Paul Krugman believes Donald Trump has a simplistic and misguided view of trade, where he thinks selling more to another country means 'winning' and vice versa. Trump has consistently advocated for tariffs, ignoring warnings from economists and Wall Street. Krugman expects Trump to follow through on his tariff threats, which could lead to significant economic disruption, especially given the integrated nature of North American manufacturing.
Krugman argues that the North American manufacturing sector is highly integrated, with components of products like cars crossing borders multiple times before final assembly. Imposing tariffs on Canada and Mexico would disrupt this supply chain, leading to catastrophic economic consequences. Additionally, other countries may retaliate with export taxes on essential goods like oil and uranium, further escalating trade tensions.
During Trump's first term, he imposed a 20% tariff on China, which was a fraction of U.S. imports. While the impact on inflation was minimal, Krugman warns that the tariffs Trump is now proposing—25% on Canada and Mexico—are roughly ten times larger in scale. This could lead to a full-blown trade war with significant economic consequences.
Krugman believes Biden's economic legacy will be viewed positively in the long term, comparing him to Harry Truman. Despite high inflation during his presidency, Krugman argues that this was a global phenomenon driven by COVID-19 supply chain disruptions. Biden's policies, including the Inflation Reduction Act and CHIPS Act, focused on climate change and industrial policy, which Krugman sees as significant achievements.
Krugman believes politicians should listen to economists, especially when they warn of negative outcomes. However, he acknowledges that economic policies must also consider political realities. For example, Biden maintained Trump's tariffs on China for political reasons, despite economic advice to repeal them. Krugman emphasizes the importance of balancing economic expertise with political pragmatism.
Krugman is uncertain about the direction of U.S. fiscal policy under Trump, especially given conflicting statements from Trump's team about slashing the deficit. He notes that significant fiscal changes would require cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid, which would be highly unpopular. Krugman suggests that the U.S. needs to increase revenue, but he doubts this will happen under Trump.
Krugman argues that cryptocurrency has no legitimate use cases but is widely used for illegal activities like money laundering and ransom payments. He highlights the inefficiency of moving large sums of physical cash, as seen in the case of Assad transferring $250 million in cash to Russia, which weighed two tons. Cryptocurrency, by contrast, allows for the movement of funds without physical weight.
Krugman believes Biden's industrial policy, including the CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act, could have a lasting positive impact. He sees these policies as creating durable economic changes that even a Republican administration might find difficult to undo. For example, subsidies for green energy projects have gained support from Republican lawmakers whose districts benefit from them.
This week: Paul Krugman may have ended his iconic New York Times column but he’s still going to tell us what’s going on. Felix Salmon) and Emily Peck) are joined by Paul Krugman) to get wonky on global trade, discuss the relationship between politicians and economists, and examine the economic legacy of Joe Biden.
In the Slate Plus episode: Favorite media of 2024.
Want to hear that discussion and hear more Slate Money? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Slate Money show page on Apple Podcasts) and Spotify). Or, visit slate.com/moneyplus) to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Jessamine Molli and Cheyna Roth.
**Disclosure in Podcast Description: **A Bond Account is a self-directed brokerage account with Public Investing, member FINRA/SIPC. Deposits into this account are used to purchase 10 investment-grade and high-yield bonds. As of 9/26/24, the average, annualized yield to worst (YTW) across the Bond Account is greater than 6%. A bond’s yield is a function of its market price, which can fluctuate; therefore, a bond’s YTW is not “locked in” until the bond is purchased, and your yield at time of purchase may be different from the yield shown here. The “locked in” YTW is not guaranteed; you may receive less than the YTW of the bonds in the Bond Account if you sell any of the bonds before maturity or if the issuer defaults on the bond. Public Investing charges a markup on each bond trade. See our Fee Schedule. Bond Accounts are not recommendations of individual bonds or default allocations. The bonds in the Bond Account have not been selected based on your needs or risk profile. See https://public.com/disclosures/bond-account to learn more.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)