We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Eric Drott, "Streaming Music, Streaming Capital" (Duke UP, 2024)

Eric Drott, "Streaming Music, Streaming Capital" (Duke UP, 2024)

2024/12/6
logo of podcast New Books in Critical Theory

New Books in Critical Theory

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Eric Drott
G
Gummo O'Claire
Topics
Gummo O'Claire:介绍Eric Drott及其新书《Streaming Music, Streaming Capital》,并围绕流媒体音乐的政治经济学展开讨论。 Eric Drott:从先锋音乐和实验音乐的背景出发,探讨了对流媒体平台的兴趣,以及流媒体平台对音乐类型定义和用户体验的影响。他指出流媒体平台是多边市场,用户群体包括听众、艺术家、广告商和投资者,平台通过利用不同用户群体获利。他分析了Spotify的盈利模式和数据的重要性,以及平台如何利用音乐数据进行用户画像和广告投放。他还探讨了流媒体环境下音乐类型的变化,以及传统音乐类型与基于情绪、活动和情境的新兴分类的共存。此外,他还分析了流媒体平台的算法推荐中,传统音乐类型与基于种族和群体特征的分类的共存,以及流媒体平台收集的数据如何被用于平台之外的各种分类和用途,例如汽车保险公司利用车载设备收集音乐数据评估驾驶风险。 Eric Drott进一步探讨了流媒体平台上播放量与实际聆听之间的差距,以及由此产生的流媒体欺诈行为,包括利用机器人、点击农场等手段人为提高播放量,以及利用平台接口的漏洞制作假冒歌曲等。他还分析了流媒体平台对音乐合法性与非合法性的界定,以及这种界定如何受到文化和社会因素的影响。 Eric Drott还探讨了流媒体经济中的征用问题,以及社会再生产理论视角下的流媒体音乐。他指出,流媒体平台对音乐的去商品化和再商品化,以及由此产生的新的音乐消费模式和聆听方式。他还分析了新的收入分成模式对不同类型音乐的影响,以及音乐资产化的增加和AI生成的音乐对流媒体经济的影响。最后,他还展望了未来的研究方向,包括音乐资产化和音乐与人工智能的关系。 Eric Drott: 详细阐述了流媒体平台的多边市场模式,以及不同用户群体(听众、艺术家、广告商、投资者)之间的互动关系。他深入分析了Spotify等平台的数据收集和利用方式,以及数据作为一种资本形式的重要性。他指出,平台通过对用户音乐偏好的数据分析,构建用户画像,并以此为基础进行精准广告投放。他还探讨了平台如何利用音乐作为一种监控技术,追踪用户的喜好和情绪变化,并以此来满足广告商的需求。此外,他还分析了流媒体平台上音乐类型的演变,以及传统音乐类型与基于情绪、活动和情境的新兴分类的共存。他指出,平台的算法推荐中,既有基于传统音乐类型的分类,也存在基于种族和群体特征的分类,这反映了音乐分类的复杂性和多重维度。他还探讨了流媒体平台收集的数据如何被用于平台之外的各种分类和用途,例如汽车保险公司利用音乐数据评估驾驶风险。 Eric Drott还深入分析了流媒体欺诈行为,以及平台如何界定音乐的合法性与非合法性。他指出,流媒体欺诈行为利用播放量与实际聆听之间的差距,通过各种手段人为提高播放量,并以此来获取利益。他还指出,平台对音乐合法性的界定是文化特异的、可变的,并且受到各种社会和经济因素的影响。 Eric Drott还从社会再生产理论的视角,探讨了流媒体音乐与资本主义的关系。他指出,流媒体平台对音乐的去商品化和再商品化,以及由此产生的新的音乐消费模式和聆听方式。他还分析了新的收入分成模式对不同类型音乐的影响,以及音乐资产化的增加和AI生成的音乐对流媒体经济的影响。最后,他还展望了未来的研究方向,包括音乐资产化和音乐与人工智能的关系。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did Eric Drott's interest in the political economy of music streaming begin?

Eric Drott's interest in the political economy of music streaming began when he stumbled upon articles in music information retrieval that were focused on automated systems for genre recognition, which were being developed for industry applications on digital music platforms. This led him to question the audience for these algorithms and the broader implications of the streaming ecosystem.

Why are streaming platforms considered multi-sided marketplaces?

Streaming platforms are considered multi-sided marketplaces because they mediate interactions between multiple user groups, including listeners, artists, advertisers, and investors. This design leverages network effects, where adding one user group benefits the others, leading to rapid growth and profitability.

Why is the audience for streaming platforms not just the listeners?

The audience for streaming platforms includes listeners, artists, advertisers, and investors. Advertisers and investors are crucial for the platform's revenue and market valuation, which often relies on the data collected from listeners to target ads and attract investment.

Why is music being used as a tool for data surveillance by streaming platforms?

Streaming platforms use music as a tool for data surveillance because it reveals intimate details about users' moods, activities, and contexts. This data is valuable for targeted advertising and can be monetized in various ways, making it a key asset for the platforms.

Why are traditional genres still present alongside new context-based categories on streaming platforms?

Traditional genres are still present alongside new context-based categories on streaming platforms because while platforms are shifting towards hyper-specific categorization for data collection and user engagement, these genres reflect long-standing listening patterns and market demands. New categories help platforms adapt to micro-trends and offer more personalized content.

Why do fraudulent streams pose a significant challenge to the streaming economy?

Fraudulent streams pose a significant challenge to the streaming economy because they exploit the gap between digital representation and actual listening. This can misrepresent engagement metrics, leading to unfair distribution of revenue and undermining the credibility of the platform. Major labels are pushing for new revenue-sharing models to address this issue.

Why is the new revenue-sharing model controversial among smaller artists?

The new revenue-sharing model is controversial among smaller artists because it sets a threshold of 1,000 streams and 500 distinct users to receive royalties. This can demonetize and marginalize artists who don't meet these arbitrary criteria, leading to a significant redistribution of income upwards to more established artists.

Why does Eric Drott use Marxist feminist approaches to analyze the streaming economy?

Eric Drott uses Marxist feminist approaches to analyze the streaming economy because they help understand how music is used to facilitate processes of social reproduction, both at individual and intergenerational levels. This includes how music is used for childcare, mood regulation, and as a cheap alternative to social services, reflecting the broader economic and social implications of the streaming model.

Why is the streaming economy evolving to treat music as an asset class?

The streaming economy is evolving to treat music as an asset class because it generates small but consistent payouts over long periods, making it attractive for investors. This aligns with the shift towards using music for data collection and targeted advertising, further integrating it into the broader digital economy.

Why might the regulatory environment for streaming platforms change with the new U.S. presidency?

The regulatory environment for streaming platforms might change with the new U.S. presidency because Trump, backed by Silicon Valley and crypto investors, is expected to be friendlier to large tech platforms. This could mean less regulation and more favorable conditions for platforms, potentially at the expense of smaller artists and music workers.

Chapters
This chapter explores the impact of music streaming on music culture, starting with the author's academic background and his interest in music genre. It discusses the shift in music platforms from catering to users with clear preferences to reaching a mass audience using curated playlists and recommendation algorithms.
  • The author's background is in avant-garde and experimental music.
  • Music platforms shifted from catering to users with clear preferences to reaching a mass audience.
  • Curated playlists and recommendation algorithms became central to the streaming experience.

Shownotes Transcript

Streaming Music, Streaming Capital)* *(Duke University Press, 2024) * *provides a much-needed study of the political economy of music streaming, drawing from Western Marxism, social reproduction theory, eco-socialist thought and more to approach the complex and highly contested relationship between music and capital. By attending to the perverse ways in which recorded music has been ultimately decommodified under the current regime of music production, circulation and consumption, Eric Drott explores issues that far exceed music - consumer surveillance, Silicon Valley monopolism, the crisis of care, capitalist extractivism and the climate emergency - while showing us how the streaming economy is thoroughly imbricated, and implicated, in these processes. Drott's rigorous and wide-ranging analysis thus offers novel ways of understanding music, culture, digitalisation and capitalism in present and future tenses .

Eric Drott is Associate Professor of Music Theory at the University of Texas at Austin.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)

Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory)