Marshall argues that virtual socializing often lacks a clear purpose and can feel forced, making it an inefficient use of time. He believes it crowds out other activities that could more effectively build meaningful connections and productivity. Additionally, he highlights that these events can be exhausting, especially for introverts, and may not cater to everyone's preferences or life circumstances.
Deb argues that virtual socializing helps build psychological safety, camaraderie, and trust among team members, especially in hybrid and remote work environments. She emphasizes that these activities create familiarity with teammates, making collaboration easier when work-related tasks arise. Deb also cites data showing that having a workplace best friend increases job satisfaction and retention.
Marshall suggests allowing for more organic, ad hoc, and self-organized activities where team members can connect in ways that suit their preferences. He believes that forced group events often fail to foster genuine connections and that people should have the freedom to build deeper relationships through smaller, more meaningful interactions, such as one-on-one coffee chats or shared Spotify playlists.
Deb argues that structured virtual social events can help shy or new team members break down barriers and feel included. She shares an example of how playing a Jackbox game with her team made it easier for her to initiate one-on-one conversations afterward. Deb believes that without these facilitated events, some individuals might be left out of organic socializing, reinforcing cliques within the team.
Deb references Gallup data showing that having a close friend at work became even more important during the pandemic. People with workplace best friends were more likely to recommend their workplace, stay at their job, and report higher job satisfaction. Atlassian's own research also confirms that workplace friendships contribute to team connectedness and overall happiness.
Marshall highlights that work friendships can create challenges for managers who need to give constructive criticism. He shares a personal experience where he became work best friends with a colleague and later had to manage them, leading to a conflict between maintaining the friendship and delivering critical feedback. This dynamic can make it difficult to balance personal relationships with professional responsibilities.
Deb suggests treating virtual socializing like an intentional date night, where teams prioritize and schedule quality time to build relationships. She emphasizes the need to remove other tasks from team members' plates to create space for these activities. Deb also advocates for experimenting with different tactics and cadences to find what works best for each team, rather than abandoning virtual socializing altogether.
Marshall compares the current state of virtual socializing to a garden overrun with weeds. He suggests that to allow new, more meaningful connections to grow, teams need to 'pull some weeds' by removing less effective activities and creating space for better-designed, intentional interactions that foster genuine connectedness.
Hello and welcome to Work Check, an original podcast from Atlassian where we debate whether the workplace practices of today are still working for us. Hello Atlassian community! Oh, nicely done. That was a test. You passed. Great job. I'm your host, Christine De La Rosa, and instead of being both host and judge as I normally am for all these episodes, today I'm just your host. As you heard a little bit earlier, you are actually all going to decide on who the winner is. So,
Hello, hello everybody.
That was a... Hello. That was an awkward hello. We did some winks that you couldn't see and then almost high-fived and then didn't. So that's the exhilarating thing that you're going to see from today, from this debate. But I'm just going to jump right in. I'm going to get started for our first ever live show. Sounds good? Deb. Marshall. I like my remote hangs. Like, I like my magic show participation.
At first, I'm all sweaty. I'm dreading the fact that I was picked to go up. But then afterwards, I am relieved because I got to see magic up close. Very on brand. That's right. Today we're talking about virtual socializing. And just a level set, as we do for every episode, let's just define what that means. Virtual socializing. We're talking about a whole team dedicating time, putting it on their calendars for people to come together and not necessarily talk about work.
This could be chit-chat, this could be catch-up, this could be an AMA with different members, but essentially it's a departure from talking about moving work forward. Does that work? All right. May I ask one clarifying question? Of course you can, Marshall. So all those examples you gave, they would all be happening during working hours, is that right? Yes, that's correct, during the workday, whatever that may be for your team. Understood. Okay.
All right, before we get into our actual debates, we're going to start out with some opening statements. All right. Since you're on my left, Marshall, why don't we start with you? Oh, great. Are we going to put time up on the clock? I was told I only had 90 seconds. Actually, yeah. Oh, no, that is terrifying. Okay.
I like this font. This is very intimidating. Wait, the clock is ticking. I have to go. Okay. All right. I want to start by asking the audience a question. I need your help. So I want you to applaud if you agree with the following statement. Who here has way more time than they need to get their work done? Okay.
Okay, well, for the audience listening at home, that silence you're hearing is confirming what I assumed, which is that we are all very busy. In the remote and hybrid world, many of us barely have enough time to get our own work done. And Christine, you said that all of the social events we're talking about today would be happening during working hours, yes? Correct. All right, so at the risk of stating the obvious, I want to state the obvious. If it's happening during working hours and I'm expected to attend, it is work, period. Okay.
The aim of the meeting might be lofty, building relationships or reinforcing values, but at the end of the day, if it's a happy hour or a virtual scavenger hunt, if it's happening at 2 p.m. on Thursday, it's work. It's another meeting. So just like we do with our other meetings, we need to inspect these social events to make sure that they're actually meaningful. We need to ask, do they have a clear purpose? Are they actually achieving that purpose? And critically, could we be doing something else instead that might be more effective?
So to cut to the chase, Christine, Deb, today I'm going to be arguing that virtual socializing has no purpose at all. Hmm. Maybe a murky purpose at best. And that it's actually crowding out other activities that could more meaningfully get us to a place where we are happier and more productive at work. Nice. And time. Great job. Yeah.
that's me commenting on you being within the time limit, not necessarily my opinion. Thank you. Just to clarify. Deb, there's a lot of high-level thoughts, strong statements. What do you got for us? Very bold, Marshall. Yes, I'll give it to you. They're sometimes very cringey, but I truly believe that they're worth it in the end.
We need something to stay connected with each other now that we're hybrid and remote and our teams are distributed across the globe. Virtual hangs are a way to build connective tissue that successful teams have. I'm talking about psychological safety. I'm talking about camaraderie, a sense of trust that you have with your teammates.
It helps you also stay familiar with the teammates that you barely work with and maintain those relationships. So when the time comes that you need to work with that person, you're not starting at zero. And hybrid work now means that we need to intentionally make space for organic, small talk to happen. Like we don't have the water coolers. We don't have the elevator rides. We don't have the hot lunch line to catch up.
I will admit it's not a one-to-one replacement for in-person, but it's the best we have. And not having anything, I think, is bleak and just makes it all about transactions. Deb, another great job staying within time. I just want to say for both of your opening statements, those are really great thought starters in terms of what are the questions that we should be asking and evaluating this debate?
Are we evaluating the right thing? And if we are evaluating the right thing, do we have the right means, the right practices in place to carry them out? Great job, again, on your opening statements, because that is going to transition us into our head-to-head round. Keep it light, keep it tight, and let's get started. Marshall, you're up first. Yeah, so I want to start by just quickly addressing, Deb, I think the last thing you said. I heard you say that a world without virtual socializing, if we're remote and hybrid, would be bleak and transactional. That's right. Okay.
Okay, so I just want to make sure I'm clear with everybody here today and everybody listening that I'm not advocating for a world where we optimize every moment of work for productivity. I'm not saying we should do away with socializing entirely. I'm certainly not saying that we shouldn't be building relationships with our colleagues. I just think there is a better way to do it than all getting on a Zoom together. But we'll talk about that more later.
So I want to start by being vulnerable with the two of you. Great. And everyone in front of us. And I suppose all of these strangers in the audience. So I'm confused. Deeply. All right. Sorry, that's not the right reaction. Oh, tell me more. Thank you. You just went into therapist mode and I appreciate that.
Honestly, after dozens and dozens of virtual gatherings, I still don't understand what the purpose of these events is supposed to be. And I don't think anyone else does either, which is why they're so jumbled and unpredictable and awkward.
So I asked some co-workers what they thought the purpose of virtual socializing at work was, and their answers were, predictably, all over the place. One person said that they were supposed to help us build relationships. Another person said that they were supposed to relieve tension and help the team move past stressful events and trauma. And a third said that they're kind of like medicine. I like this one. There's something that we kind of have to take, even though we don't like it, because somehow it's good for us, even though we don't know why.
Great analogy. So my very informal survey revealed that the outcome we're trying to drive with these virtual socializing events is fuzzy at best. So I thought rather than starting by making a point, I would just start by asking a question. Deb. Marshall. Thank you. I knew you were listening, but then you said my name and confirmed it, and I appreciate that. Look at this. Do you feel like you understand the purpose of virtual socializing with your team? Can you enlighten me?
I will enlighten you, Marshall. I say the outcome that we're striving for here is connectedness, whether that's small, like getting familiar with near strangers on your team, or the big ways that we can be connected to each other. Say we become friends with someone that you'd want to invite to your wedding. Familiarity greases the wheels to make working with each other easier.
I'm more likely to send a DM or give feedback to a colleague after having a few low stakes hangs with them. No, I totally relate to that. I, sorry to cut you off. I am a kind of a nervous person. No, I don't believe it. That's because we have developed camaraderie and we have connectedness, Marshall. Point taken.
But if I just met you, if I just joined your team, I don't know what you're like. I don't know how you're going to react to me. And so if we have some social hangs, some good social credit in the bank,
I can take that forward and know that I can rely on some good times and not just assume that the first experience I have with you may not be the best one. Right, right. Exactly, Christine. And for example, my team did a virtual social hour where we shared our Enneagram results with each other. And I got to learn that my colleague George and I are both helpers. Any helpers in the house? Thank you.
So now, because I know more about what motivates George, what drives him, I feel like I have a cliff notes on how we can best collaborate together on future projects.
The bigger connectedness point, friendship, right? That's way less common. We can't engineer becoming best friends with someone at work. But because we spend so much time at work and so much time with our work team, it's crucial to have ways to make actual friends at work. Who here has a workplace best friend? Anyone? Thank you. And who feels happier at work because of that friend?
Oh, did I just hear more applause than the first round? Marshall, I hope you're paying attention to all that clapping. I thought you were my workplace best friend, Deb. I didn't clap because I'm really close to the mic, but I would have. You know I'm sitting between the both of you right now.
So work friends make us happier at work and make us more likely to stay at our jobs. I actually have data to back this up. So data from Gallup showed that having a work best friend became even more important during the pandemic. People who had a close friend at work were more likely to recommend their workplace to others, stay at their job, and they reported more job satisfaction. Oh, yeah, I've seen those studies. Yeah, our own state of teams research confirms that.
That you did. So back to you, Marshall. Okay, there's a lot to respond to there. So I agree. And I think that your point about building friendships in order to feel connected is important. I stumbled across very similar research. I think it'd be fair to say that right now we're experiencing at work a crisis of connectedness. Connectedness doesn't just make us more productive, it makes us stronger.
more likely to stick around, more efficient, more likely to deliver value to customers, and also critically happier. And it's plummeted since the beginning of the pandemic. I think I saw a statistic that 70% of workers say they feel less connected than they did four years ago, right?
So connectedness is a serious problem, and it's one worth solving. I think the challenge and the crux of the argument today is that I don't believe that organized virtual social events are likely to solve it. And to circle back to what I said in my opening statement, I think they are crowding out other opportunities that we could be giving people to build that connectedness through different kinds of actions, different kinds of experiences.
So several studies have shown that you're exactly right, Deb. Yes, I know this. Friendship is the key to connectedness, right? It is better to have deeper connections with a smaller number of people at work rather than to feel a surface level connection with a large group. It's much more likely that you'll stick around if you have, as you said, a work best friend, not a lot of work acquaintances, right? So here's why I think that
virtual socializing the way we currently practice it is unlikely to help us build those friendships and build this sense of connectedness. First of all, virtual group events are too often right now just a pale imitation of all the things we used to do in person, IRL, all jammed into this one Zoom-sized package. Christine, you know I love to talk about Maslow's hammer. Sure do. Yeah, and so this is yet another situation just like on our video call episode of
of the podcast, where we are using video calling technology as a Maslow's hammer and approaching every problem like that's the solution to it, right? So I think in order to give people with different preferences more opportunities to build different types of connections, we need to let them break out. We need to let them have different types of opportunities to connect.
And another problem with the organized virtual socializing events we have now is that they're forced. They're mandated. People aren't very good at building connections when they're forced to do it. We need to allow people to connect organically. We need to let people find their work best friends. We don't push work best friends together.
And as a final point here, I'll just say that work friendships are great, fully in support of work friendships, but they can force you to walk a very fine line. If you're a people manager, if you're somebody whose job requires you to give a lot of constructive criticism in order to improve work, it can be tricky when the people that you're having to give that criticism to are your friends.
I was in a situation several years ago where I became work best friends with a co-worker of mine and then our roles changed and I became his boss. And my job was to give him a lot of critical feedback. And so I found myself on a daily basis having to decide if I wanted to risk producing lower quality work or risk harming my friendship with my work best friend. That sounds terrible. What did you do? I think I did both things badly.
but I learned and I would probably approach it differently today. So wrapping it up, I will just say, I do think that the key here is that everybody has different preferences and people want to connect in different ways. So we need more opportunities for organic, ad hoc, self-organized activities, not mandated Zoom calls.
I wonder, though, if what you're saying, Marshall, is true, that we have better ways to do it. Then the question is whether or not it's the best use of time and which activities will help have the most impact on the top priorities. Yeah, I think that's right. Deb, what do you think about that? Oh, Marshall, you said a lot. You said a lot there.
I'm going to go back to, I think, what your main point is, is that we should just allow these things to happen organically. People should just sort of self-organize hangs with the people they want to hang with, the people they're interested in.
And I think that's great. I'm not saying that you can't do that. I'm actually just saying that teams need to make space for all kinds of personalities on their team. Say you're shy. Say you're new to the team. Yeah. Hi, Christine. Oh, sorry. She raised her hand. Audio medium, but I raised my hand. That's me. You know, these shy new people to the team...
probably not going to be included in these like organic hangs that are being organized on like private channels. Like they're not going to know about them. What about those people? Then they become even more sort of wallflower-y. I just think that people need ways to break down barriers of getting to know someone.
After playing a Jackbox game with my team together, and my team is like about 50 people deep now, I feel like it's easier to create a connection or reach out after that game for an organic one-on-one coffee chat. Like, oh, that joke you made was like really funny. Sure. You mentioned you liked a show that I like. Let's talk about it.
Let's talk about beef. And this is happening in a DM after the social hang. I know you're saying all the cues that appeal to me right now. I'm not the judge for this event just to remind everyone. I haven't finished beef yet. So can we keep the beef talk to a minimum? Yes. Yeah.
Yes. I actually want to say I relate to that. It's not just people who are perpetually shy. I consider myself a shy person, but once I get to know you, once I have a relationship on a team, I'm pretty good. But if I'm brand new, so earlier in my career, I joined, everyone was so loud in a good way, but their personalities were naturally like, I'm going to be out there. I'm going to take up a lot of space in the room and I just don't do that.
And so guess what? A whole bunch of people that I was supposed to be working with, I didn't know what they did. And I was too scared to ask them because it was a weird way to, am I going to set up a meeting and be like, I'd like to just get to know you and figure out how we can better get along. Like, it seems like such a simple thing. And actually I do that practice now, but at the time and a very early stage, a young person in my career, too scared to do it. If someone had facilitated that meet and greet or that conversation for me, I
I would have appreciated it. Right, right. And, you know, honestly, I'm just afraid that, you know, purely ad hoc organic socializing is going to leave a lot of people out. And it can reinforce a culture that supports like clicks within the team. Interesting. Well, so as evidenced by the fact that I'm on a stage with you right now, Deb, recording a podcast, I'm not a shy person, but I am an introvert.
I think we've got some other introverts on the stage. How about the audience? Introverts, make some noise. Look at the introverts. They love to clap. Great job. No, but seriously, I am an introvert. I find having to participate in these events deeply exhausting. Sure. So if I have to spend an hour in the middle of my day going on a virtual scavenger hunt,
and then return to work for the next three hours, I'm spent. And that is not how I would organize my energy if I had say so, right? I'm being forced to do it.
I think that the problem here is that we're assuming that shy people, people who are introverted, are suddenly going to benefit from these forced group activities that might shine a spotlight on them and compel them to step forward and share personal information about their lives or demonstrate a skill they don't have, like escaping a virtual room, which I was not able to do, by the way, twice.
Yeah. Yeah. Both as a shy and introverted person. Offsites, especially offsites that are longer than a day, really, really draining. And when we try to make them virtual and I'm on a screen and we're doing both intense work deep sessions in addition to social hangs online, I can't do anything else. Even after work, I just need to be by myself in a dark room and close my eyes. Yeah. And
I'll also add, it's not just introverts or people who are a little more recessive who might not want to socialize. There's lots of reasons why people might have a different appetite, a lower appetite for socializing. Somebody who's single and 25 and looking to make new friends might be much more interested in devoting time to socializing than somebody who's, frankly, like me, older and a parent and really boring. So...
Debate for a separate time. I want to share one quick story. Several years ago, my wife was on a team. She moved to a new team. The team was full of 24, 25, 26-year-olds. Now, this was an in-person team, but they also had the opportunity to work hybrid, so they...
Mm. Mm.
And there was a lot of social pressure on my wife to participate. Now, my wife was a little bit older. She was married. She had kids she wanted to get home to. The younger people on her team didn't mind missing out on several hours of work in the middle of the day because they just ended up staying late together and then going out for drinks at 9 p.m. when they wrapped up work. So my wife every day had to decide, well, do I want to alienate myself from this team or do I want to miss time with my family, right? Yeah.
And so the same dynamic can start appearing when we're virtually socializing and our time is so precious. Yikes, Marshall. I mean, that's not great for your wife. But I think the problem that is really here is that your wife's job scheduled virtual social time without taking away tasks and without moving project deadlines.
They treated it as like an add-on, which I think is really unfair. We've got to approach this at a systems level. We absolutely need to take things away from people's plates to make the space and time for social hangs. And, you know, I can speak from experience on our team.
I'm a designer on the creative team at Atlassian. We structure every bi-weekly meeting to open with an icebreaker, and then someone spends like 20 minutes doing an about me presentation and sharing about themselves with the group. And by doing this, it demonstrates that our culture, our team culture, we value connection and teamwork. It's a way that we live our values. So
Before I make my final point, who in the audience has regularly occurring like date nights with their partner or with their friends? Give me some applause if you have calendared quality time. Thank you. So a lot of you, right? And...
What I'm suggesting here is what if we viewed regular virtual social hangs with our teammates like an intentional date night? So I know it feels weird and unnatural that you're like scheduling quality time into your calendars, but I think doing so says that you prioritize those relationships and that you value making space for knowing them better. Hmm.
I have a lot of mixed emotions there because on the one hand, I feel like you just told me that my wife should have gone on dates with her team instead of with me. And that hurts. That's not what I was saying. But on the other hand, I feel like I heard you say that I should be allowed to move my deadline so that I can go go-karting. So that's great. And Scott and MCB are here. So if you want to pitch that, I think now is the best time.
So, yeah, it's interesting, this question of can we remove items from the calendar? I think we'd all like to believe that in theory, yes. I think in practice we all find that to be challenging, if not impossible. And I think of this being like a little like a garden. The garden's starting to get full of weeds.
If we want the garden to flourish, if we want new things to grow, we have to pull some of the weeds. And I think that once we do that, there's a lot of interesting things that we could explore that might be a little better designed, a little more intentional that could help us build this sense of connectedness. In fact, there's a great Atlassian Work Life article all about this, ways that you can connect both sync and async with your team, suggest things like building a Spotify playlist together and everything.
sharing GIFs over Slack or over Trello. I think even if we want to keep using Zoom, there's more interesting ways we can do it. We can make time for donuts and other one-on-one connections where we have the opportunity to build deeper relationships and get past small talk. I think if we tried to live our values day in and day out, which I'm sure most of us do, we might find that the work itself could help us feel more connected.
And I love this idea of using our work practices, whether they're our agile ceremonies, our one-on-ones, or just our Slack conversations, as an opportunity, a location where more meaningful socializing and connection can happen if we show up with our full selves, with our full humanity. Personally, I've never felt more connected to my teammates than when we're really humming, working well together, respecting each other, and producing great work that delivers value.
So in the end, I'd just like to close by saying...
I love the idea of being able to socialize with an entire group of people with whom you're connected because you build projects together, you ship work together. I don't think we have the tools to do it now, and I think the much more important problem is that spending time doing it actually makes us less likely that we'll get the outcome we want. This feeling of connectedness, this feeling of having really purposeful social bonding at work. I think that's more likely to emerge through other channels, and those channels will open up once we...
pull some of the weeds, so to speak. I like the metaphor continuation. Deb, do you? Do I like that metaphor? It was a good metaphor. I'll give Marshall that. But for me, I don't think we should throw out the baby with the bathwater. Ooh, metaphor upon metaphor.
Had to hit you with one. Though there isn't a universally successful formula, like we haven't hit it yet for virtual social time, there are versions that work well for many people. So I just feel like the demand for connectedness is just going to skyrocket as we become more distributed or across time zones and
So what I want to do is like, let's lift the baby out of the tub. Let's dry her off, pour out the bath water, right? And take a look in the mirror, okay? Let's be honest with ourselves about what's working and what's not. Let's try out some new tactics to see what activities and what cadence works for each team.
We can be agile about this, Marshall. And let's not let perfect be the enemy of the good. Wow. You turned it up to 11. Was that a mic drop? I appreciate that.
Honestly, I kind of feel like you're both agreeing, like you both want this connectedness. We are all acknowledging that we are feeling less connected to each other. We're becoming more distributed on our teams. We need to find ways to improve that situation. And the big question that both of you are asking is, is virtual socializing the way to do it? And at what point do we decide, hey, we're going to do it.
that's probably been enough. We should try a different tactic and start from scratch. Or, hey, there's some benefits, and that's enough of a positive indication that we should continue to explore and figure this out further. But thankfully for me, I don't need to decide what the answer to this debate question is. In fact, all of you out there in the Atlassian community are going to get to decide.
So if you think that Marshall is today's winner, that teams should not dedicate time for virtual socializing, please let me hear you by applause and screams. Cool. Cool. All right. Some sustained applause there. I think the people have spoken and we can stop there. Okay. If you think Deb should win and you agree that teams should dedicate time for virtual socializing, let's hear it.
Deb's side. Thank you. Okay, I did not anticipate that I would not be able to tell the difference between which side was louder. So I'm going to actually go into our sound team. Come on, Sean. I'd like to award the winner of the side for Deb. That team should dedicate time for virtual socializing. I feel like this is rigged because I know for a fact that Deb had dinner with Sean last night. So did you. So did you.
Great. Well, let's keep the jokes going in our own perhaps virtual socializing after this conference. Nice work, Marshall. But in the meantime, while I have the mic and I'm on the stage in front of all of you, I'd like to just publicly thank everyone that has been involved in this process for not just this episode and this debate, but for the show. I want to thank, of course, our debaters today, Deb Lau and Marshall Walker-Lee, as well as the rest of our debaters from season three.
Just going to list them off. Maren Hotvet, Ronnie Shaw, David Shaw, Shannon Winter, and Kelvin Yap. Also, shout out to Joey Sabio and Deb Lau for their artwork on the show. Digital support from Jessica Lynn and Jamie Austin. And finally, Work Check is produced with the huge help of the team at Pacific Content, including Pippa Johnstone, Annie Reuter, Carla Hilton, and was sound designed by Robin Edgar and Sean Cole. Round of applause for all those folks, please. Thank you.
And for those that are listening on the podcast, visit Atlassian.com slash blog for transcripts and more about this show. And until next time, I'm Christine De La Rosa, and this is Work Check, an original podcast from Atlassian. Thank you.