We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode SCOTUS curbs regulatory agencies’ powers. Again.

SCOTUS curbs regulatory agencies’ powers. Again.

2024/6/27
logo of podcast Marketplace

Marketplace
AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
B
Blake Emerson
J
Jelana Hall-Johnson
M
Megan McCarty Carino
M
Mitchell Hartman
S
Stephanie Silverman
Topics
Blake Emerson: 最高法院近期一系列裁决，特别是SEC诉Jarquez案的判决，大幅限制了国会对经济的监管权，以及促进公共健康和安全的权力。这一系列判决的影响远不止SEC一家机构，其他许多联邦监管机构，如国家劳资关系委员会和联邦贸易委员会，也面临着权力受到威胁的风险。这些机构的权力对经济运作至关重要，至少自新政以来，它们一直是经济运作的核心部分。本案判决削弱了这些机构限制金融欺诈和滥用行为的关键工具，增加了监管机构执法的成本，同时降低了违法者的违法成本，这将不可避免地导致更多的金融欺诈和滥用行为。此外，最高法院很可能会推翻或大幅限制"谢弗伦原则"，这将进一步削弱行政机构在法律解释上的权威性。对行政国家和经济运行方式的批判，源于对联邦政府在经济监管、防止不公平行为和避免有害污染等方面的作用的深刻法律和政治分歧，并且这种分歧已沿着党派路线发展。 Colin Risdell: 作为主持人，Colin Risdell引导了与Blake Emerson教授的讨论，并提出了关于最高法院裁决对经济和监管机构的影响等问题，促进了对相关法律和政治背景的深入探讨。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The Supreme Court's decision to limit the SEC's in-house court powers impacts the administrative state, potentially leading to more financial fraud and a chilling effect on regulatory agencies.

Shownotes Transcript

The Supreme Court has decided a case involving internal tribunals the SEC uses to enforce fraud rules. In this episode, we’ll hear from a legal scholar about the ruling’s implications for all sorts of federal regulatory bodies. The short of it? It will be harder for agencies to enforce laws and easier for people and companies to get away with breaking them. Plus: what “final sales” means in the Federal Reserve’s analysis of GDP and why continuing jobless claims are climbing.