The LA Riots
01:04:07 Share

What's up, what's up everybody? Welcome to a brand new episode of Part of the Problem. Birds are chirping. Robbie the Fire Bernstein is out in some nice location. Where are you? This is beautiful Sandpoint, Idaho. We just wrapped up a great evening of porches. And now I'm on to Reno, Salt Lake City with you and Wise Guys, Las Vegas. So come out, make me look good to the club.

That's right. Come on out and see a great comedy show while you're at it. And of course, that's right. Me and Rob this Friday and Saturday will be out in Salt Lake City. I'm looking forward to that. ComicDaveSmith.com for those ticket links and our tour for the rest of the year. And then The Porch Tour for ThePorchTour.com for the rest of Rob's solo run. All right. So...

the big story that what's going on since last we've spoke, Rob is, uh, well, there was the, the Elon Musk fallout of the Elon Musk, Donald Trump fallout. And then, um,

as some have speculated might be related although I'm not sure it is but the the LA riots um which is what can you say this is what LA's this is what LA does um have really taken over the last couple of days it is there's there's a lot to this the like Dynamics that are going on here but

On its, just at the start of it, it should say it is, I was just reading this earlier today, it is the first time that the National Guard has been deployed to break up riots since the LA riots of the 90s. And this was pretty crazy to me, Rob. It is the first time that the National Guard has been deployed to,

against the wishes of the state government. So like where it was opposed by the governor and the National Guard was forced on the state government since Selma in the civil rights movement

uh movement so there this is there is something historic about this um and so I guess maybe that's just the the first place to start um I I've got a bunch of thoughts on this they are not exactly linear um so I you know I I want to give you a chance to to kind of give your take on this but essentially there like there's a lot of different things that are going on here

One of the major things is that, as we've kind of covered this since Donald Trump's got back into power, that the immigration enforcement in terms of deportations, forget border security, which is kind of a separate issue. I mean, they're related, but it is a separate issue.

border security is easy um and it's popular and you're not going to get much pushback from the voting base over that um you know people did not like joe biden's de facto open borders they're quite pleased that the number of migrant crossings has gone way down and they're you know there's there's broad support for for border security

Deportations, while there has been broad support in an abstract for deportations, me and you have been talking about for several months now that this is an issue where there's the real potential for Donald Trump to fall into something here. Like, you know, if they're done in too brutal of a way, they can really turn people off.

Another dynamic kind of separate from that has been the, and this is really, I think, over the last year, one of the most interesting things in American politics is that the protests over Donald Trump have been essentially non-existent.

it was shocking to me um but the protest throughout the campaign you know Donald Trump was going and doing events in Manhattan and there was almost no protests about it this is just very different than 2016 or 2020. now USA don't have the budget

Well, there's, you know, we can get into a lot of that, too. There was actually a piece in the New York Post this morning. I'm not sure if you saw it about some of the groups that they've already linked to these protests. It turns out this is one of the things that a lot of Americans have woken up to over the last few years is that mass protest movements seem to not be quite as organic.

as the way we like to think of them when we tell ourselves stories. I'm not sure exactly to what extent that's true in the past, but it's certainly very true in the recent past. Now you have a situation where for the first time since Donald Trump's been president in his second term, you're seeing protests on the streets. And

What that ends up doing is it kind of like it conjures up this not so distant memory of the crazy riots that we saw during 2020, which were the longest sustained riots since the L.A. riots. And I did quite a bit more property damage than the original L.A. riots in the 90s. I think there's I think all of these things are at work here.

And especially when you're kind of going into the summer months,

to see like these, these protests turning into riots. I think there's a, um, uh, a view from the Trump administration, which I think is, is largely fair and correct that they did not do enough to put down the riots of 2020. And that ultimately that hurt Donald Trump in his reelection year. Um, and so they are, they reacted much quicker, uh,

this time around. And so I think all of these things are kind of at work. I also think that one of the elements that almost gets forgotten when we talk about how the corporate media discredited themselves over the last five years or so, because there's so many other things that just race to your mind first, but it is, while we're talking about riots, it is important to mention that

the corporate media and the democratic establishment and much of the republican establishment all went all in on supporting the george floyd summer of love riots in 2020 and that that turned out to be enormously unpopular and that donald trump by opposing them um actually was on the winning side

of that issue. And ultimately, if you remember, Rob, Joe Biden had to come out and denounce the riots because it got to a point where even amongst Democrats, they were wildly unpopular. It turns out like burning shit and terrorizing people isn't that popular for very long. So you do see more of an understanding of that

The riots also became a thing that became fodder to mock the corporate media, you know, with their fiery but mostly peaceful and, you know, images of reporters standing in front of a car that's on fire talking about how peaceful everybody is. They're not quite doing that or they're not laying it on as thick this time. So, yeah, go ahead. Yeah.

There was also the COVID element from what I remember of that no one was allowed out of their house, no one was allowed to congregate, but somehow rioting in the name of racism protected you from COVID, which also just amplified the cartoonish behavior of the press as they both described protests as being relatively peaceful.

Wall damage was being done to minority businesses. That was absurd. And then also the fact that after years of lockdowns and COVID, people were being encouraged to now congregate outdoors for this one specific activity that I guess like sitting down in a restaurant, then you're suddenly protected from COVID.

- All right guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is The Wellness Company, and specifically their Parasite Cleanse. If you've been feeling brain fog even when you're exercising and eating clean, it might not be burnout, it could be parasites. Now, groundbreaking research from Dr. Alan McDonald revealed a direct link between chronic parasite infections

and neurological diseases like multiple sclerosis. Parasites can cause inflammation, nerve damage, and long-term cognitive decline. More reasons to do a full body cleanse at least once a year. The Wellness Company has a solution for you. It's ivermectin.

and Mabendazole, the gold standard parasite solution now combined in one cleanse combo designed to eliminate harmful invaders and support your immune system naturally. Medical grade, not some trendy herbal gimmick.

Fill out their quick intake form and get a three-month supply shipped straight to your door. Maha is officially here, and the wellness company is making hard-to-get medications digitally accessible so you can live your best life. Head over to TWC.health slash problem and use the promo code problem to save $60 off plus free shipping on all orders. Once again, that's TWC.health slash

slash problem and use the promo code problem for 60 off plus free shipping cleanse your body today all right let's get back into the show yeah it was uh if you remember at the time because me and rob had already been out against the covid regime at this point this is the summer of 2020 but i remember both of us commenting that we thought that that was at the time

we felt like that was kind of a turning point moment when a lot of people became more comfortable opposing the COVID insanity because it was, I mean, you can't make this stuff up. It was coming off three months of lockdowns and like two days before the riots broke out, or they start, you know, the protests that very quickly turned to riots. But like two days before the George Floyd riots, which I believe were in Minneapolis at first,

They were like, they were mocking people for being outside not wearing masks.

they were literally sitting there going like oh the real you know turn the camera around so you can see um you know the uh you know so you can see the guy here without a mask on and then two days later it's you're you're allowed to do it you're allowed to not only take your son for a walk without a mask but you're allowed to get together in uh you know a group of a hundred thousand people and and all be together so it was it was really a moment that kind of changed

It changed how much people were willing to tolerate the COVID stuff. And it changed people's kind of, it made people feel more comfortable to be like, okay, I think the whole media apparatus is lying to me. That's what it seems to be here. I'm not sure if it's better with Rob muting and unmuting, because I don't know if that's like every time he talks, the noise is going to come back in, but we'd give it a shot. I think I'm better off. I'll stay muted until I'm piping in.

Okay. All right. Sounds good. All right. So, look, I guess...

You know, I'll say this. I saw that Alex, oh God, I still have not learned how to pronounce his last name. I really do feel bad now because that's on me. But Alex Narasta, I think is how you say it, who was my debate opponent at the Soho Forum the other day, I did appreciate this. He tweeted the other day, or it was earlier today or yesterday, he tweeted, there is never any excuse for a riot.

um, which I did appreciate, especially because he's one of these open borders libertarians. And obviously I, I disagree with that and think it's kind of goofy, but I did think it was, that was, uh, um, it was good that he had that take. Of course, he followed it up by talking about how terrible the deportations and things like that are, but there is something very fundamentally. And I, I, you know, it, it, uh,

kind of brings me back to the summer of 2020 when I remember I ruffled a lot of feathers amongst libertarians by being so harshly critical of the George Floyd riots. But I do think that that's the most important starting point with all of this shit. What Alex tweeted, like that is the most, no matter what your views are on anything else,

And that including if you're a hardcore libertarian like me or Rob, there is no excuse for riots and we must all oppose riots. It's like it seems like such a basic thing that you would never even need to say this if you're doing like a show about politics. Like if there couldn't be one starting point that we all agree on, you'd imagine it should be that. But I will say particularly for libertarians, you know, sometimes.

right-wingers, when they're being critical of libertarianism, they will say something to the effect of like, you know, order has to precede liberty. Like order is kind of the foundation and then liberty is something you can have up on the top of it. I think the truth is that order has to precede everything.

It has to precede any type of civilization. And if the core of libertarianism is believing that at the top, the highest political goal ought to be liberty, and this is based on a belief in private property rights and the non-aggression principle, well, okay, but what is a riot other than the biggest threat to property rights and the non-aggression principle? It is that by definition, you're talking about

hurting people and destroying their property.

And that's what we're seeing here. And I really don't, you know, I think no matter where you stand on any issue, no matter how important it is, whether it's war or immigration or the economy or taxation or any of this stuff, you are not allowed to start setting cars on fire, to start assaulting people, to start taking over public areas. Like all of this stuff is, it is,

anti-civilizational by its nature. And I think that all...

I think all serious people must oppose rioting and it's fundamentally unserious to do anything else than oppose it. And, you know, I, I gotta say in this type of situation, I do understand why Donald Trump's, um, instinct was to be like, this has to be put down and we cannot allow this to continue. You know, there there's, um, no,

No shortage of ways that you can legitimately express opposition to government policies in this country. Just essentially what a riot is, is...

is an adult temper tantrum in a large group. And that cannot be one of the ways that's allowed. Like it's not, it's not acceptable for my three-year-old. So it's certainly not acceptable for adults to just start destroying things. So that, that, that would be my starting point, but then Rob take it. And any thoughts on any of this that you have go ahead.

Well, I guess also on the riots, some are trying to say that Donald Trump provoked the riots in the way that he went about deporting people in a

in California. And I think your top kind of side view of immigration of, hey, the border, we needed to close the border. The border was closed. When it comes to deportation, I think we actually need to overhaul our immigration policy. Everyone go listen. I just did an incredible interview with David Stockman and also Mike Mishtalk for Zero Hedge.

They're brilliant economists and they gave a good breakdown of why immigrant labor is actually so important to our country. And Stockman has said, I think it's only 10,000 people are allowed to legally immigrate here. And the actual demand for foreign workers is significantly higher than that, which has created a lot of the chaos of a non-government policy of something that a lot of businesses and people actually want.

With all that being said, I think there was too much illegal immigration over the Biden administration, and there probably needs to be some level of deportations now, and some of it will be heavy-handed. But there needs to be something to correct and let people know, hey, even if there's a Democratic administration that's going to let you come in, you might not want to just come in.

And you're not gonna get a perfect enforcement of this policy. I don't know exactly who you deport, what's the nice way of deporting them, but there's some level of people that I do think it's reasonable for Donald Trump to be deporting. To have an agenda where you're claiming you're going after the criminals first, I think that's probably the best way to sell it and the best approach. But some people are gonna get deported.

So the idea that if you're going to go ahead and deport them, people are going to riot and now you can't enact your government policy that you actually have a mandate to do, I don't think it's fair to say, well, the natural cause of enforcing this policy is going to be riots, so don't enforce the policy. And then once the riots are happening, firstly, I'm going to guess if you actually talk to law enforcement, they're happy that someone had their back.

I'm going to guess that people who are not engaged in the riots are happy that there aren't going to be riots and we're not just going to signal, hey, go ahead and riot and burn down businesses. And then after what happened with January 6th, I don't want to hear from liberal leaders of, oh, it's our call whether or not you're going to have National Guard. Because they failed on January 6th. From what I understand, there was an opportunity to have National Guard in the Capitol. They chose not.

to do so and then that situation escalated to where people had to go to jail for no reason. So I don't really understand if there's a riot and the president has access to the National Guard, that's not the military coming in and enforcing curfews in our cities and going into our homes. That does not seem to be a trampling of liberties or some sort of an escalation. It seems to be a very specific incident and a wise move.

Yeah, I mean, look, I completely agree with you. And I also think that there's, you know, there's kind of something interesting to me in like the pure theory of all of it. But, you know, a lot is made. What ends up happening is that

So look, and it should be pointed out in this case that Donald Trump actually, you know, he took pretty swift action here, but he didn't invoke the Insurrection Act. He didn't, you know, they floated out some ideas like Hegseth said something about sending the Marines in or something like that. But really what has happened, at least so far, is the National Guard was sent in. They seem to mostly be protecting government buildings and buildings.

What's been going on, the violence that's been seen, has been done by the LAPD. So it isn't as if this was Donald Trump. Like all those videos where you saw the video of the reporter lady get hit with a rubber bullet or like some of them pepper spraying the crowd and stuff, that was all LAPD doing that. So, you know, that's just worth pointing out. But I got to say—

On that note, OK, if you if you can criticize the idea of having federal buildings, you can criticize the idea of having a National Guard. But if you have federal buildings and then you take the National Guard to protect your federal buildings, what offense has been done there? And then furthermore, when all of a sudden you have the media crying and you've got Newsom crying, hey, this situation was under control. We didn't need this here. I'm protecting my federal buildings. I don't think you have it under control.

The criticism seems to just be trying to paint the picture that Donald Trump is fully authoritarian and he's going to be marching the army into cities. And maybe we should just let California fail and be a failure USA in its own state. But in the meantime, it's still a part of the country. And I don't know, this just doesn't seem all that heavy handed.

All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Massa Chips. They're a new sponsor. We love having them on board. Did you know all chips and fries used to be cooked in tallow up until the 1990s when big corporations switched to cheap processed seed oils? Today, seed oils make up 20% of the average American's daily calories.

and recent studies have linked seed oils to metabolic health issues and inflammation in the body. Masa decided to do something about it. They created a tasty and delicious tortilla chip with just three ingredients and no seed oils. Organic nixtamalized corn,

sea salt, and 100% grass-fed beef tallow. These chips don't only avoid the bad stuff, but they taste incredible too. Masa is crunchier, tastier, and sturdier than other chips. It doesn't break in your guac or salsa, so that's always good.

- Massa chips are beloved by tens of thousands of customers and have been endorsed by industry leading health and nutrition experts like Ben Greenfield and Gary Brekka. Ready to give Massa a try? Go check them out at massachips.com/dave and use the promo code Dave for 25% off your first order. Once again, that's massachips.com/dave

M-A-S-A chips.com slash Dave promo code Dave for 25% off your first order. All right, let's get back into the show.

Well, I, you know, I agree. And that's why I got to say there's, because, you know, for people who don't know, you know, I'm a libertarian. And I was at one point kind of like a theory bro who was like obsessed with libertarian theory. I'm more concerned these days with like what's actually going on in the world and what is going to, and consequentialism in general, like what's going to lead to a better outcome. But,

just with this topic, there's so many interesting theory questions that come up. And so like, you just touched on another one there, which is kind of like the idea of states' rights and the idea that generally speaking, I do favor

states having more sovereignty and the central federal government having less. And even if it's issues that I don't completely agree with, I kind of like the idea of, you know, federalism and 50 laboratories of innovation and all that stuff.

There is something kind of particularly uniquely different about immigration. And again, generally speaking, I'd be fine with states exercising more control over immigration. The issue becomes that we kind of we basically have kind of like this system where there's an agreement between the 50 states that you're allowed to freely travel.

there aren't going to be checkpoints between California and its neighbors. And so therefore, if Texas and Arizona want to close their border and California wants to leave it wide open, just to use an example, to use an extreme to paint an example,

Well, that kind of isn't just a decision California is making for California, because now that people are in the country, they can freely enter anywhere else in the country from there. And so it just makes the situation a bit more complicated.

But to the other theory question that I was kind of getting at before, I do think that there's a tendency, and I think that this is something that left libertarians get completely wrong. And I think more just like liberals and leftists tend to get wrong too. But when you see... So first off, Gavin Newsom can say it's under control. It's like, I don't know, dude, when cars are on fire in the middle of the road, I don't consider that under control. So I don't know what...

I don't know that that needs any more than that as a refutation. But there is something like the left libertarians or the left liberals,

they tend to see, you go, okay, here is a group of people protesting, and they think of protesting as like a natural right or something like that, which I think is not exactly the correct frame, you know, the correct lens to view it through. It's more what libertarians and good right libertarians understand is that all rights are property rights. You have a right to protest or

On your property or on property you're invited onto, you don't have a right to come protest on my property if I do not want you here. Just like you don't have freedom of speech or freedom of travel. These are all abstractions. Tangible natural rights are based on what you own, including owning yourself, including like the most basic rights of like you, you know, this isn't like whether you rent or own property. This is like what you own yourself, you own your possessions, things like that.

And so when the left liberals will see a group of people protesting, they tend to go, well, that's their right. These are the, you know, the voices of the unheard or whatever it is they tell themselves. And then when you see police protesting,

like shooting rubber bullets into a crowd, you go, well, that's authoritarianism. I mean, here you have a group of people protesting and they're being met with like the heavy hand of the law. Shouldn't we oppose that? We believe in liberty. We don't believe in this kind of authoritarianism. But there's much like with the immigration question itself, there's kind of some more fundamental questions to be asked here.

And one of them might be like, well, what exactly do you like? What is this right to protest? And what exactly do you have a right to do? Like, do I have a right to go onto the highway and for us to all link arms and just stop traffic? Do I have a right to do that because I don't like some government policy? Do I have a right to say we are going to now protest?

quasi-kidnap these people who are in the middle of the highway and stop them in their tracks and majorly inconvenience hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps do enormous damage to the economy. Is that correct? Now, I would argue, no, you do not. You do not have that right. This is a public highway. And in this case in LA, it was in public streets. I don't think you have a right to just take that over for the cause that you

believe in. I don't think that's correct. And this is not... It's much different. It's almost as if people will treat it like if the cops shoot rubber bullets into a crowd of people, that if it hits some person, that person there was just like an innocent bystander who had

But this is not the same as like dropping a bomb on a city where the property rights are kind of very clear, like that was that person's home. And even like say like in the case of like Israel, Gaza, they'll say, oh, we told them to flee, but they're not going to flee.

even in half those times you're like, yeah, but they're trapped in like a tiny little strip of land that's very densely populated. And you know, like there's the area that you say is safe. They get shot up when they go there and they don't have the resources to move around. It's very different to tell people they have to flee their own homes than to tell someone you got to leave the middle of the highway. You don't have a right to be here right now. And to me,

As flawed as it is, as flawed as anything that the government ever does is, which includes all of it, you know, it's like this is the problem of government in general. But if the cops are coming and saying, OK, there's a group that's become violent.

They are assaulting people. They are terrorizing people. They are lighting cars on fire. They're looting. They're doing like all this violent shit. And they're in the middle of public property. And the cops come to him and say, you have to leave and you stay there. It seems to me like you're not some innocent bystander anymore. You are choosing to participate in a riot. And you may not even be like, you know, you may not be actively rioting yourself.

But I don't know. It seems pretty reasonable to me that if the whole thing has devolved into a riot and you're told that you have to leave and you refuse to, you've basically at this point now kind of accepted a duel from my perspective. Like, I don't know. I'm just saying, like,

What is it that is supposed to be done in that situation? Is the correct answer that the police and the National Guard and the state government and the federal government are just, well, they're outside. And so they have a right to destroy anything they want to.

That doesn't seem to me to be a reasonable conclusion. And it doesn't seem to me to be too unreasonable that like you're told you have to leave. You don't have a right to be doing this right now. And ultimately, we're going to enforce that. I just don't really have a problem with that. And I think the left liberals and and left libertarians, I think they get this issue all wrong. It's not the case that you just have a right to go take over public property and do whatever you want to do there.

Any thoughts on any of that, Rob? Well, I guess the only concern, I don't disagree with you, but I have this cartoonish concern of essentially a very peaceful protest that law enforcement declares being a riot, even though that there is no rioting. And then they're allowed to forcibly remove or be violent towards that crowd because they're

That's a fair point.

But I mean, I guess I do agree with you that once it is blatantly riot conditions, if you're just hanging out around the rioters, but you're not the actual rioter, it's pretty hard for law enforcement to be able to make that distinction. And the fact that you're with you're a part of the crowd does mean that you're kind of actively giving cover for the people that are doing the rioting.

And so, you know, I agree with you that kind of once it's riot conditions, you know, police should have the ability to, I guess, squash that.

Yeah, I mean, look, you brought up a very fair point there. It's just that, like, that's one error. And then on the other side, you could imagine, Rob, a scenario where there are riots and the media is telling you, no, they're completely peaceful protests. What are you talking about? And I think that, you know, look, there is something that riots provoke, right?

That is, which I'm probably guilty of right now in this conversation. It's, it's, there's something, um,

very like deeply instinctual and hardwired into our DNA for riots to like evoke emotions. They evoke a very excited emotion out of the people partaking in them. And they evoke fear. And they really, I mean, they get people excited.

You know, look, look, even with like, say, like January 6th, as you use that as an example before, there's a reason why the the corporate media and the Democrats jumped on that. And there's a reason why it was effective propaganda, at least for a while.

Until more information started coming out. But there is something they took that and they go look at this riot. Look at this video of people breaking windows or wrestling with police or this is chaos, you know, and there's something very deeply rooted in humans to not want chaos.

Nobody wants that, you know? And of course, the same thing was done on the right about the riots in 2020. Now, obviously, we could sit here and analyze this and go, you know, the riots in 2020 resulted in like dozens of murders and hundreds of assaults and billions of dollars in property damage. So like they were a little bit worse than January 6th or something like that. But the bottom line to me is that riots...

are never justified, never justifiable. There's, you know, well, look, I guess I should say with the caveat, riots against governments could be justified. It's never a wise strategy unless you have more overwhelming force than that government or almost never a wise strategy. But riots on private property are just simply never justified or never justifiable. And so, you know,

Again, you're left in a bad situation with nothing but bad options. But it does seem to me that the worst of the bad options is to say, well, they started rioting and therefore we can't lay a finger on them. That just, to me, doesn't seem reasonable. And then the other thing I would mention, because this is, again, it's kind of taken me back to five years ago, but one of the things that

I think it's almost like sometimes people get too hyper-focused on politics. I know, I'm one to talk. But sometimes people get so hyper-focused on politics that they kind of cast aside human psychology.

And it's almost like everything should just be treated at face value. Like this is a political statement and nothing more. And I remember, um,

I was listening to, uh, to Cornell West who, you know, like, yeah, you know, I, I, I'm sure I would disagree with Cornell West on quite a number of topics, but he's like amongst lefties. He's kind of one of the lefties that I like a bit, you know, he's like, he's kind of good on the stuff you expect a lefty to be good on. And he's, um,

You know, he's not a coward, and I appreciate that. Anyway, I'd probably very largely agree with Cornel West about Israel's destruction of Gaza, for example. We'd probably really agree about the Iraq war, and, you know, there'd be issues that we would agree on. But I remember seeing an interview with him after, you remember when the guy lit himself on fire to stand up for the Palestinians or something like that?

And he gave this whole interview afterward, and he was talking about how the guy was a hero and that he just believed in the cause of the Palestinians so much and that he saw all this human suffering. And so he had to make a statement or something. And I remember just listening to that and being like, oh, dude, no.

You've got this all wrong. This was a crazy person with severe mental health issues. Okay. That's who like, that's who sets themselves on fire. And then since they are burning up for a while, it's not, it's not just like, Oh, he believed in the cause more than other people did. You know what I'm saying? Like you're missing the whole thing. If you think that's the case. And likewise, I think it is often been treated as a given that,

That when people are rioting, they are rioting over the stated political grievance that this maybe a protest started as. But like, all you have to do is go watch some videos of riots and just think about human psychology and groupthink and things like that.

before you just dissuaded of any of those notions. It's not true. Like the George Floyd riots had nothing to do with George Floyd. Nothing. Now, I'm not saying that the people protesting with picket signs earlier that day had nothing to do with George Floyd. There's a connection there. It's still not quite as much of a one-to-one connection as some might try to make it, but there is something to that. But like, by the way,

By nightfall, when every single night the George Floyd protests are turning into a bunch of teenagers looting a Nike store, those teenagers are not looting the Nike store because they are concerned with police brutality. The two things are not even related. It's pure opportunism. It's excitement and thrilling and a social activity. And it is a...

like a social status thing where young men can let off steam and demonstrate their fearlessness and they can, you know, get attain resources, you know, like get the new pair of Nikes. It's like these are the type of things that are going on. And you see it again just in some of the videos I've been watching of these riots. It's like, OK, I'm sorry. That part has nothing to do with immigration, simply has nothing to do with it.

It is just not about that, you know, and that you see all the pundits on the news trying to be like, this is the fear that the Trump administration has put it. Like those people don't look very afraid to me. These don't look like people who are afraid of the law. They look like people who are setting a car on fire because it's going to make a really loud boom.

That's what I'm seeing, you know? And so I just think like, as much as this is like the most basic, simple point, it's almost something that 99% of the coverage of this is completely missing. You know, like, it's like, no, dude, this is a scene. This is an event now. This is, and trying to, trying to analyze these things politically makes about as much sense

as like trying to politically analyze a really violent mosh pit at a concert and go, what do you think this is? Is this a comment on fiscal policy? Like, no, it's not. This is a comment on young people wanting to go wild. You know, it's like a thing to do, a place to hang where there's a little bit of danger and a rush. And, you know, you're going to break some stuff and maybe leave with a new pair of Nikes. Like that's what we're witnessing. Not,

political. It's human on a different level. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Cornbread's Hemp CBD Gummies, the best hemp CBD gummies out there. Cornbread's Hemp CBD Gummies are made to help you feel better, whether it's stress, discomfort, or just needing a little relaxation. They only use the best

part of the hemp plant, the flower, for the purest and most potent CBD, formulated to help relieve discomfort, stress, and sleepiness. All products are third-party lab-tested and USDA organic to ensure safety and purity. I gotta tell you, I love these. I've used them for sleep, and they are wonderful, so definitely go check them out. Right now, part of the problem listeners can get 30% off their first order. Just head to cornbreadhemp.com

dot com slash POTP and use the promo code POTP at checkout. That's cornbreadhemp.com slash POTP promo code POTP at checkout for 30% off. All right, let's get back into the show. So I just wanted to say that any thoughts, Rob? On that note, there's this great book. I recommend it to everyone. It's a real thin pamphlet. It's called a crowd.

And it's one of like the earliest works on propaganda. And he's got a piece in there where essentially he talks about how in riots people will do things that they would never personally do, that there's some sort of an energy to the crowd. So like, for example, I would never be so violent as to stomp on some guy's head.

but if in the course of a riot seven people are kicking a cop who got pulled down you might catch yourself doing that because you're kind of bought up into the energy of what's going on and you've kind of almost uh you're almost like in the crowd hypnosis where you're not making uh your free i mean you still have free will but there's a capturing of the energy of a crowd so

While I agree with what you're saying, there is a little bit of like the moral excuse of, oh, we're going to protest George Floyd. And then that gets amplified, too. And that gives us permission to now break into this Nike store where I think you're mostly right, where it's young individuals who are like, this is a thrill. But sometimes if you give people like a little bit of a moral excuse for why they can go engage in these activities, the people that would like to engage in those activities will hop on it. So

Believe me, there was no librarian yesterday who decided, oh, I'm so upset about these deportations that they went and they lit a car on fire. There's a guy who spent his entire life wanting to light his car on fire, and he finally got his excuse of like, oh, this is now for a cause. But that element does, the element of it being somewhat for a cause is, and things escalating that enough people care about it that you have the cover to do it. It still is a bit of a root ingredient.

Yeah, no, so sure, I don't disagree with that, and I do think that that's a fair point, and that's also part of the reason why it's so dangerous to have a culture that hands these people this kind of like moral get out of jail free card, where it's like, oh, you're the good guy now, unquestionably, and the fact is that

even if you're on the right side of an issue, you don't get just like a blank check to do whatever you want with being on the right side of that issue. Like you can still become the bad guy there. So I think that's a very fair point. Now,

What is political is what the response to all of this is going to be and what the impact this is going to have on, you know, the Trump administration, his ability to govern, his ability to get his agenda through. I will say so far from what I've seen.

There certainly are the voices who are going as goofy as they went in 2020. I've already seen a couple people post things about how the riots are the voice of the unheard type shit, which is all just so fucking ridiculous. You know, it's only because people are marginalized and oppressed that they have to loot a Nike store. It's like, no, I don't actually think that's true. But...

But it does seem more broadly speaking that there's much more hesitation to do that than there was in 2020.

There's been a huge cultural shift in the last five years, bigger than any cultural shift I've ever lived through in a five year period, for sure. And the you know, if you remember, this is part of the thing that brought the Kamala Harris campaign down, not the entirety of it, but this was a big factor in it was that in 2020,

there was just a different atmosphere and democrats really seemed to believe that like the woke shit was going to work like that this would not come back to bite them and so they were on record saying a lot of these things like standing up for the right i mean literally there were pieces titled the case for looting like people were writing pro-looting columns in 2020 um

Anyway, what I was saying about the Kamala Harris campaign is that this is why Kamala Harris in her 2020 presidential campaign, she got on the woke side of every goddamn issue. And this came back to bite her in 2024. But she was, oh, illegals should get health care. You know, we should decriminalize illegal boarding crossings, gender reassignment surgery for prisoners, you know, all these things that they were able to hang her by.

that she was on board because at the time it seemed like, oh, this is where we're going. We're going all in on woke. It seems to me like there is a hesitation from the establishment to kind of go that hard in on this. But I do think that the temptation is still there and that, and this is probably part of the reason why Donald Trump took the action that he took. I think that the,

This is my guess. Again, I'm guessing to some degree here. But I do think that one of the things that held a lot of people back from supporting Donald Trump in 2020 and to a lesser extent, but still a very real one in 2024, was that people went, look, when that guy's in there, the left loses their fucking minds.

And we don't really want to live in a country where half of it loses their minds. Like, that's not good for anybody. But now that Trump is back in, that might have been a good enough reason to not support Donald Trump, even though you recognize it's not entirely his fault.

but still you didn't want to. But now that he's back in there, I do think you're going to see this type of chaos is incredibly unpopular. And I think that the people who are being seen as siding with that or justifying that are going to lose the political argument ultimately. I think this is actually very good for the Trump administration politically because they are on the side of, you know, it almost in a way,

It it it gives them a cop out like it lets them get out of actually defending their immigration policies. And instead, they can just go, you can't take over city blocks and burn cars. We can't allow you to do that. That, to me, is a very winning political argument. It's a winning human argument.

Who, how many, you know, like who disagrees with that? It's always like, okay, yeah, I understand you disagree with that when you're 19 and you don't own anything. Like, okay. But what adult actually is like, okay, with just burn it all down. It's always unbelievable when you see someone in a suit and tie on TV supporting burn it all down. Like you're like, shut up.

You wear a suit. You don't mean this. Nobody, even those people, they'll only support it when they think it's a comfortable distance away from them. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Moink Box. Longtime sponsor. I absolutely love this company. If you're anything like me, you are a little bit wigged out by the meat at your supermarket. Even when it says organic or grass fed, you never really know what you're getting. And the ones that don't say that, you know, you're not getting goods.

That's why I love Moinkbox. They go directly to small family farms. Their business model is simple. Moink meat comes from animals raised outdoors where a pig is free to be a pig. Their farmers are given an honest day's pay for an honest day's work and they deliver meat straight to your doorstep at prices you can actually afford. Born, raised and harvested.

right here in the United States of America. So now you can support family farms and you can get the most delicious meat you'll ever have by joining the Moink movement. Go to moinkbox.com slash POTP right now to get free wings for life. They're the best wings you'll ever taste for free, but this offer is for a limited time only. So go check them out at MOINK.

O I N K B O X.com slash P O T P that's moinkbox.com slash P O T P. All right, let's get back into the show. Um, so anyway, I guess that I felt like that should be mentioned in there as well.

I think that's a good point, because if you remember, the pitch of Biden was a return to normalcy. And I think that there is a silent majority that just likes normal and not having chaos in the streets. And I think it's a hard sell right now to go that Donald Trump is provoking this by, I mean, ICE raids on factories,

It's not unheard of in this country. It might not have been something that was happening over the last even eight years, but I remember there used to be, because it just made, it was on my radar, but like Roboshkins used to be this major kosher meat corporation. I remember they once got in trouble for having too many Mexican workers, and it was like a bit of a scandal at the time, and I think there was like a raid on their meat processing plants, but I remember hearing those stories. It wasn't unheard of.

that ICE agents would show up to places with too many illegal workers and that they would get in trouble. And right now, Donald Trump does have a mandate. Listen, I don't necessarily agree with the deportation policy, and I don't necessarily agree that there isn't room in this country for a lot more cheap migrant workers. I know that's not particularly popular even with our audience that thinks that our entire economy should be American jobs and more money in America and more made in America.

But I think if you actually, I mean, I'd like to dig into this topic more. I'd like to learn more about how farms are operating and the need for the immigrant labor. I know it's certainly true. Every hotel I'm in, it doesn't seem like most of the cleaning staff is American workers. The restaurants I've worked in, it's typically not.

all American workers in the kitchen. So I don't know how many industries really need this and to what extent we just have a nonsense policy of pretending like we only need 10,000 new workers a year, even though we have an aging population. So you know what I mean? There is like a backdrop here of a nonsense policy that probably doesn't make sense for the country. And there's probably more of a demand for actual

immigration through legal channels. But with all that said, what Biden did sneaking people as many as he could over the border was not good. It's not what the country wanted. We do need some level of deportations now to correct for that and to change the incentive structure of just sneaking in. And that comes with a better policy of who can come in here, maybe having more immigration, which I would be a fan of. But at the moment,

The public wants deportations. We need deportations. You're gonna have it. And ICE agents doing their job. I might not agree with every person they're deporting. People that have been working here for 10, 15 years that have family and taxes, yeah, make them the last to deport. Probably don't deport them at all. But at the end of the day, you're gonna have some level of deportations. Donald Trump, it is legal for him to go ahead and deport these individuals.

You can't point to then the riots and go, "Oh, he can't do that because there's gonna be riots." That's not, you can't have a government where you can go ahead and change policy. You know, I don't agree with the drug laws in this country, but if they decided to go take down drug manufacturers with large plants of pots in states where that's illegal or maybe even legal, yeah, you can work on changing the policy, but you can't go riot and protest because they're doing what's legal.

Yeah, well, it's right. Exactly. And look, it's kind of the same. It's the same logic that gets you to like oppose like a horrible war or something like that. Like it's like, look, no matter how horrible a policy is and take take drugs is a good example. I mean, it's essentially institutionalized slavery. You're fucking enslaving people for the crime of possessing or distributing a plant.

but I don't get to go burn down my neighbor's car because I'm furious about that. It doesn't matter. I don't have a right to do that. And it's not, he doesn't just have to pay for that. It's the same thing of being like, oh, Hamas is so bad. So I get to drop a bomb on a baby. Like, no, that's not, that's, that's not sit.

civilized behavior. It's the antithesis of it. And yeah, so that's, you know, that's, I think, all a fair point. I also do think that you've, you know, however...

Look, it's a real problem to have to deport a lot of illegal immigrants. There's no clean way to do it. As you mentioned earlier, it's also not clean to just say, oh, you all get to stay here because that sends a message. That sends a message to that. It's like, oh, if you can get here, you get to stay.

And that's going to have problems attached to it, too. There's negative externalities all around here with all of these different policies. And so, you know, there's no completely clean way to do any of this stuff.

You know, it'll be interesting to see how this develops. I think also, you know, obviously if things get worse, that will change the political realities of this. If this is put away quietly and doesn't turn into a big deal, I think that helps Donald Trump very much because it makes it look like he took swift and decisive action and this didn't escalate further. But

Already, obviously, other dynamics involved in this, too, are that this is California. Gavin Newsom is the governor there. And so this is for Donald Trump, I think, in a lot of ways, as is the case with politics in general. This is people like to choose the theaters in which they fight.

And for Donald Trump now to pick the fight over immigration against California, against Gavin Newsom, where he's on the side of immigration controls, of law and order, and Gavin Newsom at least is in the eyes of many put on the side of sanctuary states and chaos in the streets.

It seems to me like that's a real winning side for Donald Trump to be on. I would argue that Gavin Newsom is on the side of, hey, it's all fine. What are you talking about? There's no homeless problem. There's no energy problem. There's no fire problem. There's no jobs problem. We do the best job in California. No one's ever been happier. So good luck with that sale, Gavin Newsom.

Yeah. And, you know, there was one other thing I wanted to mention earlier, but it was I was kind of thinking about this and I'd be curious to what like David Stockman's feelings on this would be. But I do you know, we we live in a statist world.

Um, the, the, you know, it's, it's interesting because the fight right now being between the U S federal government and the state of California's government are, you know, the, this is a fight between the biggest government that's ever existed. And then the B and the biggest state government in the United States of America. These are big governments that make a way more decisions and are involved in way more things than they ought to be.

But, you know, when you talk about kind of like this demand for labor and typically speaking, what you are talking about is, you know, day laborers, factory positions, farming, you know, agricultural work. Okay. So like you have immigration policy that is set by the government. It is not set by the market. Okay. Additionally to that.

We have a lot of other policies that are set by the government. One of them is school and college that is, okay, maybe not entirely set by the government, but largely set by the government. And I mean, even amongst like,

Even within homeschooling, in many states it's regulated by the government. Not all of them. But certainly government, you know, public schools are a huge force in schooling and college is essentially a government program, including the private colleges. It's all backed up by government loans and it's heavily regulated by the government.

And then you have child labor laws, which are imposed by the government. And I will say, you know, it's a somewhat controversial take, I suppose, but I do think that child labor gets a bad rap.

I know that you can read about some example of like, you know, a 12 year old in a factory in 1890 or something like that. And like, oh, my God, look how horrible it is that they were mistreated. I think that typically when people in the current day look back at that stuff, they look back at it completely stripped of any of the historical context.

People think that child labor was a creation of the Industrial Revolution. You know what I mean? It's like, oh, they built these factories, and then all of a sudden these 12-year-olds had to work these jobs. What do you think the 12-year-olds were doing 100 years before the Industrial Revolution? What?

just laying on a lazy boy recliner or something like that. Like it's like, oh, they were doing much more grueling, backbreaking agricultural work. The factory was actually a step up from where they had been from before the industrial revolution for all of human history, all of human history with almost no exceptions, perhaps like royalty or something like that. But for

the norm for humanity was as soon as you are able bodied, you start working because otherwise people starve. As soon as you hit puberty, you get married and start having babies. Like this is how human civilization worked. And so it's a, we kind of like cherry pick the,

the 12 year old at a factory and then it's a very statist like myth because then you look back and you go oh my god look how bad things were until the government came in and wrote a law when the reality of it is not that at all the reality is like no look how bad

all of life was until we produced our way out of that. Like until we created enough wealth where it was like, oh, we don't need everybody to start working as soon as they're able-bodied. We don't need 13 year olds to get married and start having kids because, oh, everyone's not dropping dead. You know, like, oh, okay, you can wait a little bit. Anyway, I say all of this to just say that like, you know, I think I was 12,

When I got my first, like maybe not official, but I think my first job was I lived in an apartment building and the woman who owned it gave me $10 a month to take out all the trash. Like it was like a big thing of trash in the back for the entire building. And then I had to like lug it all to the front and put it on the corner. And like, I just thought that was awesome.

It was good for me. It was, you know, anyway, I guess my question is just like, we have this whole society set up. This is not an organic function of the market at all. This is totally like top down imposed by the state that kids are not supposed to work. They're supposed to just do school.

They're supposed to just be a good little Prussian soldier from age five to age 21 or something like that. And that like all of, and therefore, once you take that as a given, you're like, okay, well we need this grueling work to be done. It can only be done by illegal immigrants. But like,

I kind of think that's what kids are for. And I'm not saying like all of it necessarily, but I just, I don't, this is kind of like a controversial view, but I actually like, I'm actually a very loving kind of peaceful parent guy. But I think that particularly for like teenage boys, it's not bad to have a job in manual labor. It's not bad to do some grunt work. You can get paid

a very low wage because it's not really about the money for me when i was 12 getting 10 bucks a month was huge that was awesome and like i just now okay this was 90s dollars you understand rob so it's a little bit more than than 10 but i'm just i'm just saying that like i think this is another element to that that piece that's kind of missing too that i'm not even saying this with certainty i'm just kind of saying like maybe it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world

if we had some of those jobs done by American teenagers. Maybe it's not the best way to organize a society to say, no, we're going to keep men as adolescents until they're 35. Like maybe it would actually be better to have 14 and 15 year olds get their hands dirty, do a gritty manual labor job. And you know, then by the time they're 21,

they've got some life experience they're a little bit more of an adult you know okay yes they haven't you know taken a course in feminist dance theory but they have had you know like seven years of on-job you know experience anyway any thoughts on that Rob yeah cue the headline Dave Smith wants to put the six-year-olds to work well I'm very I'm very lucky Rob that I don't have to worry about having controversial opinions

Yeah, well, I agree with you. I worked at scattered manual labor jobs when I was in high school. I remember my roommate's senior year got like a job in a deli like over the weekends. And suddenly he just had some spending cash and was also maybe he was making 10 or 11 dollars an hour. But, you know, I didn't do that. But I was also like, hey, that kind of rolls. So I agree. I listen. I don't know about the...

I mean, maybe a 10 year old sweeping up wherever like I certainly could have worked more in my youth and the couple jobs that I had here or there on my summer vacations or moving jobs that people I don't know. There's something nice as a young dude when you're working with your hands and actually working versus sitting in school. So, yeah, I agree with you that there's probably more opportunities for that.

Yeah, I'm not even arguing. I'm not even making an argument here. I'm just kind of like saying I think it's a question that's worth asking. Put the kids to work is what I'm trying to say here. All right, listen, that's going to be our show for today. Enjoy yourself out there, Robbie. I will meet you out in Salt Lake City on Friday. Hope to see some of you guys there. Really had a great time last time we were out there at this club. So looking forward to being back. Wise guys, Salt Lake City, Friday and Saturday. And where are your shows, Rob?

Yeah, so Reno this Thursday, and then I'm with you Friday, Saturday, and then Sunday headlining Wise Guys Las Vegas. And then next weekend, I've got a road trip, which is Rochester, New York, two gigs in Canada, one outside of Montreal, and one near Albany. And then lastly, busy guy, run your mouth, still cooking, but I got a new podcast over at Zero Hedge. Not quite sure how often or regular that's going to be, but I did incredible interviews with both...

mish talk and with david stockman real deep economic stuff with guys that really know and understand it uh so i think this audience would really appreciate those insights and it's on the zero hedge channel so go uh go give that a follow give it a nice uh like and you know do the things absolutely and congratulations again on that new show i will make sure to uh share it on on social media uh all right guys thank you uh very much for tuning in catch you tomorrow with a brand new episode peace