We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Team Favorite At the Money: Valuation Is an Exercise in Faith

Team Favorite At the Money: Valuation Is an Exercise in Faith

2025/2/19
logo of podcast Masters in Business

Masters in Business

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Aswath Damodaran
纽约大学斯特恩商学院金融教育凯什纳家族椅位教授,专注于估值、企业金融和投资管理。
B
Barry Ritholtz
知名投资策略师和媒体人物,现任里特尔茨财富管理公司董事长和首席投资官。
奥斯卡·王尔德
Topics
奥斯卡·王尔德:讽刺家只知道价格,不知道价值。这句名言点明了本期节目的核心议题:价格与价值的区别。在投资领域,理解价值的重要性远超价格。 Barry Ritholtz:理解股票价值对长期投资回报至关重要。作为主持人,我强调了估值在投资决策中的核心地位,并引入了Aswath Damodaran教授,一位在估值领域享有盛誉的专家,来深入探讨这一话题。 在节目中,我与Damodaran教授就估值的各个方面进行了深入的探讨,包括内在价值的计算方法、不同估值方法的优缺点,以及投资者应该如何看待价格与价值之间的差异。 Aswath Damodaran:价值的本质是现金流、增长和风险。我详细解释了如何利用现金流、增长和风险这三个核心因素来评估一家公司的内在价值。我强调,即使是经验丰富的投资者,对同一只股票的估值结果也可能大相径庭,因为对风险的衡量方法因人而异。 我指出,市盈率、市净率等比率是基于价格而非价值的判断,卖方股票研究主要关注的是价格而非估值。 我以Nvidia为例,说明了估值需要深入了解公司的业务模式和未来前景。内在价值评估的本质是购买公司而不是股票,投资者需要深入了解所投资公司的业务。 我进一步解释了内在价值评估方法同样适用于股票指数,并阐述了初始价格越高,预期回报越低的道理。 最后,我强调了投资的本质是信仰,即对估值结果和价格回归价值的信仰。长期投资没有保证,投资者需要接受这种不确定性。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter explores the core difference between price and value, particularly in the stock market. It emphasizes that while prices fluctuate constantly, value is a more complex concept based on intrinsic worth. The discussion highlights the distinction between traders who focus on price movements and investors who seek undervalued assets.
  • Price is determined by market forces, while value is based on intrinsic worth.
  • Traders focus on short-term price changes, investors on long-term value.
  • Traditional valuation ratios like P/E are pricing mechanisms, not value measures.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Meta's open source AI, available to all, not just the few. Here's Dr. Annie Hartley, Yale professor. We use Meta's open source AI model, LAMA, to build an AI tool that helps us tailor medical advice in remote areas. Learn more at ai.meta.com slash open.

With Amex Business Platinum, your dental clinic can really sparkle. With a flexible spending limit that adapts with your business, that's the powerful backing of American Express. Not all purchases will be approved. Terms apply. Learn more at americanexpress.com slash amexbusiness. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. Because I gotta have faith. I've got to help.

Oscar Wilde once described a cynic as a man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing.

Nowhere is understanding value more important than in the stock market. Sure, prices get quoted every second, every tick, but value, that's a much more challenging problem. Whether you're buying broad indices or purchasing specific stocks, it pays to not be a cynic and understand both price and value of your investments.

I'm Barry Ritholtz, and on today's edition of At The Money, we're going to explain how to become more savvy about understanding equity values. The value you pay for your investment has an outsized impact on your long-term returns.

To help us unpack all of this and what it means for your portfolio, let's bring in Professor Aswath Damodaran of NYU School of Business. He is often referred to as the Dean of Valuation for his extensive work in the area. He's written numerous books on the subject, including Damodaran on Valuation, Narrative and Numbers, and the textbook, Transcripts.

investment valuation tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. So, Professor, let's just start with the basic question. Why are valuations so important when it comes to equities? I'm going to give you a cynical answer. They're not important if you're a trader. Traders live on pricing. I mean, the essence of pricing is you buy at a low price, you sell at a high price, and it doesn't really matter why the price changes if you get the direction right.

Value matters if you're an investor. To me, the definition of an investor is you buy something for less than what it's worth. And the essence of value is you're trying to estimate what something is worth. But most, as I said, it depends on the philosophy you bring in. Are you an investor or are you a trader? Because that's going to drive whether value matters to you. So let's talk about identifying that intrinsic value of what something is worth. With any specific company, how can you determine that valuation? Right.

It's as old as time that Venetian glassmaker who sold his business in the Middle Ages probably sold it to somebody, bought it because of the cash flows he generated, the risk in those cash flows and how much those cash flows are going to grow. It's cash flows, growth and risk. That's the essence of value. That's always been true.

We act like we invented valuation in the last century in finance because we came up with all these neat little models and metrics to measure risk and bring it into what you need to make. But value has always been driven by cash flows, growth and risk and how you get to that value.

can come from different pathways. I use intrinsic valuation, you know, in that sense as capturing anybody who thinks about those fundamentals. So let's dive into that intrinsic valuation based on cash flow, growth and risk.

What different ways are there to measure the fundamental value of a company? And how do these different valuations reveal intrinsic value? I mean, ultimately, cash flows, growth and risk are not going to be different for different people. The way we think about risk, though, can differ depending on who you are as an investor and what you think matters. I mean, I'll give you an example. In traditional finance, we think about risk by looking at how prices move for a stock relative to the market.

But there are intrinsic value people argue the true measure of risk is what happens to your earnings, your revenues, your operating metrics. So even within people who believe in intrinsic value, we can have disagreements about how to measure risk.

What is the right cash flow to look at? And what's a growth rate that you think about over what period? So while we might have 20 people in a room, all of whom buy into intrinsic value, we can come up with 20 different estimates of intrinsic value for the same company at the same point in time.

So we always hear about price to sales, price to book, price to earnings. Are these all that different? They're just variations on fundamentals, or are they very different ways of looking at the same company?

Philosophically, they're very different because when you compute the price earnings or the EV to EBITDA price to book for a company, what you do is you compare to other companies out there and you make a judgment and say, hey, this company trades at 10 times earnings. Other companies like it. And I'm going to put quotes on like it traded 15 times earnings. Therefore, it's cheap. That's a pricing judgment. There's nothing value in here. There's no intrinsic value judgment. That's why all of sell side equity research, I would argue,

is all about pricing. It's not about valuation. Nothing wrong with it, but we should be honest about what we're doing. So when you use ratios, it's because you want to find something cheap by comparing it to other things out there that are being traded right now and you're looking at what other people are paying. So you're looking at price. When people look at stocks that way, they're looking at price and

and relative valuation, not intrinsic value. Let's talk about some of the things you've explained in your books. Valuation requires a deeper understanding of the business, including how it makes money and its future prospects. Give us a little more detail on that.

I'll give you an example. It's a personal example. I bought Nvidia purely by luck in 2018. I didn't see AI coming, none of this stuff. So sometimes your best investments happen by accident.

So last year, I had to revalue NVIDIA for a simple reason. I mean, I bought it at $27 per share. The stock was trading at $800 per share. And I had to decide, is it time to leave? So as I sat down to value NVIDIA, I started with a presumption that it was a computer chip company, that it made chips and sold them. And I had to estimate cash flows based on that.

It's only as I started digging a little deeper that I realized that they're not a chip maker, they're a chip designer. Every NVIDIA chip is made by TSMC, which basically changes the way you think about the business. If you're doing pricing, you might be able to gloss over it. It doesn't matter that they do it.

But if you're doing intrinsic valuation, because I have to estimate cash flows, I have to think about what is it that they spend to create these revenues. And that requires an understanding of how they conduct their business. I mean, Warren Buffett is famous saying that he doesn't buy stocks, he buys shares of businesses. That to me, in essence, is what you're doing in intrinsic valuation.

You're not buying a share of Apple or a share of Amazon. You're buying a slice of those businesses. And if that's what you're doing, you better understand what you're buying before you pay a price. So can we apply the same theory of valuation to broad indices as opposed to just individual stocks? Absolutely. I mean, it's cash flows, growth and risk drive the value of Nvidia. Cash flows, growth and risk is what drives the value of the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ.

In fact, that's a process I use at the start of every month to come up with an estimate of what investors are pricing in the S&P 500 and what they can expect to earn given the cash flow. It's a very intrinsic value view of what can you expect to make as a rate of return on an index.

So that raises, you know, the real important question. What do these measures of evaluations mean for future expected returns? The more you pay for something, let's cut away from all of the noise in this process. The more you pay for something up front, the lower your expected returns are going to be. Because if you pay more up front, and that's just common sense.

So when you buy the S&P 500 at 5,300, you can expect to earn a lower return than if you bought it at 5,100.

So if you bought it last week, your expected return was lower than if you bought it today. And that's at the basis of intrinsic value. It's about paying the right price for something up front is the most critical decision you make. So you consistently in all your books emphasize that value is not price. So how should investors think about the difference between the quoted fluctuated price we see every day and

the quoted fluctuating price that we see every moment on the market and that deep intrinsic value. Recognize there are two different processes. Nothing makes one better than the other. Different processes. Values driven by changes in your earnings, cash flows, growth, and risk. And that...

That's captured by changing value over time. So I'm not saying intrinsic value is somehow a stable, stagnant number. The intrinsic value of NVIDIA doubled because of its entry into AI. Intrinsic value can change.

Price is driven by demand and supply, driven by mood and momentum. And I think one of the best indicators you can take of mood and momentum is when the momentum is good, all news is good news. In fact, there's a whole segment of finance called behavioral finance. And behavioral finance tries to explain why price can not only deviate from value,

but stay different for long periods. There's this inherent belief that value investors have that price will move towards value and it'll happen quickly.

That's not true. Price can deviate from value. It can stay separated from value for long periods, which means if you're an intrinsic value investor, you're going to get incredibly frustrated because you think you got it right, but you keep losing money. So you're referring to mean reversion. The expectation is that pricey things eventually come back down to fair value and inexpensive things will eventually be recognized and returned to fair value. How

How long does this process take? Is it guaranteed to happen? Does that mean reversion always occur?

It's not just mean reversion. It's assumption that values what matters in the long term. I mean, that's almost, I mean, when I start my valuation class, I started the question, do you have faith? My students look at me and say, it's a valuation class. What are you talking about? I said, the essence of investing is faith. Faith that your estimated value is the right value and faith that the price will move to value.

And the essence of faith is if you ask me to prove it, and if you tell me, tell me what will cause it to happen, my answer is, I don't know. It's a mystery. I mean, it's like going to church and going up to your pastor or your rabbi and saying, can you give me some proof that God exists? I keep coming back every week because I did. And if that rabbi or priest is telling you the truth, they should say, look, you know, I can't give you that proof. It's faith.

And I think that's what makes investing so difficult is it's driven by faith rather than by proof. So if you ask me, you know, if I bought something undervalued, am I guaranteed to make money in the long term? Absolutely not. And you have to be OK with it. If you're not OK with it, buy an index fund. Don't invest or be a trader. The essence of investing is you can do everything right and have nothing to show for it. And you have to be OK with that. Wow.

So, Professor, bottom line it for us. When we think about valuation, when investors look at equities, what should be foremost in their mind before deploying capital? First, be honest with yourself. What is the game you're playing? If you're playing the trading game, don't lie to yourself about caring about fundamentals and earnings and cash flows. Just play the trading game. Look at charts. Look at technical indicators. Look at mood and momentum because that's what you're playing.

If you want to be an investor, you need to do your homework. You can't hide behind the fact of I've never done an accounting or evaluation class. I don't understand these financial statements. The essence of investing is you got to be able to look through those financial statements and be able to gauge the value of a company. You might not want to use the full technology of intrinsic valuation, but you need to start thinking about businesses and value in a much more, in a much deeper way than you're doing right now.

If that's not your thing, that's fine. There are lots of people who get rich as traders and there's nothing wrong with trading. Just play that game well. So to wrap up, investors who have a long-term time horizon should be very aware of the variations in valuations. The more you pay for a given stock or a given market index, the lower your future expected returns are.

Understand that there are no guarantees in the market and merely buying cheap stocks is no guarantee that you're going to outperform or even market perform in the future. I'm Barry Ritholtz and this is Bloomberg's At The Money.

That's where Amazon Business steps in. They've got smart buying solutions like Spend Visibility, a cloud-based system to track your buying patterns so you can optimize your savings, and Bulk Buying, so you can continue to save costs on select products with quantity discounts. Smart, right? Let Amazon Business take care of the admin so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Check out Smart Business Buying at AmazonBusiness.com. A Business Prime membership is required to access Spend Visibility.

I think

A lot of people think that you're supposed to be going to therapy once you're like having panic attacks every day. But before you get to that point, I think once you start even noticing that you feel a little bit off and you can't maintain this harmony that you once had in relationships, that could be a sign that maybe you want to go talk to somebody.

There's always a benefit in talking to someone because we can all benefit from improved insight about ourselves and who we are and how we behave with other people. So if you're human, that's like a good indicator that you could benefit from talking to somebody. Find out if therapy is right for you. Visit BetterHelp.com today. That's BetterHelp.com.