Hopkins believed it was the most important UFO abduction case because it occurred in a bustling city, challenging the notion that abductions only happen in rural areas. It also involved multiple credible witnesses, including police officers and the UN Secretary General.
Critics argued that researchers felt pressured to deliver increasingly sensational stories to maintain interest, often pushing witnesses to embellish their experiences to fit a more dramatic narrative.
Hypnosis was used to help Linda Napolitano recall details of her abduction, as she had fragmented memories. However, critics argue that hypnosis can lead to false memories or suggestibility, making it a controversial method for gathering information.
There were nearly 30 witnesses, including police officers and civilians, who claimed to see a woman being abducted from her apartment by a UFO and taken into a hovering craft.
The documentary featured Budd Hopkins' ex-wife, Carol Rainey, who raised concerns about the case, including the authenticity of the witnesses and the possibility that Linda Napolitano fabricated parts of her story. Rainey also questioned the use of hypnosis and the pressure to produce sensational narratives.
Carol Rainey discovered that the handwriting in the letters sent by the supposed witnesses matched Linda Napolitano's own handwriting, suggesting she may have written them herself. Additionally, some details of her story closely mirrored a fictional novel published in 1989.
Two men claiming to be UN security officers, Richard and Dan, said they were part of the UN Secretary General's security detail and witnessed the abduction. However, the Secretary General himself denied any involvement in the case and refused to discuss it.
Richard and Dan accused Linda of having supernatural abilities and being involved in strange events, including poltergeist activity and mysterious phone calls. They believed she was working for a secret government program or was an alien herself.
Richard and Dan claimed that after the UFO incident, they were teleported to a beach where they saw Linda with aliens. She was holding a dead fish and was referred to as the
Rainey criticized Hopkins for not following strict research protocols, such as using hypnosis without safeguards, and for potentially allowing financial incentives (like book deals) to influence the presentation of the case. She also questioned the authenticity of the witnesses and the lack of proper investigation.
In 1996, veteran UFO researcher Budd Hopkins published a report that would change the UFO scene in ways no one could have imagined. He described the saga of a woman seemingly abducted from her New York City apartment in the middle of the night and thrust into a world of stalkers, MIB-like men, and diplomatic mystery. No longer was the UFO phenomenon limited to rural locations or lonely roads; if someone could be taken from a bustling city, then no one was safe. But was it true?
We discuss stunning new revelations suggesting that the story may not have been investigated as thoroughly as it should have and consider whether Hopkins may have been drawn in by the lure of crafting a more sensational narrative. Then, for our Plus+ members, we explore a series of strange mass hysteria events that may have a paranormal cause after all.
Witnessed; The True Story of the Brooklyn Bridge UFO Abductions)
A Critique of Budd Hopkins' Case of the UFO Abduction of Linda Napolitano)
Sight Unseen: Science, UFO Invisibility, and Transgenic Beings)
A Manhattan housewife claimed she got abducted by aliens in 1989 — and now she’s suing Netflix)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)