June 29, 2025 "Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan Watt --- Redux (Educational Talk From the Past): "BIT and City of Pigs"
01:33:18 Share

This is Melissa and today is the 29th of June 2025 and I hope that you are all doing very well. And I wanted to just right off the bat remind you to go to the website and take advantage of all of the literally a couple thousand audios that are up there for free download, transcripts, stacks of them. That's cuttingthroughthematrix.com

And while you are there, as Alan would always remind us, make a note of the other sites that you can access, cuttingthroughthematrix.net.us, alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca, and alanwattsentiencecentinel.com.

There's also the mirror site, cuttingthrough.jankness.com, and then the video channels and the other things that I have started in the last several years. YouTube, BitChute, Odyssey, a couple of channels at Rumble. There's Xsubstack. Just kind of doing the scattershot approach here to get as much out as I can.

There will also be right on the main page, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. If you scroll down a little bit, you will see the link for how to donate via Stripe or have a subscription via Stripe. There's a link to the Cutting Through the Matrix book club on Telegram.

And our next discussion, we're going to hear from Neil Foster, who's covering a couple of interviews, and that will be next Saturday, the 5th of July. So there's a lot on the website. There's audios that you can download. There's transcripts. There's information on how to purchase the flash drives. Flash drives are all of Alan's work except for the books. There's a link there on how to order his books.

There's a link to article archives, and that's some of the articles that Alan thought were most important to archive for you, mostly documents such as the UK's Ministry of Defence Projections. That was an interesting document that he talked about quite a bit. That's UK Department of Defence documents.

DCDC Global Strategic Trends Program 2007 to 2036. And it's interesting to see so many of the things that were talked about in that document playing out in front of us. And then there are other things like links to the Aldous Huxley book,

speech at Berkeley, all of those things you'll find in the article archive. There's a link there for not sure articles. So all of this by way of saying, I thank you for your support. I encourage you to support so that I can keep going. And I, I am, I have a, a renewed, uh,

vigor. It has not been easy going for me the last little while and I have recovered my footing or my stride or however we want to put this and I have as always a burning desire to bring as much of this to you as I can. So thank you. Thank you so much those of you who support.

I didn't want to spend an awful lot of time thinking about the situation in the Middle East because this ceasefire, the 12-day war, Operation Rising Lion, and then America's involvement with Operation Midnight Hammer. Boy, these warmongers, they just love their catchy little names. But

It's, you know, there is an agenda and those of you who have listened for a long time to Alan understand that whatever this lull is, eventually they will get around to finishing the region off in a way that suits them.

This article that I want to share from the Jerusalem Post is about enough on that. The Israel-Iran peace trumps motivation for holding ceasefire is a Nobel Prize legacy. So this is an opinion piece. We'll see. The writer said,

It remains to be seen whether Trump started another war or ended one that day. Attacking another sovereign power is defined as an act of war, notwithstanding the denials of Vice President J.D. Vance. He insists the United States didn't declare war against Iran, but only its nuclear program. I guess that means this is just a special military operation, not a war.

And he guesses right. That's just the ridiculousness that comes along with the war industry. One email that I got from someone just prior to the ceasefire was questioning, quite rightly, if those at the top in Iran and Israel weren't sort of in on this together. They had...

heard that both countries are dedicated to smart infrastructure and doing a lot of things to bring in that technology into the country. And the person who sent the email said, well, in that case, then they're all colluding at the top for the next phase in the agenda. And I would say to that, bingo.

I've seen the same kind of articles come out around Ukraine and how much money Ukraine is putting into their smart infrastructure. I guess whatever money doesn't go into Zelensky's personal kitty goes into the smart infrastructure.

So because I, like I said, I didn't really want to focus on the Middle East and I was, it has been on my mind, all of the smart technologies, digital IDs, sustainability, and all of that. I started doing a search in my area, what's going on in smart cities. And so I'll just share a few highlights in the...

What was interesting to me in looking at my area, I actually learned a few things that I had not heard about, which were quite interesting. And I also saw how these things are marketed to us. So the biggest large city in my area is Dallas, and it's about an hour drive from me, so it's not

really, really close, but, and it's not someplace I go that much, but I do have family up there. So I'm there, oh, I don't know, once or twice a year, maybe three times. And there was a big paper, and this is already from 2018. It's called Smart Dallas Roadmap, a guide, a guideline for a smarter Dallas. And it's a slick document, about 45 pages long, and

And it tells you what you can see when you look at the smart cities is how it's mixing in what we might call Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030 all into it. And so I'll just give you the highlights of this document. What makes a smart city? That's the introduction. And then Smart Dallas, Guideline for the Future, Smart.

current and future challenges, vision, domains, goals, infrastructure, environment, smart public safety, smart government, metrics, program models, ecosystem, and so forth. And there was a, there's a lot, I'll post this so that you can look at it yourself, but one of the ways that I saw some of the smaller towns and smaller cities in the area are approaching this is

like the town next door to me, is through traffic. So the smart technology is being lauded as a way to keep traffic down and make it flow better. So that's one example. Then there's another town next door to me on the other side, and it's

This doesn't use the word smart city. It doesn't use the word sustainability. And this is one thing that Alan pointed out. A technique is not to use those words, but to kind of skirt around it. And if you look up Agenda 21, you'll often find that it's referred to as a conspiracy theory.

even though it is a UN agenda, but it's now known, if you look on the UN website, it's known as SDG or Sustainable Development Goals. So it's barely referred to as Agenda 2030 anymore. The point is that when the public starts to catch on

on to what is going on, then they just find a different way of naming it. And that's how it goes. And the other day, a couple of weeks ago, I'm going to look this up and see if I can find it right now. I was on Pinterest where I sometimes go to get pictures to illustrate a video. And I was illustrating a video. There it is again. I'm going to take a screenshot this time and show you.

And I was looking for just a graphic or an image to show you Agenda 21. So I typed in, and Pinterest is just pictures and, you know, things that you can use like that. So that's kind of, you can pin it and make a little scrapbook and keep whatever. But so Agenda 21, I typed in and it came back with nothing but a caution. It said, pins about this topic.

often violate our community guidelines so we're currently unable to show search results and then there's a button there you can click to review community guidelines now there's all manner of images if you want to find out about witchcraft wicca

throuples and couples and new kinds of relationships you can find it all on pinterest um john d and uh you just just pick a wild topic you name it you can find it on pinterest but you can't find it agenda 21 interesting

So what I'm saying is it is hard to find information particularly on what is going on in your area. Then another article that I found in 2019 was that smart cities make for a larger attack footprint. And this is kind of a duh and more potentially devastating results from a breach or a hack.

So, I mean, this is really obvious. If you have all of your information in one area, it's definitely hackable. And we see this, we see this over and over. And there was something because I was in Canada at the time, and I just was completely unaware of this. It did not cross my radar.

But this headline is how ransomware attacks on 23 Texas sites change the way cyber criminals operate. And it tells you, and in fact, one of the cities is my town, which is really only about 7,000 people. So it's not very large, but they were all held up one day for a ransomware attack asking two and a half million people.

and the Texas towns did not comply, there is a little saying here in Texas, don't mess with Texas. And that was joked about as this story was covered. But what had happened is that the smaller towns that were attacked could not afford their own

information technology, their own dedicated IT teams. And so they didn't have that infrastructure and they used a service and it was that service that was hacked that was managing the data from these 23 cities. So these are vulnerabilities, but other articles that I read talk about how the solution, of course, is just to get smarter and

So then I was thinking about all the different data centers, and this ties into this massive operation that we are seeing unfold around us, this Stargate project where it's AI, AI, AI. And I started thinking about all of the...

money that's going into data centers and what goes on in all of these data centers that are popping up everywhere and that I was doing some reading earlier today the data center is basically considered obsolete after seven years and the money that goes into it the electricity that is used for these I'll post a couple of articles I don't want to spend too much time here today but I

This is one from datacenterdynamics.com, and this was from January of 2024. Global data center electricity use to double by 2026. AI and cryptocurrency workloads are driving up demand. Now, the one thing I know from...

doing research on this topic is that a lot of the cryptocurrency, crypto mining data centers are being repurposed for either AI or general purpose data centers. So that is a little misleading that the cryptocurrency workloads are driving up demand. Yes, that is there.

But where it appears to be headed is to feed the AI infrastructure. And so we just ask ourselves a lot of questions. Why? What's going on? What are they doing this for? I'm going to post another one from October of last year from McKinsey. AI-powered, expanding data center capacity to meet growing demand.

Soaring demand for AI-ready data centers offers many opportunities for companies and investors across the value chain. How quickly they grasp them could determine the pace at which AI is deployed. And it's one of those things, at least for me, some of you might have an easier time understanding all of this, but you really have to understand that

a lot you know the the compute power and what does that mean here's this is one again from data center dynamics ai could drive 6.7 trillion investment in data centers maybe claims mckenzie so this is referring back to that other report that i will mention it's just

focusing on a certain aspect of that report. It says global capacity could triple to 219 GW. I realized immediately, I don't know what a GW is. If AI proves useful, firm says, but only if the technology finds real world utility.

So, oh, sorry, by the way, a GW is a gigawatt. And then I'm trying to find out, well, how much does it cost to generate a gigawatt? And no way that I could search it out would answer that question. But all of the search results were sure to tell me that whatever it costs, it would be cheaper if it was generated by solar power or wind power. Like, well, you can't tell me how much it's going to cost. I could determine for myself.

that but no I'm sure if it's done by wind power or solar power it'll definitely be cheaper than coal or nuclear or whatever so at the end of all of this diving into it I went back to the talk from Alan and I was just thinking about how we are nudged and our behavior is guided by

to where they want to take us. Now, and I'll just really quickly mention here that the BIT, the Nudge Unit, is based on Nudge Theory. Nudge Theory is Cass Sunstein. I'll put some links up there you can find out about him. He's considered a power couple with his wife, who is Samantha Power. She ran USAID. That's

She was the 28th United States ambassador to the United Nations for four years. She was a big Obama appointee and also worked for Biden. So that's the power couple. And he is the man behind nudge. That is nudging you to do what they want you to do. So when I realized how, you know, BIT is kind of all over now.

I went to find out what's going on in the U.S. and I just looked at the New York office and some of the things on the main page they're talking about. So this is what they want to nudge you to do. Changing U.S. consumer habits to reduce plastic bag waste. And the next one is let's electrify. And of course, that's electric cars.

And the third one there is use a behavioral lens to tackle trust in U.S. health care. And that one made me laugh. I'm thinking, well, they've already tackled trust in U.S. health care. I don't think that exists anymore. But I clicked. I took the bait. I clicked.

And I get the same headline, and then it says, Trust is vital to every aspect of health care, from reducing disparities and advancing medical innovation to ensuring the best patient outcomes. As health care systems recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, restoring public trust is top of the mind. So I won't read their PR. There's a link to it, though, and you can investigate this for yourself.

But after all of the different things that I read today and looked at and considered talking about, I tried to get that Alan want bird's eye view. And for me, it was there. It was asking the question, why are they crowding us into cities? What is ha you know, and we know it's because of the system that happens next and

But also the question that I asked is why, how are we guided? How are we nudged into thinking that all of this infrastructure that is going into what is ultimately going to imprison us

in these urban areas, in the 15-minute city, with the digital ID, where every transaction is tracked and traced, where your whereabouts are known, where basically your thoughts are read. How do they sell this as a sustainable service

eco-friendly good thing for the environment when all you have to do is look at how many gigawatts they're sucking up on and the trillions of dollars they're spending and the these data centers literally are just popping up everywhere and none of this is reducing a carbon footprint you see

But your carbon footprint has to be tiny or non-existent as this behemoth, this monster is constructed all around us. But you're not even supposed to breathe. So it's these questions that we have to ask. You can get very...

myopic I guess when you look at this and so to to pull back and go hmm why and that that is very my goodness that's very interesting and Alan did remind us over and over again how unnatural the city is and that is another place a good place to go back to and think and

They want you in an environment that is completely, incredibly unnatural. And so cities, the beehive, Plato, and I thought, let's just take a look. Let's look up the liner note, the cheat notes for students who are studying Plato's Republic and have a look, see what's

at what he's taught what he is saying about cities so I'll just share with you a couple of highlights this is from book two part two so there's a question about what kind of cities are desirable and what kind of cities are not desirable and what makes a good healthy human society

Socrates introduces the foundational principle of human society, the principle of specialization. Okay, so just think about that for a moment. This is what is being introduced as the foundation of human society. And Alan is saying the city is unnatural. So the foundation of this unnatural environment is specialization.

And this came up in the book club discussion actually today. Very interesting. It wasn't recorded, but it was a very interesting conversation. The idea of specialization, not Plato's Republic, what I'm reading to you, but the idea of specialization. The principle, back to Plato,

The principle of specialization states that each person must perform the role for which he is naturally best suited and that he must not meddle in any other business. The carpenter must only build things. The farmer must only farm. Behind this principle is the notion that human beings have natural inclinations that should be fulfilled. Specialization demands not only the division of labor, but the most appropriate division.

And so in this way, Socrates is convinced everything can be done at the highest possible level. So they've isolated the foundational principle, and that is specialization. So then they're going to have a city. This is called the just city. It's the healthy city where only the necessities of life are provided. Food, clothing, health, and shelter are

And it is populated by the craftsmen and the farmers and the doctors. They all do their own job and they are called the producing class. So he called that a healthy city. Now Glaucon, remember these are dialogues. Glaucon looks less kindly on this city, calling it a city of pigs. He points out that such a city is impossible.

People have unnecessary desires as well as these necessary ones. They yearn for rich food, luxurious surroundings, and art. The next stage then is to transform this city into the luxurious city or the city with a fever. Once luxuries are in demand, positions like merchant, actor, poet, tutor, beautician are created.

and all of this wealth will necessarily lead to wars. So a class of warriors is needed to keep the peace within the city and to protect it from outside forces. The producers cannot act as warriors because that would violate our principle of specialization.

So already you see how unnatural this is. And Alan would also point out that, you know, the rats will turn on each other. They do too much of everything, breeding and killing each other. And it's just, you know, deviant, unnatural things start to develop. And I think that's because we weren't really presented with a dialectic here, but a progression from healthy city where it's...

Not natural, right? Because people really aren't specialists. In our natural state, we would be generalists. So, because I'm not satisfied doing just one thing. Are you? So...

Socrates spends the rest of the book and most of the next talking about the nature and education of these warriors whom he calls guardians. It is crucial that guardians develop the right balance between gentleness and toughness. They must not be thugs, nor can they be wimpy and ineffective.

Members of this class must be carefully selected, people with the correct nature or innate psychology. In particular, guardians should be spirited or honor-loving, philosophical, knowledge-loving, physically strong, and fast. Nature is not sufficient to produce guardians. Nature must be protected and augmented with education.

The education of guardians will involve physical training for the body and music and poetry for the soul. Education of guardians is the most important aspect of the city. It is the process of purification through which the unhealthy, luxurious city can be purged and purified. Because the education of the guardians is so important, Socrates walks us through it in painstaking detail. So,

One of the, I'm just going to skip down a little bit, the guardians in training have to be supervised, their souls have to be shaped, they have to be told stories about the gods, and the people who look up to the guardians must also see them in a certain way.

Socrates comes up with two laws to govern the telling of such stories about the gods. First, the gods must always be represented as wholly good

and as responsible only for what is good in the world. If the gods are presented otherwise as the warring, conniving, murderous characters that the traditional poetry depicts them to be, then children will inevitably grow up believing that such behavior is permissible, even admirable. The gods cannot be represented as sorcerers who change themselves into different forms or as liars. These children will grow up without a proper reverence for truth and honesty."

So in concluding this summary here, the question is asked, we might also ask at this point whether it is only the education of the guardians that is so important. If education determines whether a soul is sick or healthy, do we not care about the souls of the other members of society?

The answer probably is that we do care about educating all souls. But since we are currently focusing on the good of the city, we are only interested in what will affect the city as a whole. Because of the way our city is set up, with the producing class excluded from political life,

Their education is not as important to the good of the city as the education of the guardians. Although education is important for everyone, the education of the producers, which would focus on development of skills appropriate to specialized vocation, is not relevant to the good of the city as a whole.

The guardian class, they're not really good because later on, and I've mentioned this before, in the dialogues, this whole idea of justice comes up over and over. What is just? Is just a desirable thing? Why do people need to be just? And at the end of the dialogue, it's really, well, what matters is the appearance of justice, right?

So much of the Republic can be read on different levels because it's really a dialogue for training the, well, he calls them the warrior class. You might think of it as the managerial class, the technocratic elite class, because they are understanding that they must have these things that would make them better

slightly more well-rounded you can just be a worker rat in the city and go do your thing and then you can have a beer and watch whatever you want to watch but they can have the poetry and the music and the things that will make them more well-rounded to give them the appearance of being let's face it coming from special wombs different than us

that's who the guardian class is. And so really, when we look at people like Cass Sunstein and his wife, we're looking at the guardian class. And they like to tell us what to do. So you all take care, or as we say in Texas, y'all take care. And I will talk to you later. Thank you. Hi, folks. I'm Alan Watt. And this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 9th of September, 2018.

I'd like to mention too that you can buy the books and discs, remember, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com from the website and you find out how to do it on the websites. Remember to make a list of all the other sites that I do have there in case any of them get pulled or go down because odd things, as you know, are happening today. Not so odd, actually. There's nothing happening today that wasn't planned a long time ago.

and we've got to be prepared for what's coming along without panicking either too because this as I say there's no surprises in the system in which we live they talked about the different technological changes and information warfare techniques would be used and then from in the 1990s they mentioned this when they gave the public the internet

Remember, the whole goal was to get the people addicted to it, and then they'd start reining in the freedoms that you would have, knowing most folk would stay on it regardless, once they're addicted to all the other things they can do on it. And that's what they're doing today. There's nothing happening at all that's unusual, as far as I'm concerned. They planned it a long time ago, and they talked about it quite openly in the newspapers back then.

So here we are, because we're living in a system today, a global society, remember, a planned global society, where barriers are coming down, borders are supposed to come down as well, according to all the bigwigs who own us.

And the rest of the public and all the countries have to just go along with it all. Most don't mind, mind you. They think it's all quite natural because they don't think too deeply about anything at all. They're told what to think and what not to think. And it's a technique to teach you how not to think about certain things. It's very, very effective. And I might touch on some of the professionals that deal with that tonight.

So remember too, you can buy the books and discs at characterdominates.com or you can donate to me too and that keeps me ticking along and helps me pay for all the different sites I have up there and all the other things I have to pay for. As computers crash and that kind of thing happens too, we have to replace things since we're supplied with junk and it's disposable junk basically and I've trained the public that that's quite normal as well.

At one time you didn't buy things if it didn't last very long and they made to be robust but today they've trained you, the customers, to suit the products like Bernays said they would and it's been awfully effective as well. Now tonight

I want to mention too before I get on to the topic, but remember too that there are people waiting for some books. I'm getting them printed up and hopefully I'll pick them up this week as well because I'm really tied up. I'm out in the country, I don't live in the city and I have to make the journeys and so on and fit it all in together and to get basic stuff out of the city. And I don't like going in very often at all. And the older you get actually the less and less you like going. In fact I never like going in to be honest with you, nothing to do with age at all.

I never liked cities, any cities really. They're nice to visit once and that's about it. And they're pretty much the same across the planet with the cramming of the public into them. And once you're into the city, you're into a trap, a financial trap. And if you get married, you're really stuck then because then you've got to support a spouse.

And you have to both work generally just to get the basic rents paid and so on, or mortgages if you can afford a mortgage. And then they get stuck in a rotten job. And a city is a trap. That's what a city is. And there's nothing natural about it. It's meant to be, those in the city are meant to be used by the elite who control and rule the city. And all cities are the same. Plato talked about it a long time ago.

And it works awfully well for getting people rich at the top. And for the rest of you, well, you just go berserk or you go neurotic or depressed or whatever it happens to be. Or you take drugs or you take booze. And that's all laid on for you as well. That's what cities are, as far as I'm concerned. Really. So anyway, as I say, I'll get the books and get them out to the people who are waiting for them. Now, tonight I'm going to part two of

of one of the systems of controlling you all. We're all controlled and your thoughts are controlled. I've been telling people this for years, your thoughts are controlled and there's many ways to do it. And this is the second part of Three Thought Buster Opinion Adjuster by the BIT group, worldwide group actually. And they were set up to help government supposedly

to get the public to conform to whatever government departments wanted the public to do and what to obey, and without even realising that they were being nudged into it, being guided into it, and adopting the opinions that were professionally put out to them. They don't even know what's happening, most of them.

And I've watched this a long time, an awful long time, before they came out with the BIT group. They've always used professionals to manage the public as far back as long before Machiavelli, in fact. He's a professional. People who are advisors at that time, they were called advisors. Today they're just called professors, et cetera, of psychology, neuroscience, behaviorism.

All the things that they keep showing you, all these little experiments with putting things into rats brains and so on to make them turn and stop and turn around and all that kind of stuff. It was all to do with humans of course, it's not because they've got any interest in helping rats to be happy. It's to control humans and to make the controllers happy. That's what the BIT is all about. And in all ages you've got the rats, the true rats who have degrees today

and who are quite willing for big salaries to do in free thought. And I mean do in the free thought of supposedly free peoples. Supposedly free peoples. We've never truly been free for an awful, awful long time. What is freedom? Ask people that and they give you different definitions. But in reality, we're all being nudged, etc. And remember Bernays, who...

had such an ego. It came out at the time too when those with the egos, the controlled things, would love to boast about themselves and how bright and clever they were and how they had conned so many people. Bernays actually despised the general population because he said it was too easy to get them en masse to adopt the policies that he was pushing through.

on selling them things for the organic people to get in the general population to buy the products of the advertisers, which was himself, of course, in the groups he ruled on behalf of the manufacturers. It was just too easy. I contempt for them because it was behavior modification.

And people who love to believe they're free and they've got their own minds and they can make their own minds about opinions and whatever it happens to be. He laughed at that because even back then he knew it was a joke. And today it's beyond a joke. It's a travesty, to be honest with you. How people truly, truly are conforming en masse by their prompting and their guidance.

by those that manage you behind the scenes. He called it an invisible government. The true power was invisible and it wasn't the ones that you elect at all. And it's never really been the ones you elected, to be honest with you, because they're just front men too. Most people today, if you get to know their names, are front people.

It doesn't matter if they're supposedly the inventor of something, which is the big con today, to make you really admire them, going all the way back to Einstein and so on. They're made to be stars as a front, specifically. It's a big star-making machine, and it makes them stars. And you're all made to be in awe of these people. And it doesn't matter if it's a Zuckerberg or anybody else, they're front people. And...

they're supposedly, they're all working together basically as one organization, like one company, on behalf of those who really have the power in the world to control the people's minds on behalf of the masters. And don't think ever, don't think ever, please, that someone who's just a multimillionaire becomes a multimillionaire, billionaire, whoever it happens to be, don't think ever that they're somehow superior in any way at all.

Because they're given that speech by the ones who really rule the world They're made to be we're going to make you a multi-billionaire and you better front and you'll do all the things we tell you to and you'll push all these different other topics social topics we tell you you're going to do once you're famous and if you don't do it believe you me We'll get rid of you and they mean get rid of you to understand. It's impossible in today's society impossible for any rich person really really really rich person to

to be their own man or woman and get away with it if they bucked the system. There's an old saying, you know, basically, the sniper's going to get through. And those who control the world are ruthless. They're ruthless. They've always been ruthless. And they laugh at social norms and their big clubs at the top. And they've contempt for ordinary people.

And for the limitations of our thinking, that's what they actually say, how we're limited in thought. And they're bold, you see, because at the top, you have to be audacious and bold. And that means you'll take chances and risks that no one else in the right mind generally will do. You go beyond the normal thinking. You break boundaries by being unconventional.

And that's been the norm now for quite some time, even with CEOs when they made them into some sort of gods, walking on water or on the air or something, above us all, because the CEOs are treated like gods now with their little statements, little quips they came out with, and everybody goes in awe of them. There's other gods. It's quite amazing to watch them live through all this. It really is. If you're aware of what's happening, it's truly astonishing to witness it all.

the pettiness of humans because they always go the same way don't they when they start to really believe they're into godhood yet that's the age we're in and we're taught being taught over and over with all the magazines and all the different articles about these people's being superhuman oh they're such geniuses and utter rubbish utter rubbish like this but the sad thing is the people themselves often believe that they are geniuses and gods and a little bit some knowledge

Over the journal population since I've studied the population more intensely than any rats in a laboratory have been studied And they're so cocky because they're certain that given the right kind of prompts the right situations They can make you obey and and and go along with it even knowing you're being prompted push and prodded a lot and coerced and even threatened along the way, but you are and

You really are. On behalf of your supposedly free and elected governments who employ these people and fund them using our tax money. So if the real power is unelected, why do you bother voting? Really, why do you bother voting? Because it's all a farce. All a farce. If voting for new candidates and the right people worked, you would have seen it before now. You would have seen it.

and if voting worked it would have been banned. That's quite amazing to watch it all, really is. And the saddest thing too is to see how what does work with it all. It's like the Cyberg thing too. The Cyberg program was to do with the integration of science and technology with humans, with the human body and mind. And you can lecture people about it, you can show them the evidence of all the studies that have been done and little test programs over many many many years.

But the public are unaware when it actually happens. And even the behaviourists will tell you this. They'll tell you that they know exactly how you're going to behave depending on the type of information they funnel to you and the way they funnel it to you, how it's phrased and all the rest of it, and how you're going to react by it. And really, the way you put things together and string things together is awfully, awfully important.

They also know that you'll ignore most of information, even if you put the same information out later by an authority figure. Somebody you know. It could be an actor or actress simply because you think you know them. You think they're famous. Oh, it's someone in authority. And that's why they use so-called celebrities. Terrible term, actually.

Because they're not a heady people at all. They're not intellectuals at all. They're little actors and actresses. But they use them as fronts for big major topics for changing society. You know, global warming and the greening and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But they have no more education or intellect than actually maybe less intellect than the person who fixes your plumbing. It's all in perception, isn't it?

And if you're told someone is famous, you'll grovel more than someone who's not so famous. Sad thing, but it's true. But that's how power works. Power works very, very well on the public because it's done through behaviorist studies and repetition and the tests that they put on the public too. Every year, there are countless, countless, countless studies for statistics that

questionnaires the same questionnaires for last 30 years on different topics that are socially sensitive and they always know and they're awfully good at predicting the actual year a study on a particular topic will come out where most of the people studied will be all for whatever it happens to be whereas 10 years ago they'd have maybe 40% saying no one didn't like this or whatever

And all broken up into age groups because everything is brainwashed into the children in school and then through college, high school and college and so on. And that's how it's done. Very, very precise, very effective and it works very well on most topics.

So they can change society quite easily by the way the behaviours have designed the indoctrination curriculum in school and the toolkits that they give teachers, how to bring the children to agree on topics that perhaps they shouldn't be agreeing upon. It's very effective. The very thing that Aldous Huxley talked about on one of the TV shows he was on,

when he said that there were techniques to be used on the public that would make them, that would change their opinions and behaviour in ways that perhaps wasn't wise or good for them in their own interests. They wouldn't be aware that they were doing it, being prompted and guided and so on. Very effective techniques. And that's how it was done, very simple. But today, because the techniques of indoctrination were put in very early on, very good indoctrination techniques were

at an early age. Just like Jack Celon said, the subsequent indoctrination would be much, much easier and propaganda would take a better hold actually. It's very, very effective. And the children today, no matter what they look at, even if they ever look at a paper book, for instance, for children, they've got all the PC messages in the stories paid for again by your tax money because they get paid to insert all the updates.

for the changing of society that they're going to experience in their own lifetime. And it's all through the electronic media too. And it's reinforced in school and right through their educational period and their movies and so on. There's nothing left to chance in this system today. It's pretty seamless right from supposed fact to fiction. It's all seamless integration. It works very, very well. The sad part too is that it's worked very well. Those who become adults understand

have it fixed in them as well. They never change. That's the sad part about it. You've had your mind stolen and you don't know it. In fact, you'll fight anybody who says you don't have your own mind and your own opinions. It's a sad thing to see people who get angry. I know what I'm doing. I know what I think. I know the conclusions I've come to on my own. You can't help them or show them. Naturally, they think they have basically come to these conclusions and opinions by themselves.

or what to like or what to dislike, and right down to what to hate, because the behaviourists also teach you what to hate. But I'll just talk about it on the Wallace show. Now, the Behaviour Insights team that I talked about last week is worldwide, so-called professionals, that are advising governments on every possible thing you can imagine. And supposedly, they'll tell you supposedly, it was how to...

It was to get the people to change their habits and so on, to save government's money. And then to save money for themselves for retirement, things like that, and to give more money to charity, and even to donate their bodies for organs donations. Without you knowing, you're being nudged by professionals who laugh at you because, let's be honest, if we're so easy-managed...

In fact, if you were managing the public and it was so easy, you'd start to have disgust at the public, just like Bernays. It's true, you know. And these are the elitists that rule you. It's exactly what they do. And getting back to the whole idea of cybernetics, you don't have to have the chip implants in you. You don't have to. To have your behavior changed, cybernetics also can be useful.

really used or be in the form of using internet technology and digital technologies that's outside of you. You're simply interacting with it all day long, every day. Same thing. And your behavior is being changed constantly by professionals and now, of course, by computers and computer systems themselves because they admit now they can do that.

The computers themselves run programs and can design programs, etc., etc. And more and more and more, it's being applied, actually. Anyway, here's an article here. It says, BX is coming back to London for 2019. And this is really what they're calling this international team, the big international meetings of the behavioral scientists, the BIT groups.

And this is technically BX isn't coming home either. The inaugural 2014 conference was held in Sydney, where it returned last month for BX 2018. But it was London where BIT was established in 2010. The world's first government institution, government institution, remember, dedicated to the application of behavioral sciences to improve public policy. Remember, too, they're also using it in all different departments within governments and civil service.

Do you elect any of these people? Of course you don't. You realize the whole system of government, even the one that they thought was working or was there, you thought it was, it wasn't actually there the way you thought it, it has all changed. Anyway, here it goes and it says that to improve public policy, in just eight years, BI has gone global with over 200 teams working in countries around the world. They all work together, eh? 200 teams working.

working in countries around the world and BIT offices in Sydney, Manchester, New York, Wellington, Singapore, etc. We're delighted to invite global BI practitioners and colleagues to the UK next year for the big annual conference, you see. And it says they've gone from strength to strength, readily sells out and attracts leading academics, policy wonks and public sector managers to discuss new results and share practical lessons.

There are many academic behavioural science conferences around the world and lots of events focused on public policy but none that brings the two together. And that's the specific niche BX aimed to fill. So it says the magic potion of the interaction between policymakers and academics. So there you go, it's the magic potion interaction. Policymakers and academics. So do you vote in academics? You know nothing about them, most folk don't even know they're there.

They don't know that the policies coming out of governments for quite a few years are coming out from the so-called professionals that you've never even heard of. And what they do really is to get rid of all the human things. See, the human problems are always in the way according to those that want to rule the world. It's always been the same human problems because they say, like Bertrand Russell said, that people don't behave in a logical fashion. It's because they're human, you see.

If you want something to behave in a very logical, predictable fashion, make a robot. Well, this is the next best thing to it, is using the human material and altering them, their behavior, through behavior modification in such a way they don't even know what's happening to them. To get them as close as possible to making, in their own words, to making the correct decisions. You understand? That's what it's about.

Because being human, you're not making the correct decisions, you're emotional. Most things you'll decide in any big way is about, it's an emotional decision generally. And that's a nuisance to those who want to rule the world. Awful, it's an awful nuisance that. So they're going at it big time. And were you asked about it? Of course not. But then you were never asked about anything that mattered from governments, have you? You've never been asked about anything that matters.

Do you realize we're living in an age now today where you have all lots of professional, all kinds of groups that want to protest things, all led by professional people. I'm talking about the leaders of them, trained to lead these groups and to have their protests and their chants and four legs good, two legs bad, that kind of stuff. And they do it and they get out. Their followers just get it out of their system, get it out. Oh yeah, four legs good, two legs bad, blah, blah, blah.

And they go home and they think they're doing something. But it's just, it really is, it's diffusing and getting rid of anger and resentment and just irritation, frustration, whatever it happens to be. That's all it is. It's all scientifically managed. And they don't even know what's happening to them, the ones who are following you.

It's quite amazing to live through this age when everything's managed with events like all year round, all planned out and published in major cities across the world. Protest groups all taking their turn at different things and yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, whatever it happens to be. And nothing happened. The same systems run all the time. The same people who run the money systems, the same people who run the war systems across the planet.

and who plunder countries for other resources. Same, that continues as always, while the rest of the people are shouting forlays, good and two legs bad, or whatever it happens to be. That's quite amazing. But anyway, I'm going to put quite a few of these links up tonight. This is for those who really want to understand. There's a few who want to understand what's happening in the world and what really is running their lives. And you understand this part. I mean, you'll understand an awful lot of it, in fact, everywhere you look. For instance...

These same characters are helping doctors decide by nudging doctors not to prescribe antibiotics and so on. Now, what they publish and what they'll do, like all power groups, there'll be a two-tiered system. There's one for the public and there's the deeper stuff that the public shouldn't learn about because they might be a little bit unhappy about or angry even. Now, if you have...

A few have people being told, don't prescribe so much antibiotics. Well, supposing someone needs it. Okay, what's the next? Well, let's get the age groups of the people who are getting the antibiotics. Well, is it really wise to give them to the older people? Because they won't have as long to live anyway as the younger people. And this is the kind of stuff where it all goes into, folks, and you're put into categories as soon as you walk through the doors and what you think are hospitals and places that are there to help you.

And they might just give you the euthanasia pill as opposed to an antibiotic, according to your status in society. And they have these categories, by the way, and I read them years ago from the British system, National Health Service, where they had the resuscitate, non-resuscitate little codes that they had on the beds. Now it's on computers, of course, for the patients.

And it's to do with their standing in society, their age, etc., etc. It's all cost effective. Whether you're going to use so much money on you or maybe put on someone who wants a certain change in some way or another that's not really what you would call a life-changing situation as such or a saving situation. But that's where we are today. Politics goes into everything. And now you have professionals nudging the doctors on what to do or not to do.

Now behavioural science is involved in everything, everything to do with humans, including what you should eat, what you shouldn't eat, and ways of prompting you to eat the right way, like make the right decisions on what you should be eating, etc. They never go into the facts at these universities, including the ones in Canada, that Canadians were guinea pigs for all the GM food in the first place.

all the vegetables that were modified and using the specific pesticides that were much, much more potent than old pesticides to do with the GM foods. And it was done in secret by the Government of Canada and the particular companies at the time that were growing the genetically modified organisms and foods and so on.

secret. It bust out, I did the shows on it years ago, it bust out from Britain when Tony Blair was going to make the people in Britain eat the same kind of foods. They call them frankenfoods of course. And it came out during the protest that Canadians had been eating it for 10 years in secret. The secret deal, I should say, was made by the Government of Canada and it actually said that secret deal

these particular companies. And they studied us to see how it would affect her health. The studies eventually came out and they showed you that the test animals were fed these particular foods, developed cancers in the stomach, etc., intestines, etc., etc., etc. And sure enough, with about the same time they started to give Canadians prescription drugs without prescriptions to do with reducing acid in their stomach. It was a reaction to the

To the stuff you were eating now, they didn't know what was causing the problem. The public didn't know, but of course the ones who planned it at the top obviously knew what was behind it all. Because your body will always try and flush out something, just like the eyes will flush out something or the nose will flush out something that irritates it. So does your stomach as well. And it produces excess acids and so on to get rid of it. So they gave you the proton pump inhibitors, as they call them.

over the counter for the first time without saying anything to the public. It just happened to be there on the shelves. And that was the reason for that, folks. For those who didn't know that, by the way. Secrets. Imagine voting for governments who did that kind of thing in secret and studied the public. Huh? Democracies. People always talk about democracies. It should be a demonicry, maybe. But anyway, here's another one, too, to do with the companies that are dealing with BIT and so on.

Because remember, they're using the internet big time and they have access to it. I mentioned last week that the cybersecurity company in Britain was basically for the GCHQ is pretty well next door to the big Google building as well. They call it, the company that owns Google is actually Alphabet, they call it. It's like a massive holding company. Anything to do with internet and telecommunications and

Any digital anything runs through them and your driverless cars all this kind of things like hundreds and everything you can imagine is under this massive monopoly including how to shape society to suit their vision of the future. So here you have a relationship between Google and DeepMind, as DeepMind they call it. Might not be as rosy as they'd like you to believe according to an in-depth report from the information

which cites several sources across both companies. Google fought off Facebook to acquire DeepMind, London-based artificial intelligence, a lab working on solving artificial general intelligence in 2014 for a reported $600 million, but not everyone at Google saw it as a smart move. Now, I'll put these articles up. These are from Forbes magazine at the time. Well worth looking up.

And you'll find more about the people. Remember, if you're good at remembering names, remember the people, the names you'll see and so on. And Google Brain, terms like that, Google Brain. Deep Mind, as they say, is their deal. Because it's all part of Alphabet. And it's all to do with you, folks. Everything's to do with you.

Everything happens on the... All wealth comes from the public. You're all forced to buy certain things. You're all forced to go on the internet in this day and age. You're forced to do it. Every day, if you don't go on it, you get little prompts and reminders and nudges from governments that it's...

It saves money, you know, if you do it electronically and blah, blah, and save resources and all this kind of stuff, you know. They're always on about revenue. It says the lack of revenue generated by DeepMind is reportedly one of the main issues for some Google staff. Others are annoyed by the fact that DeepMind has a special status within the Alphabet group that allows it to work on projects that may not deliver results for decades. The whole future is really getting planned, you see.

And if you're going to be driving or not driving or certain areas, you'll have driverless cars. The rest of you won't even have them because you won't be living on the land of a Gen 21 as you all know. Remember, the next meeting for the Gen 21 is 2030 to see if they've implemented the last part up to the year 2030. But it's still all for the 21st century. They must change the whole planet in this particular century. This is a century of change, remember. Transition, they call it.

So, as I say, you have to get into the terms and these big, massive corporations that are really intelligent services too, obviously. Obviously. They control societies across the planet. And Jigsaw. And Jigsaw's part of it too. How can technology make people in the world... It's not to do with making the world safer, isn't it?

safer from attacks on free speech as well. Attacks on free speech is interesting articles actually because it goes into... they never use the term censorship of speech. This go into helping prohibit certain types of speech or just knocking them off the net before it gets to the receiver you see things like that yeah and modifying what you're saying

Stuff like that. And then safer from online harassment. You think it's all happening just now? It was planned years ago. Long before they gave it to you, they knew where it would go. Actually, I think they helped you get along, you might say. Safer from violent extremism. And safer from injustice and corruption, isn't that? Don't you feel better already that these are the people in charge of what you can say, can't say, and all the rest of it? It's to make everything safer, for goodness sake.

That's a nice, proactive, nice word, isn't it? Social word, safe, safer, isn't it? Perspectives is an API that uses machine learning to spot abuse and harassment online.

perspective scores comments based on the perceived impact a comment might have on a conversation okay remember too is that you're dealing with behaviorists they've been using perspective to alter your opinions and the way you speak and think about things and what you believe so they can also use it you see to alter what they don't like and what you're saying i

so may have in conversation which publishers can use to give real-time feedback to commenters, help moderators sort comments more effectively or allow readers to more easily find relevant information. We'll be releasing more machine learning models later this year but our first model identifies whether a comment could be perceived as toxic to a discussion. Toxic, see? There you go. And it's got online harassment, the challenge is the press

Google cousin develops technology to flag toxic online comments. That's in the press. Google cousin develops technology to flag toxic online comments. And then it's got zero two project shield, a filter experiment where they can filter stuff out as you're saying stuff. I guess I'll do it in such a way too. You won't even get the bleep that you'll just get the, they'll be seamless. They'll just, you know, connected together with no, no gap there.

And then the Project Shield have met news organizations around the world who suffer crippling digital attacks when they publish something controversial or that questions powerful institutions. Do you understand? All the emotive topics of today have been planned long ago to stir up emotions and controversy. And they all worked out to who to demonize when you can complain about it. Hmm.

Don't get someone's screwing with your head a bit. So Project Sheek uses Google's infrastructure to protect independent news sites, independent ones, from distributed denial of service attacks, DDoS, a type of digital attack that exploits thousands or even millions of computers to overwhelm websites, servers, and take it offline.

And that's true, they can certainly do that. I mean, the people at the top, including the intelligence services, have been crashing sites for years since the beginning. If they don't like what they're saying, they simply get a two or three computers to constantly go into a site and download, download, download until it crashes, basically. Very easy to do. And then I've got the challenge attacks on free speech. In the press, Google wants to save news sites from cyber attacks for free. Well, here's a part of the world's ruling system.

Going to do something for free. Do you want to believe that? Do you want to believe that? It's like the government saying we're putting on blue helmets to go into countries as peacekeepers. Not as soldiers, but as peacekeepers. It all depends on the colour of your helmet, you see. The rifles are the same, the grenades are the same, all the gear is the same, but you just put a blue helmet on instead, eh? And most of the time they don't even do that. They just call it a peacekeeper. Right out of George Orwell's.

Yeah, everything's opposite of what the claim is, isn't it? But for free. And we're going to countries, remember, to help people, right? We're going to help them. We've never gone into any country to help anybody. Never, never, ever. Nope. There's an awfully good documentary put out about when they went into Bosnia and Yugoslavia and the wars and

Albania and so on and Serbia. It's called The Weight of Chains. Well, we're seeing because the information in that what really happened is something else. And the characters' names that come out are awfully well known, by the way. And the World Bank and all the rest and how they literally take all these countries down, these little countries down, get them all fighting each other. Literally, literally, the US and some other countries were arming them like crazy to go to war with each other.

Telling them they're all going to end up ruling the area. Each one of them is going to rule the whole area. And then they end up all broke. All in debt to the World Bank and the IMF. And big American companies. Come in and take all the resources. But we were in there to help people. They said.

Anyway, so the attacks on free speech and so on and they want to help you from keep free from cyber attacks for free these are Intelligence agencies that crack and take down sites all they want to help you for free, right? All depend what you push if you're pushing part of their propaganda for them They might leave you alone. This is how to use Google's password alert tool to thwart phishing attacks And then I'll put in this one here, too

Conversation Artificial Intelligence is a collaborative research effort exploring ML as a tool for better discussions online. Isn't that wonderful? For you that, remember I've told you, a lot of the arguments you're having online are done by computers. It has been that way for years. You have these sock puppets, they call them, and folk are committing suicide because these socks are arguing with them. They think they're real people. They really do.

Why would you argue with anything you can't even see anyway in the first place? So how might machine learning methods help online conversations? What aspects of a conversation can machine learning understand? And what are the risks and challenges of using machine learning to assist online conversations? So there you have it, public data sets and so on. The main challenge of machine learning research is limited availability of high-quality research data to improve online discussion. We want to change that.

by creating, publishing and/or identifying high-quality public data sets related to online discussion. There you go. And they give you Wikipedia, talk page comments and so on.

annotated with toxicity reasons kaggle competition never heard of it a public kaggle competition based on a crowdsourced data set that includes four toxicity subtypes reasons why something might be considered toxic and so understand these are big movements to alter everything folks and it's your generally your tax money has been used to create your chains in a sense always we always pay for our own chains

Now we only have big band-aids over our mouths probably. If you're bad, oh you're bad, get some good duct tape and stick it over that mouth of yours. The company formerly known as Google is far bigger than most people realise. No kidding, eh? Several of the projects and companies overseen by Alphabet Inc., the holding company Google created in 2015, had generated news of late.

RBC Capital analyst Mark Mahaney issued a bullish report of the future of Waymo, a self-driving car company due to launch commercial operations in Phoenix, Arizona before the end of the year, it says. And Wednesday, Alphabet's research development arm X announced that two projects, Loon and Wing, will become independent companies within Alphabet. This is a whole list of different companies within it. There's Javelin 2, a secret project, and so on that Larry Page was on about.

They're focusing on the big picture, you know, the bigger picture. Sounds very suspicious, eh? And Alphabet is a massive corporation that encompasses everything from internet-beaming hot air balloons to self-driving cars to Google Cloud. It's everything basically digital that you're going to be forced into whether you like it or not. And it gives you some of the history of it.

And it's research and development. But believe you me, most of the research and development is coming from not just private corporations, but also from your tax money. Always is, eh? And it also goes into Google Fiber, launched in Kansas City 2012. It's for smart cities and so on, how it's going to control all this kind of stuff. One massive monopoly, really. They'll pretend it's not, but it's a massive monopoly. It's just like a big holding company.

with hundreds and hundreds of organizations and companies underneath it that run your life basically. This one article was on Forever Preval, with some of the companies that it runs and owns basically, under Alphabet. And it's also got, what is it, Urban Innovation, as I say, smart cities and so on, led by Dan Doktoroff. Who's got a name like Doktoroff?

But anyway, Sidewalk Labs aims to find new ways to improve cities through technology and goes on and on. Then there's Calico, launched 2013 with an ambitious goal, cure death. The Alphabet-owned company has invested millions to develop drugs that could help prolong human life by fighting age-related diseases like cancer or Alzheimer's. I personally think that at the very top, they've definitely had advanced medicine and treatment for these things for a long, long time.

Because some of the top people in the world, the most richest within the groups of them, for years and years and years, they don't come down with old age diseases like most folk. They don't get arthritis and so on. They're generally given lectures till they're 100 years old. Quite frequent lectures at that too.

Another one too is GV Alphabet's early stage venture arm, formerly known as Google Ventures. It has $2.4 billion in management and has invested in more than 300 companies, including Uber, Flatiron, Health and Slack. Then Google Capital is Alphabet's growth equity investment fund, and it says it's purely financial returns and so on. The think tank division with Alphabet was spun off in a company called Jigsaw, led by Jared Cohen.

Jigsaw uses technology to tackle geopolitical problems like online censorship, extremism and harassment. In other words, they are censoring, you see. The ones who tackle it are censoring. So there you go. And then they've got artificial intelligence of all kinds, blah, blah. DeepMind, Waymo, half a bit self-driving car, and so on and so on. This is too long to go into, but anyway, Project Loon and so on. I'll put all these up tonight, by the way.

And then you go into this one here and it says, who are we? We are a global community of public private sector decision makers. This is part of it too. They're called decision makers, behavioral science researchers, policy analysts and practitioners with a bold mission to proceed. There's that wording in bold to promote the application of rigorous behavioral science research that serve the public interest.

We serve as an information hub and community builder, connecting individuals and organisations through our conference spotlight workshops, task forces and publication of newsletters on behavioural science and policy.

This is the philosophy is the impact of public private sector policy policies depends critically on the behavior of individuals groups and organizations We believe a clear understanding of how the power of behavioral science research interventions can provide innovative solutions for addressing challenges faced by policymakers and other Practitioners so as how to meet the people do it you want them to do basically as a global hub BSPA

where behavioral scientists and other practitioners interact via conferences, workshops, briefings, and our membership portal, and so on and so on. But these are the ones that help you make the right decisions and actually say that. And all the same old people are Nussbaums there, Grant, Erner, Sunstein, all the names you've known, Craig Fox and so on, on and on and on, Kahneman, Daniel Oppenheimer, people who, and a lot of them have churned books out too if you really want to spend your life reading them.

and how, if you can manage it, mind you, there's only two kind of folk read their books. The ones who want to understand how they're altering society, and they want to complain about it, and the ones who want to cash in on it and become one of them. And there's a lot of people out there that want to be part of the winning team, and helping to manipulate everybody else to do their bidding. Also, Ontario's Behavioural Insights Unit 2, I'll put that there as well.

They're also working with the Treasury Board Secretariat, the Centre of Excellence for Evidence-Based Decision-Making, etc. Because remember, too, they're trying to make you give more tax money, give more money to ministries, the big foundations, you know, the big foundations that they're there because they love you, you see.

and how to eat right and do right and all the rest of it. The things you're not doing properly to make the proper decisions that they've already decided they're proper. You understand what I'm saying here? They've already decided what the proper decisions are for you. So why bother trying to make them yourself? For goodness sake, you probably make the wrong ones. So anyway, they have the behavioral insights group. They call it BIG here. BIG sounds better than, you know, than TEAM.

and but it's part of the team the behavioral science and policy association etc so i'll put this one up as well improving communications using behavioral insights new results from test plus build it says here new for employers delicious evidence on what works to reduce the gender pay gap encouraging retirement planning through behavioral insights you're going to starve to death and inflation is running rampant have you saved money are you not

Is there any point saving money since it's getting worthless all the time? I think eventually they'll do away with it. In Canada, they'll probably just get rid of the $50 bills since everybody has to pull out hundreds these days to pay for anything.

It's worth nothing. That's inflation for you. Improving the annual electoral canvas. So here you are to BIT constantly on lookout for interventions that can scale dramatically at low or even no cost. That's why we're excited that some of our evidence-based interventions will hit millions of letterboxes across England, Scotland, Wales this summer.

the household inquiry form plays a key role in keeping the blah blah blah anyway they try and get but you start voting so as they see understand voting is a legal legality if you put yourself down and you're registered to vote so you've made a deal with somebody you got to do it and then you when you do vote then you made a deal they can do it in the one two you once they're in power that's a legality what do evidence and olives have in common etc people can learn in a number of ways through direct and instruction

And through watching what other people do and learning from their actions or through our own experiences and trial and error, psychologists have long studied the ways in which we learn from our experiences as well. In other words, what they're going to tell you is they can guide you along a lot faster into the proper ways of behaving.

would have decided for you you see and then symbolic rewards real benefits in a way ways to give you a little little gains give all your information up for for maybe a special card in a store for a little discount you give all your information up isn't that wonderful symbolic rewards real benefits and so on and then the one two antimicrobial resistance and bi what's next you see

in their book Super Bugs: The Arms Race Against Bacteria. They go on about how terrible it will be if the drugs don't work and blah blah blah blah. So should you really be prescribing it? Goodness sake. Opposite apologies. Onwards to the next frontier. Remember this is the last frontier. The final frontier is managing and brainwashing and controlling billions of people across the planet. The final frontier is your mind. Hope you understand that.

So new frontiers in behavioural insights, behavioural exchange etc etc blah blah. Also using behavioural science to put charities on a sure footing. How allegiances can harm policy making, call it policy tribes. Scaling effective health interventions across the globe. You know, if you're getting on, why don't you just take this pill here and have done with it.

rather than cost the taxpayers more money when they can use it for better, you know, pay increases for some of the specialists in the hospital. They're in the field of modern dating, why businesses need to give up their game on the small prints, keeping your eye on the ball, defense of self-control, how to tackle gender pay gap. They're all in the same things, you know, because uniformity is very important to get things done. The illusion of similarity.

Helping people save on their energy. You know, freeze to death in the winter, put on more clothing because it's going to be too expensive to pay for your electricity shortly anyway. So they help you save and not do things. They help you, you see. Then the problem with groups, because they run all different kind of groups, the ones who protest everything. They call for papers about social norms.

And then how to prompt doctors to get doctors to reduce their antibiotic prescriptions or boosting classroom attendance. These norms are now blah, blah, blah. How it run the world really is what it is. A call for papers about social norms. I'll put that up too. Another one here is...

even how to alter behavior of different ethnic groups in the classrooms and that will change their lives and how certain minorities and with other big majorities and I've studied it all how to do it just how many should do in a minority to a majority to make it start to work till they're accepted and so on it's just amazing everything they've done here including the different kinds of minorities and what works quicker than others quite something

and applying behavioral insights. Behavioral Insights Team North America. The Behavioral Insights in Canada 2018 speakers. Got all that too. Most folk won't read this stuff. They really won't. They don't mind being managed, in fact.

They're also teaching you what to think and how you feel about climate change, what you should think and believe about it. They are working in all countries, the BIT, they're working in all countries together to bring everybody to the same conclusions. Remember the Club of Rome? Man is therefore the enemy. They were given a reason to really control everybody and get everybody to give up their rights and be controlled. And they said that climate change and climate

Drought and famine would be that would fit the bill different man was the enemy so it's going on and on That's what carbon is so important even though we're there's more forests emitted carbon along with volcanoes in the last year than then you know Thousands of generations have ever done that's got nothing to do with it because carbon doesn't matter It's to control you and your way of life and even right down to heating and eating no kidding you miss was about also one by Daniel Goldstein

They call it choice architecture by these BIT characters. It relates to retirement savings and organ donation. Currently, the principal researcher is at Microsoft Research, where he works the intersection of behavioral economics and computer science. Behavioral economics, folks, is a big one. He was previously a professor at London Business School and taught out research there.

or researched at Wharton, Yahoo Research, Columbia University in Germany's Max Planck Institute, where he was awarded the Otto Hahn Medal in 1997. Anyway, it says, Assistant to Behavioural Insights Team Academic Advisory Panel, was President of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making. Nice to tell me, Judgment and Decision Making, the largest academic organisation in behavioural economics. Everyone's economics, eh? Because the ones at the top can't get rich,

unless they get it off of you, all of you. And that's our dilemma, is how do they maintain a system into the future if they want to reduce the population at the same time, eh? Big, massive herd management. So anyway, I'll put this kind of stuff up. As I say, it won't be for everybody's cup of tea. Most folk don't mind it. I saw a lot of people were scared about it when they got into that. Well, I don't really want to know if I'm being managed. I want to believe that everything is my own decision, my own opinions. That's what I'll tell you.

Especially the ones who've gone through their lives, the young folk, up to the age of 18 now, they've been brainwashed since birth with very effective techniques. Uniformly so, too, in a system where they're getting the same information daily, the same curriculum through schools and so on. And they watch the same movies, but it's all embedded in movies. But they think they're, you know, they think they're making their own decisions. But some of them are scared to go into that, too.

And something I'll tell you too, they don't mind what the governments and agencies know about them across the planet. They don't care. They think that privacy is ridiculous, that privacy would take time. And if they start worrying about things, it's much better having their bills automatically taking out their paychecks and everything without them having to even worry about it. It's kind of like not looking at it and if it clears that week, everyone's okay. But don't look at it. They'll give you a note if something didn't clear. And even that's been studied intensely too.

And you're all going to go and vote, aren't you, the next time another group comes along. And you'll believe it's all real. The left wing and the right wing attached to the same bird. Sorry to hurry through, by the way. There's a lot of bits and bytes of information to run through there. And people will grab it. They'll use my information because I've done all the research put up for them. And they'll never mention me, but that's the way it goes, isn't it? Sad that, isn't it? Really sad in the system in which we live today.

Because if you don't have people who appreciate other people, we're all done for. But we really are, and we deserve what we get, don't we? We really do. We've lost all the old values we had as a society. We really have. And people literally will rip each other off, just like the ones at the top do to the bottom. The ones at the bottom are doing to each other. Rather sad. Winners and losers. As society goes down the tubes. And that's what they've been taught. Winners and losers.

From myself, Alan Watt from Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your God or your gods go with you.