House Majority Leader Scalise on DOGE & The NYT DealBook Summit 12/05/24
35:53 Share

Bring in show music, please.

Hi, i'm N B. C. Producer katy cramer today on squad highlights from the new york times deal book summit, Andrew r. Sark and sit down interviews with jeff bases fed chair drone power prince Harry.

even OpenAI CEO sam, all mood asked the .

world's biggest thinkers on the world's biggest issues, like former president bill clinton on the backlash against diversity, equity and inclusion.

diverse group's light, Better decisions and how .

much and assurance stood and bitcoin hits one .

hundred .

thousand dollars. Finally, I have a you D I didn't .

talking a dee plus house .

majority leer Steve coles on efforts for unity in the new congress.

lowering energy cost, lowering food costs, securing america's border, all those things we deliver if we all vote together.

It's thursday, december fifth. Twenty, twenty four squared begins right now.

Stand back to buy and three, two.

one carefully.

Good morning, everybody. Welcome to school box here on cnbc. We alive from the antec market site in times square. I'm back a quick along with joe kern and Andrew a sorkin and Andrew, welcome back. Well done.

Thank you. IT was a crazy day yesterday. Trouble talk a lot about tens and tens of new.

a huge names. You were talking to a standing .

I I made happy. I am drinking my coffee and enjoying IT me going staring. Now past one hundred thousand dollars.

You can take a look, one hundred and two thousand dollars right now. And just yesterday at the deal book summit, a fed chair, Powell, said this about bitcoin. People use bitcoin as a speculative asset, right? It's it's like gold.

It's just like gold only. It's virtual. It's digital.

People are not using as a form, payment or store of value. It's highly valuable. It's not a competitor for the dollar.

It's really a competitor for gold. It's that's really how I think I tell you that comment onto itself, I think was um a move. I'm not really just for him, but for washington.

I mean, I don't think you've seen a lot of policymakers exam. I think this this new administration obviously thinks if IT may be as gold, but we could talk about store value, whatever that is. But this the idea that if you talk to Janet yelling in the old days, or you benberry n nai grun views about crypto.

but if you get people graduating ly to admit that, is that to .

be something like go.

go.

be the most basic store .

of value for four thousand years? But when you ask them.

I think specific listening to IT think you ask them. Finally, is this like the dollar? And this point was, no, this is not a currency, not a dollar. People are aren't using IT to go out and buy things.

but IT is much more to to go infinitely divisible. Same as why .

would you so but why would you use might .

not always be that?

no. But for now, I .

never used no.

you got the .

point where IT really did just match the devaluation of of the currencies and then got to the point where it's where IT is, where I don't see we wanted be alive when you get to twenty one million, that's not till two thousand, one hundred and fifty.

See russia sounds like they're kind of advocating for IT now too, after being pretty .

and I the U. S. Really moves toward things.

I was trying to talk to j about yesterday. Dolls me. really. What is on the question of whether there should be a big coin reserve? Right, right.

And what that would mean, and if you do start having this funny, was IT wasn't in venice villa. What was the country l. salvador? When l. Salvador first said that they wanted to have bitcoin. There are a lot of people, by the way, including myself.

So blame me, who sort chine?

What's going on here? IT worked out to work out.

but not that the gold. If you can go back, you can say that a suit in ancient, whatever civilization you pick, whatever a suit costs back then was about announced go to this equated to oil IT. It's been probably the most consistent store of value in a way of representing work or what everyone to say gold had. So to be compared to golf, that's like the highest praise every years.

I also say, and I know five, I don't know, have sounded IT, but you know kenric in from citi, al has the opposite view.

Here's the problem. I own canvas is covered with oil. Canvas probably cost fifteen box. The oil paint probably costs twenty dollars, thirty five dollars, sort of net cost, some of these paints for tens of millions of hours.

Who am I to judge? crp? Ta, of course, I wish i'd bought something that trades at one hundred times the Price of traded in a few years ago, right? We all, we all have the al and just universals part of human psychology like there's always what do we miss out on, right? And the number two is what I don't care for about cyp du is what problem is that solve for our economy?

He doesn't understand. Bitcoin says.

why doesn't he try to do?

He says, just not for him. He said he prefer to buy art. I mean, literally.

that he had get that far into IT to understand the nature of money that is really just there. That used to be shells on the ireland. If you did an hour of work and somebody else an hour of other, you all keep a distributed ledge, you all keep the same letter.

What everyone else did in that way IT represent, it's a beliefs. M, no, it's not. If you have to make.

it's mabe you to believe in that. You believe I have read that you have to do you didn't.

then you read the bit. And yes, and that didn't help you. So I feel like I yes.

we have been talking about IT for a decade.

So you see that money has always been represented by these.

I think it's a fascinating i'm not telling you it's a terrible thing.

but why have you thought IT is a store of value for so long?

Because he has been IT is because because I .

think it's a five thousand dollars for one hundred and two thousand always been a value IT just happens .

to fluctuate a .

lot and that fluctuate a lot stocks.

But that's not a that's not when this first was uh, developed and talked about he was talked about as I could take IT IT .

exactly why know but you're not going to pay IT IT and you can even say the dollar is not valuable because the dollar twenty years worth twice as much as what it's worth today. So that's not a store of value either.

But why you get back to somebody like .

a kingdon who because I don't think is he said he .

doesn't understand IT if no.

no stand, I think he doesn't know. I think I think saying he doesn't understand IT like it's in the context.

but I think there's a lot of people that have not done the work.

but that's what makes a market. I mean, that people think .

what makes a market is big, the market, but there's people that I mean, I wish you know now because I believed in IT, I had I could have, you know, participle participated. I could have partied IT all. You could have ten million dollars right now if you had just bought a little bit IT at one hundred dollars or at a thousand dollars.

And there a lot of people who did.

There are a lot of people who did.

Meantime would take .

five things. I was a believer and I didn't, and I didn't take a in.

We were to believe back then. No.

I was a believer at four thousand.

I think you were believer closer to like six years I bought so IT four or we bought them before OK or when I came down, right?

But I my average cost was eight. I .

book, let's talk about some of the things that took place yesterday because there were a couple of big themes at the deal book summit, including this person elected downal trumpet, as you might imagine, came up multiple times a can griffe signed up a chi and jeff is were among the leaders that offered an optimistic view on the incoming administration and what it's going to mean for business .

and the economy in america. Open for business again, the endless amount of regulating and litigation induce processes from the bide administration is over. It's over. So when i'm with a group of american executives, whether it's some telephonically IT from the consumer space they are, where do they voted for trump? Hr, for Harris, from a perspective of building their business, they are smiling from ear to ear because they know they cannot focus on creating value for customers, on creating jobs, on growing their business and and prospering rather than having to deal with just the endless on slot, a pointless liberation of pointless regulation.

And in my conversations with them, he's definitely very focused on american competitiveness, particularly in technology, including A I um look, I think there's a real opportunity in this moment. Um one of the constraints for A I could be the infrastructure we have in this country, including energy, the rated which we can build things. I think there are real areas where I think um you know he's thinking about and committed to making a difference.

I'm very hopeful about this is he seems have a lot of energy around reducing regulation. And my point of view, if I can help them do that, i'm going to help them because we do have too much regulation in this country. This country is so set .

up to grow.

by the way, all of our problems, all of our economic problems, like if you look at the deficit, I mean, you know the dead, the national dead, and how gigantically IT is, is a person of GDP. These are real problems and their real long term problems. And where you get out of them is by outgrowing them.

There was an optimism, a sense in the question of courses where will be in year to work. But interestingly, you know, i'm talking to can many of the others even to buy terrorists and some of the things we think of as a the great new uncertainties. And I think this issue of regulation, even more than anything else, is sort of the thing that front and center of the idea that, you know, the tips may or may not happen.

They may or may not happen when they happen, who knows? But this is the one thing you do know if there is a certainty ugly enough IT, is the likelihood that the regulatory regime that we've been living under is going to shift or at least lesson. Now what that looks like, I didn't think .

we know that there's some I think something dippolito he's gonna president, know you might as well, but he said there's nothing .

you can do about .

IT I think other there suddenly a lot of people do wake up to, oh my god, maybe maybe a py namic was not so great with all the regulations and thought, I mean, the the economy did find, but maybe we can do much Better and a lot of people that probably didn't vote for triple IT.

IT would scares me, reminds me of davos from a couple years ago, where a lot of the same people that we're not supporters of present truth sudenly over there, even in europe. But was I got, here comes the savior of capitalism and then the pandemic, like two weeks later, in fact, we I asked truth in that interview about IT was january twenty first. And IT was the same day that I think the world health organization admitted that there could be human.

Human transferred is the same day. And one there had been one person came to washington state, and that was the first case, and that was all downhill from there. Now I hope no, I hope not. But but whenever we get on where twenty two times earnings, so but maybe we can grow like basis may be we can grow in the twenty two times earnings.

I think back to when we used to have jack welch on the program and he talks so much about regulatory or like the overhang in washington, how much trouble that caused for business along the way. He just talked about the idea if you could slice a lot of those things. So this has been kind of a quest for business for rent for decades and decades. But now the reality of potentially having a president .

who is going to and but there are also is the issue. Look, there's an india o craic issue, which I think each of those people that you do saw have business in front of the president. You will. And I think there is a very strong, if you can be them.

join up and of tim cooks relationship.

I want to to be single out.

I think, in time, not the president yet. And you're hoping for the best. There is a honeymoon period and we'll see. And I think now there's a lot of hope.

So IT goes all the the executives who have made their way to I go, the people and I think would .

have been easier as maybe for us as a network, maybe cover more positively the the possibilities of of capitalism being analyzed and deregulation and lower taxes and all the things. I just think we're on the wrong side of trade. And I and i'm glad that I you know, it's not easy, it's not easy. It's not easy to to have been sort of hoping for this outcome in the chAllenges paper. You i'm saying I think that everybody.

he's got a different role in this.

which is that I think but I think he was a new to be .

embrace I .

think a few embrace you, embrace capitalism. If you're pro business and not in a business, I just think that I would have been much Better too. I think.

for Better or worse, that the role journalist is to be professional skeptics. Hopeful ly, not cynics but skeptics. That is that is the gig. I don't know if it's that you .

a lot that cause you a lot of ley to just be what we seen the mainstream legacy media big through this entire election process and and I don't think they be proud of A.

I don't um let let me continue with a little bit more um from yes yesterday IT was two years ago this week that OpenAI launched a ChatGPT um at the deal book summit to O M talking about issues around safety, the company's relationship with microsoft in the future of agi. But a moment that stood out was when I asked all about elan mosque, the lawsuit that was filed against OpenAI and how he feels about all this. Personally.

I grew up with elon as like a mega hero. Um I thought what elon was doing was absolutely incredible for the world and i'm still, of course, different difference but not i'm still glad he exists. And not not just because no, I mean that genuinely not not just because I think he's like companies are awesome, which I do think um but because I think he like at a time when most of the world was not thinking very ambitiously, he pushed a lot of people, me included, to think much more ambitiously and i'm grateful is like the wrong kind of work but i'm like thinkers and positive about that.

Then as to altman about elon most influence, given his relationship with present electrum.

I believe that pretty strong, they may turn out to be wrong. But I believe pretty strongly that elon will do the right thing and that americans be profoundly unamerican to use political power to the degree that elon has IT to hurt your competitors and advantage your own businesses. And I don't think people will tolerate that. I don't think elan would do IT. Um I IT would go again, lots of things not to like about him, but he would go so deeply against the values I believe he holds very dear to himself that i'm not the word about .

IT and that was just the beginning of all this were going to share you a lot more of deal book a and h. So many different headlines and over the just trying .

to figure out what he had to say about elan, trying to figure out where he thinks there aren't these of this wall that you're going to hit with different things along the way, which was interesting too.

because, you know, he talked about how there isn't a world. There is a big debate. Obviously, I right now about scaling, he talked about how he said, no wall later in the day sound dark.

He can say wall, but he said limitation IT gets a little harder. So this can be very interesting to start to see how these things play out in the backlash on the topic of D. I was a big topic of conversation at the deal book summit. Want to show you alphabet CEO, sunder, per chi and former bill clinton and talking about these topics.

Our employees have a uh, strong noise in the company. I've always seen IT as a source of strength for the company. So I don't see there's a power dynamics, sly. I actually think it's restarting with a lot of employees to right. I think you know the employees are also looking for they don't want always like know in a workplace, right to be starting on personal.

You just think you got so out of hand that everyone IT had a own back.

I think a business separative people want to have impact through their work. Um I think you know we can survey. We see people are happiest when they feel they are being productive and the work is being important and they are doing well, right? That firms other things, right? And so, so in some ways, maybe the set of factors coming together, but I do feel it's not like I don't see this as a imbaLances between us, our employees. IT doesn't feel that way.

The one thing I believe is that diverse groups make Better decisions, an imaginary ones. And I just think, and I think you could prove IT, I think you could fill this very favorite space with all the studies that have been done showing that diverse groups like Better decisions and margin source do. And that's what D. A.

Is to me. So is very interesting. I thought in a way, you saw two views there, right? You saw a sunday on one side where they were very much in in the D.

I. camp. And I think IT was a bit of a both the the business imperative issue, which changes things, but also almost an internal backlash meeting things went so far internally. Some of these issues that I think there was actually snap back among the people inside IT wasn't just a set of a top down situation. I think there was so much pressure across current pressure.

But what was so interesting to hear bill clinton say, former president, we know he's, but he spent the last decade more now with the clinton global initiative, which where he's been working with companies and pushing companies to pursue causes, uh, all often times around esg issues and the issues, and his view was not walk away from IT. He was like leaning to IT stop wise everybody because he thinks that sort of the winds blowing one way. So everyone's going this way now, meaning the backlash is happening. And he said, if you if you're believer, you're looking if you're but you shouldn't be with the way that take away away .

believer and where we want, where we want to get, obviously. But if if what you're doing to try to get there is actually kind of productive, you need to face that and you need to realize that your own efforts to actually counterproductive to getting there to where you want. That kind of got ten there.

We all have watching. That was James carvel, who work to get bilk lin elected and what he has had to say about some boy's things. He said, the reason you're in this position is because of what you've done with this.

There is the goal focus on the economy. It's the economy. Stupid was his famous tagline and then picked up and was.

so we all want to get there. It's just you don't want to do things that turn people off so much as you end up further away from the goal and where you started. And and that definitely has happened. I think social media.

of course, has come under increasing scrutiny. Issues of safety and the impact on mental healthy was a topic that we talked about yesterday with printer ry, the duke of susi s he's been focused on IT in his recent work. Um some cases have been a victim of IT and that's what he said about IT at the debt summer yesterday.

Shareholders are the ones that really are are are are in are in control. And i'm sure their parents, i'm sure, hope hope that they would agree that the kids need to be kept at safe. But again, one of the things I guess is always puzzled me is that we live in an age now, or we have done.

If this goes back to the the tabloid era, tablet era, specifically the conversation we are having about tables that you guys all heard, that we have elements of the mainstream media, legacy media elements, not all elements, trying to redefine public interests for their own personal interests. And at the same time, we have social media companies trying to redefine free speech for their own personal interests. And what shocks me, or what fascinates me, is the fact that that's not a conflict of interest because it's so clearly the the loudest voices, other people who are really deeply brought into making sure that things move the way that they want them to move.

I have enough time to talk enough about this, but there was this was fascinating because on one side, this goes the whole information, disinformation, free speech issue, censoring, non sensor. good. And so what? What is the right answer? Because there are so many people who want .

to protect you, want to protect people right from.

And and what is? What is misinformation or disinformation? Because and he goes back, we were talking about maxara berg, which is, you know, he was thought he was doing the right thing during covered, for example, and down ranking through the algorithm, certain types information.

But he has now come back out and said. And so there's part of the public and maybe we were time, but maybe this this election actually might to suggest something. Part of the public is saying, don't sensor anything.

I want all of IT and i'm smart enough to figure out out myself. And then there's another part of the population that's clearly saying, actually, no, no, no, I only want you to show me the stuff that's actually real. But then the question is.

what's real? real. And he has the experience having lived through some horrible things .

that I don't know if you have zero tolerance for, that you're going to have to move to no vana to some type of because it's never .

going to be perfect.

I think unity know. I want to see most everything, and then I want to make my, my own decisions. The U.

K. Is not going moving down a super soup. You've seen what what is getting jail time over there.

I mean, saying things that some of the things you are just talking about that if you had said something about covered, if you had said some you're doing time perhaps over in the U. K. Or or what's that's why you got to pick your poison. You want to see everything, including what's totally made up, or you just want to see what what people want you to see and go to jail.

You say that about what they're supposed to see. We got to do whole thing about, oh, what has australia under sixteen years old? They are saying, you can't know social media. What's the right answer?

My kids who told me stuff that I.

your kids .

aren't under sixteen? No, no. But that they look, they act, they are and I act like I am. So I mean, age has nothing h has nothing to do with IT. Next.

coming up on squad pod, the dose how house majority leader's receives collects the new department of government efficiency as pitched by the incoming trump administration.

We're going to a be work in hand, in hand and you we want to share a lot of those ideas, the things that we've uncovered along the way. We also want to make sure that is their identifying things. They're getting those to us quickly ly, so that we can put some of those items in the law.

This is small pot pop an enter.

Q, you're watching square x right here on C, N, B, C, M. Andr b next joins to .

talk about the government funding later this month, president elect a, trump's latest picks for his administration and the new department of government efficiency. Let's welcome houses. Majority leader I, Steve skillets from lizz.

Ana, uh, good to have you on. Uh, leader skillets, thank you morning. Good to be back with you.

Want to get your reaction up to something that was actually said yesterday. The deck rama swami was at R C M B C. CFO council summit here is talking about potential cuts, the government spending, and then will get you away.

And is there anyone thing the president trump has told you, I want you to go cut that, you know, I think actually is looking at the other way in terms of keeping a very open mind top down to say that let's start with a clean slate, let's start fresh and everything is in scope for what count as government efficiency. It's not one part of the federal government or the other. It's actually looking at IT as a whole.

Are we respecting the taxpayer dollar in some ways, to use analogy to those in this room in the way that a CFO would look at their shareholder capital. This I mean, we've got the regulation and possibly streamline in government. How much can actually be done? Are you optimistic that we can make a difference or the doge can make a difference?

Yes, i'm very optimistic. And in fact, you know, one of the things will be talking about with the on and vevey today, a lot of our members have ideas, have been working on various committees on things to do just that, to cut government waste, to identify, root out a lot of efficiencies in government. And we're going to be work in hand in hand.

And we want to share a lot of those ideas, the things that we've uncovered along the way. We also want to make sure that is their identifying things, they're getting those to us quickly so that we can put some of those items in the law because there will be some things president trump can do on a zone through executive water. There will be some other things that we're probably going to need congress to pass through, let's say, budget reconciliation, which is a bill we're working on already for january with president trumps transition team.

So that, that conversation has been going on for months. But this addition with doge, I think so many people are very encouraged by the idea. Look at a fresh ing idea that we're going to actually make government work Better and make your taxpayers go further.

There are party seventy five percent of federal employees here in washington that still are not showing up to work under the exclusive of coffee cove has been over for years. And yet you might wait right now months and months to get a passport renewed. Some people are waiting years to get a tax return process from three years ago because those employees aren't showing up for work. So it's hurting families all across this country. Know those are the kind of inefficiencies we're going to be looking at all across the board.

How much can be done without an actual legislation? And in the reason I ask is you you just noted that there may need to be some legislation. What's the house gonna a look like at this point? I've seen you know with some of the appointments and some people living in some close results that we still don't have yet, if you can believe that. But do you expect the the overall environment to be any easier for for anybody to get anything down if you have a one vote or two vote margin in the house.

right? We we're going to settle in probably at two hundred and twenty one republicans in the house. We have the majority, you know, whether it's a two seat, you know some months because of people that are going to be pulled out of the house into the administration, it'll narrow down probably for a few months to have out a one seat majority.

And we're already working on on recognized, by the way, earlier this year, we were out of one seat majority and we still took care of our business of that then. So this isn't new for speaker Johnson myself. The rest of our leadership team, IT makes a chAllenging make no mistake, I mean, we'd all take a twenty seat majority, but that's just not realistic.

I wish states like california would learn how to count like every other state where you can get the results of the election. On election night, not three weeks later, they're still counting. But at the same time, whatever the final numbers going to be, republicans will have the majority in the house and senate president triple be in the White house.

And we're already working with president trump. I was on a call, senator, soon the new majority leader coming in. We're all working in sink to make sure we deliver for the american people.

Well, you remember that I mean, I was, I just, I was a rock's caucus the last, the last two years. And you remember the freedom of fair. yeah.

Do you remember the freedom side of things? They could be different. Now with trump, can he turn the screws on some of those those guys I don't I wasn't sure what they held.

They were trying to accomplish other times I know exactly what they want to accomplish. But um will they be as outspoken and IT I was IT was a difficult to satisfy all their concerns. And we do have budget talks coming up again. Will that not be the case with president trump, the head of the party? yes.

Look what we've already have in some of those meetings now for what's going to happen in january. We're not going to wait until then to start working through what we know we're going to be real chAllenges. But we're listening not just to freedom caucus members we have on the other side of the spectrum, we have members in those swing districts, the fifty, fifty districts that have different views on some of these issues.

We're here in all of them right now. Listen to him. And but we're also making a clear to everybody, let's say, when we're at a one seat majority for a few months in february, march, April, we're all in this together.

IT doesn't happen. And and we talked about very specific things that we will deliver on for the american people, like lowering energy costs, lowering food costs, securing america's border, all those things we deliver. If we all vote together, if if three people think they've got a Better idea and they're just going to vote their own way, then IT won't happen.

And so I think everybody realizes, okay, look, now the time to put your ideas on the table if you have a different approach. But at the end of the day, we're going to all come together in president trip is the leader of our party, and president truck has a very clear plan. He ran on very specific things.

And Frankly, most of us ran on those exact same things in our districts. So all across the country, I think you're going to see, you know, the Mandate that was that was Carried out by voters on november fith is going to be Carried out by this new congress starting in january. We're going to hit the ground running at school.

I guess, is what we do. We've actually had we've been interviewing for a health financial services and we've had andy bar on. We've had french l and I can't believe we get done in the weeks of that extent, but we do.

Who should we be open for? Who do? Who do you want? how? Like, IT is an important post and IT .

makes a difference. Yeah, look, andy. Andy in the mix. French as well as bill has singer and Frank lucas.

So you ve got four great members that are on the committee today that are running for the chairman with patron. We can we retire. The good news is we've got great choices.

We're going to make that pear carefully. Next week. The steering committee is going to be meeting next week and that, that will be one of the first ones we take up.

Energy and commerce is one of the other big committees that has an opening. These openings don't come around off. And although at least on our side, on the republican side, we have six year term limits for chairman.

On the democrat side, you might serve twenty years. And so the Younger members see no path to become in a chairman. Here you've got some real viBrant, energetic members that now have a chance to get the gavel on a real important community like financial services.

The other of nominations that we've seen or picks from a president electrum for the cabinet, who are there going to be some that don't make IT all the way through? We don't have to get specific. But do you think everybody that, that is now up for a position is going to be successful?

I hope so. I mean, look, we've been a couple of people drop out already. But you know, if you look at the people that president troops pick some of more, more traditional people that have the kind of background you would expect, but then some people are are foxed. President trop is pulling out of different walks of life, and that's what's made him so successful in business.

President trop, remember, came here in twenty seventeen as a business man, was not in government at all, and he brought a lot of different people that helped us get things done, get the the economy moving again, that understood the economy surely Better than some of kind of typical washington people. So when he make some of those picks, know, I think you see some of those people that have been around washington for thirty years kind of scratch your hand go og was that's not somebody who I see walter in the halls of congress every day. That doesn't mean they're not onna make really good cabinet secretary.

And so what everybody should do is just your mouth, and that's what they're doing right now. They're going around meeting with senators. All of these picks are meeting with senators and having one on one conversations so that the questions asked, a tough questions. Share the vision and and recognize that you got a lot of different people from very different walks of life that are going to add to this trump s administration. But the ultimate goal is to get the country back on track, to get the economy moving again, the lower inflation and lower costs for families and secure the border.

That's our focus, is everybody's focus. And quickly at a year from now, will you be same well, and speaker Johnson says this, speaker Johnson says that that's gonna the case with your prediction.

Yes, I surely make that prediction. And you know, speaker Johnson has been A A very effective leader and has the respect of our members. He listens a lot, which is an important trait for a leader.

And with our conference. Especially all the different factions, you know, to keep us together on really big critical things for all the, you mentioned IT early, we had our chAllenges, but we also delivered very big things. Hr, one, a great energy.

bill. H, R, two, a great border secure. thirty. Bill hare, five, a great bill for parents, bill of rights.

We're going to keep delivering for the american people will have our differences. The democrats do too, but we come together and deliver for the american people. And now with the unified government, january, we're going to get this country .

back on track. The democrats don't have. They are like the board collective. They're always saw that that that 这 样子。 I think you should be envious of what well.

they just got to defeated because they were solid in the .

wrong direction. If you heard rockers caucus before, and I come up with that, if you heard that before.

we ought I go by the website quick before somebody scooped IT up?

Yeah, it's like new.

Normal make t shirts.

Rocket is a right. Thank you. Like this, please.

All right, thank you for listings. A squab today, squabs is hosted by joe carnon beckie k and Andrew ross san tune victim mornings on C N B C S sexy sten. And to get the smartest takes and analysis from R T V show right into your ears, follow square pot. Whatever you get, your podcasts will be right back here tomorrow.

And we are clear .

bank guys.