Why the World Keeps Getting Shocked by China's Technological Progress
39:01 Share

You're listening to an iHeart Podcast. And here we have a specimen from the early 2000s, a legacy investing platform. Please don't touch the exhibit, folks. It could crash. Ready to step out of the financial history museum? At public.com, you can invest in almost everything, stocks, bonds, options, and more. You could even put your cash to work at an industry-leading 4.1% APY. Leave your clunky, outdated platform behind. Go to public.com slash podcast and fund your account in five minutes or less.

Paid for by Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA, and SIPC. Full disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Hiscox Small Business Insurance knows there is no business like your business. Across America, over 600,000 small businesses, from accountants and architects to photographers and yoga instructors, look to Hiscox Insurance for protection. Find flexible coverage that adapts to the needs of your small business with a fast, easy online quote at Hiscox.com. That's H-I-S-C-O-X.

There's no business like small business. Hiscox Small Business Insurance. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News.

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal. And I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, we talk a lot about the tech competition between the U.S. and China, but I still think we talk about it in sort of broad strokes. We talk about some of the policies obviously made in 2025, but actually how the process of tech innovation in China unfolds.

still seems like important. There's more to learn about there. I totally agree. And actually, we have a really good example recently in the form of DeepSeek, right? And this thing that people acted like it came out of nowhere, but actually a lot of the papers had been published over the course of months. But it seemed to surprise everyone, right? I don't know if it's true. You know, the story that, oh, it's just this side project of a quantitative hedge fund. Like, that's such a good story.

I'm not entirely sure if that's true. And they made it so like, oh, yeah, well, they were doing this quant fund. They built DeepSeek on the side. Like it's such a it's such an alluring story. Well, not just a quant hedge fund. Isn't the story supposedly that the founder decided to go into AI after Xi Jinping was kind of complaining about how much talent and resources is being wasted on finance in various ways? Yeah, I've heard that.

People like these are like great stories. Right. And of course, there is a lot of truth to them in the particularly in the broad sense that we know that. And we talked about this at the time several years ago. There was this sort of announced hard pivot away from the sort of like consumer Internet tech. And they sort of had their legs cut out from under them towards these more like strategic.

serious capital T tech. Hardware. Hardware, AI, things like that. Things that have like more stakes than say social networking or something like that. So like, how do you actually do that though? How do you actually like direct talent in certain ways? You know, I think that if President Trump came out tomorrow and said, we want people to, and he has actually talked about that.

this, but we want to do more hard tech. I don't think there's like a real easy, straightforward mechanism. And so how do you transmit certain ambitions into the actual landscape? I think there's more to be learned on that. Well, I think also we in America are very used to thinking about technology as this like very creative process and the outcome of Jeff Bezos working in his garage or something like that. And

It's hard to imagine often the same environment existing in China. I think that's just like a cultural difference perhaps between Americans and Chinese. So we should talk about it. Totally. Well, I'm really excited to say we are going to be talking to one of the best China watchers there is who has a lot of interesting thoughts

on this topic, someone we've never had on the podcast. We're going to be speaking with Kaiser Kuo. He is the host of the Seneca podcast, which has been around since 2010. Wow. Yeah, we've been doing this for a little less than 10 years. So it's very impressive, this sort of longevity. Someone who spent a lot of time in China, splits his time between the US and China, lived there for several years. Kaiser, thank you so much for coming on Outlaws.

Hi, Joe. And hey, Tracy, this is a huge honor for me. Thanks so much for having me. Thank you for coming on. What is the Seneca podcast? What has been your project in the last 15 years?

Yeah, so Seneca is an hour-long or sometimes much longer interview format show. We bring on academics and policymakers occasionally. I've had a number of the former assistant secretaries of state for East Asia Pacific on, have had ambassadors and so forth on. But it's changed in addition. It initially started off as being sort of more here's what's in the news and here's a couple of people who can talk about it intelligently, having to do with China.

Since 2016, when I moved to the States, the focus has really been on U.S.-China relations, and it's got more American guests on than previously. But we tackle everything under the sun. I mean, U.S.-China.

China relations, China, India, China, Russia, China, India, what have you. And the Chinese macroeconomy, technology, lots on technology and culture. But the idea is that it's supposed to look at the way that we think and talk about China now. It's really evolved into something which I think has a longer shelf life. Wait, why did you decide to start it? Because you were in a band, right? That was your main gig. Yeah.

Yeah, that's correct. Something that for some reason everyone knows about me. I transitioned. I went out, I left that band in 1999 and like other people who didn't have many marketable skills, I went into podcasting.

Well, not right away. I mean, I worked for internet companies for a number of years and I worked as a reporter for quite a number of years. And then in 2010, it was just sort of on a lark. I was about to start a job at Baidu as their head of international comms and a very good friend of mine in Beijing. We got into a conversation about what podcasts we were listening to. And I said, oh, you know, the usual, This American Life and Radiolab and whatnot. And he had a few. And then we just sort of said, well,

why don't we start a podcast? We're both talkers. We both know everybody. Let's just do one and see what happens. And we did. And it took off. It did pretty well. We got acquired in 2016, right around the time I was moving to the States. And the company that bought us folded in 2023. And I just sort of struck out on my own doing a sub stack. And I've stuck with it, managed to find a

few and hopefully after this more subscribers, but we're continuing to put them out every week. It's just me solo, but it's a group effort. I'm in a band. I'm trying to go the other direction. I have a country music band and maybe one day I'll leave podcasting behind.

No, no, no. I'm never going to leave podcasting behind. I'm actually not going to leave podcasting, but I've gone back into it. My old band reformed when I was back in China recently. Are you on Spotify? As of this summer. We are, yeah. You can look up TwinQiu, C-H-U-N-Q-I-U. You've got to put a space in between them for some reason, but it's spring and autumn in English. I'm going to start with like a really super broad-based question that is not even really – it's probably a full –

hour long or two hour long episode. But in your years of covering China from a journalistic perspective, or at least from a sort of conversational perspective, and watching American media or American pundits talk about China, is there like a persistent blind spot or a thing that stands out to you as something that people talk about China that does not accord with your experience of having lived there and having reported on it yourself?

There's so many. I don't even know where to start. It's one that I would usually focus on. I mean, it's a whole cluster of issues that are related to this. But I think that people aren't mindful of just how compressed and how rapid China's transformation has been. What has happened in the course of one working lifetime? I mean, I like to tell people.

that if you can imagine graduating junior high or high school in 1979 on the eve of reform and opening, and then 40 years later at the end of your life, the end of your working life, you're thinking about retiring, and you've seen the per capita GDP go from about $175 at the beginning of your working life to almost $13,000 now. That transformation is just profound, and it's just so quick. So I think that what people get wrong is that they don't see that

hardware that's visibly advanced has done so just at a much faster pace than the software. People don't change overnight. I mean, I liken to that movie. I don't know, Joe, if you or Tracy have seen Big with Tom Hanks. I watched it a month ago with my kids. Keep going. Yeah, great movie. It's actually aged well. But, you know, Tom Hanks, no.

makes a wish and goes to bed at what he's like 11 and he wakes up and he's in his 30s, right? I mean, that's kind of China, right? It's like the mind is still out of that 11 year old in a lot of ways, but it's in the body of a 30. So we look at this fully grown adult and expect it to behave as a fully grown adult, right?

That's what people get wrong. You know how I measure China's technological progress? Go on. So I remember in the early 2000s, I was on a trip in the countryside and I experienced one of the worst toilets I've ever experienced in my entire life, like basically just a hole in the ground. And then I went back in

2019 to Beijing and I went to one of the nicest bathrooms that I've ever been in in like a luxury shopping mall and I thought, wow, things have changed. Yeah, yeah. That's a good measure. That's a good proxy. Yeah, I should do that all the time. Okay, so...

I guess I'll just jump into the technology aspect of this, but does technology come from a different place in China versus the U.S.? Kind of getting back to the intro, there's this sense in America that technology is the product of freedom and creativity and you have the ability to start a new company in your garage, whereas in China, maybe there's a different sense of how tech actually gets started.

Yeah, so there is that American myth about the lone genius toiling in obscurity in his garage either in Menlo Park, New Jersey or Menlo Park, California, right?

I think there's some of that, definitely that mythology in China, but I think the reality is very, very different. I think China does place a premium on that kind of ex nihilo, kind of from scratch, zero to one innovation. But I think it places more of a premium on the scaling up of technology and the diffusion of technology in a way that I think the American mythology has sort of blinded us to.

We're constantly caught off guard by Chinese technological advances. I think we keep seeing this tech momentum despite all the decoupling, despite the chip bans, in spite of all the economic headwinds that China's obviously facing. And I think that the reasons are pretty deep. They're actually societal and even cultural. So I think that gets to part of the way that technology is conceived of in China. You'll find pockets, of course, in America where people...

are still really, really techno-optimistic. They're still very solutionist. They're still very accelerationist, right? But it's incredibly common in China, whereas it's only here in pockets. I think American society now, and I think the West more broadly, has for some time now had a fear. If you look at our science fiction, if you look at the way technology is thought about broadly in society, there's real anxiety over it, right?

Our leading technologists, our leading natural scientists talk all the time about the existential threat that AI poses. I don't want to diminish that threat, but I have to say that in China, you just do not hear that conversation certainly not nearly as frequently and not coming from the leading technologists themselves.

So it's very different. Why is it different? You know, I'm thinking about your big analogy, actually. I'm going to extend the metaphor a little bit too far. But, you know, my phone, I have a love-hate relationship with my phone. I'm on it all the time, but I also think it's doing significant damage to my mental health. Whereas if I were to like, you know, my daughter wants a phone.

And if I were to give her one, she would probably be thrilled for a long time. I'm not going to let her have a phone for a long time, but she would be like thrilled. This is an incredible addition to my life that she would be very excited about. Again, do people have the same love-hate relationships with gadgets and new technologies that we seem to have here?

I mean, there are some people, of course, who have anxieties over it. But no, I think broadly speaking, you know, when I've sat on the sidelines of a soccer game watching our kids play and I'm trying to talk to the other parent about how they limit screen time, he's there scrolling on his device going, wait, hang on a second, let me answer this email. What were you saying just now about screen time? What? I mean, it's like the question doesn't compute. They don't see it as such a threat. I mean, part of that, of course, is because the social media environment in China is a lot more sanitized.

There isn't a threat that Junior is going to be scrolling porn all day, right? That's part of it. But I think really more to the point is that for these many years now, ordinary Chinese people have seen their lives, their material lives, just improve pretty much in lockstep with the quality of the technology they have in their hand or in their purse or in their pocket, right? Their bandwidth at home, how fast their network speed is and how...

powerful, their handheld device is basically tracked with their livelihood, right? So there's not that reason for suspicion. Now, that isn't to say that everyone in China has experienced this, certainly not. But I think the vast majority, and not just of urbanites, but the vast majority of people have seen this correlation.

Wait, but there is some negative feeling towards some technology in China. And I'm thinking specifically of Xi Jinping and his big crackdown on consumer online tech. And he's not a fan of video games precisely because he thinks it's a waste of time and kids are staring at the screen too much. So there is an element of that. That's right.

That also tracks with the Chinese parent thing, right? They all want us to be really good on computers, but not to waste our time playing video games or just chatting up people. Yeah, I think you were saying in your intro, and I thought that was really interesting, how Donald Trump, he wouldn't be able to just simply order everyone, the physicists, to start doing physics and not go work for quantitative hedge funds. Yeah.

In China, you kind of can. It's not, I mean, again, that's an exaggeration. There isn't a way, I mean, there are still plenty of people who go to school and study the social sciences or...

who graduate with engineering degrees and then go to work for a major social media company or go to work designing complicated financial derivatives or whatever. But he doesn't like that. He thinks that that's been one of the pathologies of the United States is that it's over-financialized and that our best and brightest here in the U.S. have gone to work for these companies that basically don't make anything and just suck a lot of people's time and create polarization in the country.

So they're worried about that and they have more wherewithal to direct people. It's not coercive though. Let me be clear about that.

They have ways to incentivize it. And I think that this, again, this is part of the popular culture. There's all sorts of reasons. I mean, we can start at the top. If you look at the composition of the Chinese leadership, I mean, what do we have in Congress? Who do we have heading major agencies? It's almost all lawyers, people with legal training. And that's good in a country that really prizes rule of law. And it's good for many reasons.

But in China, the analogy is that you look at the senior leadership, if you look at who runs the provinces, whether the party or the state, you look at who are the mayors or the party secretaries of cities of a million people or more, and you're almost all going to find engineers. They're going to be like 70%, 80% engineers. If the ladder of success, if the people who are top it

all did one thing in common. They did a four-year degree in the natural sciences or in engineering. There's a good chance that you're going to tell your kids to do the same, or your kid is the case maybe, to do the same. So I think there's a lot of pressure that way in terms just of social mobility and in terms of what the perceived path of mobility is.

By the way, this point about engineers and lawyers, regular Odd Law guest Dan Wong has a book coming out August 26th, 2025. It's up for sale on Amazon right now. You can preorder it about exactly this dimension of a sort of lawyer society versus an engineering society. I'm looking forward to reading that. I'm looking forward to having Dan on. Yeah, Dan Wong is great. So I interviewed him for this book.

Nova documentary that I did called inside China's tech boom and the whole thesis of it was really I mean in many ways inspired by some of Dan's ideas about the importance of process knowledge how

The fact that China has not stopped manufacturing – there was never a maker's movement in China because they didn't need to be one. They were always making stuff, right? The fact that they still have all the hardware there, it creates this sort of frictionless ecosystem of innovation where if you're a guy with an idea for some gadget and you're in Shenzhen, you can have your designer –

just send you over on WeChat his latest design. You can take it to your ODM, which is just a quick bike ride down the street. They can have you a prototype by the afternoon. You can make some tweaks and iterate, and they'll just keep changing the thing overnight. It's practically frictionless.

And I think that's a huge piece of China's innovation success as well. But what happens when Xi Jinping comes out and says, you know what, we're not as into social networking anymore. We're not as into video games. We really want to focus on other areas of hard tech, important tech, something like that. What is the process of here is this national priority and then the transmission and diffusion of these priorities into choices that maybe students make or technologists make?

That's a great question. I think it's actually one that I can answer with three letters, KPI. What happens when you have these kind of abstract directives, the will of the leader from on high, is that they get translated not into specific policies, not right away certainly, but into this expectation set policy.

from the leadership on down that this is how I'm going to score my brownie points. This is how I'm going to get promoted within the party is if I tick these boxes, if I do these things. Let's say we decide that the thing is we all need to have data centers. So suddenly every municipality and every province is going to want to build data centers. They're going to fight each other for it. They're going to figure out here's the best place for us to build ours and here's all this money that we're going to put into that. I mean, they're going to want to tick that box.

This is the sort of the way that everything gets done in China. When recently when Xi Jinping announced that they were going to be – and this is a directive that came not out of just the state council but out of the party as well, that they were going to boost consumption. A lot of people just sort of sneered and said, yeah, I don't see a lot of policy here in place to do that.

But you can bet your bottom dollar that everyone on down, they took this very, very seriously. And they're all figuring out ways where in their little patch of dirt, they are going to figure out how we can boost consumption because that's the way that I'm going to get promoted. They do the same thing with cleaning up air pollution. They do the same thing with cleaning up rivers. They make it part of your KPI. That's what they're going to do with this as well. That's

That's what they did. I mean, the question that you asked about how they made sure these physicists were doing physics, it's much the same. There's also, I feel, like a sense of clarity in some of these policy directives. So China very often explicitly will say where it's investing, right? So when we have the consumer tech crackdown, it came with a simultaneous announcement that

Everyone should go into hardware, basically. And we saw that repeated in various ways. I remember Chairman Rabbit was tweeting that people should go to the industries that actually fit the central government's general policies. So I feel like it's just very clear as well. And the messaging is kind of on point.

We have a word in Chinese, fengkou, which literally means sort of wind mouth. It's the place where the wind will be blowing. It's like that little wind tunnel. And they telegraph that. They tell you, you know, well in advance, here is where we're going to do this. In the 14th five-year plan, this tunnel.

In the 15th Five-Year Plan, they say exactly which industries are going to not only receive a lot of government investment, but where the paths are going to be cleared. There's going to be removal of a lot of regulatory hurdles. There's going to be favorable policy for you if you get into this.

And if you're an investor, that's where you're going to put your money. That's what you're going to do. You're going to, you know, it doesn't take a genius. You just need to read the important documents and you figure out exactly what their priorities are. Just as you say, there's that clarity. And here we have a specimen from the early 2000s, a legacy investing platform.

Please don't touch the exhibit, folks. It could crash. Ready to step out of the financial history museum? At public.com, you can invest in almost everything. Stocks, bonds, options, and more. You can even put your cash to work at an industry-leading 4.1% APY. But the real game changer? Public was designed this century. The experience is clean, intuitive, and just makes sense.

And leave your clunky, outdated platform behind. Go to public.com slash podcast and fund your account in five minutes or less.

They'll even give you up to $10,000 when you transfer your investments. Only at public.com. Paid for by Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA, and SIPC. Full disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today.

I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of $45 for three-month plan, equivalent to $15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See full terms at mintmobile.com. I have to admit, you know, like when I read...

say, a Xi Jinping speech translated into English, or maybe I just have a chat GPT translated. Like there is often not a lot of like specifics or arguably even substance in them. There's a lot of like really sort of

high-level, grand things. But this sort of makes sense. Now, granted, leaders around the world often don't get into a lot of specifics, but it makes a little bit more sense to me in the context of, okay, these priorities are announced and immediately on down, I have to imagine provincial leaders, leaders of school systems, universities, immediately get the message that

that their futures and their success and their careers will be about who can show the best results on what maybe sounds like some sort of vague priority.

And you're missing the biggest piece of it, which is parents. Oh, interesting. They're getting this message as well. They're the ones who are ultimately deciding, no, you're not going to be an intellectual historian. You're going to study engineering physics. Sorry, buddy. Because you're going to get a job at Tencent or at BYD or at Huawei when you graduate.

Yeah, so I think that's the important thing. Everyone gets the message. A friend of mine once joked that a lot of people in the West have a great deal of difficulty imagining how the leader of an authoritarian nation can do all these things that seem so apparently cruel, arbitrary, but actually have your best interests in mind. But for anyone who grew up with Chinese parents, they know exactly how that works.

Wait, so just on the authoritarian point, I know you touched on this already, but just to press on this, would you say authoritarianism is a net positive or a net negative for technological development? Hmm.

I think it's a wash in most ways. I mean, look, maybe this is my upbringing talking, but I am not willing to discard the idea that a lack of intellectual freedom, of academic freedom, of freedom to query and to experiment without any ideological fetters, that if you don't have that, in the long run, you are hobbled. I think that's probably still the case. But I think in America, we've taken it too far. We have this idea. I mean, do you remember back in 2013, 2014, when

Joe Biden, and even Carly Fiorina, who really ought to have known better. I mean, she was the CEO of a major technology company. They were going around and they were making these speeches. You know, Biden was making these graduation speeches. Fiorina was on the campaign trail. And she was talking about, and Biden was talking about, they said the same talking point. It's like, show me one thing that China's ever innovated. You know, as long as we have freedom, we will always be in the lead of innovation. And I mean, I think

that takes it from a necessary condition, which I even have quibbles with. In fact, I don't believe that freedom is a necessary condition for technological innovation, but it even elevates it to sufficient condition, yeah? Where it's like just because we're free, we're always going to be ahead in innovation. So I mean, that's part of the reason why we're constantly just being just

sideswiped, just completely just blindsided by Chinese tech advances. You hear that to this day. I think you hear less of it, but it is remarkable the degree to which you still hear that. What's your version of DeepSeek? Where did it come from? And how much does it fit this story of like, oh, they were doing quant stuff and then suddenly they're like, oh, we should pivot to AI. Like what's the DeepSeek story?

Well, I mean, the biography of Liang Wenfeng is not in question. I mean, he ran a quant fund called High Flyer, right? And he pivoted. Now, to what extent they were just developing this as a sideline hobby or, I mean, I think more likely they were developing AI that would help them in trades, right? Help them in high frequency, high velocity trading, right? But the pivot

Being attributed to Xi Jinping making this policy change, that totally tracks. I don't know the precise details, but it totally tracks. It doesn't seem suspicious to me. I have no reason to doubt that that's the case. I mean, plenty of people have made that kind of a pivot. I mean, maybe not all of them have enjoyed the kind of world-striding success that DeepSeek has, but it certainly tracks.

I want to talk about the export controls from the Biden administration. So what role would you say those have played in China's technological progress? Because one thing I sometimes hear, people used to use the analogy of the three-body problem. Did you ever read that, Joe? I never read it. I did, yeah. Oh, sorry. And Kaiser, yeah.

Oh, yeah, for sure. Neil Ferguson actually used that at Davos a few years ago. I was there. I was working this little side hustle. I'm just kind of a note taker for the World Economic Forum. But he actually, without explaining anything, he just simply said, what the United States is trying to do to China right now is exactly what the trisolarians were trying to do to Earth in three-body problem. And without explaining what he meant, but just on the assumption that everyone in the audience had read it, and probably most people had. But yeah.

trying to basically stymie technological advance. Right, right. Right. So I feel like we should explain it now, but I guess it's the idea that in the three-body problem, Earth is threatened by this alien species, and because of that, humanity kind of reorganizes itself and technological progress thrives, at least for a while. Yeah. Yeah.

And I think that that's kind of what we've seen happen. I mean, I use a more quotidian metaphor, the one that I think not everyone has to have read this really, really long turgid science fiction classic for. But I think we've basically compelled the frog to leap again. And it was happy enough just sort of hopping along well behind the US when it came to cutting edge semiconductors. But now it

It may leap the United States as the frog, our metaphoric frog did in 5G or in renewable energy like solar and electric vehicles, right? So we have now given China both the kind of urgency and the sense of imminent threat that was needed to light a fire to that frog's posterior. And now it's in the air. It's maybe directly over our heads and right in front of us. ♪

You know what's great about your investment account with the big guys? It's actually a time machine. Log in and Zoom. Welcome back to 1999. It's time for an upgrade.

At public.com, you can invest in almost everything. Stocks, bonds, options, and more. You can even put your cash to work at an industry-leading 4.1% APY. But the real game changer? Public was designed this century. The experience is clean, intuitive, and just...

Thanks for watching.

When Robinhood started, it was built to make trading more accessible.

Thank you.

with powerful charts, including custom intervals down to the tick, and over 80 indicators and drawing tools. Trade all of your favorite assets, including popular stocks and ETFs, all in one place. Take your trading to the next level by customizing your layout in seconds and even enter and exit positions in one tap, right from the chart, with up to eight charts per layout. The future of trading is fast, powerful, and precise. Experience it now on Robinhood Legend.

Sign up today. Investing is risky. Robinhood Financial LLC member SIPC is a registered broker dealer. Other fees may apply. One of the things that's really elemental to U.S. tech is the vision and dreams of gigantic markets.

monopoly profits. This is sort of like the Peter Thiel ideas. Like the goal is to like build a monopoly and get insanely rich doing it. And the people who go into tech dreams of fortunes, et cetera. There is this huge liquid stock market that becomes the destination either for IPOs or acquisitions.

Talk to us about the capital markets component of Chinese tech. Is it the same like path to getting super rich that American technologists see here? Like what incentivizes and motivates the technologist in China?

I think that they're exactly the same. I think that there's very little daylight between – well, first of all, I mean, in the 90s, in that first technology boom in China, it came right on the heels of what you saw in the United States. All these people, Charles Zhang, who left MIT and went back to China in I think it was like 97 or 98 to start this company, Sohu.

All these other entrepreneurs, Robin Lee, who I used to work for at Baidu, a lot of them were returnees from the United States and they had the same glint in their eye. And you have to remember, these guys, they had American business models, essentially. They went to American VCs from Sand Hill Road to raise their money. They went to American capital markets, right, when they wanted to list their exits were always on NASDAQ or on New York Stock Exchange.

Only in rare exceptions were they actually not. Tencent's an exception. Alibaba's a little bit of an exception. But most of them, I mean, hundreds of them went to the United States forces, right? And yeah, I think it's the same motivating force. The cultures are remarkably or were remarkably similar. So that was like the only thing I felt comfortable working. I mean, as a guileless American who just had my, I would just have my business

posterior handed to me in any kind of corporate setting except in the internet where, you know, the same kind of Silicon Valley egalitarianism and that kind of enterprise culture prevailed. So that was like one of the only safe places for people who, you know, were clueless like me.

Since you mentioned... So I think they're the same. I think they're the same. Since you mentioned culture, can I ask a slightly random question? But I think you're a good person to ask about it, given your background as a musician. But China has been very successful in exporting technology. So, you know, whether it's BYD cars or TikTok or whatever, I think we can all agree that it's come from nowhere, basically, and is now certainly a major player in

Meanwhile, in sort of pop cultural exports, the lack of Chinese pop culture exports has been a sort of long running discussion point now. And if you compare China to a place like Japan, where there's J-pop or Korea, where there's K-pop,

It does feel like something is kind of lacking there. I guess my question is, is it fair to say that China has fallen down on cultural exports, at least compared to technology? And then B, why is that?

Yeah, no, that's a great question. It's something I've pondered for a very long time, too. I mean, I think there's no arguing that China's got a gigantic gap. It's not punching at its weight. But let's figure out how we calculate that weight. Because, you know, when you look at when did we all start eating sushi and watching Akira Kurosawa films? Like in the 80s, right?

So that's when Japan's soft power starts to really, really peak, right? We all start driving Japanese cars. This is at a point where Japan's per capita GDP was about 75% of what the United States was at that time. And Korea's, similarly, around the time where we start all listening to Gangnam Style and then all our daughters or whatever have posters of BTS on their walls, as mine still does.

This was at a time when South Korea's per capita GDP, it's like 70, 72, 73% of America's GDP per capita per capita.

I think that has something to do with it. I think that per capita GDP kind of shows what a nation's priorities are going to be. When it's low, it's still going to be in that stage of we've got to work really, really hard. This is why, I mean, in China, I mean, I play music. So I'm constantly frustrated by the fact that for most people, for the overwhelming number of people, music is just entertainment. There's nobody who thinks of it as an art form anymore. I mean, or if there ever was. I think that it has to do with that.

But I think there's also, and it's obvious to me, that the first rule of soft power should just be don't talk about soft power. China's government's obsession with trying to create soft power is one of the big impediments to it actually having soft power.

Again, let me be very, very clear. It has plenty of soft power in the developing world. I mean, if you look in Southeast Asia, a lot of people are watching these insufferable costume dramas about, you know, palace intrigue in the Qing dynasty. But there are some good ones. There are some good ones out there. Yeah, maybe. I don't know. A bunch of them are on Netflix nowadays. Yeah, yeah. I guess the Thai ones are really popular these days. That's interesting. So that's actually popular content in Southeast Asia?

Yeah, it's huge. It's absolutely huge. All over Southeast Asia, in Indonesia, in Malaysia, Thailand, in the Philippines, even in Vietnam. Anywhere in Southeast Asia you go, there's a lot of this stuff. But yeah, but no, to your point, in Europe, in the United States, no, it's not really registering. And I think that's one of the reasons. But I think ultimately the reason is, well...

Soft power tends to be created on the periphery. It creeps in through the cracks. You know, it's a grassroots thing. It's not supposed to be created top-down. And yeah, you can look at South Korea and say there was a lot of government, you know, and a lot of these gigantic conglomerates who created Korean soft power, the boy bands and stuff, but that may be sort of an anomaly.

Kaiser, we could go on a long time. There are just so many questions, but I think that's a good spot to wrap it. Thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots. We'll have to have you back on again soon. I would love to come back on. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you. Thank you, Kaiser. That was fun. Thank you.

I thought that was really interesting. I like the point about everyone getting the message and then everyone doing their own thing to sort of prove that they're getting a message. And we talked about this on our episode with Sam D'Amico, the Impulse Labs guy. This idea of, okay, there's some priority and then all the different provinces compete on how well they're doing at fulfilling their priority. It makes a lot of sense.

that that's a very broadly applicable lesson to like different sectors and different parts of the economy. Totally. I really think the messaging is kind of key here. The message is very clear. It's if you choose this route that the Chinese government is encouraging you to take, your life is going to be a lot easier than if you take another route. And I think that's kind of different to the way industrial policy, I guess, works.

in the States where, you know, even if a president stands up and says, we want a lot more semiconductors in the U.S., there's still a lot of bureaucracy, a lot of uncertainty, a lot of paperwork attached to getting support from the government for a semiconductor project. And so I think that uncertainty like still feeds into the U.S. certainly. Yeah.

Yeah. President Trump recently gave a speech at University of Alabama. I think it was their graduation ceremony. And he said he was like to the business students here, don't just think about your portfolios. Think about your country. And I like that message. But I don't know, like, what are the levers that actually get towards that? And so. Oh, also, Tracy, I have a take.

Oh, oh, really? Just one? Yeah, just one take. Okay, hit me. This is something I've been workshopping. And so I'm leaving it to the end. I can't believe you're not tweeting it. Are you going to tweet it? Are you workshopping for a tweet? I'm workshopping it for you here. I figured a lot of people aren't listening by this point, so I can drop it here, which is I'm kind of coming around to this idea that like complex financial products, that they have a bad rep.

Wait, they have a bad rep or they are bad? No, that they have a bad rep. This is like sort of contra to a lot of popular things. It's like, oh, complex semiconductors, good. Complex financial products, bad. I'm just throwing it out there that maybe we should talk more about why people get paid so much to design complex financial products in a market economy and why they're so highly valued. I'm just throwing it out there.

We should do an episode on Ray Dalio and the chicken nugget again. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. Derivatives gave us the chicken nugget. Anyway, talking to Kaiser about this just reminded me of that, that I want to explore this idea. And I'm saying it here now kind of as a reminder to myself to think about this more.

Chicken nuggets is the ultimate example of American technological and financial supremacy. We do great complicated things in the United States, but because we have this bias against finance as being extractive or something, I think we don't sufficiently recognize where we're at the cutting edge. It is true that in China, finance and industry are often working hand in hand. And if the government says that

For instance, hardware is now very important. You will see the banks start to loosen up on lending standards and things like that. So a valid point, Joe. What is a supply chain but a payment chain in reverse? That's Zoltan Pozar's line. Oh, he said that? He just stole that one. Yeah, I stole it from Zoltan.

That's right. Yeah. Credit to Zoltan. But, you know, maybe we should think about this a little more. Yeah. All right. Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Traci Allaway. You can follow me at Traci Allaway. And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow me at the stalwart.

Check out our guest, Kaiser Kuo. He's at Kaiser Kuo. And check out the Seneca podcast and Substack. Follow our producers, Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Arman, Dashiell Bennett at Dashbot, and Cale Brooks at Cale Brooks. For more Odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash Odd Lots, where we have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes. And you can chat about all of these topics 24-7 in our Discord, discord.gg slash Odd Lots.

And if you enjoy OddLots, if you like it when we check in on Chinese technology and how it actually develops, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening. ♪♪♪

Hiscox Small Business Insurance knows there is no business like your business. Across America, over 600,000 small businesses, from accountants and architects to photographers and yoga instructors, look to Hiscox Insurance for protection. Find flexible coverage that adapts to the needs of your small business with a fast, easy online quote at Hiscox.com. That's H-I-S-C-O-X dot com.

There's no business like small business. Hiscox Small Business Insurance. Every dog deserves a little fun. So let's talk BarkBox and SuperTour. These monthly subscription boxes deliver top-tier toys and treats that'll have your pup begging for more. And this month, the 420 box is back. It's Bark's most anticipated box of the year, packed with hilarious limited-edition toys and snacks. And trust me, it sells out fast. Don't miss out. Grab your 420 box at Bark.co before it's gone.

You're listening to an iHeart Podcast.