We're throwing it back today with an oldie - but a goodie - with the 1988 SCC decision of Crocker v Sundance. This fundamental tort law decision about voluntary assumption of risk and foreseeability of harm is brought to you by our extra special guest Lisa Rodríguez (@_rodriguez_lisa) who recently graduated from the University of Calgary! Zach and Karly have a tiny intro and then we leave it to Lisa to explain why she chose the decision!

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii45/1988canlii45.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQASY3JvY2tlciB2IHN1bmRhbmNlAAAAAAE&resultIndex=1

We're now on Patreon! Become a patron, unlock fun bonus content, and support the project here: patreon.com/LegalListening

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 87: Crocker v Sundance 42:23 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 87: Crocker v Sundance