Bertrand Russell noted how people often describe the same factual behavior using emotionally opposite language depending on perspective — e.g. I am firm, you are obstinate, he is pigheaded. This framing tactic is now called a Russell Conjugation, and once you start noticing them, they’re everywhere — especially in politics and media.

For the past year and a half, I’ve been training a finetuned ChatGPT model, and building a tool to automatically highlight Russell Conjugations in text and suggest emotionally opposite alternatives. It functions as a fact-independent bias reverser — showing where emotional spin might exist, and how the opposite side might see an issue, regardless of the factual accuracy of specific claims. I find it valuable especially when trying to parse tribal political language, as very often different sides of political divides will use words that feel completely different to describe the same things.

Here's an example I [...]

---

First published:
April 17th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/GjqwHYBrGhCjP7gkH/the-russell-conjugation-illuminator

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“The Russell Conjugation Illuminator” by TimmyM 02:19 Share

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

Shownotes Transcript

“The Russell Conjugation Illuminator” by TimmyM