We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode vol.67 张颂文没有实锤,但还是要骂骂“家暴”和“潜规则”这些事

vol.67 张颂文没有实锤,但还是要骂骂“家暴”和“潜规则”这些事

2025/1/13
logo of podcast 黑刀鱼

黑刀鱼

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
摔仔姜小黑
Topics
摔仔姜小黑:我痛恨家暴,但家暴取证很难,需要明确的人身伤害和证据链才能构成实锤。张颂文事件没有实锤,但受害者通过公开控诉也能让施暴者付出代价。在亲密关系中,权力不对等可能导致家暴,受害者因害怕而不敢反抗。很多时候没有实锤证据,很难处理家暴事件。即使报复了施暴者,也无法弥补受害者所受的伤害。随着时间的推移和个人成长,受害者对过去经历的看法可能会发生改变,这可能是其公开控诉的原因之一。受害者公开控诉的动机可能是为了避免类似事件再次发生。我不理解张颂文的朋友为何要为他辩护,因为他们没有经历过家暴,无法为其作证。网络热点事件的关注度短暂,家暴事件即使没有得到官方回应,也会随着时间推移而淡化。如果家暴事件属实,当事人可能选择不回应,因为没有更好的方式来弥补过错。如果被诬陷家暴,当事人也很难自证清白,因为取证困难。张颂文事件的影响主要局限于其所在的圈子内。每个圈子都存在权力霸凌的问题,这需要持续关注和警惕。张颂文之前的良好公众形象可能是刻意营造的结果。进入一个团队或公司,可能会经历被欺骗的过程,与最初的幻想存在差距。如果不想让公众知道某些信息,完全可以通过不合作或采取法律手段来避免。被骗的原因不仅仅是贪婪,也可能因为信息不对称或其他因素。我坚信骗子最终会受到报应。世界是公平的,但受害者的伤害无法通过报复来弥补。张颂文是否回应受害者很重要,而网友的看法相对次要。我分享了一个朋友遭遇家暴的经历,并说明了家暴的严重性和处理方式。即使有证据,家暴的报复也难以达到理想效果。公司可以根据家暴行为对员工进行处罚,例如不发放年终奖。遭遇家暴后,受害者应该寻求帮助,并考虑报警或采取其他法律手段。如果发现伴侣有暴力倾向,应该及时寻求帮助,并考虑专业治疗。社会对家暴的容忍度越来越低,这是好事。施暴者和受害者都是受害者,但施暴者的行为不可原谅。施暴者最终会付出代价,受害者应该及时站出来寻求帮助。每个人面对家暴的处理方式不同,旁人能提供的帮助有限。 炯杰

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is it difficult to prove domestic violence cases like the one involving Zhang Songwen?

Domestic violence is harder to prove than other crimes like rape because it often lacks physical evidence unless the victim reports it immediately, gets medical documentation, and files a police report. In Zhang Songwen's case, the allegations are based on past events without concrete evidence, making it challenging to verify the claims.

What are the societal implications of power imbalances in relationships, as discussed in the podcast?

Power imbalances, especially in industries like entertainment, can lead to exploitation and abuse. The podcast highlights how individuals in positions of power, like Zhang Songwen, can manipulate or coerce others due to their influence. This dynamic is prevalent in various fields, including finance and art, where power disparities often result in unethical behavior.

What is the podcast's stance on the role of friends in defending public figures accused of misconduct?

The podcast criticizes friends who defend public figures accused of misconduct without firsthand knowledge of the events. The hosts argue that such defenses are meaningless and can undermine the credibility of the accuser. They emphasize that only the accused and the accuser truly know what happened, and outsiders should refrain from making judgments.

How does the podcast address the issue of delayed accusations, such as the one against Zhang Songwen?

The podcast acknowledges that delayed accusations, like the one against Zhang Songwen, are problematic because they lack immediate evidence. However, the hosts also recognize that victims may come forward years later due to personal growth or a desire to prevent others from experiencing similar harm. They stress the importance of addressing such claims thoughtfully, even if they are difficult to verify.

What are the challenges of dealing with domestic violence in modern society, according to the podcast?

The podcast highlights the challenges of addressing domestic violence, including the difficulty of proving abuse, societal stigma, and the emotional complexity of leaving an abusive relationship. The hosts discuss how victims often endure abuse for years before seeking help, and they emphasize the need for better support systems and legal frameworks to protect victims.

What is the podcast's perspective on the role of social media in exposing misconduct?

The podcast acknowledges that social media can be a powerful tool for exposing misconduct, as seen in the case of Zhang Songwen. However, it also notes the risks of false accusations and the potential for public opinion to overshadow facts. The hosts stress the importance of balancing accountability with fairness, especially when allegations are made without concrete evidence.

How does the podcast discuss the concept of revenge in the context of domestic violence?

The podcast explores the idea of revenge as a response to domestic violence, noting that while it may provide temporary satisfaction, it does not address the underlying harm. The hosts argue that true justice requires systemic change and support for victims, rather than focusing solely on punishing the perpetrator. They also emphasize the importance of early intervention to prevent long-term damage.

What is the podcast's view on the portrayal of public figures like Zhang Songwen in the media?

The podcast critiques the media's tendency to idealize public figures like Zhang Songwen, creating a 'perfect' image that can later be shattered by allegations. The hosts argue that such portrayals are often misleading and contribute to public disillusionment when misconduct is revealed. They call for a more nuanced understanding of public figures, recognizing their flaws alongside their achievements.

Chapters
该章节讨论了张颂文家暴传闻,重点在于证据的缺乏以及家暴取证的难度。嘉宾们探讨了家暴的不同形式、取证的挑战以及受害者在亲密关系中面临的困境。
  • 张颂文家暴传闻缺乏实锤证据
  • 家暴取证的难度,尤其是在缺乏人身伤害的情况下
  • 受害者在亲密关系中可能面临的困境和压力

Shownotes Transcript

张颂文没有实锤,但还是要骂骂“家暴”和“潜规则”这些事 本期主播:烱杰(小飞)、@摔仔姜小黑 合作讨论、听众群请联系:jxh19941114开头Bgm:Wish you were here—Pink Floy结尾Bgm:《莽撞》演唱(第一作曲):汪紫芸;作词(第二作曲):姜小黑