We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Dr. Darrell Duffie on Liquidity Strains at Year-End/Quarter-End and When Fed Reserves Will No Longer Be Ample

Dr. Darrell Duffie on Liquidity Strains at Year-End/Quarter-End and When Fed Reserves Will No Longer Be Ample

2024/12/29
logo of podcast Monetary Matters with Jack Farley

Monetary Matters with Jack Farley

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
Darrell Duffie
Topics
Darrell Duffie: 季末和年末,特别是年末,SOFR/IOR 利差会显著扩大,这主要是因为银行的资本要求和资金需求变化。外国银行为了满足资本要求进行“窗口粉饰”,减少回购市场融资,导致美国银行承担更多融资压力,从而提高利率。美国大型银行的资本要求和余额表规模限制也加剧了季末和年末的流动性压力。银行准备金减少以及量化紧缩政策可能导致系统内准备金不足,从而影响银行的日常支付和回购市场融资,加剧流动性压力。金融危机后,监管加强,银行更注重自身流动性管理,减少对美联储的依赖,导致对准备金的需求增加。即使准备金充足,季末和年末的融资成本仍然可能高于美联储提供的利率,这表明市场机制存在缺陷。量化紧缩政策只能缓解季末和年末的流动性压力,并不能完全解决问题,根本原因在于银行的资本要求。美联储可能在明年第一季度末或第二季度之间放缓量化紧缩的步伐,因为准备金可能不足。银行对准备金的需求存在“棘轮效应”,一旦准备金增加,银行就会增加流动性高的负债,即使准备金减少,也不愿减少这些负债,导致对准备金的需求持续增加。很难精确估计足够的准备金数量,因为金融体系结构不断变化,需要关注预警信号。监控银行收到款项的时间可以作为准备金是否充足的预警信号。银行收到款项的时间比SOFR/IOR利差更能有效预测流动性压力。美联储拥有银行间支付数据,可以实时监控准备金状况,但这些数据高度保密。目前流动性压力主要源于资本要求,而非准备金不足。隔夜回购便利设施余额下降,意味着准备金余额将承担更多量化紧缩的压力。国库普通账户余额的变化也会影响准备金的可用性。国库券发行和国债发行对SOFR/IOR利差有不同的影响。财政部可能调整国库券和国债的发行比例,但这不太可能是为了实施隐性量化宽松政策。国债发行对SOFR/IOR利差的影响大于国库券发行。美联储下调隔夜逆回购利率是为了使其与联邦基金利率目标区间下限一致。隔夜逆回购便利设施余额下降到零后,准备金余额将成为量化紧缩政策的主要影响对象。财政部通过国库券发行进行隐性量化宽松的可能性很小。财政部发行国库券的目的并非为了刺激经济,而是为了降低融资成本。财政部在决定发行债券期限时,会考虑其对市场的影响,并非简单的价格接受者。财政部增加国库券发行,部分原因是为了满足市场需求,以及进行现金管理。财政部对债务期限的管理策略有所转变,从追求长期债务转向考虑市场需求和现金管理。政府债务规模过大,会挤出私人部门融资,导致利率上升。美国政府债务规模持续增长,且债务与GDP比率不断上升,这是一种不可持续的趋势。政府债务规模过大可能导致市场功能失调,甚至投资者拒绝持有美国国债。政府债务规模持续增长,会增加未来世代的负担。很难预测政府债务规模的临界点,但需要关注市场压力信号。美国国债市场杠杆率高,但中央清算机制降低了风险。从LIBOR转向SOFR作为银行贷款参考利率,增加了银行面临的信用风险。 Jack Farley: 对Darrell Duffie观点的回应和提问,主要围绕着年末流动性压力、准备金充足性、量化紧缩政策以及美国国债市场等方面展开。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why do liquidity strains often appear at quarter- and year-end?

At quarter- and year-end, foreign banks reduce their balance sheets to meet capital requirements, a practice known as 'window dressing.' This reduction in funding in the repo market shifts the burden to U.S. banks, which charge higher rates due to their own balance sheet constraints. Additionally, the Treasury market's growth increases financing pressure, further widening the SOFR/IOR spread.

What is the significance of the SOFR/IOR spread widening to 20 basis points?

The widening of the SOFR/IOR spread to 20 basis points indicates increased stress in the repo market, particularly at quarter-end. This is driven by foreign banks reducing their balance sheets for regulatory compliance, forcing U.S. banks to charge higher rates. The 99th percentile spread reaching 45 basis points further highlights the strain.

How do capital requirements impact bank behavior at year-end?

At year-end, U.S. banks are monitored for GSIB scores, which include a component related to repo market activity. This leads them to constrain their balance sheets, similar to foreign banks, to avoid appearing over-leveraged. This dual pressure from capital requirements exacerbates funding stress in the repo market.

What role do bank reserves play in the current liquidity strains?

While current liquidity strains are primarily driven by capital requirements, the sufficiency of bank reserves is also a concern. As quantitative tightening reduces reserves, banks may face challenges in meeting intraday payment obligations and financing securities, potentially leading to higher SOFR rates.

Why might the Federal Reserve reduce the pace of quantitative tightening in 2025?

The Federal Reserve may reduce the pace of quantitative tightening in 2025 to avoid a repeat of the September 2019 repo market blowout, where insufficient reserves caused a spike in SOFR rates. With reserves currently at $3.2 trillion, more than double the 2019 level, the Fed aims to maintain a comfortable buffer to prevent market stress.

What is the 'ratchet effect' in relation to bank reserves?

The 'ratchet effect' refers to banks becoming semi-addicted to high levels of reserves after periods of quantitative easing. Once banks offer services like transaction deposits and credit lines based on ample reserves, they are reluctant to reduce these services during tightening, leading to a persistent demand for reserves.

How does the timing of bank payments predict SOFR/IOR stress?

The timing of bank payments, particularly when banks receive the first half of their incoming payments, serves as a canary in the coal mine for reserve sufficiency. If payments are delayed by more than 100 minutes, it signals that banks are holding back funding, indicating potential stress in the repo market.

What impact does the transition from LIBOR to SOFR have on bank funding risks?

The transition from LIBOR to SOFR increases bank funding risks because SOFR, a risk-free rate, tends to decrease during crises, making it cheaper for corporations to draw on credit lines. This exposes banks to large, unexpected funding needs, particularly smaller banks that rely on wholesale markets.

Why is the U.S. Treasury market considered a safe haven?

The U.S. Treasury market is considered a safe haven because U.S. Treasury securities are the largest and most reliable source of safe assets globally. Investors, including pension funds and insurance companies, rely on them to manage liability risks, especially in times of market stress.

What are the potential risks of high U.S. debt-to-GDP levels?

High U.S. debt-to-GDP levels pose risks of market dysfunction during stress periods, as seen in March 2020. Additionally, if investors demand higher risk premiums for Treasury securities, it could lead to unsustainable borrowing costs, crowding out private investment and increasing the burden on future generations.

Shownotes Transcript

With the end of year approaching and SOFR/IOR spreads widening, Darrell Duffie, renowned and prolific monetary scholar, joins Monetary Matters to share his views on why liquidity strains often appear at quarter- and year-end. Duffie explains his work on the September 2019 repo blowout and shares his findings that timing of bank payments is a better predictor of SOFR/IOR stress than the SOFR/IOR spread itself. Duffie also shares his views on debt-to-GDP levels, the theory that the Treasury has engaged in “stealth QE,” and the impact of SOFR transition on bank funding costs. Recorded on December 27, 2024. 

Duffie Piece On Reserves Discussed For Most Of Interview (“Reserves Were Not So Ample After All”): https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr974)

Duffie Piece on SOFR vs. LIBOR impact on bank debt-overhang cost (discussed at end, “Bank Funding Risk, Reference Rates, and Credit Supply”): https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr1042)

Darrell Duffie’s website https://www.darrellduffie.com/)

Follow Monetary Matters on:

Apple Podcast https://rb.gy/s5qfyh)

Spotify https://rb.gy/x56dx5)

YouTube https://rb.gy/dpwxez)

Follow Jack Farley on Twitter https://x.com/JackFarley96)