Today we have Part II of our Three-Part episode drop of Andrews v Law Society of BC. If you want to hear Z & K chat section 15 and the meaning of the case, head back to episode 27. Part II gives you McIntyre J's dissent, the framework of which the other two decisions in the case are based. Although they disagree in ultimate interpretation and conclusion, McIntyre sets the stage for the subsequent interpretation of section 15 of the Charter.

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1989/1989canlii2/1989canlii2.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAbQW5kcmV3cyB2IExhdyBTb2NpZXR5IG9mIEJDAAAAAAE&resultIndex=1

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 28: Andrews v Law Society of BC PART II 01:09:25 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 28: Andrews v Law Society of BC PART II