probably pay for the acquisition and the renovation costs with your line of credit. I don't know what rates are at, but it's probably going to be a very competitive rate compared to a construction loan, if that's what you were going to get or any sort of renovation style loan. So I think what you're saying makes a lot of sense. I

My questions for Dave would be, one, is the deal you're going to do great? Because it sounds like you have a pretty good portfolio. And if you're slowing down in acquisitions, that just happens. That's just part of being a real estate investor. You run out of capital and there are some times where you should just wait and save up your money. And if you're cash flowing every month from your four rentals...

Maybe you just enjoy that for a little while and then use the cash flow to buy your next deal. But if you're seeing great deals out there, yeah, like you could do this. I think Henry's point is really good. Doing a HELOC just seems like an easier way to accomplish the exact same end. But the other thing I would ask you is like, what is going to happen to that other deal if you refinance it? Because

Sure. I can envision scenarios myself where I would carry a property that is cashflow negative for a while, but not indefinitely. So that's the other thing I would ask is like, well, let's just call it property one. This is the one you have 400K in equity and you want to take 200,000 out.

you're going to refi it and then it's losing 500 bucks a month. How does that get back to cash flowing? How long does that take? Is that going to take years? Did you already do a burr there? Because if you've already done a burr there and already added value, then I'm wondering what that

property is doing for you in your portfolio, right? It's not going to value add. You're not going to build that much equity. You're losing cash flow on it. Sell it. Sell it or HELOC it. But refining, it seems like it might be the worst of the three options. Yeah, that's a great point too. Because at some point, if you tapped all that equity, now you're stuck because you can't even sell it and get out of it. Another option could be

you sell it and 1031 it into a duplex, triplex, quadplex, small apartment building. So that way you're taking that equity and then you're paying down a larger asset quite a bit. That's going to get you a ton of cashflow. If you go and put all that cash into a

you know, four or five, six, seven, eight, 10 unit building, and you're putting down a hefty down payment, that's going to get you a lot more cashflow as well. Definitely. I was reading about the multifamily market in Chicago last night and it is a good one. No one's building anything there. It could be a good option for you. All right. Well, those are our questions from today. Thank you, Henry, for joining us. Appreciate all your insights here. Thank you for having me. This is a good time.

And thank you all so much for listening. Before we go, as a reminder, all the questions that we talked about today came from the BiggerPockets forums. So if you have any questions that you want us to answer or you want just the wisdom of the BiggerPockets community to weigh in on, go to biggerpockets.com slash forums, get that expert advice from thousands of BiggerPockets users. And of course, Henry and I might tackle them on our next Q&A episode. Thank you all so much for listening. We'll see you next time.

Thank you all for listening to the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast. Make sure you get all our new episodes by subscribing on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or any other podcast platform. Our new episodes come out Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. I'm the host and executive producer of the show, Dave Meyer. The show is produced by Ian Kay. Copywriting is by Calico Content, and editing is by Exodus Media. If you'd like to learn more about real estate investing or to sign up for our free newsletter, please visit www.biggerpockets.com. The content of

this podcast is for informational purposes only. All host and participant opinions are their own. Investment in any asset, real estate included, involves risk. So use your best judgment and consult with qualified advisors before investing. You should only risk capital you can afford to lose. And remember, past performance is not indicative of future results. BiggerPockets LLC disclaims all liability for direct, indirect, consequential, or other damages arising from a reliance on information presented in this podcast.