CW: This decision concerns sexual assault - please take care when listening.

We're thrilled to bring you Part II in the SCC decision of R v JA! This decisions concerns the legality of advance consent to sex while unconscious. This is the dissenting opinion of Fish J. If you want to hear the Majority opinion or listen to what Zach and Karly thought about the case - head on back to episode 85.

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2011/2011scc28/2011scc28.html?autocompleteStr=R%20v%20J.A.&autocompletePos=1

We're now on Patreon! Become a patron, unlock fun bonus content, and support the project here: patreon.com/LegalListening

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 86: R v JA Part II (Dissent) 35:23 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 86: R v JA Part II (Dissent)