We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Fluoride: Fact vs. Fiction

Fluoride: Fact vs. Fiction

2025/1/8
logo of podcast Short Wave

Short Wave

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Emily Kwong
P
Ping Kwong
Topics
Emily Kwong 和 Ping Kwong:长期以来,饮用水中添加氟化物被认为是预防龋齿的有效方法,但最近的研究引发了关于其潜在风险的担忧,尤其是在高浓度氟化物暴露的情况下。这项技术已经使用了近80年,并被认为是20世纪最伟大的公共卫生成就之一。然而,关于氟化物对儿童神经发育的潜在影响,以及氟化物是否仍然像过去一样有效的问题,引发了新的讨论。 Ping Kwong:氟化物最初被发现存在于自然水中,并且与龋齿发生率较低相关。20世纪30年代,科学家们提出在饮用水中添加氟化物以预防龋齿。此后,越来越多的美国人开始饮用氟化水,这在很大程度上降低了龋齿的发生率。然而,氟化物并非没有争议,自其应用之初就一直存在反对的声音。 Ashley Mullen:国家毒理学计划的一份报告指出,高水平的氟化物暴露与儿童智商的轻微下降有关。 Bruce Lanphier:支持重新评估饮用水中氟化物益处和风险的证据已经足够充分。 Stephen Levy:认为目前关于氟化物与智商之间联系的科学证据不足以支持改变现有的氟化政策。 Joseph Ladapo:建议佛罗里达州的地方政府停止在饮用水中添加氟化物。 Robert F. Kennedy Jr:主张停止在全国范围内对饮用水进行氟化处理。 Emily Kwong:这项技术已经使用了近80年,并被认为是20世纪最伟大的公共卫生成就之一。然而,关于氟化物对儿童神经发育的潜在影响,以及氟化物是否仍然像过去一样有效的问题,引发了新的讨论。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What is the current U.S. Public Health Service recommendation for fluoride levels in drinking water?

The current recommendation is 0.7 parts per million, which is equivalent to three drops in a 55-gallon barrel. This level was revised down in 2015 from a previous range due to concerns about dental fluorosis.

What is dental fluorosis and why is it a concern?

Dental fluorosis is a condition characterized by streaking or mottling on children's teeth caused by excessive fluoride exposure. It was a key reason the U.S. Public Health Service revised fluoride levels in drinking water to 0.7 parts per million in 2015.

What did the National Toxicology Program's 2024 report reveal about fluoride exposure?

The report linked high levels of fluoride exposure to a slight decline in children's IQ. The analysis, published in JAMA Pediatrics, reviewed dozens of studies, mostly from China and India, and concluded that high fluoride exposure might cause neurodevelopmental harm in babies and kids.

Why is the National Toxicology Program's fluoride study controversial?

The study is controversial because it suggests a potential link between high fluoride exposure and neurodevelopmental harm, but the fluoride levels studied were twice what is added to public drinking water. Critics argue the findings could be misinterpreted and that the benefits of water fluoridation, such as cavity prevention, outweigh the risks.

How did water fluoridation begin in the U.S.?

Water fluoridation began in the early 20th century when dentists noticed lower tooth decay rates in areas with naturally high fluoride levels. In the 1930s, scientists proposed adding controlled amounts of fluoride to drinking water. Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to fluoridate its water in 1945, leading to widespread adoption across the U.S.

What are the economic benefits of water fluoridation?

A study by the Colorado School of Public Health found that water fluoridation saved approximately $6.8 billion in dental expenses in one year alone. It is particularly beneficial for lower-income families who may lack access to fluoride products like toothpaste and mouth rinses.

What are the main concerns raised by critics of water fluoridation?

Critics are concerned about the cumulative fluoride exposure from water, food, toothpaste, and mouthwash, which might push vulnerable groups like pregnant people and young children to harmful levels. They also question whether the benefits of water fluoridation are as significant today, given the widespread use of fluoridated dental products.

What recent developments are influencing the fluoride debate?

Recent developments include a court decision urging the Environmental Protection Agency to tighten fluoride regulations, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s push to stop water fluoridation, and local actions like Calgary, Canada, reintroducing fluoride after a rise in cavities. These events are shaping the ongoing debate about fluoride's risks and benefits.

Chapters
This chapter explores the history of fluoride in drinking water, starting from its discovery in the early 1900s to its widespread adoption in the mid-20th century. It highlights the initial success of fluoridation in preventing tooth decay and its economic benefits, while also acknowledging the existence of early pushback against the practice.
  • Dentists in the early 1900s observed lower rates of tooth decay in areas with naturally higher fluoride levels.
  • In the 1930s, scientists proposed adding controlled amounts of fluoride to drinking water to prevent tooth decay.
  • Grand Rapids, Michigan, was the first city to experiment with water fluoridation in 1945.
  • By the 1960s, federal drinking water standards included fluoride guidelines, and fluoridation became widespread across the U.S.
  • Fluoride's benefits include preventing cavities and saving billions in dental expenses annually.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

This message comes from NPR sponsor Hiscox, committed to helping small businesses protect their dreams. Quotes and information on customized insurance for specific risks are available at Hiscox.com. Hiscox, business insurance experts. You're listening to Shortwave from NPR.

Hey, short wavers. Emily Kwong here. I'm back again with Ping Kwong. Hello, hello. To look at what is in our drinking water, this time fluoride. Yep, we're talking fluoride, which is a topic that NPR has covered in drinking water around the U.S. for literally decades. Fluoride is a very common mineral that occurs naturally in almost all soil, in water, even in many rocks. I didn't know that. Fluoride's hanging out in the rocks. Okay. Mm-hmm.

And most people in the U.S. get fluoridated drinking water. It's added to the water to prevent tooth decay and cavities. The current U.S. Public Health Service recommendation is 0.7 parts per million optimally, which is three drops in a 55-gallon barrel. Okay, not higher, not lower, just 0.7 parts per million. Right.

Right, Emily. And it used to be a range, but in 2015, it was revised down to the standard minimum, 0.7 parts per million, because there were concerns that at levels higher than that, it could be causing dental fluorosis, which is, you know, streaking or mottling on kids' teeth. Yeah, I mean, growing up, fluoride...

was always kind of unquestioned. It was like considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century. And it still is, Emily, but a debate is evolving over whether the risks and the benefits of fluoride have changed.

So back in August 2024, part of the National Institutes of Health called the National Toxicology Program released a big report. It was over 300 pages long, and it linked high levels of fluoride exposure with a slight decline in children's IQ. At the time, I spoke with Ashley Mullen, who's an outside researcher. She studies toxic exposures at the University of Florida, and she called it...

and so important for our understanding of impacts of fluoride exposure on child IQ. And there were experts, especially within the dental community, that raised concerns about the report immediately. I mean, they were worried that people would misconstrue it to mean that any fluoridation in drinking water is a problem when the amount of fluoride being discussed was twice what's added to the public drinking water.

Okay. And there's a new turn in this debate. Monday, government researchers published the analysis behind that report in the medical journal JAMA Pediatrics. What did that say? Yeah, yeah. So it gave us some more details about how they'd done their research for this analysis. They had looked at dozens of studies, mostly from China and India,

And they use this to conclude that some babies and kids exposed to high levels of fluoride may experience some amount of neurodevelopmental harm. Now, these results are controversial, but the analysis has spurred opponents of fluoridation to call for a new assessment of its benefits and its risks. Today on the show, we wade into the fluoride debate to separate the science and truth from fear and fiction. You're listening to Shortwave, the science podcast from NPR. ♪

This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices, like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on Thinkorswim. Visit Schwab.com to learn more. This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices, like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on Thinkorswim. Visit Schwab.com to learn more.

This message comes from Grainger. As a maintenance specialist for a historic high-rise, you know that vintage charm historically needs constant attention. Which is why, when it's time to upgrade turn-of-the-century mechanicals, they turn to Grainger. With easy access to a million-plus products and the scale to deliver when and where you need them, the right tools and supplies are never far away. So you can keep that vintage building running like new. Call, click Grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done.

All right, Ping, I think, oh, where to begin? We don't have time for a complete exhaustive history of fluoride in drinking water. But what are the major beats? How did this all start? Okay, so the story starts at the turn of the 20th century, early 1900s, when dentists in the U.S. started noticing that people who live in certain areas have lower rates of tooth decay. And they don't know why until a few decades later, the 1930s, when they realized that

In these areas, there's actually a higher than normal amount of fluoride in the water. Oh, wow.

Like, naturally. Yeah, naturally. And it's also in the 1930s that a team of scientists at the University of Pittsburgh proposed in a paper to add a controlled amount of fluoride to the drinking water to prevent tooth decay. Okay, so that is the genesis of this idea. Right, yeah. And then in the 1940s, cities started experimenting with adding fluoride to the water. So it starts with Grand Rapids, Michigan in 1945.

By the end of the decade, dental examiners are reporting markedly lower cavities. And so hearing this, you know, other towns in Michigan, Texas, and Wisconsin start their own programs. And that doubles the number of Americans who get fluoridated water to over a million. Wow. So if you fast forward to 1962, federal drinking water standards are updated to give fluoride guidelines and then

Over the subsequent decades, more and more Americans get access to fluoridated water to protect against tooth decay. That figure is up to around 70% in the U.S. today. And there's even more fluoride that abounds. There's fluoride in toothpaste.

Yeah, it's been the case for decades now. I mean, basically every toothpaste I've used throughout my entire life has had it in it. Plus it's in mouth rinses, it's in dental floss. It also naturally occurs in all kinds of foods like spinach and seafood and tea and fruit.

You'll find fluoride there. The science is clear, Emily. Fluoridating water lowers the numbers of cavities in people, which it does by restoring minerals to teeth that are lost when bacteria grow inside the mouth, especially after, like, say, drinking sugary drinks.

And this is especially useful for lower-income families who might not have access to fluoride products like toothpastes and mouth rinses. There's a study by the Colorado School of Public Health which found that adding fluoride to the water saved around $6.8 billion in dental expenses in one year alone. So this has been the story of fluoride for most of our lifetimes. It's a very rosy public health story. But it sounds like there's always been a little bit of pushback.

Pushback? Tell me about that. Yeah. So ever since it started, there's been this debate over fluoridating water. Our colleagues Jeff Brumfield and Selena Simmons-Deffin have reported about conspiracy theories surrounding fluoride in drinking water. There was this time in the 1960s when the John Birch Society, this far-right group, alleged that it was part of a communist plot.

And there are lots of other theories around it as well, different versions that reflected the concerns of their times. But meanwhile, the scientific understanding is also evolving, which brings us to this latest research in JAMA Pediatrics.

It was done by government scientists at the National Toxicology Program. That's the part of the NIH that you mentioned earlier. Uh-huh, with that August report. That's the one. And like we were saying, they just published a study in JAMA Pediatrics that looks at a few dozen studies that other people have conducted. And it finds this link between high levels of fluoride and a small decrease in children's IQ.

Now, it's not totally definitive. This is something that they're saying with moderate confidence. Okay. We could have a whole aside about IQ tests and what they measure. Sticking with the study, what does moderate confidence mean?

So moderate confidence is basically like a grade that they put on the quality of evidence that's available to them. It's not low quality. It's not high quality. It's enough to say something with moderate confidence. Does that make sense? Yeah. Okay. Moderate confidence, that high level is, again, much higher than what's added to our drinking water, is associated with a small decrease in IQ. Yeah. Could be associated. Could be associated. Yeah. Science. So many words. Yeah. Yeah.

And while this conclusion is not new, this research has already been quite influential in the debate over Florida drinking water. It was accompanied by two op-eds in the paper that was published on Monday. One questioned its methods, disagreed with its conclusions, and the other fully supported it. I spoke with Dr. Bruce Lanphier. He's at Simon Fraser University, and he co-authored that supportive piece. The

So he's arguing that there's enough evidence to prompt this reassessment of the risks and the benefits of fluoride in the water system. Now, on the other hand,

On the other hand, you've got a dentist like Stephen Levy. He's a public health dentist at the University of Iowa. He wrote the other op-ed that argues for staying the course. And he says that using this data for that debate is a stretch. The major problem is that the science is not as strong as it is presented by these authors. So he says that they didn't fully consider some other recent research that cast doubt on the links between fluoride exposure and IQ.

And he also makes the point that, you know, because water fluoridation is so common, we take its benefits for granted. You know, there are problems definitely associated with getting cavities too. It can be painful. You can get infections. You can have to go to the dentist and get expensive fillings or you can miss school for it. Like there are all these problems that are also associated with getting cavities. Yeah, I can see why there's so much pushback, certainly among dentists, but among fluorides critics, what are their main questions? Yeah.

Yeah, so there are a couple that are being raised right now. One of them is about whether, you know, because people get fluoride not just from their drinking water, but also from the food that they eat, the toothpaste and mouthwash they use, whether that total cumulative fluoride might be pushing, you know, some vulnerable people, again, that's pregnant people and young children, whether that's pushing their fluoride levels to levels that might be harmful.

And another question is really on the benefit side of it. There is recent analysis that showed that fluoride in the drinking water definitely prevents cavities, but it's not to the same extent that it was back in the 40s, 50s, 60s, before fluoridated toothpaste became a regular thing. So some are saying that it's time to reweigh the risks and the benefits given how society has changed. As a science reporter, what do you make of these questions and that they're being raised right now?

I think they're interesting. I think that, like, it's useful to have a real scientific debate about these questions. You know, as a science reporter, you're like, okay, great, these are the questions, let's get more evidence. But my concern is that even in the lack of evidence, you know, there's this huge public debate that's swirling and political and sort of happening regardless of whether the evidence becomes clear or not. Right. Science will always move slower than politics. Okay, so where does that leave us? Like, what are you watching for next?

Yeah, so there's a couple things that are coming up. The Environmental Protection Agency has this deadline coming up in the next two weeks over whether they want to appeal this recent court decision that told them to tighten their fluoride regulations that could have bearing on the debate. And then there's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He's President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for health secretary, and he told NPR that one of his priorities is to get the country to stop fluoridating the water. So...

We'll have to see what happens there. And finally, there's also what's happening on the local level. So there are some communities that are going through transitions with their drinking water. For example, NPR has reported that Calgary in Canada removed fluoride from its water supply. And then after data came back showing that dental cavities rose significantly, they're now reintroducing it. On the other hand, you've got Florida Surgeon General Joseph Latipo, who made headlines recently for

advising local governments in Florida to stop adding fluoride to their water supplies. So yeah, there's a lot happening with fluoride right now. It's going to be interesting to track those decisions and what the public health outcomes are. So we will see what happens. Peng Huang, thank you for summarizing what is a sprawling and complicated conversation right now. I admire it and I appreciate it. You're welcome. Thanks for having me on. And I'm sure we're going to talk much more about fluoride in the future.

We recently had Ping on our show as part of a big roundup of health stories from 2024 that will flow over into 2025. You can check out that episode at the link in our notes. We'll be tracking developments in drinking water, bird flu, and more. If you like this episode, follow us. Whichever podcast app you're using, click follow right now and you can stay up to date with all the latest science news. ♪

This episode was produced by Hannah Chin. It was edited by our showrunner, Rebecca Ramirez. Rebecca, Ping, and Tyler Jones checked the facts. Kweisi Lee was the audio engineer. Beth Donovan is our senior director. And Colin Campbell is our senior vice president of podcasting strategy. I'm Emily Kwong. Thank you for listening to Shortwave from NPR.

This message comes from Mint Mobile. From the gas pump to the grocery store, inflation is everywhere. So Mint Mobile is offering premium wireless starting at just $15 a month. To get your new phone plan for just $15, go to mintmobile.com slash switch.

This message comes from Capella University. With Capella's FlexPath learning format, you can set your own deadlines and learn on your schedule. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu.

This message comes from Bombas. Their slippers are designed with cushioning, so every step feels marshmallowy soft. Plus, for every item purchased, Bombas donates to someone in need. Go to bombas.com slash NPR and use code NPR for 20% off your first order.