We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode 美候任商务部长:DeepSeek的窃取行为再清楚不过 - 1月 30日,2025年

美候任商务部长:DeepSeek的窃取行为再清楚不过 - 1月 30日,2025年

2025/1/30
logo of podcast 每日视频新闻 - 美国之音

每日视频新闻 - 美国之音

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
霍华德·卢特尼克
Topics
霍华德·卢特尼克:中国人工智能公司DeepSeek以低价创造人工智能模型,其背后是通过窃取或利用美国的技术实现的。这是一种对美国知识产权的公然侵犯,必须立即予以解决。我们目前的出口管制措施形同虚设,因为中国找到了规避方法。我们需要用关税模式来支持出口管制,以保持美国的领先地位,并向中国表明,我们绝不容忍这种行为。我们必须强硬地回应中国对美国知识产权的侵犯,让中国尊重美国的知识产权。我将严格执行限制措施,以确保美国在人工智能领域的领先地位。中国利用美国的专利制度和法律来侵犯美国的知识产权,我们需要采取措施阻止这种行为。我们需要与其他国家建立互惠原则,如果其他国家不尊重美国的知识产权,美国也不应给予同等待遇。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

And have you given any thought to the leakage of our investments and the breakthroughs that are made, the intellectual property leakage to adversary countries and parties and how we might continue to be vigilant against that?

How could it be more clear than this week when DeepSeek, a Chinese AI, says they were able to create things dirt cheap? How? By leveraging what they've taken from us, stolen from us, or leveraged from us. It's outrageous and it needs to be addressed. What this showed is that our export controls, not backed by tariffs,

are like a whack-a-mole model where they get prevented over here and China figures out a way around it over there. We've got to find a way to back our export controls with tariff model so that we tell China

You think we are your most important trading partner? When we say no, the answer is no. It's a respect thing. They've disrespected us. They've figured out their ways around it. I do not believe that deep seek was done all above board. That's nonsense.

Okay, they stole things, they broke in, they've taken our IP, it's got to end. And I'm going to be rigorous in our pursuit of restrictions and enforcing those restrictions to keep us in the lead because we must stay in the lead.

I think the Chinese use our patent office against us. They use our laws. They have huge applications. And those applications are growing like fire. They're trademarks. You know, what they would do is they would say Senator Bud and then they'd say S Bud and S Bud S. You know what I mean? They just go right around your trademark and abuse it. So I think we need to stop that. We need to address it. We need to stop it. We need to end it.

And we need to have countries understand if you do not respect our company's IP there, you should not respect the same treatment here. Reciprocity is a word that really is effective. We are treated horribly. We want that to change. Or you should expect the same treatment here.