Are Trump's military picks based on merit or loyalty?
08:28 Share

Before he was even tapped by President Trump to lead the Department of Defense, Pete Hegseth laid out how he thought the incoming administration should overhaul the armed forces. There's a chance to course correct it, but it would take the new Trump administration going after it really hard. This was on the Sean Ryan Show podcast. And at the top of Hegseth's list... Well, first of all, you've got to fire...

You know, you've got to fire the chairman of the Joint Chiefs. That would be General C.Q. Brown, who was the nation's highest-ranking military officer until Friday night when he was fired. Hegseth had attacked Brown for promoting diversity initiatives in the armed services. In his book, War on Warriors, he questioned whether General Brown got the job because he was black.

On Fox News, over the weekend, Secretary Hegseth said he has, quote, a lot of respect for Brown, but that Trump had the right to dismiss him. There is civilian control of the military. Nothing about this is unprecedented. The president deserves to pick his

key national security and military advisory team. Other presidents have fired high-ranking generals, though none has fired a chairman of the Joint Chiefs. They serve four-year terms, often across administrations. And though they do serve at the pleasure of the president, they take an oath to the Constitution.

Some Democrats say Trump's move undermines that. They want everyone in DOD to be holding to the president, not to the Constitution. That's the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, speaking there on ABC's This Week. They want everyone there to do what they're told, regardless of the law. And Senator Reed had this question for Brown's successor. Will he have the ability to speak truth to power? ♪

Consider this. The Trump administration says it wants a military built on meritocracy. Critics say it's building one governed by political loyalty. From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly.

This message comes from Greenlight. Ready to start talking to your kids about financial literacy? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app that teaches kids and teens how to earn, save, spend wisely, and invest. Start your risk-free trial at greenlight.com slash NPR.

This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices, like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on Thinkorswim. Visit Schwab.com to learn more.

This message comes from Rinse. These days, you can do a lot from your phone. Book a vacation, buy and trade stocks, but you can also make your dirty laundry disappear and then reappear washed and folded with Rinse. Schedule a pickup with the Rinse app, and before you know it, your clothes are back, folded, and ready to wear. They even do dry cleaning. Sign up now and get $20 off your first order at Rinse.com. That's R-I-N-S-E dot com.

It's Consider This from NPR. So this weekend saw six senior officers ousted by the Trump administration, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Also included the top lawyers for the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force. And Trump named his new pick for chairman, retired Air Force Lieutenant General Dan Kaine.

To get a sense of what this shakeup at the Pentagon will mean for the military, I spoke with Frank Kendall. Until about a month ago, he was a top Pentagon official as Secretary of the Air Force. Secretary, welcome to All Things Considered. Hello, Mary Louise. It's good to be with you. Hey, so to be clear, your departure was part of the regular turnover when a new administration takes over, right? Yeah, that's correct. Okay. Okay.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as you well know, this is the highest ranking officer in the U.S. Armed Forces. They are appointed to serve four-year terms. They also serve at the pleasure of the president. So just it is within a president's powers to pick a new head of the Joint Chiefs, correct? It is. I've never seen it done before quite this way.

Normally, chiefs carry over from one administration to another very smoothly without any interruption. As far as I know, there was no reason not to do that in this case. You have concerns about General Brown being fired. Just lay out for us what they are. Sure. First of all, General Brown is one of the, if not the finest officer I've ever worked with. One of the things that stands out about the military services in the United States is the apolitical nature of all of our officer corps.

And I've been through a lot of transitions and I have seen in every case, very smooth professional transitions where people, you know, they adapt to the policies of the new team in charge. They follow orders as they should and they give good advice.

I want to play a little bit of what this is. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who went on Fox yesterday and spoke about C.Q. Brown. Here's what he said. I have a lot of respect for C.Q. Brown. I got to know him over the course of a month. He's an honorable man, not the right man for the moment. Hegseth has in past shared his view that the Pentagon needs to be purged of, and I quote, the woke stuff. And he said that doing so would start with firing C.Q. Brown, who I will note is black.

How do you think, Secretary, that this may fit into the stated overt efforts by the Trump administration to scale back DEI? I don't really understand the connection, quite frankly. I also don't understand the obsessiveness about wokeness, whatever that is.

You know, it's perfectly within the purview of a new secretary and president to change policies. And that's perfectly fine. And I think all the officers who serve would carry out those orders to be a lawful order. It would be no problem. There isn't much there to actually remove. There's a few hours of training a year. And again, I don't know what they mean by wokeness. I'm not sure what they mean by that at all.

The impact of what they've done is to politicize these positions to a degree that I've never seen before. These officers serve apolitically. They are loyal to whoever is in power. They carry out their policies. And what's been created by doing this is an environment in which

career officers suddenly have to worry about their political alignment. And just to stay with the questions about wokeness, I hear you saying you don't even understand what that means. I think the Trump administration would argue that means diversity initiatives have been pursued at the expense of performance. In your long experience at the Pentagon, did you see that? No, absolutely not. We did pay attention to disparities in the Department of the Air Force.

We had some studies that were done under the previous Trump administration that showed significant disparities, but we never lowered any of our standards about moving people into positions or promoting them or anything else that was competitively selected.

Do you know General Cain, President Trump's pick for chairman? Is he qualified? I do. I have no reason to say that he's not qualified, except for the fact that he does not have the experience that is normally associated with that job.

Normally, and by law, a person who goes into the chairman's job, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, should have served as a four-star general in another major command, either as a head of one of the military services or as a head of one of the major component commands around the world. General Kane has not done that.

I also want to ask about the removal of some of the Defense Department's top military lawyers in this purge. This is not generating headlines as big as removing the chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Why is it worth paying attention to?

I find that more troubling in a way than removing the other individuals that have been removed. Why? He seems to want to have JAG officers who will say yes to whatever operational people want to do. Judge Advocate Generals, which are the lawyers in uniform, basically. They're the people who administer the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the criminal law that applies to people serving, and also interpret things like the laws of armed conflict.

or the laws that would restrict the use of the military against American civilians. So they have a very important role to play. They're professionals. They're not political appointees at all. So to just reach down within the structure and remove the legal authorities that would constrain the behavior of the military, ensure that the military follows lawful orders, is very troubling to me.

Retired Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, thank you for speaking with us. Thank you, Mary Louise. Good to be with you. This episode was produced by Jason Fuller and Connor Donovan. It was edited by Courtney Dorning and Nadia Lancey. Our audio engineer is Ted Meebane. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Mary Louise Kelly.

Support for this podcast and the following message come from Sutter Health. A cancer diagnosis can be scary, which is why Sutter's compassionate team of oncologists, surgeons, and nurses work together as one dedicated team. Learn more at SutterHealth.org.

Support for NPR and the following message come from IXL Learning. IXL Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age or personality. Get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when you sign up today at ixl.com slash NPR.

This message comes from Alfred A. Knopf, publisher of Bill Gates' new memoir, Source Code, My Beginnings. The business leader and philanthropist tells his own story for the first time. Source Code is available everywhere books and audiobooks are sold.