We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode 🎤 PODCAST • Apologies and Forgiveness ~ When to re-evaluate a spouse who has cheated's character? Interview with Dr Tara Smith

🎤 PODCAST • Apologies and Forgiveness ~ When to re-evaluate a spouse who has cheated's character? Interview with Dr Tara Smith

2025/6/14
logo of podcast www.drkenner.com Answers Your Questions

www.drkenner.com Answers Your Questions

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Ellen Kenner
T
Tara Smith
Topics
Tara Smith: 我认为,那种认为我们都应该无条件地互相原谅的态度是完全没有根据的,具有误导性和破坏性的。宽恕在某些情况下是合适的,但必须是赢得的。也就是说,宽恕的可能性出现的基本情景是,一个人以某种方式伤害了另一个人,可能是严重的婚外情。当一个人成为受害者时,他面临着一个选择:我应该如何看待这个人?我应该如何理解他在这里所做的事情?你需要查看所有的证据,包括这个人之前的记录,以及他对冒犯行为的态度。他是否真正地、真诚地后悔自己对你所做的事情,并且正在采取措施加强自己,避免再次犯错,修复自己的品格。当你选择是否原谅一个人,并对这个人做出某种判断时,你所依据的是客观证据。原谅另一个人意味着不因为他的错误而完全否定他,你需要有充分的理由。需要区分两个方面:是否原谅他,以及是否继续与他保持关系。宽恕是对另一个人的一种判断,是对他品格的评估。如果他确实赢得了你的宽恕,你必须诚实地原谅他。你不欠任何人必须与你保持关系的义务,但你欠自己诚实地评估那个人的义务。 Ellen Kenner: 即使一个人已经改过自新,但如果这个人给你造成了如此深的个人伤害,以至于你再也不想见到他,这是合理的吗?即使一个人已经改过自新,你仍然因为他给你造成的伤害,不想再与他有任何联系,这是合理的吗?所以宽恕不是像在犹太-基督教伦理中那样,用橡皮擦擦除他们的过去。真正的自尊来自于依靠你的思考能力。这意味着认真对待事实,即使你不喜欢它们。努力获得知识,而不是在茫然中度过一生。独立思考,而不是出于被动或害怕不赞同而盲目地追随他人。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

The Selfish Path to Romance. Download Chapter 1 for free at drkenner.com and at amazon.com. Thank you all for coming. And I think there's been a serious misunderstanding. I want you all to know that everything that you have seen in my theater is an illusion. It's a trick. It's not real. I can't bring loved ones back from the grave. I can't receive messages from the other side. I apologize if I've given you any false hope. My intention has only been to entertain. Nothing more.

And can you imagine hearing that said by some of these scam artists? There are so many of them out there. In this case, this is from the movie The Illusionist. If you haven't seen it, I will say nothing else about it. See it, enjoy it, have fun with it. It is a passionate movie. It is a wonderful, wonderful movie. And with me to discuss forgiveness, apologies, is Dr. Tara Smith, a specialist in ethics.

and she's a professor of philosophy at the University of Texas, Austin, where she currently holds the Anthem Foundation Fellowship. And she is the author of I Am.

Rand's Normative Ethics. Now get this, the subtitle is The Virtuous Egoist. Imagine loving your own life and having it be moral, virtuous. And welcome to the show, Tara. Thank you. It's nice to be here. And you know, people will say, I get many cases where people will come in and a wife or a husband has cheated on one another.

And they say, you know, but it's my husband's duty to forgive me. He should have mercy on me. Or my wife's duty to forgive me. That, you know, I had a few affairs, but she should be able to just turn the other cheek and go light on me. And she doesn't. She's real angry with me. Can you talk about forgiveness? Yes.

Yeah. Yeah, I think that is a very prevalent attitude, that we all owe one another forgiveness, whatever the misdeed, the wrongs that may have been committed. And I think it's a completely unfounded, misguided, destructive idea. Forgiveness can be appropriate in some cases, but it's got to be earned. That is,

I mean, the basic scenario in which the possibility of forgiveness even arises is one in which one person has in some way, shape, or form wronged another. It could be something as serious, as grave as the marital infidelity example that you raised. It could be breaking a confidence, and depending on what that confidence was about, that could be a more or less serious thing. There are all sorts of ways, minor or major, full spectrum, in which one person can, again, wrong another or transgress.

When one is the victim of this, you face a choice of how should I view this person? Exactly. How should I understand what he did here? I've had people say to me, how do I judge my wife's character? How do I judge my husband's character now that he's cheated on me? I don't know. I'm confused. Well, what you've got to do is look at all of the evidence. The person's previous track record.

how serious this offense was, what the person's own attitude toward the offense is. You know, is it a kind of casual, oh, what are you so upset about, honey?

Is it a, yeah, I'm sorry, come on, I told you I'm sorry, you know, expressed just for paying lip service in a very hollow way? Does the person, you know, alternatively, it's clear to you, and this is the kind of thing that can usually only be made clear over some period of time, that the person himself truly, sincerely regrets what he did to you.

that he doesn't want to be the kind of person who did that thing or could do such a thing, that he is taking steps to try to strengthen himself, but to not do it again. To repair his character. Yeah. I mean, there will be objective evidence.

about this person character and that is what you're stepping when you're when you're choosing whether or not to forgive a part to forgive a person to reach a certain kind of judgment about that person a certain sort of moral conclusion it in effect today while what he did here was wrong

I'm not going to write him off completely on the basis of that, or I'm not going to take that misdeed as a sign of an irredeemably bad character. But if that's what the judgment of forgiving another person is, then you have to have good reason.

to not write him off on that basis. To think, yes, this was a terrible thing he did, but... And there's got to be a follow-up to that but. But he's also done A, B, C, D, and E, and he's trying to make it up to me, and I have these reasons to think it's... And let's say in the case of an affair, he's trying very hard to make it up. And let's say that we give him 100%, a gold star for his effort. He does everything right. And the wife still sits there and says...

I went through, I don't know, months or years of hell, and the damage and the scars are so deep that even if he's repaired his character, I never want to see his face again, assuming they don't have kids. Is that legitimate? Even if the person has...

gone on and made themselves a decent person again that you have been so personally wounded by that person that you don't want to connect with them anymore. Now, I think that's a very interesting question, and I think we have to distinguish between two things. Hey, I've got to interrupt this because we've got to pay some bills. 30 seconds, that's it. A very quick ad, and then Ellen will be back. Romance. Oh, I wish guys knew more about what we want from a relationship.

Boy, I wish I knew more about what I want. Where's that ad I saw? Ah, here it is. The Selfish Path to Romance. A serious romance guidebook. Download Chapter 1 for free at SelfishRomance.com and buy it at Amazon.com.

Hmm, the selfish path to romance. That is interesting. Now, I think that's a very interesting question, and I think we have to distinguish between two things, two different aspects of the woman, in this case, her response to the husband. One is whether or not she forgives him. The other is whether or not she continues to have a relationship with him. Forgiveness, as I was saying a few minutes ago, is forgiveness.

a kind of judgment that you make of another person. It's an assessment of his character. And if, as you said, this guy has truly earned the gold star, he has distanced himself from that sort of action, et cetera, et cetera, then he has earned your forgiveness in the sense that he has earned your equation. A different evaluation. I'm sorry? A different evaluation of his current character. Exactly. So your evaluation has to be truthful to what all of the evidence is. And if he's

He truly is a good guy who regrets this terrible transaction. You have to honestly forgive him. However...

That doesn't entail that you have to get back into bed with him. So you don't have to love this person that did damage to you. Your emotions may not be up to speed with your conscious evaluation. And he did do real damage to you, so why wouldn't that be integrated? That is the kind of breach of marital fidelity that is typically searing.

to the victim. And it is natural that her emotions may not have yet caught up and they may never be caught up. But you don't owe it to a person to have an ongoing relationship with you. You owe it to a person because you owe it to yourself to be honest in evaluating that person. And again, not that...

She would be accurate in saying, I can see that he's changed his character, but he is the individual that damaged me in the past, and I choose, because of the harm he did me in the past, even if he's changed and I recognize that fact fully, I don't like him. I never want contact with him.

Well, I also think... I mean, I think that would probably be one possibility. I would see it slightly differently in this way. A person might think, yes,

He has reformed that bad part of himself, and he is basically a good guy and so on. But simply, it's too painful for me. The memories of the affair still flood whenever I'm with him. That's a good point. Very good point. So it's not even that I don't like him. It's just that I do like him, but the emotions are still too rich and alive. So it's a mixed case.

And I don't have any obligation to anyone to put myself through that if that's what maintaining the relationship, at least at this day, is. Very good point. Very good point.

Very, very good point. So forgiveness is not taking an eraser, like in the Judeo-Christian ethics, and erasing their past the way we would erase a traffic violation off of a record. It's not that. It has to be earned by accurate evaluation of a person's character by rational standards. Exactly. And sometimes it will be earned, in which case you do owe it to the person to forgive him.

And sometimes it won't be earned. So I think forgiveness itself is not a virtue. It's not an unconditional good. The propriety of forgiving somebody really depends on the evidence about what that person is doing. So it's always... Yeah, go ahead.

to reform himself, what his own attitude is toward the transgression. So it's always being reality-based. I'm with Dr. Tara Smith, who is the author of Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics, The Virtuous Egoist. Thank you so much for joining us, Tara. Thank you. For more Dr. Kenner podcasts, go to drkenner.com and please listen to this ad. Here's an excerpt

From the Selfish Path to Romance, the Serious Romance Guidebook by clinical psychologist Dr. Ellen Kenner and co-author Dr. Edwin Locke, who's world famous for his theories in goal setting. How do you make yourself worthy? Genuine self-esteem comes from relying on your power to think. This means, for example, taking facts seriously, even when you don't like them. Can you really afford that new car?

Exerting mental effort to gain knowledge rather than drifting through life in a daze. Do you try to improve your job skills, your knowledge of the world? Thinking independently rather than blindly following others out of passivity or fear of disapproval.

Do you ever pretend to agree with things that friends say, even though you strongly disagree with them? You can download Chapter 1 for free by going to drkenner.com. And you can buy The Selfish Path to Romance at Amazon.com.