We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Buy Tech’s Bounce? 2/18/25

Buy Tech’s Bounce? 2/18/25

2025/2/18
logo of podcast Halftime Report

Halftime Report

AI Chapters Transcript

Shownotes Transcript

What counts most to you? Maybe it's spending more time with the ones you love, or maybe doing more of what you love to do. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. At Edward Jones, our dedicated financial advisors are people you can count on for financial strategies to help support what truly matters to you. Let's find your rich. Edward Jones, member SIPC.

What if your business could see beyond the what is and into what can be?

What if you could create more impact in every decision? What if you had a partner as visionary as you are? With Bank of America, you get access to our trusted experts, real-time insights, and digital tools. So whether you run a local shop or a global enterprise, you're backed by business solutions to make every move matter. What would you like the power to do? Visit bankofamerica.com slash banking for business to learn more. Bank of America is proud to be the official bank sponsor of FIFA World Cup 2026.

I'm Scott Wapner and you're listening to CNBC's Halftime Report, the podcast, the most profitable hour of the trading day. We record this live weekdays at 12 Eastern. Listen in. All right, Mike, thanks so much. Welcome to the Halftime Report. I'm Scott Wapner, front and center of this hour. Tech's reemergence, the NASDAQ 100 looking to build today on its best week of 2025. We will trade that space with the Investment Committee and we are right at a new closing high for the S&P. We'll track it with

With Josh Brown, Joe Terranova, Sarat Saitse, and Brian Belsky as we take you to the markets, give you a look here on this Tuesday morning. But, Joe, that's the story very much is this resilient stock market and the fact that we're right there at a new closing high, give or take a point or so throughout the morning. The resiliency is remarkable. We've had three bouts of elevated volatility. The VIX spikes above 50%.

three Mondays so far in the six weeks of twenty twenty five and very quickly you see the VIX on the retreat you now have the VIX towards fifteen I think the low for the year is around fourteen point six. You look at the treasury market the range in the treasury market is tight about forty basis points the earnings the growth has been there we're now entering a buyback period and I think the comfort that you have in staying engaged towards risk.

is that there is an expanding thesis surrounding where you can invest. You're looking year to date at sectors like financials, which are working, materials, which are working, industrials, which are working. And then certainly if you want to go outside the U.S., you're finding opportunities is there as well. So there's a compelling case, Scott, that could really be made for each and every asset class. And that's a much different environment than we've seen in prior years. Brian, we've gotten here to this new closing high territory. Tech's woken up.

Lately, right? I said the NASDAQ 100 off its best week of 25. We're off a record high. Last week, Apple was up 7.5%. NVIDIA's up 7%. Meta's up 3%. The others were flat, but there's a lot that's been working within that space. And I'm going to tell you a bunch of names after you address that issue that I'm putting forth. This fact that tech's woken up and thus the S&P is adding to these gains.

Well, the proof's in the pudding, right? I think these large cap tech stocks, their death has been largely blown out of proportion. And I think, Scott, where there was such a huge focus on the big cap tech companies' earnings growth beginning to roll over in terms of the forecast perspective and then other areas in tech accelerating. So actually what's happening is that the growth rates and the expected growth

growth in those areas for the next two years has actually begun to rebound a little bit better than most people thought. Cash flow's been better. Joe talked about buybacks. We're starting to see more dividends. But we're really seeing the broader participation actually come together. So I think the

I think the demise has been widely blown out of proportion. That's why we've remained quite overweight, the sector. What do you think about the resiliency of the market, Sarath? Look, I think we need tech for the market to do well overall. And I think the companies that are executing, and you look at the meta that was up 20 days, you know, except for today, they are executing and they're spending money to grow. And the companies today that's a little bit different from a couple of years ago is they're being rewarded to spend.

because they've had some good roi on the expenditure so i think you like that and that's also rolling over to software where so you not only get the large cap tax but you get the software you get financials you are getting this diversified uh uplift in the market i think that's good josh you know there's a lot working today uh within the tech universe if you and maybe some of it has to do with xai and the launch of grok 3

from Elon Musk, which he claims it performs better than anything else. I don't know what else you would expect him to say, but NVIDIA's up, Oracle's up, Dell, Vertiv, Vistra, Palantir, a new intraday high. Alibaba today is working well, you know,

President Xi in meeting with business leaders in China. The climate feels a little bit different, certainly from the idea of whether it's investable over there or not. I've got cyber that's been doing well. Palo Alto's up a bunch today. You take your shot, really, on whatever you want to talk about in that realm.

Well, here's your backdrop. Overall, you've got U.S. earnings growing. We're coming off an outstanding quarter, one of the best quarters we've had in the last five years, quite frankly. A lot of it was unexpected, and we'll take that.

it's the highest year-over-year earnings growth rate since the fourth quarter of 2021, which is already, believe it or not, like three and a half years ago. It's the sixth consecutive quarter of year-over-year earnings growth for the S&P. And then when you look at where those earnings are coming from, it's such a widespread story that people just feel good generally. Let's talk about tech, though, which you bring up.

through last week the narrative was uh... we've seen the best we're gonna see on technology and through last week in an underperformed

the S&P 500 the most of all of the individual sectors. It's going back to 2022. Today, we have a little bit of a resurgence. You've got 55% of the S&P 500 stocks above their 50-day, but 59% of tech. So they're coming back both

on an absolute basis, but relative to the rest of the market. And what I really think is most exciting here is, and I know we talk about tech as a catch-all, it's the communication sector, and it's not just meta. Look at the top names in this group that are just on my own best stocks in the market list right now. You've got the Liberty Formula One group, which is F-W-O-N-K. We never talk about this name on the show. It's a tracking stock. It's one of these weird John Malone creations, but it's...

It's crushing. Alphabet looks good. Live Nation we talked about last week. Record highs. Netflix record highs. Roblox is rallying. Spotify rallying. Now you've got AT&T and T-Mobile, and you've got some of the video game names. Take-Two Interactive.

They're not tech. They're tech adjacent. They're communications. They look outstanding. The sector seeing the highest percentage of constituents hitting new 52 week highs is the communication sector. 32 percent of the names in this group are hitting highs. That is just an incredible situation for investors who are wondering, did I miss out on semis?

Did I miss out on AI? What do I do? Did I miss the software trade? Well...

Here's a few hundred stocks you almost never think about, many of which are breaking out, a third of which are at 52-week highs. That's the nature of the tape that we're in. And by the way, it's international as well. Yeah, which we'll get to. Yes, Sirot, I mean, Meta is going for 21 in a row. It's got some work to do today. But Josh raises a good point about all of these other stocks that aren't getting as much love,

on TV, but certainly are from investors who continue to buy up these names like the Liberties and Live Nations and Roblox and Spotify's and T and Take Two and T-Mobile. Yeah, look, there's plenty of opportunity and I can throw companies like Disney in there as well. And you've got an opportunity where earnings growth is now wide across different companies.

And given where the other thing to watch for is the 10-year, right? Because if the 10-year starts coming down, people start moving more towards growth as well. So you will see more money moved across. And it's not to say you can't just be in the big seven. You can be across some of these sectors. What do you think, Belsky, of these moves in the oracles of the world today or Vistars or Palantir? We said record intraday high. We talk about a number of these names a lot because they continue to hit new highs. How

How can you not? They do. They're performing fundamentally. But you go back and look at the MAG-7, right? The MAG-7 is comprised of three specific sectors, technology, communication services, and discretionary. Our strategy all along this year is barbell that, barbell those positions by neutralizing the MAG-7, maybe picking one or two to overweight, and then massively overweighting the other side of it.

meaning the Oracles, the Palantirs in tech, the Spotify's, the Disney's, the AT&T's in communication services, neutralizing Amazon and Tesla, but owning more Lulu and Marriott and Home Depot. That's the way to do it. And oh, by the way, those are the names that are actually growing on a relative basis in terms of earnings, but also revenue growth. And that's an important distinction.

What do you got? Well, I think, first of all, Spotify is a name that we've owned. It's had very strong momentum in communication services. It's got double-digit revenue growth. But going beyond there, yeah, you're mentioning a lot of names that are really strong, but you're also having a lot of what we called years ago the longer-duration software names that are participating once again. It's not just AppLovin. It's other names like Guidewire. We haven't spoken about Guidewire.

quite some time there's areas of the market that now we're seeing inflows that previously we're not seeing the inflows look at s_a_p_ it's a beneficiary of that broadening out geographically david tepper you know i bought that last week up to one twenty seven so it's it's going to some of the unfamiliar places of the last several years

And again, that emphasizes that that is a strong opportunity for investors who over the last several years had that narrow concentrated focus on just the Mag7. Doesn't mean you can't own the Mag7. It just means there's other opportunities. I'm glad you mentioned MapLovin because we do have some unfinished business from last week when you were away. All related to ad tech, blow ups, blow outs.

We want to call it that. A blow up, Trade Desk. I want you to talk about that and the Applovin blowout, which surged on earnings, which could be part of the reason that Trade Desk had the kind of earnings reaction that it did

as well. What's your take here? Trade Desk first, please. Okay, let's go on Trade Desk. And I'm not going to sit here and say, okay, we've got a profit in Trade Desk, and I'm not playing that game. What I'm going to tell you is this, plain and simple. The strategy can't exit Trade Desk until April 30th. Those are the rules. Can't rewrite them. SEC's not going to allow me to do it for the narrative of the show. But you don't own it personally? Trade Desk, I do not own personally. No. I will say this. If you own Trade Desk and you

and you are still sitting with Trade Desk, then you are not risk managing your position because there is literally no reason to be in Trade Desk right now after what we witnessed. Well, Josh sold it last week. Good. He knows what he's doing. He knows Belsky, though. You're calling out Belsky because he still owns it. Okay. Buying. Are you buying? Come, come.

No, we own it, Josh. Hey, thanks. Hello. No, we own it. This is a shoulda, coulda, woulda stock because you shoulda, coulda, woulda sold the stock after the election. We stuck with it because of the fundamental growth of this thing. Now it's too late. Now we think at the end of the day, this stock is in a two-quarter penalty box, two-quarter penalty box. We still like their fundamental vision. We're going to continue to own it. And I know you love this. We don't own a full position. We own a small position. We're long-term investors. That's irrelevant.

In a diversified portfolio where Trade Desk is in the communication services sector, where we talked a lot about this, where News Corp and Reddit, Reddit were huge winners last year. Trade Desk is one of those areas that we think now in terms of where the comeback is, is way oversold, fundamentally great vision, great company, great product. But you said it's too late as part of your strategy.

Little speech there. Too late to what? Sell it now? If you want to have exposure to this company longer term, it's too late to sell it because I believe that this company is going to work. Now, it's going to be in the penalty box for a couple of quarters, but in terms of

of the company's vision fundamentals i think it's going to be fine and it needs to be part of a longer-term communication services holding within the mid cap space josh you obviously didn't think that it was too late to sell it cuz you did on the blow up well i was in the stock i was in the stock primarily riding the technicals higher and i let a pretty big profit turn into a loss because i held it through earnings uh...

Like most investors, I was blindsided by how poor the quarter was and how much worse the outlook would be. So one of my one of my rules with the best stocks portfolio is if it's not on the list anymore, it's out. So I'm out of the position. It's not the end of the world. I got tons of stocks that are going up. And this is a part of you either have a risk management strategy to Joe's point or you don't. But to Belsky's point.

I do agree with him that there is a longer term opportunity in the space. It is a very unique company with a very unique hold on its part of the market, which is serving people watching television and movies on apps, serving them ads with almost as perfect quality.

of a understanding of who that person is that we see Facebook and Alphabet be able to do on the internet. The connected television advertising market is not going away. Maybe there's more competition. Maybe that's why the outlook wasn't great. But I actually do think longer-term investors will...

do well with Trade Desk. But to Belsky's point, they have to earn back trust because it's a pretty substantial guide down. And that might take more than one quarter. So for my strategy, I don't need to wait that out. I'll come back into it higher if I have to. For a longer term investor strategy who doesn't want to guess it when it might turn,

It makes sense. And by the way, let me just remind people, comebacks happen more frequently than you think. And before you think they will, we talked about the comeback and crowd strike last week. There were people who thought that was over forever. Netflix blew up in 2002. It looked over forever.

Meta was in a 70% drawdown in 2022. It went up sixfold. So don't count it completely out. Just understand if you have a risk management strategy, you have to do what's best for your strategy. And sometimes that means taking the fast loss. Good point. Good points. Applovin, you want to take that one? Applovin, plain and simply, I think I gave this as a final trade over the last several weeks.

And you could see that what was happening was that there was an attempt for momentum to deteriorate. And by the way, last week I spoke about it. I think Jeff DeGraff put out an excellent note on the fact that he didn't feel momentum was overbought. Yet I pushed back against that.

I said, yeah, I feel like it's deteriorating. Well, it kind of deteriorated in a very short time span. And Jeff's right, because on the other side of that, you see that momentum is playing out strongly to the upside again. And I think what happened with Applovin is there was an attempt on the downside to see that

they would be able to negate a lot of the positive momentum and it in a failed and when you recognize something like that you have to acknowledge okay here comes the other side of that where people that are pushing against it in the option market that or leveraging up they're gonna come back in and they're gonna cover their short positioning I also think

that you have to have the Applovin, you have to have the Palantir in your portfolio if you're going to be a successful active manager. Because you're up against the Mag7, and they're performing so strongly the last 10 years. And if you have Applovin, and you have Palantir, and you're selling it early, you're never going to be able to compete with that passive indexing performance. You have to maintain ownership of your winners, and Applovin is a great example of it. Sirat?

Joe went after Belsky offhanded. Now he's coming after you. You don't own any of these names. No cyber, no Palantir. What's up with that? No, I got my others. I got Oracle in there. I got Salesforce. I got, you know, Workday. So I've got some of the other horses in there. But I agree with Joe's point. You need to find other horses.

growthy momentum companies that are going to keep up if not beat the back seven. And you got to look at other different areas. And we like the software space in that. And, you know, there's the cyberspace, but there's a lot to choose from. Speaking of, you sold Twilio.

Yes. Sold Twilio, bought it November 13th, 98 and a quarter. Sold it out on Friday at 125. No reason to sit around and wait here for the turnaround story to unfold. You have to risk manage the position and not look at the fundamentals and guess and hope that they're going to restore themselves very quickly. Had a decent profit in it. What got me into the trade? Momentum. Okay, so what should take me out of the trade? Momentum. Momentum's gone in the name.

the other thing i thought was interesting is the 13 f's that we got last week uh which i thought we and we highlighted some of them obviously on on the show as we talked about appaloosa you know tepper's family office adding to the china plays we learned that third point daniel loeb accumulating meta again philippe lafont co2 selling a bunch of nvidia and we also learned about berkshire which i want to talk about because we have ownership of some stocks and we have ownership of

Berkshire in and of itself. Took a new position in Constellation Brands, bought more dominoes and sold more B of A. You want to take Constellation first, which you own? Constellation is in the doghouse. It's in the doghouse like Diageo and Budweiser, and there are a lot of headwinds there. So this is something we're watching. They've got Cagney this week, which is where

all the consumer stocks are going to be talking about. The question is, you know, is beer going to grow? And what is the secular headwind against that? So it's a cheap stock at these levels. Is it a multiple you haven't seen in a decade? The question is, can they execute and will the demand be there? What if you think that, you know, as some are suggesting, that these are all in secular decline?

But the trends are certainly not your friend and not likely to reverse anytime soon. In other words, consumption of alcohol, spirits in general has been dramatically declining. That's why I will say this is on our watch list. So we are going to make a decision whether we add more or get out of this. You're going to get out of it as Berkshire's getting in?

Look, Berkshire can get it out of whatever they want, but they were getting out of Apple and people are getting into Apple. Well, but they were getting out of it with a tremendous gain in the name. Here, they're obviously initiating a new position in something that's been hit pretty hard. I'm not saying we are, but if our work determines that this is a secular headwind, it's something that we will put our capital elsewhere. If not, we'll stay in it and add more. What do you make of the B of A?

more selling of B of A? - I don't think it's any different than what he's done in the Apple, just in terms of rediversifying. I mean, I think the constellation thing is-- - Was B of A up as much as Apple? - Well, in terms of his cost position, his cost position and where he was originally in B of A, same thing with Apple,

I think with Surratt's point on the Constellation, we sold it way last year. I just think that's an expensive stock in a secular decline. But you never want to bet against Buffett in terms of this contrarian way of thinking. When you're a value manager, you're not just looking at intrinsic valuations. You're looking at being a little bit more contrarian. So he must kind of think something else is going on there. But we own the stock in our financial holdings from a financial sector perspective, and we're still going to own the stock.

Josh, you want to give me something on Berkshire in general?

contrarian is the right contrarian is the right term for what's happening here he sold apple into a massive mag 7 rally having made more money in that stock than like almost the maybe the bottom 50 stocks that they that they've owned in the last 20 years combined it's just uh it was such a remarkable gain and uh he took it off the table at a really high multiple i think he started buying apple at a 10 multiple net of cash um

which is insane when you think about what it sells for now. That's contrarian. Bank of America, lightening up. He sold all his banks into one of the biggest financials rally that we've seen since the great financial crisis. Contrarian.

what he's doing with Constellation Brands is contrarianism because there is this big idea out there that GLP-1s will not lead to the end of beer, but the person that might have drank five now drinks two.

And the person that used to drink too now just says, no, thank you. And we're seeing that with all sorts of categories within food, within alcohol consumption. And then you've got this Gen Z generation that really doesn't drink. It's not that they will never drink anything. It's just the patterns of consumption for where they are at their age are nowhere near what

What was customary amongst the Gen X's, my generation, for example, and certainly older, the boomers and the silent generation, which basically it's night and day. So that's what makes that a contrarian situation. Nobody wants to own the space. So the truth is probably somewhere in between. And I think that's the way that you want to think about it. It's usually not the most extreme version of the bull case or the bear case.

There was a contrarian view, speaking of going against the crowd, that nobody a year ago wanted to talk about Europe or investing outside the U.S. I did. Well, a year ago? I mean, the Trump election also brought upon this view of this—

perceived return to U.S. exceptionalism. I bring it up because Josh last week pointed out the breakout in Europe, and he showed you we sort of played it as sort of Josh's one big chart that he told you about. Others are talking about it, too. So Bank of America today, their fund manager survey for February says you've gotten a peak in investor conviction of

U.S. exceptionalism. Pasquarello Goldman Sachs today says the U.S. market is not the best game in town right now. We are, quote, witnessing a collective rally in global equities that is both powerful and notably broad.

Jeff DeGraff, as Joe was highlighting from Renaissance, says Europe's breaking out too. He watches the charts and he's looking at the DAX in Germany breaking out relative to the U.S. Josh, I'll give you this first. I'll go around a little bit. This idea that now you have a trade that can work perhaps better than the U.S.,

Ed Yardeni wrote about this, who is coming at it from a macro slash fundamental perspective. All the technicians I follow are writing about it separately. They don't care about the macro. They're looking at the charts. It all lines up within the FTSE 100 today. 11% of the companies are making new 52-week highs. 75% of those names are above their 50-day. It's a roaring bull market.

go over to france the cac 40 95 of stocks in the cac are above their 50 day 73 above their 200 that's a roaring bull market what's my german dax is going ballistic okay so if i'm looking at all the things as you are and then i'm sitting there wherever i am today and i'm wondering all right i want a piece of the action how do i do that well

Yes, let me ask you a question. Are you one of these people that thinks, oh, the market's always wrong, I'm about to outsmart it? Or are you like me and look at that and say, okay, maybe there are people who know something that I don't know and there's a new story going around, which is that actually...

American exceptionalism and Trumpism is super bullish for European equities because the engines of capitalism might have to roar back to life as those countries start to realize they might be on their own. So the answer to your question, judges, is this a blip? The FEC up 14% year to date, IFA up nine. Is that a blip or not?

Is this a theme that might have legs for the next three years? And I think the answer is the latter. So what you want to do here, I think, focus on large cap. Don't get cute. Don't start buying European small cap banks based in Italy. Buy the F.E.Z. or find 10 names in the F.E.Z. that are selling at a below market multiple and try to figure out if three of three or four of them could be up 20 percent by the end of this year.

That's what you want to do here. I don't think you want to fade something like this. It's early and it's insistent.

Hang Seng up 14 percent, Mexico up 10 percent, Brazil up 7 percent. Look towards Asia. Obviously, we talked about a lot of the names in China that are doing well. Baba, I've already mentioned. Brazil, new holdings, ticker symbol NU. We own it in the JOTI ETF. It's a financial stock. You get exposure to digital banking in Brazil having a very strong year. Asia, coupang.

south korea e-commerce brad gerstner owns it as well also having a very strong year and lastly yum china all right we're going to take a quick break when we come back we have a pharma fight an upgrade for one big health care name a downgrade for another we debate both our calls of the day halftime's back right after this

Are you still quoting 30-year-old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the now. It pays to discover. Learn more at discover.com slash credit card based on the February 2024 Nelson report.

Skipping cold and flu season is plan A. But if you do get sick, be prepared for plan B with Kleenex Lotion Tissues. Kleenex Lotion Tissues moisturize skin, helping prevent the added discomfort of red, irritated skin on top of your cold and flu symptoms. So this cold and flu season, grab Kleenex Lotion Tissues. Visit Kleenex.com to learn more and buy now. For whatever happens next, grab Kleenex.

At Capella University, learning the right skills could make a difference. That's why our business programs teach you relevant skills you can take from the course room to the workplace. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu.

All right, welcome back. Let's do some calls. Gilead got upgraded today to a buy. 120 is the price target at Deutsche, which also downgrades Merck to hold from buy price target to 105. You have both of these stocks. So you're the perfect person to talk about this. What about it? Well, thank you.

Do you not want to talk about it? Of course I do. We've owned Gilead for 10 years. It's both tactical and value. It's value because of the great cash flow and the balance sheet and the dividend growth. But now from the tactical perspective, it's got a great pipeline. That's where health care investors want to be. And that's why we've doubled our position over the last year in our tactical side while maintaining and valuing dividend growth. On the Merck side, we own it much lower.

We've owned it for a long time. We only own it in our dividend growth portfolio for very specific reasons. It's a new 52-week low today. I know. But from a taxable perspective, we run taxably efficient portfolios where we've owned that stock for at least eight years. We own it at much lower levels. We think that, again, from a longer-term perspective and fundamentals, we want to own it because of the dividend.

Surat, you have Merck too. Yeah, and I share the same thing. We've owned it for so many years that our basis is low, but that's not the only reason I own it. It's down 18% for the year. It's a value contrarian play like Bristol is and Glaxo is. So if you're going to play the deep value contrarian play in pharma, I think this is one of the best. Let me just say something real quick. I mean, both you guys. Yeah. Just because you've made a lot of money in the name,

which you're insinuating by suggesting, well, we owned it from much lower prices, doesn't mean that you're going to make the same rate of return from here forward. I don't disagree with you, but what I'm saying is I still think... I know you've owned it from much lower levels. Let me address that. Insinuated, not insinuated. We're a published analyst, so we actually publish our stuff. Yes, okay. So you made a lot of money because you owned it a lot lower. I get it. I hear you. But if you think about it...

What's the helpful piece of advice out of that? Here's the helpful piece of advice. We own it because it's a dividend growth name. We own it because it's more of a value name. We own it because the stock has not cut a dividend in 25 years. We own it because the free cash flow yield is above the dividend yield. We own it because their earnings are still

positive. Yes, from a tactical perspective, we don't buy and trade stocks every other day. We buy and trade stocks and own stocks as an investor with respect to the specific strategies that we run. Now, that's the kind of answer that I think is

what people were looking for. Well, thank you, Scott, for allowing me to do that. Thank you, Brian. If I could small on Merck, it's a name that I have owned in prior years, don't own it anymore. I think what is good about the Deutsche Bank downgrade is here you go. The analyst community is finally saying, OK, we're going to begin to acknowledge the price deterioration. The 12 month price target

on this stock is 35% higher. No one is a sell. 67% of the analysts have a buy. Don't you own this name too? Mark? Yeah, but you know what though? On the analyst price targets, analysts are really good at a lot of things. Some of them are good at price targets. Some are good at modeling. Some are good at fundamentals. I would never, and I've never in my collective career, bought or sold a stock based on an analyst price target. Agreed, but it's a reflection of sentiment. Correct. It's a great reflection of sentiment. You can't.

All right. Does Merkle take a momentum team? No. Okay. I thought you owned it. Gilead does. Josh has highlighted Gilead as last week. Great stock. Looking for a breakout. So give me a 10-year chart. Let me cook for like two seconds and we can get out to a break. Go ahead. Look at the 10-year chart on Gilead. So I wouldn't sit through 10 years of this because it's like a smile. And you're writing that's not 10 years. There we go. Thank you so much, guys.

I mean, so the smile is going to have a happy ending when it gets back to the upper right corner of the smiler's mouth, but like...

Let it break out. So, Les, I don't know anything about it. Honestly, nothing. It broke out last week. So, I'm like, hey, if you haven't looked at Gilead in a long time, and I haven't traded it in like 15 years, now might be a good time to find out why it's doing what it's doing. So, it's not one approach is better than another. This is a different approach where you say, I don't want to sit through a consolidation period that lasts 10 years while a pharmaceutical company tries to do research.

I'll just buy when that's over. And I think that's why it's on the best stocks in the market list and why now it's momentum while Merck is just in a different phase of its, but it doesn't mean one is better than the other long-term. Short-term is a huge difference.

All right. Good stuff. Let's get the headlines now with Silvana Henao. Hi, Silvana. Hey, Scott. Good afternoon. A federal judge is expected to rule today on a request to temporarily block Elon Musk and Doge Saffers from accessing information systems at several federal agencies. Thirteen state attorneys general argued the power should be exercised by an official who has been nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

However, the judge did question during the hearing whether the plaintiffs met the legal standard needed to grant a temporary stay.

A federal appeals court has blocked former President Biden's student debt relief plan that was designed to lower monthly payments for borrowers and speed up loan forgiveness for others. The court ruled the Biden administration didn't have the authority to go ahead with the plan. The Trump administration was expected to roll back the plan if the court did not block it.

And Nike is teaming up with Kim Kardashian's shapewear company Skims to launch a new brand called Nike Skims, which will include apparel, footwear and accessories that will launch this spring and globally next year. And the partnership is part of Nike's bid to win over more women and better compete against rival Scott.

Silvana, thank you very much. That's Silvana now. Straight ahead, startup investing for the masses. The big push underway now to give investors more access to the private markets. Kate Rooney is following that money for us. Think you'll be interested in this story very much so. App Time is back right after this.

If your small business has a problem, you could say, Ugh, just my luck. But you should say, Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. And we'll help get you back in business. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.

Are you still quoting 30-year-old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the now. It pays to discover. Learn more at discover.com slash credit card based on the February 2024 Nelson report.

All right. Welcome back. A big push among investors to gain better access to private markets. Gaining some traction as the new SEC takes shape. Our Kate Rooney joins us now with how startup investing for the masses, so to speak, might be on the horizon. Tell us more.

Yes, Scott. So there is this renewed momentum around changing the SEC's so-called accredited investor laws. They were first put in place to protect people from asset classes that historically come with higher risks. So think venture capital, private equity, hedge funds. Right now, you need at least $200,000 in terms of it.

income and then net worth of about a million dollars. Historically, mom and pop investors would get a shot at those growth companies when they went public. But venture backed names are not in any rush to go public at this point. IPO, there's a lot less pressure from their employees who can now sell pretty easily in secondary markets. And on average, it's now about 10 years, 9.7 years before a company does go public, according to PitchBook. And there's about half of the

public companies available listed right now versus thirty years ago meanwhile you can see that chart their valuations and the total number of private companies have soared venture as an asset classes outperform if you look compare that at least with the s_e_p_ in terms of annualized returns about fourteen percent

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev is among those looking to open up access here by maybe changing those laws. He pointed out some of the irony of allowing access to speculative meme cryptocurrencies, but not in some of the blue chip startups we talk about. You mentioned OpenAI, Anthropic. He's pushing for a knowledge-based test versus that wealth criteria. And part of these laws, Reg D in particular, were loosened in the first Trump administration. So there's some renewed hope right now that

the SEC chair nominee, Paul Atkins, will be supportive. Proponents say the changes could support capital formation. It would make these markets more liquid, but critics still are going to be worrying about investor protection, Scott. Yeah. Kate, thank you. Appreciate that. That's Kate Rooney. Josh, you know, I see a story like this and I'm like, well,

makes reasonable sense in how the evolution of alternative investing has come to the masses, so to speak. We know most people never had access before to private equity or private credit, private companies. So why not now? So I yeah, these are two things happening on a parallel track, but with different motivating factors on the alternative side, the traditional buyer of private equity and private credit is full up.

The institutions have bought as much as they can. And because of where interest rates are, there just aren't exits. And so you need exit liquidity. So bringing in retail investors, bringing in the dentist with the accountant, Morgan Stanley, and getting them really excited about, hey, you two, we're we're democratizing. Guess what? We're going to make this available to you. That's the story there. I'm a little bit cynical.

On this one, I actually think it's a good idea, but people are going to lose a lot of money. And it's a good idea because you look at historical small cap returns and why they've been trailing for so long. It's because the best companies don't come public until they're already large caps.

So they almost skip that part of the lifestyle where they're paying their dues in the Russell 2000. Airbnb, Uber, they come public worth $30, $40 billion. They're never small caps. Some don't even come public. I mean, that's one of the arguments. The retail investor in public markets misses them entirely. Yeah, I'm sorry to interrupt you. So I like bringing that back in. I like giving people access.

But in the venture-backed startup world, a lot of these things go to zero, and I don't think most investors understand that either. But we've also been talking, Joe, lately. I'm sorry to interrupt Josh there, but...

More companies staying private for longer. Yes. So you have just fewer IPOs. So a lot of these companies that people hear about all the time on networks like this and in other publications or whatever, they have no access to. And they may never come public or they certainly may have to wait years before that happens. And the availability of publicly traded companies is down like 40 percent in the last 20 years. I also think there are a lot of public companies who are now looking towards the

patient time that they are afforded by actually going private so um i i agree with josh about the concern that he has but i do think we need to find some form of a solution as we move forward in the wealth management industry to say okay we've got these private markets they are fertile ground for strong returns over the course of a five and ten year period how are we going to properly package it

for the investor who previously had no access. All right, the setup is coming up next. All right, time for the setup. Arista Networks. That's after the bill today. Joe T.

David Tepper, I believe, moved out of position here. Revenue has to come in at around 23%. It already had the deep seek sell-off. The CapEx is related to Microsoft and Meta. That's what's important here because it's the adoption of Ethernet capability. That's where Arista Networks is going to benefit in terms of having that networking. One thing to watch out for here is the guidance. What are they going to do on the guidance? If they just maintain the guidance...

I don't think that's going to be good for the stock. OK, Garmin tomorrow morning. What do you think about that one? Garmin, you're going to need to have revenue growth and earnings growth come in mid teen level here. This is a stock that has been appreciating very significantly, obviously a very strong momentum name. With that, you have to see the ability of this company to deliver a strong earnings. Walmart Thursday before the bell. Brian Belsky, you own it.

Love Walmart. Stock's been doing great lately, right? Yeah. I mean, Walmart and Costco are the only names you should own in staples. We talked about Constellation earlier. This is an expensive stock that's going the wrong way in terms of that. But let's hear more about margins in their awesome business on the grocery side and the e-commerce. Shaq is Thursday morning. Josh?

Looking for revenue up 15% year over year, 25 cents in earnings, which would be up 1,150%. It's a 95 forward PE, but 142% earnings per share growth in calendar 25.

is the expectation. So it all sort of makes sense. I want to stay long this name. I've been long since the beginning. It's worked out really well for me. And I think new management is doing exactly what we want to see if this is going to be a company of significantly more scale. How about Block, which is also Thursday morning? I'm not in the name currently. I am. This stock has. Yes. My bad. I'm sorry. I'm going to give it to Joe.

I read the sheet wrong. My bad. Let's give it to Joe. It showed the early signs of beginning to develop some strong positive momentum. It's kind of teetered out somewhat. On the earnings front, you're going to have to see this company accelerate the revenue growth. Single-digit revenue growth for XYZ is just not going to get it done. Free cash flow generation also has to increase as well. Somewhere in the mid $400 million to $500 million. Again, insufficient. All right. We'll bounce for a couple. Santoli on the line.

on the other side with his midday work. Senior markets commentator Mike Santoli is here at the desk today. Not a lot of direction.

We are above a closing high, though, on the S&P. Thank you to some very big stocks. Yeah, working on kind of the least emphatic breakout potentially to a new high that you can remember. It's kind of tantalizing. I mean, tactically, you're supposed to trust the move out of a two to three month range if we get a decisive one. But you're also not supposed to anticipate it. Right. You're supposed to react to it. So that would be the trading side of it.

I'm on board with the idea that the market has largely been pretty resilient and able to kind of ingest all the noise and kind of hang in there. But I also would say, what else would you expect when more than three quarters of companies are beating by seven percentage points for the fourth quarter? So you've had, I think, a little bit of a fundamental head start into this year. Now, the question is,

How do we assimilate it from here? Very interesting sentiment breakdown. It doesn't seem unified across the board. You had the B of A fund manager surveys, very low cash levels. On the other hand, the retail investor survey has lots of bearishness. So normie long only retail is a little cautious. And then you have

Robinhood traders who are kind of nutso, pedal to the metal. So it's kind of a funny offsetting sentiment. I felt like a lot of people came into this year thinking that returns were going to be almost a layup, that the environment was going to be so great that what could happen other than the market going up, deregulation, all these deals, animal spirits, blah, blah, blah.

Tariffs are one issue there. I thought the story today that Eamon had on the M&A guidelines of the Biden era staying in place for the time being is an interesting perspective on this animal spirits idea maybe not coming to fruition as easily as some thought.

It's a challenge to that kind of, you know, that sort of playbook that we went into the year with. On the other hand, market's been good about not reacting to things that aren't yet substantive and written down. So we'll see. I think it's going to get hard. It's going to be hard to get people off the fundamental idea, the premise that it's somehow a growth problem.

positive agenda whether in fact the details seem like that in the near term or not so I think I think investors get the benefit of doubt until we are told well it is a group you can make I think you the yeah the statement it is a growth positive agenda well just a government spending you might be adding tariffs you're gonna actually be a little bit above roadblock from for M&A what what's growth-friendly as taxes regulating the financial regulation industry honestly that's the one thing anybody's convinced

is going to happen. Yeah. All right. Good. I'll see you on closing bell. That's Mike Santoli. We'll do finals next. Three o'clock Eastern closing bell. Mary Lago, private wealth manager is going to join us. Liz Young Thomas and the winner of the Daytona 500, William Byron. He's won it two years in a row. I think he's going to be with us today right here at post nine. Can't wait for that. Josh Brown, what's your final trade? Watching toasts report this week with no position. NXST media, Salesforce, AI.

Intuitive surgical. I think that right now it's best health care. All right. We'll see if we can close above that. Get that closing high on the S&P 500. I'll see you in a few hours. The exchange is now. You've been listening to CNBC's Halftime Report, the podcast. You can always catch us live weekdays at 12 Eastern, only on CNBC.

Thank you.

as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Halftime Report participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Halftime Report disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Halftime Report disclaimer.

Ready to start your GLP-1 weight loss journey? It's never been easier with Whole Health Rx by The Vitamin Shop. Visit Whole Health Rx for access to highly effective weight loss solutions, transforming countless lives every day. With no insurance required, choose from Dr. Trusted Ozempic, Munjaro, compounded semaglutide, and more delivered to your doorstep. See if you qualify for quick approval to reach your healthiest weight ever. Explore Whole Health Rx.

including important safety information about risk for thyroid C-cell tumors at www.vitaminshop.com slash GLP-1 weight loss.