We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode How the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions impacts businesses

How the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions impacts businesses

2025/6/30
logo of podcast Marketplace All-in-One

Marketplace All-in-One
AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Andre Harris
A
Anthony Sanders
B
Becca Brett
K
Kimberly Adams
M
Mary Heinz Drosch
M
Melanie Fish
M
Michael T. Morley
M
Mitchell Hartman
N
Nancy Marshall-Genzer
P
President Trump
R
Rima Reis
银
银行的调查数据
Topics
Nancy Marshall-Genzer: 作为主持人，我介绍了最高法院再次审议奥巴马医改法案的背景，强调了这次审议涉及预防性医疗保健的覆盖范围以及谁来决定这些范围的重要性。这次裁决直接关系到数百万美国人的医疗保障，因此备受关注。 Mitchell Hartman: 作为市场观察员，我深入分析了案件的争议点，指出案件主要争议在于私人健康保险计划中哪些预防性医疗保健必须免费提供。同时，我也解释了法院的裁决结果，即联邦工作组将PrEP等预防HIV传播的治疗纳入是合法的，因为工作组本身是符合宪法的。此外，我还强调了这项裁决对癌症和糖尿病筛查等一系列预防性医疗保健的积极影响。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

One of the Supreme Court decisions released Friday limits the circumstances under which courts can issue nationwide injunctions. While the case was about the executive order related to birthright citizenship, it has consequences for consumers and businesses alike. We'll unpack how the decision may reshape things like class-action lawsuits. But first: The Supreme Court weighs in on Obamacare (again), and travelers opt for more cost-effective "destination dupes."