The current recommendation is 0.7 parts per million, which is equivalent to three drops in a 55-gallon barrel. This level was revised down in 2015 from a previous range due to concerns about dental fluorosis.
Dental fluorosis is a condition characterized by streaking or mottling on children's teeth caused by excessive fluoride exposure. It was a key reason the U.S. Public Health Service revised fluoride levels in drinking water to 0.7 parts per million in 2015.
The report linked high levels of fluoride exposure to a slight decline in children's IQ. The analysis, published in JAMA Pediatrics, reviewed dozens of studies, mostly from China and India, and concluded that high fluoride exposure might cause neurodevelopmental harm in babies and kids.
The study is controversial because it suggests a potential link between high fluoride exposure and neurodevelopmental harm, but the fluoride levels studied were twice what is added to public drinking water. Critics argue the findings could be misinterpreted and that the benefits of water fluoridation, such as cavity prevention, outweigh the risks.
Water fluoridation began in the early 20th century when dentists noticed lower tooth decay rates in areas with naturally high fluoride levels. In the 1930s, scientists proposed adding controlled amounts of fluoride to drinking water. Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to fluoridate its water in 1945, leading to widespread adoption across the U.S.
A study by the Colorado School of Public Health found that water fluoridation saved approximately $6.8 billion in dental expenses in one year alone. It is particularly beneficial for lower-income families who may lack access to fluoride products like toothpaste and mouth rinses.
Critics are concerned about the cumulative fluoride exposure from water, food, toothpaste, and mouthwash, which might push vulnerable groups like pregnant people and young children to harmful levels. They also question whether the benefits of water fluoridation are as significant today, given the widespread use of fluoridated dental products.
Recent developments include a court decision urging the Environmental Protection Agency to tighten fluoride regulations, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s push to stop water fluoridation, and local actions like Calgary, Canada, reintroducing fluoride after a rise in cavities. These events are shaping the ongoing debate about fluoride's risks and benefits.
Fluoridating the public water supply has been common practice for nearly 80 years in the U.S. It's an acclaimed public health intervention that helps prevent cavities. For just as long, some have raised concerns about the practice that can veer from evidence-based to unsubstantiated conspiracy. An analysis by government researchers, published Monday in JAMA Pediatrics), is adding to the debate. The research found that exposing babies and kids to high levels of fluoride might be associated with neurodevelopmental harm. Frankly, it's a lot to digest — so we invited health correspondent Pien Huang) onto the show to wade through the debate.*Questions, story ideas or want us to dig into another public health debate? Email us at [email protected]) — we'd love to hear from you! Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave).*Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices)NPR Privacy Policy)