We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode HoP 456 - Touch Me With Your Madness - Cervantes’ Don Quixote

HoP 456 - Touch Me With Your Madness - Cervantes’ Don Quixote

2024/11/10
logo of podcast History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Peter Adamson
Topics
Peter Adamson: 文艺复兴时期人们盲目乐观地看待过去,而《堂吉诃德》则展现了一种不同寻常的疯狂,即对中世纪过去的怀旧。 《堂吉诃德》是开创性的作品,作者塞万提斯是莎士比亚在欧洲最伟大的文学人物的称号中最有可能的竞争对手。 塞万提斯和莎士比亚的作品都具有自我指涉性和自我意识,例如塞万提斯将世界比作戏剧表演,而《堂吉诃德》也包含着更短的故事。 《堂吉诃德》与斯宾塞的《仙后》最为相似,两者都以讽刺的距离反映了骑士文学及其与基督教伦理的模糊关系。 《堂吉诃德》被认为是第一部现代小说,因为它反映了现代性,并关注其自身的虚构性以及虚构的本质。 《堂吉诃德》关注自身虚构性以及虚构的本质,这使其具有哲学意义。 塞万提斯的文学技巧与伊拉斯谟和其他人文主义作者的倾向有关,例如伊拉斯谟的《愚人颂》。 堂吉诃德的愚蠢使他成为一个有吸引力甚至令人钦佩的人物,他的疯狂使他能够将日常事物视为奇迹。 小说颠倒了事物,例如将丑陋的农家女变成美丽的女士,将酒馆变成城堡。 小说对事实的描述不完整,甚至虚构,体现了小说对事实的有限把握。 堂吉诃德通过改名和改称自己的马,将自己和坐骑变成了值得进行伟大冒险的角色。 堂吉诃德武断地决定一个女孩的名字叫杜尔西内娅,并坚持认为她是世界上最美丽的女子。 在第二部分中,桑丘说服堂吉诃德一个丑陋的农妇实际上是杜尔西内娅,但魔法师施了魔法阻止堂吉诃德看到她的真实面目,这进一步突显了虚构的主题。 《堂吉诃德》关注的不是知识的本质,而是虚构的本质。 《堂吉诃德》是一部关于书籍的书,堂吉诃德的疯狂是由阅读引起的,他不断遇到其他喜欢同样骑士文学的人。 小说中焚烧堂吉诃德藏书的场景是对宗教裁判所和审查制度的嘲讽。 小说的框架故意含糊不清,学者们对所读内容的细节存在争议,例如序言就表达了写序言的困难。 小说中引入多层人工性,例如声称手稿是阿拉伯语写的,由另一个作者撰写。 小说第一部分存在于第二部分的世界中,人物们遇到了已经读过第一部分的人。 第二部分的创作源于第一部分,堂吉诃德和桑丘在了解到他们的冒险已经赢得名声后才开始新的冒险。 塞万提斯对阿维拉内达的续集感到愤怒,这激发了第二部分的创作。 阿维拉内达试图驯服原著的混乱,将塞万提斯颠倒的事物恢复原状,并嘲讽了塞万提斯残疾的手。 塞万提斯对阿维拉内达的回应可能是出于愤怒,也可能是出于对进一步进行元虚构游戏的兴趣。 第二部分中,塞万提斯通过改变情节和不断强调真实性和准确性来突出小说的虚构性。 小说中不断提醒读者故事的版本不完整,间接传递,并与从未发生过的事情相对应。 小说中人们投票决定理发师的盆子是否是传说中的头盔,这体现了视角主义,即堂吉诃德认为它是头盔,对他来说它就是头盔。 塞万提斯并非要阐述视角主义,而是要阐述虚构的非凡力量,即事实可以通过作者的意志召唤到现实中。 小说将自身的故事称为“历史”,具有讽刺意味,暗示读者读到的是一个真实的叙述,实际上却是完全虚构的。 塞万提斯通过反复暗示他自己的故事是历史,用强烈的讽刺暗示读者读到的是一个真实的故事,实际上却是完全虚构的。 塞万提斯与堂吉诃德一样,拥有丰富的想象力,能够创造出虚构的世界。 堂吉诃德的疯狂代表了作者决定其创造的世界中发生什么的权力,但同时也带来了痛苦和屈辱。 堂吉诃德和桑丘因为现实的拒绝被改写而遭受巨大的痛苦和屈辱。 堂吉诃德的精神疾病是真实的,他不仅古怪,而且患有精神障碍,他甚至知道别人认为他疯了。 堂吉诃德的精神疾病有生理基础,可能与体液失衡、饮食和气候有关。 小说可能对残疾哲学具有意义,堂吉诃德似乎有意识地接受了自己的状况。 堂吉诃德对自身残疾的态度似乎包含着对自身状况的有意识的接纳,他会合理化那些会破坏他妄想的证据。 堂吉诃德选择模仿骑士因思念爱人而发疯的方式,这体现了存在主义传统中对选择的强调。 《堂吉诃德》与存在主义传统产生共鸣,尤其是一些哲学家认为小说预示了克尔凯郭尔思想。 克尔凯郭尔从路德和加尔文的思想中汲取了将希望和信仰寄托于超越人类理解范围的事物上的思想,而塞万提斯并非新教徒,但这种激进的信仰主义跨越了宗教和地域的界限。 小说中堂吉诃德和桑丘比较游侠骑士和僧侣或圣徒的差异,这与将骑士精神与基督教虔诚进行比较的尝试形成了对比。 桑丘试图说服堂吉诃德成为圣徒是上天堂的最好方式,堂吉诃德承认圣徒比骑士更容易上天堂,但真正的骑士很少努力去做圣徒。 小说中对骑士精神与基督教虔诚的比较是讽刺,这与斯宾塞在《仙后》中的质疑类似。 堂吉诃德认为骑士精神是最高的科学,这是对经院文化的讽刺,也是对堂吉诃德自大言论的嘲讽。 小说中堂吉诃德和桑丘的关系体现了西班牙社会中的阶级关系。 堂吉诃德和桑丘的关系反映了西班牙社会中的阶级关系,桑丘追随堂吉诃德的主要动机是希望获得岛屿总督的职位。 桑丘成为岛屿总督,这体现了小说中颠倒的逆转,也引发了对乌托邦小说的解读。 桑丘作为总督的经历引发了对乌托邦小说和社会政治的解读,有人认为他是一个好统治者,因为他是一个好人,一个好基督徒。 桑丘作为总督的经历是小说中颠倒逆转的另一个例子,也反映了社会政治主题。 桑丘的性格体现了狂欢节精神,这与拉伯雷的作品和巴尔廷的研究有关。 《堂吉诃德》反映了新大陆的发现和奴隶制的兴起。 小说中将岛屿赠送给桑丘的行为类似于随意殖民主义,桑丘对拥有殖民地的幻想也反映了殖民主义的元素。 堂吉诃德释放奴隶的举动与西班牙经院哲学家关于人天生自由的观点相呼应,但也突显了其行动的错误。 小说中体现了经济理论,即物品的价值取决于其感知价值而非内在价值。 塞万提斯以编辑的身份讲述了发现阿拉伯语书籍的故事,这体现了经院哲学的公平定价理论,也反映了小说的主题。 小说价值在于我们的信念,享受小说不仅仅是暂停怀疑,而是积极地相信我们知道并非真实的事情,或者更好地说是假装相信它。 虚构之所以令人愉悦,是因为它与现实之间存在着模糊的关系,既不是完全的谎言,也不是完全的真实。 《堂吉诃德》是一部既悲伤又令人发笑的书。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is Don Quixote considered the first modern novel?

Don Quixote is considered the first modern novel because it reflects social developments associated with modernity, such as economic changes, and it is self-aware of its own fictionality. It explores the nature of fiction itself, making it a pioneering work in literature.

What role does self-referentiality play in Don Quixote?

Self-referentiality is a key feature of Don Quixote, as it embeds shorter stories within the larger narrative, much like a play within a play. This technique highlights the fictional nature of the story and invites readers to reflect on the nature of fiction.

How does Don Quixote reflect the Renaissance humanist spirit?

Cervantes' literary gamesmanship in Don Quixote can be connected to the humanist spirit, particularly through his education with a humanist scholar and his time in Italy. The novel's themes of enchantment, doubt, and arbitrary misidentification reflect the humanist fascination with the limits of human knowledge and the power of fiction.

What does Don Quixote reveal about the relationship between fiction and reality?

Don Quixote demonstrates that fiction gains its value through the reader's conviction that it is valuable. It explores the ambiguous relationship between fiction and reality, where events that would be horrific in real life can be entertaining as a story due to this ambiguity.

How does Cervantes use metafiction in Don Quixote?

Cervantes employs metafiction by having the characters aware of their fictionality and by embedding the first part of the novel within the second part. This creates a layered narrative that challenges the reader to consider the fictional nature of the story and its relationship to reality.

What is the significance of Sancho Panza's governorship in Don Quixote?

Sancho Panza's governorship is a satirical commentary on utopian fiction and the idea that a low-born, good-hearted man can be a better ruler than morally bankrupt nobles. It also exemplifies the novel's theme of topsy-turvy reversals, where social norms are turned upside down.

How does Don Quixote reflect the theme of fideism?

Don Quixote's unswerving belief in the authenticity of chivalric romances, despite rational arguments against it, reflects a form of radical fideism. This theme resonates with existentialist ideas, particularly the notion of the Knight of Faith, who adheres to his beliefs regardless of their absurdity.

What is the significance of the barber's basin in Don Quixote?

The barber's basin symbolizes the power of fiction to transform reality. Don Quixote sees it as a magical helmet, and through his belief, it becomes a helmet for him. This scene illustrates the novel's exploration of how fiction can shape our perception of reality.

How does Cervantes critique social class in Don Quixote?

Cervantes critiques social class by using the relationship between Don Quixote and Sancho Panza to comment on class relations in Spanish society. Sancho's rise to governorship, despite his low birth, highlights the potential for social mobility and questions the competence of the nobility.

What does Don Quixote reveal about the nature of knowledge?

Don Quixote explores the nature of knowledge by presenting a character who doubts everything and believes everything. This theme encourages readers to think about the limits of human knowledge and the power of fiction to shape our understanding of reality.

Chapters
This chapter explores the claim that Cervantes' Don Quixote is the first modern novel, highlighting its self-awareness and unique style. It compares Cervantes' work to Shakespeare's and Spenser's, discussing its self-referentiality and the transformation of everyday objects and characters through belief.
  • Don Quixote's self-awareness and fictionality.
  • Comparison with Shakespeare and Spenser.
  • Transformation of reality through belief.

Shownotes Transcript

Why do critics consider Don Quixote the first “modern” novel, and what does it tell us about the aesthetics of fiction?