Gillingham argues that the EU's issues are deeply rooted in its institutional design, which centralizes power in Brussels, leading to reduced economic growth, resource misdirection, conflicting priorities, and policies that are out of touch with member states' needs and public sentiment.
The Lisbon Agenda, which aimed to make the EU more competitive by 2010, failed due to the rise of economic nationalism among member states and the reluctance to implement liberal reforms, leading to a widening productivity gap with the United States.
The CAP is described as immensely wasteful, costly to the third world, and a major stumbling block for reform. Phasing out or eliminating the CAP is seen as a crucial step for the EU to regain public trust and focus on more effective policies.
Bruton emphasizes that the EU is the world's only multinational democracy, with a democratically elected parliament and the ability to make laws that govern its members. This democratic structure allows the EU to address global issues and create a sense of unity and trust among its member states.
Public reservations and anti-EU sentiment are growing due to the EU's overreaching into daily affairs, perceived lack of democratic control, and the failure to deliver tangible benefits. This has led to a loss of trust and a demand for a more responsive and transparent institutional framework.
Gillingham advocates for downsizing EU institutions to restore democratic control and efficiency. He believes that the EU must concentrate on what it does best and create new, more effective treaties and institutions that provide clear, tangible benefits to its members.
The EU's struggle with economic liberalization is partly due to the rejection of liberal reforms by member states, the influence of protectionist policies, and the rise of economic nationalism. These factors have made it difficult to implement the liberalization agenda that was once seen as a key to economic revival.
The regional funds are controversial because they are often seen as a political boondoggle, involving logrolling and pork barrel politics. While they are meant to even out economic disparities, they sometimes pay disproportionate benefits to wealthier states, undermining their intended purpose.
Gillingham argues that the EU lacks the sovereign powers of a true democracy, such as the ability to tax. He believes that the EU's institutions are more about centralization and power concentration rather than democratic representation and control.
Norway and Switzerland, both wealthy and with specialized economic interests, feel they can thrive independently. Norway, in particular, is concerned about relinquishing control over its fisheries. They enjoy economic benefits through association agreements but prefer to avoid the political and administrative requirements of full membership.
The European Union appears to be in trouble. The rise of economic nationalism among member states has thrown the Lisbon Agenda's goal of European economic revival into disarray, and Europe's trade protectionism has contributed to the collapse of the Doha round of trade negotiations. Europe's decision makers have been paralyzed by the rejection of the European Constitution, and many wonder if the European integration, process can recover its former vitality. John Gillingham, one of the world's leading experts on the EU, argues that current attempts to revive the EU through initiatives centrally planned in Brussels are doomed to fail. He calls on Europe to instead embrace the wave of liberal reforms that swept through the former communist countries. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy) for more information.