We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Are BlackRock and Vanguard Too Big and Powerful?

Are BlackRock and Vanguard Too Big and Powerful?

2022/6/8
logo of podcast Money For the Rest of Us

Money For the Rest of Us

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
Topics
David Stein: 我认为Vanguard和BlackRock等大型指数基金公司对市场的影响力日益增强,这既带来了降低投资成本的好处,也引发了对其在公司治理和政策制定方面影响力的担忧。作为指数基金的投资者,我们虽然享受了低成本的便利,但也失去了对所投资公司决策的直接投票权。这些大型基金公司在气候变化、社会责任等议题上的立场,可能会对公司行为产生重大影响。我担心这种集中化的股东权力是否会抑制市场竞争,或者是否所有公司都应该积极管理气候变化等投资风险。虽然他们不能直接串通,但他们公开的立场无疑影响着整个企业界,最终影响我们每个人的投资和生活。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter explores the increasing market share of BlackRock and Vanguard, questioning if their immense asset control poses a risk to the economy. It examines their fiduciary role, the lack of investor input in shareholder proposals, and their significant ownership stakes in major companies across various sectors, including the firearm industry.
  • BlackRock and Vanguard's combined assets under management exceed $17 trillion.
  • They hold significant ownership stakes in major companies (e.g., Apple, Target, Sturm Ruger).
  • Index fund investors lack direct voting rights on shareholder proposals; these rights belong to Vanguard or BlackRock.

Shownotes Transcript

How big index fund and ETF providers have increased their sway over publicly-traded companies while potentially discouraging competition. What can be done about it?

Topics covered include:

  • How market share for assets under management has become increasingly concentrated with big fund complexes like Vanguard and BlackRock
  • What is a fiduciary relationship and how do asset managers serve as fiduciaries
  • Why do investors in index funds and ETFs have no input as to how fund sponsors vote on shareholder proposals
  • What percentage of outstanding shares do Vanguard and BlackRock own of publicly traded companies like Apple, Target, or gun manufacturers
  • How Vanguard and BlackRock use engagement and voting policies to influence publicly traded companies, particularly when it comes to climate risk and diversity
  • How ownership by Vanguard and BlackRock in publicly-traded companies in the same industry could discourage competition.
  • What can be done through regulation or through individual action to reduce Vanguard and BlackRock's influence

For more information on this episode click here).

Sponsors

Policygenius - save over 50% on life insurance)

Wealthfront - get your first $5,000 managed for free for life)

Show Notes

What BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Are Doing to the Economy by Farhad Manjoo—The New York Times)

Investment Company Fact Book)

World's Top Asset Management Firms—ADV Rating)

West Virginia Treasury Drops BlackRock Over Stance on Climate Risk by Alicia McElhaney—Institutional Investor)

How an Organized Republican Effort Punishes Companies for Climate Action by David Gelles and Hiroko Tabuchi—The New York Times)

The Future of Corporate Governance Part I: The Problem of Twelve by John C. Coates, IV)

Larry Fink’s 2022 Letter to CEOs: The Power of Capitalism)

BlackRock's gun money by Dan Primack—Axios)

Investment Stewardship 2021 Annual Report—Vanguard)

Proxy Voting Policy for U.S. Portfolio Companies)

Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership by José Azar, Martin C. Schmalz, and Isabel Tecu)

Common Ownership and Industry Profitability: A Crossindustry View by Haifeng Wang, Jan-Carl Plagge, James Rowley, Roger A Aliaga-Diaz)

How ESG investing came to a reckoning by Harriet Agnew, Adrienne Klasa and Simon Mundy—Financial Times)

Related Episodes

148: Is Your Financial Advisor Loyal to You?)

234: Index But Don’t Herd)

340: Climate Change, ESG, and What Should Investors Do?)

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy) and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info).