There's a conventional narrative by which the pre-20th century aristocracy was the “old corruption” where civil and military positions were distributed inefficiently due to nepotism until the system was replaced by a professional civil service after more enlightened thinkers prevailed. Orwell writes in 1941 (emphasis mine):

For long past there had been in England an entirely functionless class, living on money that was invested they hardly knew where, the ‘idle rich’, the people whose photographs you can look at in the Tatler and the Bystander, always supposing that you want to. The existence of these people was by any standard unjustifiable. They were simply parasites, less useful to society than his fleas are to a dog.

But this misses a key point about the pre-industrial world: it was difficult to monitor performance or even measure things in general. A modern bureaucracy can track hours worked, tasks completed, goods received [...]

---

First published:
January 8th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YooqjbxGu2WZ3vszq/the-aristocrat-as-hostage

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“The Aristocrat as Hostage” by Arjun Panickssery 05:38 Share

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

Shownotes Transcript

“The Aristocrat as Hostage” by Arjun Panickssery