We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Will the "MAGA Accounts," the Proposed $1,000 Investment Accounts for Newborns Help or Hurt the Economy?

Will the "MAGA Accounts," the Proposed $1,000 Investment Accounts for Newborns Help or Hurt the Economy?

2025/6/25
logo of podcast Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin

Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
N
Nicole Lappin
一位致力于财务教育和媒体的专家,通过多种平台帮助人们提高财务素养。
Topics
Nicole Lappin: 我将深入研究特朗普账户,评估其对下一代的投资价值,以及是否会加剧美国的贫富差距。我将分析特朗普账户的运作方式、长期影响以及对个人财务和税务的影响。如果大美法案通过,2025年至2028年间出生的美国婴儿,只要是美国公民并有社保号,将从联邦政府获得1000美元的投资。如果符合条件,你的宝宝的净资产将增加1000美元,而且这是每个孩子1000美元。这笔钱将进入政府设立的投资账户,投资必须是低成本、多元化的美国股票指数基金或类似工具。这些账户将有一些税收优惠,但不会完全免税,投资收益将需要缴纳资本利得税。如果你为孩子开设了这些账户,里面的钱将被锁定,直到孩子年满18岁。18岁时,账户持有人只能将账户中的钱用于高等教育、购买第一套住房或创业。即使对于这些符合条件的类别,账户持有人也只能取出账户价值的一半,并且需要支付账户投资增长部分的资本利得税。账户持有人年满25岁时,他们可以提取账户中的所有资金,但前提是他们将其用于我提到的三个类别。如果他们提款用于其他用途,他们将受到10%的罚款。当他们年满30岁时,他们可以将这笔钱用于任何他们想要的东西,但仍然需要支付资本利得税。你可以往账户里存钱,家庭和朋友每年最多可以往账户里存入5000美元。我完全支持这些让人尽早投资的工具。财富的秘诀不是择时,而是时间。股市历来逐年增长,所以你越早投资,获得的增长年限就越多,你的钱变成更多钱的次数也就越多。如果每年能贡献5000美元,那么同样的账户现在会变成18万美元。这个账户对那些已经有钱储蓄的家庭,那些可能已经在为孩子投资的家庭,影响最大。非营利组织对特朗普账户的捐款不受每年5000美元的限制。这种方法的好处是,因为它是普遍的,所以它可以是自动的,这意味着你不需要知道它,你不需要注册,它就像刺激支票一样是你的。每年约有360万婴儿在美国出生,如果每个婴儿获得1000美元,那么四年内每年将花费36亿美元,总计144亿美元。大美法案总体上正在加剧我们的国债。我们每年花费近1万亿美元用于保险利息支付,这超过了医疗保险,超过了国防。我们花在利息上的每一美元,都是我们没有花在公立学校、带薪休假、早期教育以及真正建立世代财富的事情上的钱。更有可能的是,这将增加国债,而我们现在负担不起,特别是如果这个账户的优势没有得到证实。科里·布克参议员在2018年提出了《婴儿债券法案》,并多次重新提出,他的版本更具进步性,每个孩子都会获得联邦资助的账户,低收入家庭的存款额度更高,试图直接解决种族财富差距问题。康涅狄格州在2023年启动了美国首个全州婴儿债券计划,出生在Husky(该州的医疗补助计划)中的儿童将获得3200美元的账户。英国在2005年推出了一项类似的计划,名为儿童信托基金,2002年至2011年间出生的每个孩子都从政府获得了一个启动账户,低收入家庭获得的更多,这些账户可以在18岁时充值和提取,该计划很受欢迎,但最终因预算削减而在2011年被取消。许多英国家庭继续在以信托基金为蓝本的私人账户中储蓄,政府在减少年轻人对经济的依赖方面获得了长期利益。如果这些账户只对有经济需求的家庭开放,肯定会更便宜,而且还可以确保这些账户的力量能够传递给最需要的人。最需要的家庭不会从中获得太多好处,而那些不需要的家庭则获得了另一种财富积累工具。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

When you're with Amex Business Platinum, going the extra mile for your business pays off.

With five times membership rewards points on flights and prepaid hotels booked through amextravel.com, you can earn more points to help grow your business. And with access to more than 1,400 lounges globally through the American Express Global Lounge Collection, including the Centurion Lounge. Can I get you a refill? You can stay fresh wherever your business travel takes you. That's the powerful backing of American Express. Terms apply. Learn more at americanexpress.com slash amexbusiness.

Okay, Money Rehabbers, I want to hook you up with some swag. If you're a fan of the pod, now is your chance to spread the love and get something for it. I'm giving away a Money News Network sweatshirt of your choosing. And if you haven't checked out our merch, you are missing out. Honestly, I think they are hilarious and so, so cute. We have a Bullish sweatshirt. We have an I Told You So Crypto Bro sweatshirt, a Money School sweatshirt, an EBITDA sweatshirt. That's EBITDA. Once you get it, get it.

In order to be entered to win, it is super duper easy. No purchase necessary. Here's how it works. Step one, rate and review the show wherever you're listening. And please be specific. I really want to hear what you like so I can do more of that. Step two, take a screenshot of your review. And step three, email that screenshot to hello at moneynewsnetwork.com with giveaway in the subject line. And that is it.

You're entered. Easy peasy. And to find out if you've won, you've got to be following me on Instagram at Nicole Lappin. That's where I'll be announcing the winners. And this is my little way of saying thank you for listening, sharing, and being part of the Money Rehab community. You truly make this show what it is, and I so appreciate you. And good luck. This giveaway is open to U.S. residents 18 and older. Voidware prohibited. One entry per person. Entries must be received by July 1st, 2025.

I'm Nicole Lappin, the only financial expert you don't need a dictionary to understand. It's time for some money rehab. This is a major, major week for Trump's big, beautiful bill. Of course, the president's collection of economic policy that he is trying to smush into one gigantic catch-all bill. The

The hope is that the bill passes in the Senate this week, which would put the bill one step closer to hitting the president's desk for signature. He really wants to sign this thing by the 4th of July, but that is coming up super quickly and there's a lot left to do, so we'll see. And there is a lot in this bill. It is over a thousand pages of proposals that span topics like border security and Medicaid and AI and a whole lot more.

But today I want to double click on one proposal that has gone viral: the Trump accounts. These are the government-backed investment accounts for babies. There is a lot to love about free money, don't get me wrong, especially when it's invested. But today I'm going to dig into the numbers so that you can decide if this is truly a smart investment in the next generation or a vehicle to make the wealth gap in the U.S. worse.

I'm going to break down exactly how these Trump accounts work, the long-term impact of programs like these, and what these accounts could mean for your wallet and your taxes, even if you don't have kids. By the way, if you want an easy summary of the other heavy-hitting policies in the Big Beautiful Bill, I've done other episodes about this, which I have linked in the show notes, so please check those out next. Anyway, these Trump accounts are part of a new five-year pilot program tucked into the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

You'll see them called Trump accounts in the headlines, but initially these were actually called money account for growth and advancement accounts.

or MAGA accounts. Washington just loves to reverse engineer an acronym. So if the big beautiful bill is passed, every baby born in the United States between January 1st, 2025 and December 31st, 2028 would get a thousand dollar investment from the federal government. So long as the baby is a U.S. citizen with a social security number. And if there are two parents in the picture and they are married, both parents have to have social security numbers too.

By the way, I had my daughter in December of 2024, so she missed this by a matter of days.

But that's just how my 2025 is going for me so far. But if you do check these boxes, you're in and your baby's net worth is now $1,000, which honestly is kind of dope. I'm pretty sure that I was born with the debt, definitely financial baggage at least. So I would have loved a little four figure head start. And this is $1,000 per child, by the way. So if you have multiple babies born over the next four years, they all get their own fund.

That money goes into a government-established investment account. The investments must be in low-cost, diversified U.S. stock index funds or a similar vehicle. So the ETFs I usually talk about on the show, like SPY or VOO, those probably will count. The language on how these accounts will be taxed is...

is a little iffy and will likely get firmed up if the bill indeed gets through the approval process. But as it stands, these accounts will have some sort of tax perks, but they won't be tax-free. The investment gains on these accounts will be subject to capital gains taxes. Capital gains tax is like income tax, but for your investment gains.

Now, if your child is under eight years old, they are potentially eligible to open up a Trump account. They just won't be eligible for that $1,000 gift from the government. The government is only planning on making contributions to children born between 2025 and 2028. But if you have a young child like I do, you would still be able to take advantage of some of the tax benefits of these accounts. If you do start one of these accounts for your kid, the money in that account is locked until the kid turns 18.

So if you get the $1,000 from the government, you couldn't use that $1,000 to cover diapers or daycare now. And even when your kids are 18, they can't just use the money for whatever they want. There are some rules. And stick with me here because the rules are unnecessarily complicated, in my humble opinion. At age 18, account holders can only use the money in their accounts for three basic categories. 1.

One, higher education or post-secondary certificates. Two, buying their first home. Or three, starting a small business. And even for those qualified categories, account holders can only take out half of the value of the account. And they'll have to pay capital gains taxes on the investment growth in the account. Once the account holder turns 25, they can withdraw all the money from their account, but only if they're spending it on those three categories I mentioned. Not for rent,

Not for a car, not for emergencies. If they do make a withdrawal to spend on something else, they'll get hit with a 10% penalty on that money. How they would know, I do not know. This is all very far in the future. But what we do know is that when they reach 30, they can use the money for whatever they want. But still, they'll need to pay capital gains tax.

So like I said, you can't take the money out of the account, but you can put money into the account. It's like the Hotel California of accounts. Families and friends can add more to the account every year up to $5,000. Intellectually, I am all for these vehicles that allow people to invest as early as possible. It is awesome. Let the infants invest. I wish I invested as a baby. That would have been so cool.

Reason being, the secret to wealth is not timing the market. It is time in the market. This used to be a mic drop one liner for financial advisors, but now it's gone a little mainstream. All it means is that the stock market historically grows year over year. So the earlier you invest, the more years of growth you get and the more times your money will turn into more money.

But how much money are we actually talking about here? A thousand dollar starter pack might sound like a lot to you or it might sound like not enough. But let's do the math and see what it would actually mean for your kid. Let's say you have a kid that does get a Trump account and you never, ever make any additional contributions. And that initial thousand dollars sits in an index fund earning a modest seven percent a year. By the time your kid turns 18, that thousand bucks will have turned into thirty four hundred bucks.

Still not college tuition, probably not changing their life, but better than nothing. Now imagine you could contribute $5,000 a year. That's the max allowed. That same account now becomes $180,000.

This is where I personally get a little frustrated with this plan. Don't get me wrong, I want more people to get into the market. I want the barrier to injury to be low, as low as possible. But this account makes the biggest difference to families who already have the money to save. Families who might be investing for their kids anyway. And here, by the way, is an insane exaggeration.

Contributions from nonprofits are not subject to the $5,000 annual limit for Trump accounts. Meaning if a private foundation wants to donate to your kid's fund,

they could give more than $5,000, any amount they want. This is another area where the exact language in the bill is a little bit fuzzy and will likely be refined before the bill passes. But as it stands right now, the rules for private foundations is that they have to make, quote, equal contributions to a large group of Trump accounts selected on the basis of location of residents of the children, their school districts, or another basis deemed appropriate by the secretary, end quote.

That quote is in essence what's supposed to be stopping wealthy families' private foundations from making huge contributions into only their families' Trump accounts. With the current language, foundations can't just cherry pick one account to make a big gift to. In my view, this could widen the wealth gap or narrow it. Time will tell.

Maybe foundations will donate meaningful contributions to kids in poverty. Maybe family foundations will donate gigantic contributions to their kids and all their rich family friends' kids. We do not know this. But this brings up a larger issue that some have with this legislation. It's one size fits all. In other words, every baby gets a thousand bucks, even if you're a Rockefeller. But the cool

thing about this approach is that because it's universal, it can be automatic, meaning you don't need to know about it. You don't need to sign up. It is just yours like a stimulus check. This makes it much easier for people who don't have access to financial education to get the financial relief that is meant for them. But a thousand dollar gift for every newborn is expensive. Let's do some more math. There are about 3.6 million babies born each and every year in the US.

If each of them gets $1,000, that's $3.6 billion a year for four years. That's a $14.4 billion program. For context, the federal budget in 2024 was over $6 trillion. So this wouldn't break the bank, but it is a significant investment. Meanwhile, the big beautiful bill as a whole is exploding our national debt. We're spending close to a trillion dollars a year just on insurance.

interest payments. That is more than Medicare. That is more than defense. And every dollar we throw at interest is a dollar we are not spending on public schools, on paid leave, on early education, on things that actually do build generational wealth.

And sure, because these accounts will be taxed, the government will get some of its money back, maybe even recoup its initial investment in the case of families that can max out that five grand limit annually. But it's likely that this will add to the national debt too, and we cannot afford that right now, especially if the advantages of this account have not been proven out. I mean, listen, at the end of the day, we could make up all sorts of hypotheticals until the vote happens, whenever it happens. But the better question is,

Has anything like this existed before and has that worked?

Well, a similar concept to the Trump account has been floated in Washington before, and most recently it was proposed by a Democrat. Senator Cory Booker proposed a Baby Bonds Act back in 2018, and it's been reintroduced a few times. His version is far more progressive. Each child gets a federally funded account with larger deposits for lower income families, an attempt to directly address the racial wealth gap.

So there is some history here, but something like this has never made its way through Congress. Local governments and state programs have been experimenting. Connecticut, for example, launched the nation's first statewide baby bond program in 2023. Kids born into Husky, that's the state's Medicaid program, get a $3,200 account.

Since this just launched in 2023, it's still too soon to look at the long-term impacts here, but there are other examples that we have abroad. The UK introduced a similar program back in 2005 called Child Trust Funds. Every kid born between 2002 and 2011 got a starter account from the government. Lower-income families got more. The accounts could be topped up and withdrawn at the age of 18. The program was popular but ultimately scrapped in 2011 due to budget cuts. Still,

Still, the idea had legs. Many British families kept saving in these private accounts modeled on trust funds, and the government reaped long-term benefits in terms of reduced financial dependency among young adults.

So if we don't have a clear sense of the ROI of this program, what would be a better version of this proposal? Well, it would certainly be less expensive if these accounts were only open to families with economic need. Not only would it be less expensive, but it would also ensure that the power of these accounts went to people who need it most.

So while these headlines are so cute, babies get savings accounts, the reality is the families who need it the most won't see much of a benefit here. And the ones who don't need it get another wealth building tool. I am not mad that my daughter missed this, but I am mad that this whole thing is built to look fair.

But it isn't. For today's tip, you can take straight to the bank. If you're already contributing to a 529 plan for your kid, don't forget to check if your state offers a 529 plan contribution match. Some states, not many but a few, offer incentives for low to moderate income families to contribute, including dollar for dollar matches up to a certain amount.

But just know some of these programs require you to apply separately. They're not automatic and they fly under the radar. So if you're in states like Nevada, Kansas or Arkansas, please look into it. You could be leaving hundreds or thousands of dollars on the table just because you didn't fill out one more form. Free money? We love to see it. Money Rehab is a production of Money News Network. I'm your host, Nicole Lappin. Money Rehab's executive producer is Morgan Lavoie. Our researcher is Emily Holmes.

Do you need some money rehab? And let's be honest, we all do. So email us your money questions, moneyrehab at moneynewsnetwork.com to potentially have your questions answered on the show or even have a one-on-one intervention with me. And follow us on Instagram at moneynews and TikTok at moneynewsnetwork for exclusive video content. And lastly, thank you. No, seriously, thank you. Thank you for listening and for investing in yourself, which is the most important investment you can make.