Today we bring you Part III of our release of Callow v Zollinger, a 2020 SCC contract law decision. As she often does in cases involving the law of contract, Justice Cote dissents - although she agrees with the concurring opinion's critique of the majority's bijural analysis. If you want to hear us chat about the care or listen to the Majority's decision, head on back to episode 76!

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2020/2020scc45/2020scc45.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQASQ2FsbG93IHYgWm9sbGluZ2VyAAAAAAE&resultIndex=1

We're now on Patreon! Become a patron, unlock fun bonus content, and support the project here: patreon.com/LegalListening

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 78: CM Callow v Zollinger Part III (Dissent) 33:30 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 78: CM Callow v Zollinger Part III (Dissent)