Today, Karly takes you R v Khelawon, *the* seminal decision about the rule for admission of hearsay evidence. Before getting to the case, Z and K chat Evidence, hearsay, and what to do when you memorize a whole bunch of Evidence rules and then appear before a tribunal that doesn't recognize any of them. Special shout out to the folks on Twitter and Peter Sankoff who inspired the episode!

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2006/2006scc57/2006scc57.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAQUiB2IGtoZWxhd29uIFNDQwAAAAAB&resultIndex=1

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 26: R v Khelawon 01:43:37 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 26: R v Khelawon