We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Ep 143: 5 Cases for Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Ep 143: 5 Cases for Antibiotic Prophylaxis

2025/4/24
logo of podcast Harrison's PodClass: Internal Medicine Cases and Board Prep

Harrison's PodClass: Internal Medicine Cases and Board Prep

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Charlie Wiener
Topics
Kathy Handy: 作为Harrison's Pod Class的主持人,我认为抗生素预防性使用是一个非常重要的议题,因为它容易被滥用。只有在感染风险远大于抗生素风险的情况下,才应该考虑使用抗生素进行预防。我们需要权衡利弊,包括耐药性的潜在风险。抗生素的使用时间和剂量也应该精准控制,以达到最佳疗效并最大限度地减少暴露时间。 Charlie Wiener: 我同意Kathy的观点。在今天的节目中,我们将通过五个案例来探讨抗生素预防性使用的合理性。这五个案例涵盖了不同年龄段、不同疾病和不同手术类型的患者,旨在帮助大家更好地理解抗生素预防性使用的指征和禁忌症。我们会逐一分析每个案例,并解释为什么某些情况下抗生素预防性使用是合理的,而另一些情况下则是不合适的。我们还会强调,在使用抗生素预防性治疗时,必须充分考虑患者的个体情况和潜在风险。 Charlie Wiener: 通过对这五个案例的分析,我们可以总结出一些关于抗生素预防性使用的关键点。首先,猫抓伤后预防性使用抗生素是合理的,因为猫抓伤感染风险高。其次,与脑膜炎患者密切接触者也应该进行抗生素预防,以降低感染风险。再次,牙科手术前使用抗生素预防可以防止手术过程中短暂菌血症及感染高危心脏病灶。此外,术前使用莫匹罗星进行鼻腔去菌可降低金黄色葡萄球菌手术部位感染的发生率。最后,虽然清洁性手术前使用头孢唑林预防手术部位感染是合理的,但术后继续用药是没有价值的。总而言之,抗生素预防性治疗应在感染风险远大于抗生素风险的情况下进行,疗程通常较短。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

This is Katarina Heidhausen, Executive Editor of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Harrison's Pod Class is brought to you by McGraw-Hill's Access Medicine, the online medical resource that delivers the latest content from the best minds in medicine. And now, on to the episode. Hi, everyone. Welcome back to Harrison's Pod Class. We're your co-hosts. I'm Dr. Kathy Handy. And I'm Dr. Charlie Wiener, and we're joining you from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Today, we're talking about antibiotic prophylaxis.

Kathy, today we're going to talk about antibiotic prophylaxis, and instead of one case, I'm actually going to present you with five cases.

All right, this is an important topic because antibiotics used for prophylaxis are commonly overused. What do you mean? Antibacterial prophylaxis is indicated only in selected circumstances. In all other cases, the risk or severity of the infection to be prevented should be greater than the adverse consequences of antibacterial therapy, and that includes the potential for selection of resistance. The timing and duration of antibacterial treatment should be targeted for maximal effect and minimal required exposure.

Okay, well, that's a good way to get to the cases for our discussion. So the question says, all of the following are appropriate uses of antibacterial prophylaxis except. So there's going to be four good cases and one bad case. Patient A is a three-year-old who receives amoxicillin and clavulinate for five days after a cat bite on the forearm that broke his skin and caused bleeding.

Option B is a 19-year-old college student whose roommate was diagnosed with acute meningococcal pneumonia and receives a single dose of oral ciprofloxacin. Option C is a 34-year-old with a mechanical mitral valve who receives a single dose of amoxicillin 30 minutes before removal of an impacted wisdom tooth. Option D is a 55-year-old with no nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant staph aureus

who receives topical mupiricin twice daily for five days prior to aortic valve replacement surgery and option e is a 73 year old undergoing knee replacement surgery who receives cefazolin one hour before surgery and daily for three days after the surgery these are all good so let's take them one at a time and we can go in order of age okay what about the toddler with a cat bite

Cat bites are notorious for their risk of infection. So prophylactic amoxicillin clavulonate, doxycycline, or amoxifloxacin for five days is reasonable. You may also consider the same regimen with a dog or a human bite, but cats pose the highest risk of domesticated animals. Also remember that if there's any uncertainty of the animal's rabies status, you must take that into consideration and would consider rabies vaccination too. No, not in this case. That was just the toddler pulling on the cat's tail.

Okay, I could see that happening. How about the college student? Yes, antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated in close contacts of patients with meningococcal meningitis. And that's due to the risk of transmission, the ease of prophylaxis, and the potential for devastating disease. And what is the recommended prophylaxis in those cases? A single oral dose of ciprofloxacin or two days of rifampin are the recommended regimens. Great. So A and B are true so far. How about the patient undergoing the dental procedure?

Also true, for dental procedures, pre-procedure antibacterial drugs are given to prevent transient bacteremia during the procedure and the seeding of certain high-risk cardiac lesions.

A mechanical mitral valve would qualify as a high-risk cardiac lesion. Someone with a history of endocarditis or congenital heart disease would also be a candidate for prophylaxis. And a single dose is okay? Yeah, a single oral dose about an hour before the procedure or even an IV dose 30 minutes before the procedure is adequate. Unless, of course, the procedure is very long. In that case, she may redose.

Also, while transient bacteremia is common with dental procedures, patients without high-risk cardiac lesions do not need prophylactic antibiotics. Okay, let's keep moving along. Option D talks about preventing MRSA infection. Does topical mupiricin work? In patients with nasal carriage of Staph aureus, preoperative decolonization reduces the rate of Staph aureus surgical site infections, and it's generally recommended. So yes, it does work. It's typically administered for three to five days before surgery.

Given its low toxicity, it is often used before elective surgery where hardware is being placed, such as a hip or a knee replacement. I know that many places that don't screen for nasal cariots just use the topical mupiricin before those kinds of surgeries anyway, right? Right. Okay, so option D is also true. That means option E is false. Tell me why.

Well, it is false, but there is some truth there. IV cefazolin is generally administered one hour before a clean cardiac, thoracic, neurologic, orthopedic, vascular, or plastic surgery, and that's to reduce the risk of surgical site wound infections.

But the important point is that additional dosing is not recommended after the incision is closed. If the surgery is long, another dose can be administered, but there's certainly no value in continuing this regimen for three days after surgery. And the choice of antibiotic?

Prophylaxis of surgical infections targets bacteria that may contaminate the wound during the procedure, and that includes the skin floor of the patient or the operating team and the air in the operating room. Okay, so to summarize, today's teaching points are that bacterial prophylaxis is indicated in particular situations where the risk of a complicating infection is much greater than the risk of antibiotics, and typically the course of antibiotics is prescribed and relatively short.

And you can find this question and other questions like it in the Harrison Self-Review book and more about this topic in the Harrison's chapter on treatment and prophylaxis of bacterial infections. Visit the show notes for links to helpful resources, including related chapters and review questions from Harrison's, available exclusively on Access Medicine. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave us a review so we can reach more listeners just like you. Thanks so much for listening.