5/9/25: Woke Marxist Pope? Trump CAVES on China, Loomer RAGES at Casey Means
58:00 Share

You're listening to an iHeart Podcast. My husband has a secret son from a past partner. Hold up, Sam. How do we know? Have we done the DNA test? Well, John, luckily it's mother. May I have a DNA test week on the OK Storytime podcast? So we'll find out soon. And this wife writes, my husband received a Facebook message from a woman saying that he is the father of a five-year-old. Whoa! At first, he didn't remember her, but then he realized they had a one-night stand right before we started dating. Wait, but do we have...

To hear the explosive finale, listen to the OK Storytime podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

This week on Dear Chelsea with me, Chelsea Handler, Connie Britton is here. I think you should encourage your friend to go ahead and not be holding out for any man to have her babies. She could be waiting another 10 years before she finds the right guy. Connie didn't meet her right guy until you were what, 50, Connie? 52. 52. I kept thinking, oh, I'm going to meet the guy. I'm going to meet the guy. I'm going to meet the guy.

I finally was like, what am I waiting for? And I did it. And I'm just so glad that I did. Listen to Dear Chelsea on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I want you to ask yourself right now, how am I actually doing? Because it's a question that we rarely ask ourselves. All of May is actually Mental Health Awareness Month and on the psychology of your 20s, we are taking a vulnerable look at why mental health is so hard to talk about. Prepare for our conversations to go deep. I spent the majority of my teenage years and my 20s just feeling absolutely terrified.

Welcome to Breaking Points. Crystal, good morning. Good morning, Emily. Lovely to see you and lovely to see our guest.

Right. We are joined now by Damian Thompson. He is an editor at The Spectator. He hosts the Holy Smoke podcast over there. And Damian, we may see our co-host Ryan Grimm pop up at some point while we're chatting with you. In fact, here he is. But Damian, I first want to say you are in Rome right now. You have been covering the events of the last 24 hours. First

first American pope has been chosen. So first, Damien, thank you so much for being here. And if you could just give us your initial reaction, this was a surprising pick. Steve Bannon, I think last week described him as the quote, dark horse, a potential dark horse candidate. And that's actually what happened. So you're the expert here, Damien. What do you make of all this? Well, I think the first thing I want to say is that there's a mood of real optimism in Rome today.

People who had dismissed Cardinal Prevost as Francis Mark II, some sort of hopeless, scheming liberal, have been very pleasantly surprised, first of all, by the sight of him coming on to the loggia of St. Peter's, wearing the traditional robes that Francis rejected. Secondly, by the choice of name, Leo, which is a very traditional one.

by his style and on checking his record they discover that he isn't perhaps as liberal as they thought, that he seems to have relatively orthodox views on the sensitive issues of

sexuality that have proved to be so divisive in the Catholic Church. And there are also rumors that he's sympathetic to the traditional Latin mass. So all of that is causing traditionalists who initially reacted with dismay when they heard the name to change their verdicts fairly quickly. And you can see it happening on Twitter.

They like the way he's presented himself. They like the thoughtful theological message. They particularly liked his very Christ-centered homily in the Sistine Chapel to the Cardinals this morning. So I think above all, it's just a sense of relief that the bizarre, quixotic and often

I think personally cruel pontificate of Francis has come to an end. There will not be a Francis II. As I've written many times, Francis was involved in so many horrible abuse cover-ups that I think his legacy is profoundly tainted.

So one of the things, of course, that people immediately noticed is Prevost's social media profile being the modern era. And several of his recent tweets, actually all of his recent tweets, seem to be quite critical of the Trump administration. This one in particular, he chimes in here and says, J.D. Vance is wrong. Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others. So that led to that, among other things, led to

Republicans like Laura Loomer calling him a woke Marxist pope and really despairing about his liberal inclinations. What do you make about his political commentary with regard to J.D. Vance and also the meeting with President Trump and the Kelly in the White House?

Well, he's not a big fan of MAGA, that's for sure. But there's a big difference between a woke Marxist and somebody who doesn't approve of the second Trump administration. And there are plenty of woke Marxists in the Catholic Church, but there's no evidence that Pope Leo is one of them.

He is probably left-leaning on the subject of migration, and it's always puzzled me that the Catholic Church is so keen on advocating mass migration without any thought about its long-term social consequences. On the other hand, and perhaps you guys can help clear up this mystery for me, what's this business about him not

Not being a registered Republican, because I understand that the state of Illinois doesn't have registration in that way, but having voted in a series of Republican primaries. Could somebody clear that up for me? Yes. You know, I think that might be Charlie Kirk polled today.

his voting history. Charlie Kirk also is from the Chicago area, pulled his voting history. And it might be the case that he's sort of from the never Trump school of the conservative movement here in the United States. He's a Chicago guy.

It's very interesting, Damien. I guess we'll see. It's always difficult to map. Go ahead. We know that he's pro-life, and it's very, very hard for an orthodox, pro-life Catholic, and the new Pope certainly is orthodox on the subject of abortion, to support the Democrats, who are incredibly dogmatic in their support for abortion, including late-term abortion. So I would have been very surprised, for example, if...

The new Pope had supported Kamala Harris. He probably didn't support either of them. What do we know about his time in Peru relative to child sex abuse cover-ups? That's an open question. I don't know. I've just seen some talk about that.

This was why my jaw dropped open when I heard Robert Francis. I immediately knew who it was because I had just been reading some very detailed coverage in the influential Catholic investigative publication, The Pillar.

which is very highly respected, about allegations that Cardinal Prevost, when Bishop of Chicago in Peru,

brushed aside complaints by women that they'd been abused by priests. And he was also accused of watering down the severity of their accusations. And therefore, you know, before the conclave, abuse survivors organizations were

drawing attention to what they claimed was his bad record on this and there's also a case dating back to 2000 in which as an Augustinian prior or whatever he was in Chicago he was accused of allowing a pedophile priest to live and operate near a school and as I understand it the new pope has

who merely invoked some sort of formal excuse for the Chicago, for the Chicago, excuse me if I get it wrong, for the Peruvian complaints by these women and offered no explanation for what happened in Chicago. So that is being followed up. I saw it was followed up in the Daily Mail today and it won't go away. But I think I would make a distinction. These things have to be taken incredibly seriously, but I would make a distinction between women

Failure to deal adequately with abuse allegations, which is terrible, but of which vast numbers of bishops have been guilty. And the sort of grossly negligent and culpable covering up of, in some cases, convicted abusers that Pope Francis indulged in.

which I think, you know, I regard his pontificate as a disgrace for that reason alone and the failure of the press to follow that up. So it would be a little bit strange if the press concentrated so much attention on following up this absolutely legitimate story and ignored the fact that the late Pope has a record which, you know, had he been the head of state,

anywhere in the West world would have forced him to resign years before he died.

Damien, what do you make of the politics of choosing an American pope? What is the significance of that? And, you know, do you have any, have you heard any rumors about some of the internal politics about how he was chosen from an ideological perspective as well? Well, I'm not so sure that the Cardinals thought of him as an American pope because this is a guy who spent nearly his entire life

certainly his entire Episcopal career, in Latin America. And before that, he was a missionary in Latin America. So I suspect that it was the Latin American voting bloc, which might perhaps otherwise have gone to Cardinal Tagliatelle,

that carried him over the two-thirds majority. So I'm not so sure. I mean, obviously people are aware that he was born and brought up in America. But he is, you know, he has a mixed ancestry and had spent so much of his adult life in Latin America that I think it was the Latin American bloc that really backed him. But that's conjecture. I saw something about the name Leo

potentially signaling some type of reference to Leo XIII's labor encyclical. I'm deeply out of my depth when it comes to this stuff, but I understand there was... Leo XIII was doctrinally orthodox and in some ways the founder of modern Catholic social teaching.

So in a way, the choice of the name Leo, if it refers to Leo XIII, and there are many other great popes called Leo, including some not so great popes called Leo. But if it is a reference to Leo XIII, then that might indicate some sort of balance between doctrinal orthodoxy. And it does seem to be doctrinally orthodox, more so than orthodoxy.

Francis is bizarre and haphazard mixture of impenetrable spirituality, I think, and a very pronounced social conscience, one that has, whether you agree with him or not, already led him into conflict with the Trump administration. But on the other hand, I think President Trump is actually very keen to, in as far as he possibly can, have good relations with the Catholic Church. So I think Trump will take...

But there won't be the same sort of insults and sniping and, you know, goading that Francis directed at Trump. If Pope Leo wants to criticize the Trump administration, he will do so in an honest, straightforward and civil manner.

Damian, one thing that people like myself, I'm not a Catholic, but people who are on the left who appreciated Pope Francis really respected was his commitment to and focusing on an anti-war message and especially vis-a-vis the atrocities committed in Gaza. I wonder if you have any insight into Pope Leo's perspective on that conflict. I have none whatsoever, but I want to ask you something. You're talking about respecting a man

who protected a serial rapist of nuns. How does he earn your respect? I'm not having a go at you, Crystal Pussley, because I'm a fan of yours, but really, a man who doesn't that, I mean, really doesn't that overshadow everything? So many abuse victims had their stories ignored and their

their abusers are pulled and protected by this man, Francis. How can anyone? I'll answer that. I think that people who are not intimately involved with or familiar with the Catholic Church and don't know the details of it assume that pretty much everybody in the leadership there is involved.

And to some degree with covering up media, that's a gross failure of the media. And there are covered up. I think maybe Crystal knows the most recent numbers, something like 13,000 children have been killed by Israel. And so anybody who speaks out against that is going to get a hearing from people who are opposed to that. It's a pope.

to abuse his personal authority to protect a Jesuit, ex-Jesuit, accused of abusing and raping 20 young women, including religious sisters, in an order he founded, which is basically a sex cult, and for him to enjoy the personal protection of the Pope, who kept his vile artwork on the wall of his apartment until the day he died. This is...

This is Rupnik that we're talking about? This is Rupnik, exactly. This should have been a very good story, but there was a corrupt Vatican press corps who kept the story out of the headlines. Which helps to explain why I think, yeah, why people like us don't think that there's a whole lot of difference in the choice. Like, okay, whoever you're going to get is going to be protected by the press. But Damien, I do want to get back... I want to hammer home this point. There's a huge difference between...

Both are appalling, but there's a difference between cover-ups and the sort of very, very active protection mechanisms

of convicted abusers that France has indulged in. So Damian, fair enough. I hear your point. I hear your point. And I confess to being ignorant on many of the specifics about who covered up what and what their level of culpability was. But I do want to know if you have any perspective on how Pope Leo may orient himself vis-a-vis war and peace and specifically with regard to Israel's atrocity in Gaza.

And also Ukraine. I think there's a question of that as well. I just don't know at this stage. My assumption is that he'll want to be a peacemaker. My assumption is that he would condemn some of Israel's actions as well as, of course, condemning the

appalling slaughter of Israelis by Hamas, I wouldn't expect him to align very clearly with either side. I would be surprised if he was as indulgent of Russia as Pope Francis seems to have been on occasion. But that's speculation. So... And Damien...

My last question, just to actually kind of wrap all of this up, is I've relied a lot on your reporting over the course of the last papacy. And I know that Leo is an ally of Francis. And I'm genuinely curious if everything that you just explained that has really been a failure of the media to cover deeply and to focus on and to put front and center of the discourse about what was happening in Vatican City.

Does the new pope have any complicity in Francis's regime of covering things up and silencing and indulging particular guilty parties? It's a really good question, because in a sense, I mean, he was a very senior member of the Curia. In a sense, every cardinal who failed to speak up

about what they knew was happening, which was that the Pope was covering up for convicted as well as credibly accused vile sex abusers, really has some explaining to do. And Pope Leo, like the cardinals who elect him,

not only has some explaining to do, I would say on that count, but has to do something about it. And what everybody's been saying to me in Rome for years is as soon as Francis dies, it will all come out. I hope it does. And when it does come out, the level of complicity of Francis in covering up sex crimes all over the world, if that really does come out, then that will be a huge diplomatic problem for the new Pope.

But at least it will be confronted, which it desperately needs to be, because the fact that the general public doesn't know the extent of the depravity is shocking in itself. Damien, we are all non-Catholics here. So we really appreciate you coming on, especially someone so well sourced, literally in Rome right now to help us understand. A great pleasure. Let me just emphasize the mood here is upbeat.

Thank you, Davian. We really appreciate it. Thanks a lot.

This week on Dear Chelsea with me, Chelsea Handler, Connie Britton is here. I think you should encourage your friend to go ahead and not be holding out for any man to have her babies. If she is passionate about becoming a mother and she has her eggs frozen and she has her life together, go for it. She could be waiting another 10 years before she finds the right guy. Connie didn't meet her right guy until you were what, 50, Connie?

How long have you guys been together? Yeah, no, 52. 52! I adopted my son as a single mom because I kept thinking, oh, I'm going to meet the guy, I'm going to meet the guy, I'm going to meet the guy. I finally was like, what am I waiting for? And I did it. And I'm just so glad that I did. I want to change the narrative about single parents and also help to

create a community for single parents so that they can not feel alone in it. One of the big things is it's so hard, especially for women, to ask for help. Listen to Dear Chelsea on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

My husband has a secret son from a past partner. Hold up, Sam. How do we know? Have we done the DNA test? Well, John, luckily, it's mother. May I have a DNA test week on the OK Storytime podcast? So we'll find out soon. And this wife writes, my husband received a Facebook message from a woman saying that he is the father of a five-year-old. Whoa! At first, he didn't remember her, but then he realized they had a one-night stand right before we started dating. Wait, but do we have proof he's the dad? Well, the author says there's no confirmation the kid is even his son, but...

the woman from facebook has a meeting with her lawyer soon i think she's going after our money if the kid is actually my husband's she would be entitled to it too so what's the husband got to say about this this could be his kid well apparently he broke down in the middle of the living room apologizing

But this is what scared me. His first instinct, if the kid is his son, is to pay the child support but not be an active father in the kid's life because he only wants a family with me, his wife. Oh, this is a mess. To hear the explosive finale, follow OK Storytime on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

All right. So interesting perspective from the right there. I, you know, I have, listen, I have no idea what the reality of how Pope Leo is going to position himself. But, you know, I will say the reaction I've seen has been quite different. You know, the left is very encouraged by, you know,

Even the choice, as Ryan was getting at, of Leo as the name. Certainly the sniping at J.D. Vance. The upset from much of the right, including the Laura Loomers of the world. So, you know, a lot to be seen about how he positions himself, but also how

To your point, Emily, I mean, he was someone who was close to Pope Francis and had been put in this position of selecting many of the cardinals and bishops, which also may have put him sort of in the pole position to achieve this position, you know, not knowing anything about the politics involved here. But what do you make of this, Emily, before we let you go? Because I know you've got things to do today, too.

Little flight to catch, so hopefully the real ID doesn't mess that up. But yeah, my Catholic friends are, I mean, I would put it this way. I think one of the things that Damien said is really interesting, that the initial reaction was pretty uncomfortable as soon as people started scrolling through his Twitter feed, Pope Leo's Twitter feed. And it's extremely political.

It was as though the only times he was tweeting or retweeting was to make political statements. Now, that's not exactly accurate, but it accounts for probably 50 to 60 percent of the tweets over the last several years on his feed, which means that he has a well of frustration with MAGA as an American and with the Trump administration, with J.D. Vance, who is a Catholic Catholic.

convert. One of Francis's, I think, points of tension with J.D. Vance and others is that there's this wing of Catholic converts, particularly in the United States, who do like the Latin Mass. And that's what Damien was alluding to. And they see that as kind of a proxy for this anger at the modernization attempts in the Vatican. And so all this is to say, I think... So basically the Latin Mass sort of codes right wing, correct? Yeah. This is like the J.D. Vance version of Catholicism.

Yeah, like tradcasts. And I don't know if JD does Latin mass, but it's sort of seen as like a proxy for that. But Leo comes from that sort of strain, the Francis type of strain of the church. And so I think what Damien pointed out was interesting, that over the last 24 hours, some of the people who were hoping for a more conservative choice have come to reconsider whether Leo might have things that they really like, and they're now feeling quote unquote upbeat. We'll see. But my last big thought on this is just,

I think my Catholic friends might not like me saying this, but there's a desperation for a breath of fresh air because Francis has mismanaged things, whether you're liberal or conservative. The guy mismanaged things. He was complicit in cover ups. He was such an intense character that I think there's some of my conservative friends who get really frustrated with mapping contemporary American politics onto the Vatican left right. It doesn't work perfectly. That's absolutely true.

At the same time, this guy was posting seemingly only to make a point against the American right over and over again. So I get that it's complicated, but I think he's probably closer to Francis than some of my conservative Catholic friends probably will agree.

They'll probably find this out in ways that are unpleasant to come. Yeah. So there's some coping going on potentially here. Possible cope. Everybody got Francis wrong. Like the first day or two after when Francis was named, everybody thought he was kind of a conservative. Oh, really? I don't remember that. Yeah, there was like a 24-hour period where the right was celebrating and the left was freaking out. And then he went around kissing people's feet and people were like, oh, okay.

Wow. Yeah. Francis was like really, really, really anti-abortion. I mean, isn't any Pope going to be anti-abortion? Yeah. For him, it was like he had, you know, everyone has sort of like a suite of issues that are their priorities. And that was definitely one of his. So that's what the rights were reacted to immediately when it came to. So they got that wrong. Yeah. All right. So I guess we'll see. Anyway, Emily, I'll let you go for the day. Great to see you as always. Have a great weekend. We'll see you next week. Thanks, guys. See ya.

Ryan, how are you this morning? Wonderful. How about yourself? Good. Thank you for standing up for my honor with Damien. I like it.

Like, well, you know, yes, this is obviously the sexual abuse scandal is an incredibly important one. But also, you know, there are other issues that we could discuss here as well. So in any case, speaking of other issues discussed, there's a ton that I want to get to in the show. And also, by the way, guys, Ryan's going to have to jump about 10 o'clock. We have a special guest, very special guest. Surprise guest.

Who has a long commute from two rooms away in order to join us this morning for the premium portion of the show. And we've got lots of stuff to get into with regard to trade. And I definitely want to get Ryan's take before he goes on the abundance caucus newly formed. And if we have time, we'll get a little bit of your thoughts on Casey Means. She may be right up your alley, Ryan. I don't know. You have... Shrooms and crystals? Yeah, man. Talking to trees? Yeah. Might be your gal. Yeah.

Is she talking to trees or is she just listening to them? Because if you're listening to trees and hearing from them, I'm with that. If you're talking to them,

That's too far. That's too far. OK. All right. We'll investigate. We'll investigate. First, I want to let me see what I got here first. I want to get into this trade stuff. And in particular, there's some news this morning. I don't know if you've seen this yet. I'm sure you probably have. But Trump posted that he thinks that an 80 percent tariff on China seems right up to Scott B. being Scott Besant. So basically, China's strategy of do nothing and win seems to be working out right now.

Yeah, and markets jumped on the UK trade deal yesterday because it was kind of a nothing burger of a deal.

Yeah. Basically, apparently the UK makes cars and they're going to be allowed to sell like 100,000 cars into the US at a reduced tariff rate. And in exchange, they will reduce their digital tax that they were hitting our big tech companies with. And there's some tariff reciprocity, basically like a free trade steel zone that we're creating with the UK. And we're still going to then hit other steel with a 25% tariff. And because there wasn't really much to it,

And Trump sold it as this like historic deal with our best friends across the pond. That sent a signal to the markets that he's looking for face saving ways out of this trade war. And so the hope then from the markets is, OK, he understands he's lost and he's going to wind this down.

And so I think that's why the markets popped. I think the markets might be a little wrong. Like we should probably, you know, dial up Jeff Stein again, see what he thinks. But I think he might be more committed to continuing this until he gets a real punch in the face that he doesn't recover from him quickly. But so that's where we are. And then, you know, knocking tariffs on China down to 80% is also silly because it's

Anything above a pretty trivial percentage is a meaningful tariff. So the difference between 80 and 145 isn't that significant because in either case, most importers, most businesses that rely on Chinese imports are out of business. So whether you're out of business at 80% or out of business at 145% doesn't really matter to the company that goes bankrupt.

But it's a move in that direction. Let me show you this, which is kind of shocking. So China apparently reported bumper April exports.

Ahead of crucial trade talks with the U.S., China's exports actually grew sharply in April, despite Trump's Liberation Day tariffs on shipments to the U.S., strengthening Beijing's hand ahead of crucial trade negotiations due to start this weekend. Strong performance came as Chinese companies diverted trade flows to Southeast Asia, Europe and other destinations following the imposition of

prohibitively high tit-for-tat tariffs between the world's two largest economies. Exports rose 8.1% in dollar terms compared with a year earlier, China's custom set on Friday, beating analysts' forecast in a poll by Reuters of 1.9% growth, but slowing from 12% growth in March when figures were buoyed by exporters seeking to get ahead of expected tariffs by front-loading shipments to the U.S. So in spite of a dramatic reduction in trade rates,

with us. In fact, China's exports grew post-Liberation Day and grew sharply year over year because we are not the entire world. And it turns out that they had other options available to them, especially as we did everything we could to piss off all of the countries around the entire world.

contrary to the proposal, I think Scott Besson had laid out of, hey, we're going to have this encirclement strategy and we're going to try to isolate China. And then they go about it by basically pissing off everyone that they possibly can. Right. And I think one thing that is underestimated is the role of kind of inertia in global affairs. Like China has been selling stuff to us because that's what they do. Like the relationships are set up, the contracts are in place.

Um, it's, it's smooth. It works. We've got to figure it out. And that doesn't mean that they didn't have other options where they could sell stuff. And we kind of took that to mean that we were the only buyer in the world, you know, for this, these products. And what China is showing here is that actually, um, if they do the, if they do, if they're forced to do the work to find other buyers, Southeast Asia and Europe, you know, do have some consumers who are

willing to buy the 28 dolls that we're not allowed to anymore. That we're not going to have anymore. This is kind of contrary to what you were saying about the UK trade deal. So let me get your reaction to this. Charles Gasparino says, now you know why Powell didn't cut rates after the UK deal. If the 10% tariff is in the UK deal, not sure how we escaped some economic reprocessing.

repercussions, i.e. inflation in the short term at the very least, since UK is a friend where we sell more stuff to than we import, i.e. 10% on the UK means much higher on countries we have deficits with. That's the tariff investment calculation you're hearing on Wall Street right now. So basically, like you said, the UK deal, I mean, first of all, we should be clear, it's not even actually a deal yet. It's like concepts of a plan kind of a deal. But it leaves in place most of the 10% tariff.

which is what it was already at. Now, there were other provisions involved as you laid out some of them previously. But basically what Gasparino was saying is like, okay, well, 10% is the baseline. That's the best deal you're going to be able to get. Then that indicates some significant inflationary pressures on countries around the world. Again, so it's like irrationality layered on top of irrationality. And it's this weird game theory where everybody is trying to figure out

what irrational thing and unpredictable thing is going to happen and trying to predict that. So in this case, what I think is going on is that the mark and the markets only ended up like 80 or something. They were up significantly throughout the day and then came down. I think what they took from it is that, OK, he's not really going to keep that 10 percent on them. He's saying that for now.

But he reached a deal and the whole point of the deal is that the tariffs are going to come down. And so, you know, once once they start to bite a little bit and have real world consequences because we've got the deal, he's going to use the deal to quietly just get rid of those. Now, they could be totally wrong about that. And this is why I'm saying it's irrationality layered over irrationality. But I think that's what they're I think that's the assumption there, because Gasparino is right that like if that 10 percent is solid.

then yeah, that signals everyone's going to get at least 10 and other people are going to get higher. But what about Trump's approach to any of this suggests that any of this is solid? That anything is solid. Yeah. So that's why I think that's what I think is going on, that he may assume that this is all soft.

I want to get your reaction to J.D. Vance got asked about the number of dolls that that anyone will be permitted to to have here. So let me go and pull this up because his his answer was interesting. Let me go and get your reaction to this. Right. So the president said, you know, maybe American kids should have three dolls instead of 30 or whatever the number was. Do you agree?

Do you tell the people of this country that you need to make some sacrifices in order to reorganize this bad trade relationship? Well, I think the president's point here is that, yeah, we do need to become more self-reliant. And that's not going to happen overnight. And it's not always going to be easy, Martha. But what I'd ask people is not whether they want $2 or $5 or $20 for their kids.

I'd ask American moms and dads, would you like to be able to go into a pharmacy and know that the drugs your kids need are actually available to you as an American parent? Would you like to, God forbid, if your country goes to a war and your son or daughter is sent off to fight, would you like to know that the weapons that they have are good American-made stuff, not made by a foreign adversary? What President Trump is talking about is bringing self-reliance back to the United States economy. We have an

What do you think of that explanation here? You know, I wish that it didn't feel like this stuff was reverse engineered. And what I mean by that is Trump seems to now understand that, oh, the shelves are going to be empty. Now I have to come up with a rationale for why I support why the shelves being empty is actually a good thing.

Right. When when if you actually start from the principle that we consume too much junk, it's it's it's spiritually degrading. It's it's bad for the environment. It doesn't make us feel better about ourselves. It's it's empty. Then and then you flow from there and try to bring the whole country together around that idea. That's to me, that's delightful.

And a spiritual regeneration of the, of an entire public. Wonderful. Agreed. And, and, but there has to be not just, you're not going to have dolls, but there has to be a replacement for that consumerist ideology that we've been sold for decades and decades. Right. Which, which we don't have like this. Consumerism is a thing that stitches us together. Yeah. And you, you, you pull that apart without replacing it with anything, you know, God save us. You know, so it could, so,

But if the process of getting to that, the process of working it through, if we did it collectively, could result in lower levels of unhappiness, less plastic in our bloodstream. All of these things would be good. You've got young kids. Yeah.

It should be a crime like that every single little kid's birthday party, they have to give you a giant bag of plastic when you walk out that the kids play with for 30 seconds in the car.

on the way home and then don't touch again. And it's genuinely awful. Like that's horrible stuff. To me, the deeper worry, and I suspect you share this, is actually about social media and specifically with regard to AI. And this administration is running a million miles an hour to...

Wild West AI. We're just going to take off all the brakes. We've got to win the AI race. We're just going to unleash this potentially

extraordinarily destructive force on society without even contemplating what the impacts will be without planning for them, without creating any sort of a safety net if there's mass job replacement. I'm sure you read the, what was it, a New York magazine piece about everybody cheating on their college tests. And like, you know, that particular like narrow problem, you could figure, okay, well now you just have to write essays in class instead of you can't, you know, there's no taking out your phone. Sounds like we're not going to bother trying to figure that out though. Yeah. But,

To me, it speaks to, correct, but also to me, it speaks to, you know, the same way that I used this example with Emily yesterday, that GPS made us like unable to navigate like that part of our brain just atrophied completely. Yep. AI is going to do that for basically everything. Yeah.

And if we were a functioning society, we would be dealing with that, right? We would be thinking about it. We would be planning for it. We would be reining it in. And so, you know, that's just an example of how

Contrary to the idea that there's some plan here from the Trump administration to remake the social contract in a way that is going to be healthier and more fulfilling and spiritually regenerative, I think is the word that you use. It's the exact opposite. We're running a million miles in the other direction and not even looking to consider where we might be headed. And doubling our energy.

Yes. In order to do it. Yes. Yeah. No, Naomi Klein talks about how this is like a vampiric technology because it eats up the resources that you actually need for not just humanity, but for creation. Your body, your mind, your soul and your energy. Yeah, that's right. In order to create this mirror world. And it's it's endlessly disturbing to me. And, you know, I don't know what to do about it other than to.

to complain and worry. The last economic piece that I wanted to, I actually really want you to make, I want to make sure I'm thinking about this the right way because the media has been saying, Oh, Trump wants to lift taxes on the rich. He's he called Mike Johnson. He told him he wants to hike the top tax rate. But as I was reading the details here, it's not exactly as it's being portrayed. So the change,

The change here would roll back one of the tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017 as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. That measure reduced the rate on income earned in the top bracket to 37% from 39.6%. This year, the top income bracket starts at roughly $600,000 for an individual. Mr. Trump is effectively seeking to restore the previous top rate, but at a much higher income level. So just

Just so people know, if nothing happens, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, those tax breaks expire and taxes go up on everybody, but especially because they got the biggest cuts on the rich. So what we're talking about here, what Trump is proposing is still giving a tax break to the rich, but not as much, quite as much of one as he had previously given. Am I understanding this correctly? That's right. Except for so some.

You could imagine a rich person who makes $20 million a year

uh, which is, you know, there, there are, I think there's in the hundreds or maybe the thousands at the most of people in the United States who make that amount of money. People can look it up. It's that, that number is available. Uh, those people would pay a little bit more because everything above a certain threshold there, you know, they're jumping from what, whatever it was, you know, 36 something to like 39. Uh, and so that,

Those couple points would then hit everything above that level. But that's a tiny number of people. So if you're a typical... But if you don't renew the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which is the whole $4 trillion that they're trying to do, then taxes are going to go up on them far more. It's a huge cut relative to not doing anything. Absolutely. Yeah. So it's still a cut. Even on the richest people. It's just not quite as much of a cut as what he had originally planned. Yes. He's still giving a big cut.

to the very rich, but a little bit less than he gave to them previously. Yes. OK. All right. All right. Let me get your take on this abundance caucus because you've been you've been you had some interesting insights on this. So you have some Democrats now who are starting an abundance caucus and abundance inspired caucus in particular. What is this guy's name? Josh Harder.

From California, says House Democrats are getting Ezra Klein pilled. Bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Josh Harder is launching a new roughly 30 member block claiming inspiration from abundance movement championed by the liberal commentator Klein. I guess my question is, like, is this really necessary? Because I feel like we have ideological groups that are already pretty abundance pilled.

Well, I mean, you've got to seize the abundance caucus. And, you know, maybe they hope that they'll be able to get Ezra to come speak to their caucus. Like, you know, he spoke to the Senate retreat recently.

This guy, I forget who, was it Sirota maybe that flagged it? The funniest thing that like one of Harder's, you know, chief accomplishments was blocking this water project. I think it was Stoller. Was that Stoller? Yes. I think so, yeah. Just, which is just hilarious because that like the whole, like to the extent that abundance, you know, has a villain, it's like, you know, environmentalists who are standing in the way of these types of infrastructure projects.

And here he was blocking one of these water projects on environmental grounds. I have it here. Congressman behind the Abundance Caucus, Josh Harder, has as a signature accomplishment stopping a water project from getting a permit. There you go. So, yeah, we'll see who winds up. And this is what I said yesterday, like.

We'll see who winds up joining this caucus. But here's a prediction. And you can map this prediction then against the analysis of whether this abundance is, you know, seriously aimed at, you know, lifting everybody up or is actually just kind of rebranded neoliberalism. My suspicion is that the abundance caucus will eventually be populated almost exclusively by people who are also in what's known as the New Democrat caucus.

New Democrat Conference. New Democrats were created by the DLC, the Democratic Leadership Council, which itself was created in the 1980s as a as the vehicle for the faction that said we need deregulation. We need lower taxes. We need we need to end big government. We need to get Democrats away from.

from civil rights, environmentalism, feminism, big unions, big government, tax and spend liberalism. We need to basically do Reaganomics light. And that was the DLC. That was the New Democrats. So I think everybody who joins this abundance caucus is probably going to be New Democrats. And if I'm wrong about that, then...

then maybe I'm wrong about my whole analysis of abundance. But, you know, let's check back in in a couple of weeks and see who harder has been able to recruit into this caucus. Now, you're definitely going to have some there are some progressive people in the progressive caucus who are also in the New Democrats.

And there are which is a lot of people in the progressive caucus are really, you know, underneath that kind of neoliberal, you know, Clinton type Democrats who have who have, you know, progressive social values. And I think you'll you'll find those kinds of people, too, will be really intrigued by the the the abundance framing because it's nice. Who's against abundance? Right.

Yeah, I mean, I feel like, yeah, so Bill Clinton is, you know, his his framing is the DLC and it's neoliberalism. It's really the Democratic Party sort of embracing the.

Ronald Reagan era framing. And Jimmy Carter, to be fair, initially is the one who starts to move Democrats away from the New Deal and into the neoliberal era. Bill Clinton really cements that. I sort of feel like Barack Obama is almost like another rebranding of the, like a different rebranding of neoliberalism. And now, and that was coming out of the wilderness of George W. Bush. And, you know, how could we have lost to this guy? Oh my God. Okay, here we go. Another rebranding of neoliberalism. And then it seems like abundance is the...

attempt again to rebrand neoliberalism as something new and fresh and different out of the wake of the, you know, devastating loss for Democrats to Donald Trump. Right. And the Affordable Care Act, Obama's signature achievement, you know, was all about using the market and doing a, you know, doing health care reform without, you know, not even without adding to the deficit, but reducing the deficit. And yeah, it's a very, very Clintonian

Well, he brought a bunch of Clinton people into his administration. So, I mean, the, you know, the carryover from the Clinton administration was quite, quite real and not just, not just theoretical.

This week on Dear Chelsea with me, Chelsea Handler, Connie Britton is here. I think you should encourage your friend to go ahead and not be holding out for any man to have her babies. If she is passionate about becoming a mother and she has her eggs frozen and she has her life together, go for it. She could be waiting another 10 years before she finds the right guy. Connie didn't meet her right guy until you were what, 50, Connie?

How long have you guys been together? Yeah, no, 52. 52! I adopted my son as a single mom because I kept thinking, oh, I'm going to meet the guy, I'm going to meet the guy, I'm going to meet the guy. I finally was like, what am I waiting for? And I did it. And I'm just so glad that I did. I want to change the narrative about single parents and also help to create a community for single parents so that they can not feel alone in it. One of the big things is it's so hard to...

especially for women to ask for help. Listen to Dear Chelsea on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

My husband has a secret son from a past partner. Hold up, Sam. How do we know? Have we done the DNA test? Well, John, luckily it's mother. May I have a DNA test week on the OK Storytime podcast? So we'll find out soon. And this wife writes, my husband received a Facebook message from a woman saying that he is the father of a five-year-old. Whoa. At first, he didn't remember her, but then he realized they had a one-night stand right before we started dating. Wait, but do we have proof he's a dad? Well, the author says there's no confirmation the kid is even his son, but...

The woman from Facebook has a meeting with her lawyer soon. I think she's going after our money. If the kid is actually my husband's, she would be entitled to it too. So what's the husband got to say about this? This could be his kid. Well, apparently he broke down in the middle of the living room apologizing.

But this is what scared me. His first instinct, if the kid is his son, is to pay the child support but not be an active father in the kid's life because he only wants a family with me, his wife. Oh, this is a mess. To hear the explosive finale, follow OK Storytime on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Let me get your take also, Ryan, since we didn't have you yesterday before you have to jump on Casey Means. So there's all sorts of there's all sorts of things going on here. I don't even know where to start. But let me pull up a friend of show, Laura Loomer, who has been was first very upset about the first Trump search in general pick and was probably influential in getting her spiked.

Then Trump picks Casey Means, the sister of Callie Means. And Emily and I talked about her a good bit yesterday. She's really a like maha influencer star. She's been on with Tucker. She's been on with Joe Rogan. She runs some health company herself, like glucose monitoring company. She wrote a book along with her brother, Callie Means.

And so when she got picked, I thought that Loomer and certainly the Maha people like Nicole Shanahan wouldn't be delighted. But I was wrong. Some people were delighted. Nicole Shanahan notably was really, really upset. And Laura Loomer continued to, you know, raise hell about this pick as well and despair truly over the decision.

Over the vetting team, not Trump, of course, it's not Trump's fault, but over the vetting team that is disserving Trump. So in any case, Laura tweeted this, which I thought was interesting. She said, I'm glad I initiated the Maha breakup. Many of these grifters needed to be exposed for who they are. And also I was amused by Richard Hinenia chiming in being like, here's another one. Go after him as well.

In any case, give me your thoughts on Casey Means, on the MAHA and MAGA tensions that are emerging, and Laura Loomer's role in all of this stuff. Yeah, I mean, look, I love all the folks that are into the crystals and the Reiki and the

The moon. You have some background in this. And shrooms, that's right. I learned yesterday. Yes, in the 90s, I used to go to Reiki sessions. Then I became like a Reiki practitioner. I'm all about that stuff. Of course you did. The chakras, this is important stuff. I don't think you want the surgeon general, though, from that world. Like, I think it's fine if, you know, it's a compliment.

to our system of Western medicine. Um, because there are, there are a lot of things that Western medicine doesn't understand about the body clearly. Um, and there's a lot left to be learned about it, but I think it's fine that it, that it lives off in, on your YouTube land and in basements and in churches and wherever, where, you know, you want to get, you want to do Reiki. Great. It's great. Go do it. It's wonderful. But to have, but to,

make that person the surgeon general. It's like, well, no, Western medicine is also responsible for an enormous number of advances. Yeah. Like when your wife got cancer, you didn't go to the Reiki specialist. You didn't go to the acupuncturist. You went to the doctor. And you might go to the acupuncturist as well to deal with some of the side effects. True. But no, it becomes dangerous when you're throwing the Western medicine out with the bathwater.

Like Steve Jobs, for instance, like, you know, thought he could cure his own cancer with his with his spirit and smoothies and that's true. And whatever. And, you know, the way that he just tried to approach it with his spirit or his will or whatever. And he as far as I understand, like that was a cancer that he should have beaten, you know, with treatment.

But he didn't. And then he died. And there's a similar story with Kyle's dad, actually, who was going to a chiropractor who was telling him, I got you, you know, and he didn't he didn't go to a regular doctor. So he didn't get a cancer diagnosis until it was far too late because the chiropractor promised him that he would be able to heal whatever ailed him. Right. And yes, then that's that's the real danger of it. Like as a as a compliment to your life and to your, you know, your your spiritual pursuits. Great.

To to supplant to literally supplant medicine, Western medicine and have the person as a surgeon general is like, well, here's here's the other thing, Ryan, is there's another piece of this I want to talk to you about, which is like the realignment from those types.

From the left. I mean, this used to be very much the, you know, the crystal people were very much within the firmament of the Democratic Party. And that realignment is interesting to me, which is how, you know, Marianne and RFK Jr. knew each other, ran the same circles and whatever. RFK Jr., of course, is like the emblem of that realignment, you know, the woo woo realignment into the Republican Party.

But the thing that really drives me crazy about RFK Jr.'s ideology, Casey means, Callie means from what I can tell is like,

Number one, the position on the left is that everyone should have access to medicine. Not that there shouldn't be medicine or that we shouldn't trust medicine. It's that people should have access to the advances of Western medicine. So that's number one. Number two, they'll oftentimes talk accurately about the corruption of the food industry, about the corruption of the medical industry, of big pharma, et cetera. But then there's no effort to actually root out the corruption. Instead, there's just a redirection.

into alternative health profiteering, of which Casey and Gally means both participate. You know, that's their livelihood. And that stuff is...

wildly untested. I mean, there are much say what you will about the FDA, the standards for actually getting a drug approved much higher than there are no standards for these supplements and things that you sell on the Internet and and all these influencers who go on and say, I take this, I take that. They're getting paid and then they're selling it to you. And there's no very little standards or testing with regard to that. So that's the other piece of it. And the fact that there's no focus on, OK, you're right, that the profit motive at the center of health care is

is actually deadly because

That creates mass incentives for guess what's most profitable for people to be chronically sick so that you can continue to have to treat them and treat them and treatment them over many years. There's no effort to root that out through something like Medicare for all system. Instead, it's just redirecting people into things that are worse, less tested and at least as corrupt. And you're right. The profiteering is outrageous. The entire reason we have the FDA is

is in response to, and I wrote about this in my first book, they used to be called patent medicines.

Right. And like literally snake oil. Snake oil. Like that's where we get the phrase snake oil. Like people would come by and say, look, this oil from a snake, you know, rub it here. And this is going to be effective. And oftentimes like it wouldn't even be snake oil. It would be like, not that the snake oil would work, but they weren't even selling you snake oil, which good. Because like you'd probably, you know, exterminate all the snakes if you had to do that. And so the FDA was brought in and said,

And it was actually the first kind of assertion of federal government regulatory power, which is why there's this alliance with corporate power linking up with the Maha people because they understand both historically and intuitively that

that the FDA is sort of like the tip of the spear for this regulation of corporate profiting. And if they can gut that, they can roll back so much else. And so that's how you wind up with like a chemical industry lobbyist being put into place by the Trump administration to oversee profits

you know, what the Maha people thought was going to be an effort to like root out toxic chemicals. Right. And then how do you think, like, what do you think of, what are your reflections on the Maha movement into MAGA world, some of the tensions there and how that comes about? I mean, I think the most obvious thing is just to say that many of them were skeptics of the COVID vaccine or skeptics of the school closures, the, you know, the lockdowns, those sorts of things. But I also think in general,

the right has just become like the magnet for sort of all conspiracy theories. And so, you know, there's just been, and the Democratic Party has become like the party of the experts, trust the science. Like that's, you know, especially with Trump,

the Democratic Party becoming more heavily college educated, although there are also plenty of Maha people. Oh, for sure. College educated, very highly educated, wealthy, successful, whatever. I mean, that was kind of the Hollywood liberal type. But anyway, what do you what do you make of that transition? Where do you think it comes from? My basic sense is that when when a lot of these people gave up on the idea of collective change and and instead began to pursue kind of individual change,

you know, self-improvement, self-help, as the atomization of society and of communities took hold, they moved right. And the male version is, you know, we see it all the time in the manager. The Bernie bros. Yeah. And also, right, the Bernie bros who then, who now the thing that they, you know, or tell themselves that they're going to focus on is,

you know, their own, like, you know, take, you know, taking the right supplements, drinking the right powders, you know, work, you know, doing the right kind of workout, the right amount of testosterone or whatever. Like that's Medicare for all the collective project. It's all right. Well, let me just let me get fit. Let me do what I can do individually. And that's the, that's the, that's the male version of the kind of woo woo, you know, Reiki Maha stuff that will, um,

Let me find my own individual spiritual practice that's going to get me out of this toxic culture or detoxify it, detoxify myself as much as possible. Because you've given up the possibility of collective healing.

liberation. Do you think there's a parallel to the back to the land movement of the 70s? Yeah, same thing. Same thing. Yeah. Like we're going to make we're going to change the world in the 60s. And then you give and you're like, wow, this world is just didn't work. Not only unchangeable, all our efforts backfired. And so we're just going to go live on a commune. We're just going to withdraw from society altogether, live on a commune. And then the commune is going to fall apart. And then we're going to go

sell out and go to Wall Street or go just do the thing that we were destined to do. Yeah, I told you I read this book about the back to land movement and focused on Vermont that Bernie Sanders randomly shows up in at some commune and they have to make him leave because he won't stop like distracting everyone from their work and talking about projects. The millionaires and the billionaires.

Yeah. Just too perfect. I was like, oh, my God. He was at that time writing for some like, you know, socialist adjacent newspaper or something. And so he shows up at the commune to like interview them and then talking about Eugene. He won't shut up about Eugene Debs. Yeah. Something like that. Yeah. Something like that. Oh, here. Kyle's here. Special guest. Special guest. Kyle Kalinsky in the house. Hey, babe. Literally in the house. I'm in the bedroom. Yeah.

We were just wrapping up talking about Casey means and then sort of digressed into thinking about the way that there are parallels between this moment of men in particular withdrawing from like being the birdie bro looking at the collective solution into like, let me, you know, work out and take whatever supplements and trust whatever.

whatever, influencers and whatever, to the moment after the 60s and the 70s when there's, okay, well, we were going to change the world. Now we're going to go back to the land and we're going to like set up these communes and kind of like do our own thing. And Ryan, the other thing that was interesting out of that book is that I never realized how many food companies, like organic food company type things that are big names now, actually came out of that back to land movement as well. Oh, totally. That makes a lot of sense. And if we're right, then over the next,

you know, five years, we may see communes starting to pop up where... Well, this is kind of like the... Like Tim Pool's type of compound situation. Right. Or like the trad wife and the... What do they call it? The people who... There is a movement of this, of people who are like, you know...

out of cities and this is all on the right becoming getting the like farms going and trying to be fully sustainable yeah there's a term for them completely sovereign sovereign citizens maybe but yeah they're like those are usually right wingers the sovereign citizens it's gonna be a right wing version yeah well and it goes with like the trad wife stuff yeah as well you

You know, it's like we're withdrawing from society. We're going to go back to these other ways. We're going to in this. I mean, there were vibes of this community of preppers. Yeah. I mean, there was vibes of this with the 70s thing on the left, too, where it was like, OK, these new modern ways of doing agriculture. We don't want any of this mechanization. We're going to figure out how to use like a horse and a cart to do our truly like we're going to make our own tools.

We're not going to have electricity. That was the pure way to do it. So anyway, interesting. Whenever I think of how to become happy, I go, let me copy the Amish. That'll work out well. I don't know. It might. I have more sympathy to that. We rely on so much.

We rely on so much stuff that we take for granted. You know, like whenever the power goes out and I lose the TV, I'm always like, holy shit, the TV is amazing. I wish I had that thing all the time. So I have like the opposite philosophy of those people. And the other thing is self-help stuff in general. Like, I feel like the only times I've been even somewhat interested in that in my life

They were like the worst points of my life. So I feel like the whole point. Yeah. Well, there's something to that. Yeah. Going down this path in general is a symptom like of an underlying misery or depression or being lost in the same way that like hyper religiosity or being an adult convert to a religion. That's a sign of like, hey, guys, let me tell you, I didn't kill myself last night. I came up with this reason to not kill myself. So it's a sign of a like decaying society.

Yes. I think we all agree with that. All right, Ryan, we'll let you go. I know you got a meeting you got to jump to. Thank you, brother. All right. See you guys later. Bye, Ryan. Bye.

All right, guys, that concludes the free show. If you want to see what Kyle has to say about Biden's reemergence on The View, there's a lot to say about that one, about Judge Jeanine being put in instead of Ed Martin as U.S. attorney for D.C. and all kinds of other good things. Also, we're going to answer a few of premium subscribers questions. Make sure to subscribe over at BreakingPoints.com. Thank you guys so much for your support. Have a great weekend.

My husband has a secret son from a past partner. Hold up, Sam. How do we know? Have we done the DNA test? Well, John, luckily it's mother. May I have a DNA test week on the OK Storytime podcast? So we'll find out soon. And this wife writes, my husband received a Facebook message from a woman saying that he is the father of a five-year-old. Whoa. At first, he didn't remember her, but then he realized they had a one-night stand right before we started dating. Wait, but do we have...

To hear the explosive finale, listen to the OK Storytime podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This week on Dear Chelsea with me, Chelsea Handler, Connie Britton is here. I think you should encourage your friend to go ahead and not be holding out for any man to have her babies. She could be waiting another 10 years before she finds the right guy. Connie didn't meet her right guy until you were what, 50, Connie? Yeah.

Listen to Dear Chelsea on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I want you to ask yourself right now, how am I actually doing? Because it's a question that we rarely ask ourselves. All of May is actually Mental Health Awareness Month and on the psychology of your 20s, we are taking a vulnerable look at why mental health is so hard to talk about. Prepare for our conversations to go deep. I spent the majority of my teenage years and my 20s just feeling absolutely terrified.

terrified. I had a panic attack on a conference call. Knowing that she had six months to live, I was no longer pretending that this was my best friend. So this Mental Health Awareness Month, take that extra bit of care of your well-being. Listen to The Psychology of Your 20s on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. You're listening to an iHeart Podcast.