LGBTQ+ lawyers, policy experts, and activists discuss the latest legal and political news affecting
We call this installment: “Waiting for cake.” That’s because SCOTUS seems to be saving room for dese
Themes of resistance run through the legal developments of the past 30 days. This episode of the Law
Discussion of: (1) the oral argument for the blockbuster Masterpiece Cakeshop case at the U.S. Supre
Discussion of: (1) a great first ruling in one of the four movement organization lawsuits brought to
Discussion of: (1) appellate courts in Arizona and New York extending traditional marital presumptio
Discussion of: (1) President Trump setting in motion a ban on open transgender military service in t
Discussion of: (1) the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirming Obergefell and the Texas Supreme Court's outra
Discussion of: (1) two transgender rights breakthroughs under federal law in May; (2) Title VII deve
Discussion of: (1) the first ruling under the federal Fair Housing Act to conclude it protects LGBT
Discussion of: (1) the flurry of Title VII decisions from federal appellate courts in the last month
Discussion of: (1) all the twists and turns in the Gavin Grimm case as we approach argument at the U
Discussion of: (1) President Donald Trump's nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Cou
Discussion of: (1) a familiar Texas federal district court judge issuing another nationwide injuncti
Discussion of: (1) what the incoming Trump Administration and Republican control of both houses of C
Discussion of: (1) the U.S. Supreme Court granting cert in three cases of interest to the LGBT comm
Discussion of: (1) Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore getting suspended for the rest of his term; (2)
Discussion of: (1) the New York Court of Appeals overruling Alison D.; (2) setbacks in the struggle
Discussion of: (1) big wins in federal court challenges to Mississippi's H.B. 1523 that have left t
After reading the names and ages of the victims of the Orlando attack, discussion of: (1) all of th
Discussion of: (1) a ruling out of the Fourth Circuit calling into question the bathroom provisions
