Today we grapple with circumstantial evidence. Before Karly takes you through this Supreme Court decision, Z and K chat circumstantial evidence, what it means, how tricky the concept can be, and what courts do with this kind of evidence. Content Warning: This episode concerns an accused charged with child pornography offences. If that content is not for you - feel free to skip this one. Please take care when listening.

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2016/2016scc33/2016scc33.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAOciB2IHZpbGxhcm9tYW4AAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 35: R v Villaroman 49:23 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 35: R v Villaroman