There was a time when sunshine brought us back to the brightest days of our youth. When midday picnics reminded us of simpler times and vibrant gardens reflected innocent romance in full bloom. It was a time of remembrance. It was summer. This summer at Biltmore. Plan your visit today to experience Tutankhamun, his tomb and his treasures. Kids visit free all summer long.
History's masterpieces wouldn't be the same without their most notable accents. Neither would the Kia Sportage without its multiple drive modes. The Kia Sorento without its expansive 12.3-inch panoramic display. Or the Kia Telluride without its three rows of spacious seating. The 2025 Kia SUVs. Kia. Movement that inspires. Call 800-333-4KIA for details. Always drive safely. Limited inventory available. ♪
Hello and welcome to the Bullard Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller. Delighted to finally welcome an entrepreneur, an investor, a film producer, former owner of the Dallas Mavericks, Boo. He just wrapped the final season of Shark Tank. It's Mark Cuban. How you doing, man? Good, Tim. How are you doing?
I'm doing pretty well, you know, with the obvious caveats applying. The Nuggets aren't in the finals tonight. Well, I guess we're taping this on Thursday, so the finals might be over by the time people hear this tomorrow afternoon. And, you know, the world has gone mad, but my life's good. How about you? You know, same, right? I mean, the Mavs aren't in the finals.
Nothing else would matter, right? What else matters? You got the number one pick. All right. I've got so much on a pick your brain on and limited time. So we'll just try to move through it all. I guess since we're doing the Never Trumper podcast, I just I kind of want to start with the Trump report card from you. I mean, you're you're for Kamala and for Hillary, but you try to be a straight shooter, which I appreciate. You know, you'll you'll give him you'll give him something. I don't like to hand it to him.
You know what I mean? I'm reluctant to be. It's like that old drill meme. I'm issuing a correction. You don't got to hand it to the terror group ISIL. I feel that way about Trump. But how about you? What kind of report card would you give them right now? Just, you know, across economy, foreign affairs, etc.?
So when I was campaigning for Kamala, we said we were going to shut down the border effectively. Right. And we talked about how the new plans from Biden have reduced the numbers so that they were lower than Trump in his final month, etc. He's done it. He shut down the border, you know, and so he deserves credit for that.
He said he was going to change the conversation on DEI. I don't think he understands what DEI is. And so I don't know how much he's actually changed other than a lot of copypasta and search and replace. And obviously, there's been times when, you know, there's been economic impact where a
programs have had to be shut down. But I think generally across the country, I don't think he's had dramatic changes on corporations, but he's done what he said he's going to do. Right. So that's two. Yeah. No Harvey Milk on the boat anymore. Sorry, Harvey. Yeah. And so third, I say deportations. He's done it wrong, but he's done it. I think
We get confused a little bit on deportations because he puts everything on tape and he makes everything an event, which amplifies it. But at least the last numbers I saw, he wasn't deporting as many people as Joe Biden. I think that's changing a little bit the last couple of weeks. Well, I think he's tried to make it seem like it's changed, right? And he's certainly done a lot of high profile work.
attempts at deportations, for sure. But then he walked it back. I mean, where the greatest numbers were, you know, farmhands, you know, working in service industry. The deportation thing is very important to me. So I just like, part of that is because Joe Biden gets credit for like,
He didn't shut down the border the first three years, right? So the people, some people are coming across the border, then they're getting turned right back around. So that's a one. Right, of course. You know, that counts as a one. No, I understand the counting thing, right? And so that number, right, so now Trump has fewer, but he's doing more of like the raids of like random businesses and people that have worked here a long time. So no, look, when I was out there for Kamala and I talked to businesses, and I would say, do you want somebody walking in the door asking you for all your I-9s
and then going in and then taking those phone numbers and showing up at people's homes, and we're going to have Elian Gonzalez day in and day out. So he said he was going to do that, and he's done it. I don't say that I'm agreeing with it, but he's doing it, right? And I think he's made a lot of mistakes in his approach, etc. But then again, he walked it back. And the numbers show, at least prior to that, that he wasn't even hitting Biden numbers, which obviously freaks Stephen Miller out a lot.
So that's three. Number four is what he's done on crypto and with the SEC. And I'll separate those two. Crypto, put aside his grift. That's ridiculous. The Trump mean coin, like literally when that Trump mean coin came out, I emailed the CEO and the people I knew at Coinbase and said I was embarrassed to be a customer of Coinbase because they were trading it.
He's allowed to do a meme coin. More power to him, right? The sponsor of the military parade, you mean? Coinbase? Yeah, those guys. Official sponsor of the military parade. You know, you got to kiss up to the audience of one. But that said, I am a fan of crypto and I think there is utility for it. But how Trump has done it with the meme coin is ridiculous. That's for A, I guess. For B is the SEC.
The SEC was a mess. And, you know, I truly believe Gary Gensler cost Kamala the election, but that's a different conversation. But just generally, the way the SEC has historically done business, and look, they came after me for insider trading. I beat them in about three hours in a trial. Literally, in the time it took for lunch, that was it.
But their whole spiel has been you litigate to regulate, meaning you don't tell anybody what the rules are. But if they believe you broke the rules, then they're going to sue you anyway, which is wrong. And this guy who's in Kamala when I was out campaigning with her and with talking to Doug about it to come as a smart lawyer. And we had this conversation. You need bright line rules in the SEC so people know what they can and can't do when it comes to starting or running any business.
Bright line rules, I think, will reduce the number of infractions and lawsuits because people know what they can't do. The new approach, that's what they're doing.
So those were his wins in my point. All right. Let's hear about the negatives. Where do you give them some L's? Oh, my God. Just no leadership, you know, no ability to make a decision, still listens to the last person he talked to, is excluded from the big boy conversations. I mean, the list is long. Economics. Economics.
How about your wheelhouse? I mean, he doesn't understand tariffs, but you know, I just look at it a whole picture. I, what you're doing is he's putting together this, this bill on the Hill. That's going to raise interest. I think this is like, appreciate it. And I want, I wonder your take on this.
because the first term he did some pretty traditional Republican economics and took a lot of credit for it and pretend like it was his magic business apprentice skills. But it was like kind of the same policies that Mark, what Jeb would have done, right? This time it's been, it's different. And the environment's different because of interest rates and a bunch of other stuff globally. So we've got a debt busting bill that's going to increase everybody's interest rates combined with tariffs that is going to increase everybody's costs combined with deportations and a culture of fear that is, that is going to affect the workforce and,
Like you combine all that shit together. And I mean, it feels kind of status quo-y to Biden, except for in certain industries like right now in people's lives every day. But I don't I think it's going to start feeling worse for people not too long from now. But already is starting to feel worse, right? There's two economies in the United States right now. There's all the small economies.
towns and cities and states, they're getting torched. Everything that they do... The forgotten man, you mean? The forgotten man, exactly. Yeah, the real people that, you know, working on farms, the people who do beef, you know, that do cattle in Nebraska, all the states that have to balance their budget now find themselves short because of all the doge cuts or all the office closings.
or the people that are laid off. They're all in deep shit. Like one of my fun pastimes is to look at small town newspapers. So like I'll get the Parkersburg Sentinel, I forget what it's called. And I'll just go reading through it because they'll write about the things that are impacting their local community. And I want to understand where the impact that Doge is having or is not having just to check my whole card. And literally, you know, the Daughters of American Revolution museum type thing, that money that they got from the states,
gone, right? The buildings that housed, you know, Social Security or, you know, in Parkersburg, West Virginia, it's a town of 29,000. And, you know, there's the Treasury group there that has 2,000 employees and I don't, you know, at least 125 have been fired. But all these small towns, particularly red towns, are decimated and it's only going to get worse.
And I think they're going to have the hardest time with all the economics. And even from a terrorist perspective, you know, when something goes up in cost and you have to ship it to a small town, it's a lot more expensive to ship it to a small town. So they get double whammied. Whereas the blue towns that are the bigger, more urbane and consolidated cities, they're going to get hit less. New York, L.A., right? They'll have an impact there, but it's not going to be nearly as bad as the small towns.
Have you ever wanted to learn more about wine but can't figure out where to start and don't have the Cuban budget when you're going to the wine store? Well, I've got the answer for you. This podcast is sponsored by Naked Wine. This is 2025.
are you still shopping for wine like it's 2005 naked wines is a service that directly connects you to the world's finest independent winemakers so you can get award-winning wine delivered straight to your door use our code the bulwark for the code and password at nakedwines.com and get their incredible deal of six bottles for just 39.99 for me i'm not really a wine man you know more of a bourbon or a
Kind of a micro brew, Colorado boy. But it's just nice to have wine bottles around the house. You never know. Somebody's coming over. My parents like wine. Want to have something with their care. We get invited to a dinner party. Want to have something to taste out. Naked Wines has been a great solution for me for...
Making sure we have wines around the house, affordable, couple different varietals, test out different things. You can tell them what you like. It is a wonderful service. Couldn't recommend it more. Naked Wines has been around for over 15 years, funds over 90 independent winemakers around the world with no commitments or membership fees. You can enjoy Naked Wines hassle-free, and you can pause or cancel at any time.
Now is the time to join the Naked Wines community. Head to nakedwines.com slash the bulwark. Click enter voucher and put in my code, the bulwark, for both the code and password to get six bottles of wine for just $39.99 with shipping included. That's $100 off your first six bottles at nakedwines.com slash the bulwark and use the code and password the bulwark for six bottles of wine for $39.99.
I want to do a little bit of going back, unfortunately. You mentioned Kamala a couple times as if you were in the room. And so I'm going to start here with just a little gossip at first. There was some green room gossip at MSNBC. You ready for this? I wouldn't tell you this if it wasn't pretty good. Somebody I kind of trust said that they asked you to send in VP vetting papers and you said, no, the list would be too long. Is that true? Yeah. It is true. Yeah.
Why didn't you consider? I mean, you ended up out there campaigning with her, advising her. Yeah. The second part of that, my response was, I'm not very good as the number two person. And so the last thing we need is me telling Kamala, you know, the president that, no, that's a dumb idea. Right. And I'm not real good at the shaking hands and kissing babies either. All right. Well, I don't know about that. I mean, I was talking to Pete Buttigieg a couple weeks ago and I was like, I want to, you know, give you a time machine. We're going to go back in a DeLorean. Like, what could we do different? Right.
So I want to ask you that same question, but also in the context, like if it was you instead of Tim Walls, who the hell knows? I don't know. It feels maybe different. It feels maybe different. I mean, obviously it would have been different. My personality is completely different than Tim's. My experiences, my backgrounds are completely different. I think I've cut through the shit more directly. I'm not a politician. And so it would have been different, but...
It would have been awful. She would have fired me within six days. It would have been better than present situation. Yes, it's true. But, you know, I really thought she was going to win either way. Here's what I want to pick on that. And I know you don't want to go period like we would have won if Mark Cuban was VP. And I get that. And I don't even know if I believe that. But maybe I think it would have been meaningfully different in a way that like picking Josh Shapiro or whatever wouldn't have been meaningfully different in a way that's kind of hard to predict.
But I was listening to you today with my man Theo Vaughn, my fellow Louisiana podcaster. My guy, yeah. And you did two hours with this dude. Yeah, yeah. And I listened to all of it on 2x speed. And I'm like, this is the most crazy experience ever because Theo at 1x speed is crazy. Yeah, it's wild. He's like asking about porn and gay stuff. And then you get into politics. And he's all over the map.
But at the end of the two hours, it's still hard for me to understand why he's for Trump. There's no real substantive thing. He's gangsta, baby. That's what he said, right? Yeah, his vibes. He's gangster. But look, most people just want to live their life. They want to get up in the morning with a smile and not be stressed. In my mind, the number one job of
any candidate, and this is where Trump has spectacularly failed. The number one job of any president could be to reduce the stress of the people of the country. Well, that's not working so far, at least for me. Look, there's only one thing we all share, and that's our president. Yeah. Everything else is unique to us, you know, or unique in a thousand different ways. But
The president is the one thing we all share. And having somebody who communicates trust and hope and reduces people's stress is critical. But the point being, relating it back to Theo, it's not his job to think about
all that shit. They're not going to think pragmatically about what's best for me and what's best for the country. And that's what the Democrats have to learn. People just want to get through shit and get to the game. Like, who's going to win tonight? Like, am I going out to get drunk? Where are my boys at tonight? You know, who's playing who and what's the spread?
Yeah. We're going to talk about how gay the Roman Empire was, you know, and like whether if you get rich enough, you get bored with straight sex, whatever other random shit he wants to talk to you about. Here's the thing though. And I am actually, I'm not critical of Theo. I wish we lived in a world where every single person with a platform like thought a little bit more deeply about policy. And you know, I've had a chance to meet him. Did I go to? Yeah. Yeah. I wish that, but we don't, we live in the world we live in. And like the thing that's actually important about that observation you just made is that like,
I came away from that thinking like basically he just wanted a guy that wasn't about like he's not ideological a lot of the democrats look at all that and they're like they're racist they're conservative we're not gettable and like this dude like it really much came down to he didn't want somebody that was a politician Trump's vibes were a little more gangster he doesn't like getting his finger wagged at and like that might be shallow but like that's also gettable that makes
them get and that's why I'm like if Cuban was on that ticket they're gettable right they're all gettable right look Rogan Theo the Pauls you know the Nelt boys all that Rogan I've been on they want to talk about sports they want to talk about girls they want to talk about getting fucked up they want to talk about gambling right
They don't want to talk about politics. 99% of people in this country do not want to talk about politics on a day-to-day basis. And in fact, they're trying to get away from it. So if you're going to try to connect to them, you've got to connect to them on a human level. You can't talk ideologies. You can't
ask for ideological purity. You know, you can't extrapolate every single piece of shit that happens and say, now this is going to happen all the time everywhere. That's not how most people think. Yeah. And this is, so now this is the part that makes me want to pull my hair out about them though. Because when you get to the policy, it's like,
Most of them are for like Bernie health care stuff, totally vibing with your cost plus drugs reform stuff, which we'll talk about against the Iran war that Trump might be getting us into right now. Right. And so like on policy stuff, like on immigration stuff, they're pretty reasonable. What does that mean? It means we don't know how to sell. Well, I told this to Kamala. I told it to Tim. I told it to the people around Kamala. Our problem isn't our policies. Our problem is how do we sell them?
Right. How do we make people feel comfortable with what we believe so that they will at least absorb it and understand that there's, you know, that there's something in it for them. It's just like our lives that we live on a day to day basis. The things that we eat, the things that we, you know, how we look at our health have all changed. They've changed. And over time, these things have been communicated and sold to us in different ways. And we've evolved. Right.
The Democrats have not evolved. Republicans have evolved. There is no more Republican Party. You know, it's the Trump family business. And Trump has always been a salesperson. And Trump understands that if you make people feel envious of some other group and then in turn you shit on that other group that they're envious of.
You can sell them pretty much anything. Okay. So there's another group of people you hang with that I do have a little more contempt for than the Theos of the world. And that's the rich guys. I don't hang with motherfucking rich guys. You don't? Okay. Whatever. You know, rich guys better than me. I don't get to talk to rich guys. You talk to rich guys sometimes. You don't hang with them. No. At least, you know, you at least hear from them. Like a lot of what you guys do, you know, in an investing class and all that is it's risk assessment, right? There's risk assessment as a central part of all this.
And I just, for the life of me, can still not wrap my head around the failed risk assessment from these guys. On Trump versus Biden slash Trump. Okay, I'll explain it exactly. So even when I was out there trying to talk about cost plus drops, and I went to the White House and I met with Ron Klain a little bit for a few minutes. And then I wanted to meet with Biden. He wouldn't meet with me.
I wouldn't say he wouldn't, he couldn't. Maybe he just couldn't. But put me aside. Maybe I don't rank, right? But every single business person that I've spoken to said the same thing.
that they wanted to get time with Biden and couldn't do it. And whether it was about AI, whether it was about crypto, whether it was about other businesses, you know, even Elon, when they were talking about EVs, he couldn't get in the room. So their first initial response is, this guy doesn't like us. So then the question comes, Biden or Kamala versus Trump?
The response as it applies to Trump, because I was like, I know this guy. I did a podcast with Vivek where I said, Vivek, this guy underpaid invoices. Would you ever underpay invoices? No. This guy ripped people off. Vivek might, but okay. I may not agree with him policy-wise, but he's not like that. But in any event, like I...
I use the example because that's when not long after the trials in New York were happening and Michael Cohen was talking about how Trump underpaid invoices and he was proud of Michael when he did the same thing. I'm like, I thought when Michael said that shit, maybe, you know, when you have this little stand up press conference after each day's hearing that he would say, of course, I paid everybody. No. Right. All these guys, all these business guys, I would say character is destiny.
Character is destiny. This is what you're going to get. And they're like, they would always go back to his first term. But he didn't do any of these things in the first term. He didn't do this, this, this, this, and this. And we have no reason to expect that he would change dramatically and do anything differently than the first term. Obviously, that was wrong. But that was their logic. That was not satisfying to me. It might be true, but it wasn't satisfying. It's like, oh, oh, oh, Biden won't meet with me.
I'm a master of your perspective. Trump's a moron. If Trump walked into any of those guys' boardrooms 10 years ago and was like, will you give me $50 million? He would have been laughed out of. Mark Andreessen would have laughed him out of the office. But let's take it one step further, right? So let's talk about them showing up at the inauguration and giving all that money. Why? Right? And I'm going to tell you exactly why. We are in a zero-sum game with artificial intelligence.
These companies, these five, six, seven companies are spending 60 to 100 billion dollars a year so that they could potentially win AI.
You know who had no interest in talking about that or dealing with that? Joe Biden. I tried to get Amala more pushing it, and she did. But by that time, it was already too late. They were already all in. And so if you're in a position, Tim, where you just spent $60 to $100 billion, and the requirement so that one guy with one pen can't fuck you over and end that $60 to $100 billion is you have to kiss the ring.
If the Democratic Party said, you know what, we've got this asshole Republican who'll switch. If Tim Miller goes and kisses the ring and shows up at, you know, you're doing it. You know, it's a zero sum. Well, I'm not doing it. I've got a great life at my home in New Orleans, but I hear you. Most people are doing it. I'm happy in my little studio. No, but you know what I'm saying, though, right? Because it is a zero sum game for them. I want to get to the A. I think next was literally the next thing on my list, but I just want to push back on one more element of it. Okay.
I don't agree with it or endorse it, but I get it in the period between him winning and Inauguration Day. Again, that last two months, though, it's just like you look at this guy. I mean, forget going into Andreessen Horowitz. If he showed up on Shark Tank for a crossover episode, it's just like this is ridiculous. Like the downside risk, the tail risk of giving him and imagine when he's 82. What are you going to do?
How do you change it? Okay, they could have done what you did. I guess this is my question. Why is it just, I literally would say this to Nicole Wallace who'd be off air and I'd be like, why is it Liz Cheney and Mark Cuban and you and me? Like, where is everybody else? Why didn't they do anything? I don't need anything from them. You know, I mean, they literally have hundreds of billions of dollars at risk. The future of their companies that they've spent their entire lives building is at risk.
That's why. All right. You're kinder to him than I am, which is nice. That's a good instinct. I want to ask you about the AI shit stuff. This is another thing you're more optimistic about than me. There's an alarming AI story I want to get to, but I want you to do a bull pitch for me on AI first before I get to the alarming stuff. I'll tell you what I tell every kid.
I wish I was 16 because the tools that AI provide any 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 25, 30-year-old kid to go out and start a business,
are amazing. It's like having every professor, every library, every mentor, every consultant available at your fingertips to go out and do whatever it is you want. If you didn't graduate from high school, if you never even sniffed a community college, if you're willing to spend time with all these new AI tools that are changing by the minute because you have the time and the interest to do it, you are going to have the most
significant job advantage, competitive advantage, entrepreneurial advantage. This is such a unique time in history when it comes to enabling young kids to do unique things. We've never seen anything like it. And if you believe in Gen A and Gen Z and what they're able to do for the future, put aside our age, my age, right? If you believe in them and what they're able to do, I think it's just going to be incredible. I do believe in them. I worry though about...
Just even the widening gap that we have now. Like, look, I got a seven-year-old. I hear you, man. Like, a 16-year-old who's somebody that's a self-starter, who's curious, who's interesting. Best time in the world, right? A 16-year-old who's lonely, who doesn't know what to do with themselves. Now you got somebody to talk to. Okay, Mark, that's very concerning. That's not a real conversation. That's not a real human, though. But, so...
Having access to a therapist on a marginal smartphone. Not a real therapist. Some of the research now in terms of how kids are, look, there are risks, right? There's been a kid who killed himself, right? There's been kids who get too connected to it. So it's picture poison.
Do you want a kid who's isolated with nobody to talk to at all, with no access to therapy? Now, that's a different problem and a different issue we might be able to solve in another way by getting them support or having a tool. I maybe want them at the pool.
I want them at the local pool. I want them at the community pool. Well, that's a whole different thing. Can I pick option three? No, option three is going to chat GPT or perplexity and said, I need a workout program and I need a social program. So the point being that we have a lot of problems, social problems, a lot of social problems across the entire spectrum of people, every city, every demographic, right? No ifs, ands, or buts about it. Now we can talk about what are the paths we can take to solve those problems.
And all the ones that don't involve AI are incredibly expensive, incredibly people-intensive, and really difficult to implement in any political environment. But on the other hand, what we're talking about are the frailties of AI that's relatively new. And so can we get accomplished...
therapists, accomplished psychologists, accomplished sociologists to produce models that are trusted because they define the models. I think the misperception that we have is that there's going to be this one big AI model. That's not going to be the case. Those people who are spending the $60 to $100 billion a year, they all have to compete. And each of those is not going away. But more importantly, there are going to be millions of models.
There are going to be millions of things and apps where you can say the therapist you wish you could have gone to, like this was the perfect therapist for you or your child. That therapist will have a model and that model will have the guardrails that you'd want that they would use in a face-to-face conversation. And if hopefully there's,
a reasonable price, then you can have a telehealth moment where they talk to them. AI will make that better, not worse.
Okay. There's a keyword that you had in there, guardrails, because I do want to talk about this because I would have, if we had we done this, I know this would have been a dream for me in 2007. So I would have been a pig in shit and not had the balls to push back on you. But at 2007, I would have agreed with you. I'd have been like, because I was like South by Southwest kid, very excited about all these new social apps. And you know, I've got 18 years of experience now and all of the cool stuff about the social web that I was promised, um,
Totally different, though. Part of that was because
You know, there wasn't a lot of smart regulation. These boomers on the Hill did let these guys kind of do whatever they wanted. And now you're telling me, well, what the AI gazillionaires, the wannabe trillionaires that are doing this AI, what they want right now is a president who won't do anything, who won't put any limits on them, any regulation. That concerns me a lot, given our experience in the last little round. Right. And that's fair. But the question becomes, who are we competing with?
with? What are the options available to us, right? And so unlike most technologies historically, the U.S. has just dominated. But now countries are starting to realize, France, the U.K., China in particular, are realizing that, look,
This is a race that might end up creating some level of economic and military dominance. And we have to win the AI race. And they're not going to have any guardrails. And so will there be some level of collateral damage? Yes. What it is, I don't know. Could it be worse than we ever expected? Yes. I'm not going to lie, right? But what's even worse is
is where we know there are no guardrails and nobody will attempt to create guardrails in other countries. And I'd rather have somebody who's living domiciled here, pays taxes here, whatever, has a business base here, where you can go after somebody when they've done some AI that we don't think is acceptable at any level. If you just stop it before anybody gets to innovate,
We're not good at determining where innovation will lead to. And that's the catch-22. Now, going to social media, where the algorithms have gone and the dominance by all these people who are rich, the good news is from AI is it's so much easier to create competitive applications and have different levels of communications. I think people are going to use social media less.
And I think a lot of this has just started. But in retrospect, we should have regulated the algorithms. Like you should have had a system where like you had to opt in to getting information. So I'll tell you an argument I got on Twitter, right? This was years ago. And I said, we need to use real names. Yeah. I've always been for that too. But here was the argument against it. And it made me really think, right? Whistleblower. Yeah. All that stuff. Yeah. And so you pick your poison.
And so, but now when you, you know, with Elon owning Twitter and, you know, Meta with Zuckerberg and it's all self-enrichment and all that, you know, the question becomes what alternatives can you create? The good news is we may not have to create alternatives because AI, if you've seen all the AI generated videos that are popping up,
they will dominate dominate social media because everybody's trying to arbitrage the economics and make money from it and so it's going to be really tough to know what's real and what's not real and you may not need real people to create entertainment which means that
No, don't do that because that, in my mind, I think it's going to force more face-to-face communications. I did this. I just love that in your pro pitch, it's like, it's going to be hard to tell what's real and what's not real. And that's in the positive pitch. Yeah.
But that is positive in some respects, right? Because it ends up being not a syllable. It's not the right term, but it's become so easy to overwhelm, to flood the zone, if you will, with stuff that isn't real. People are going to want stuff that is real and will want more face-to-face communications.
In business as well, when you get all these fake voices calling you as a sales bitch, it's like if you're the company that has a salesperson at least knocks on your door or shows up face to face, you're going to appreciate that. If you don't know what's real or not, you're going to want somebody telling it to your face so you know it's real and that you can trust it. I just had the same conversation with a bunch of doctors an hour ago. The number one business attribute is trust.
For any app, for any business, you have to be able to engender trust. In an AI world... In my business. Yeah, for sure, right? In an AI world, it's easier to do a lot of processes, but it's going to get harder and harder to get people to trust what you're presenting because the pedigree is uncertain. The background is uncertain. So when you try to game all these things out and look at second, third, fourth order, right?
I don't think it's as bad as you think because there's so much competition. And I think there's a positive to it, but I understand the risks.
If I convince you. No, because here we go. I haven't even got you to the thing that prompted this topic. OpenAI, in a press comment yesterday, they cautioned that upcoming models will carry a higher level of risk when it comes to the creation of biological weapons, especially by those who don't really understand what they're doing.
Yeah, that's fucked up. That's not a great warning sign. Yeah, I'm putting that in the cigarette pack. It's like, might get lung cancer. Right, yeah. Unopened air, it's like, you know, maybe a random teenager will create a biological weapon. That's a little concerning. Yeah, it's like a cigarette pack saying when you light this, it might have a blast radius of two miles, right? Yeah.
No, like I said, there's going to be unintended circumstances. There's going to be collateral damage, just like there are on the internet. Remember when the internet first started hitting, it was like, let's see if we can look up how to make an atom bomb, right? Yeah, sure. And, you know, and so, yes, all those things. And,
I would be shocked that OpenAI didn't put guardrails because it's easy to say, bomb and da-da-da-da-da. But it makes for a great way to sell yourself and get everybody talking about you. Oh, interesting. Because look at what Gemini is. And the difference between Gemini and ChatGPT is Gemini, the guardrails are too extensive.
Right. It's like Gemini is boring, whereas ChatGPT kisses your ass too much. Right. And so they've all made choices, but they're in a death war, death not being literally, to see who's going to win market share. Right now it's ChatGPT, but they might be the IBM of AI models right now. We just don't know.
I want to go back to crypto really quick. I'm so torn on this one because I agree with your kind of passing comment earlier that it really hurt the Democrats how hostile they were to crypto and Gensler. And I see it in my life just anecdotally with random non-political friends. So I agree with that. And yet, like...
needs to be regulated. And this bill that they put through Congress is not it. And I have friends that are in the crypto industry. That's only really for stable coins. That was only pretty much for stable coins. Right. So they get mad at me. I got friends that are at Coinbase at these other platforms. They get mad at me for my comments on this. And I'm like, well, there's some really legit...
Bitcoin is legit. The X is legit. Y is legit. And I'm like, okay, but if you walked into Walmart and it was like three aisles were legit products and then like 27 aisles were total scams. Okay, but let's take what you're saying. Go to Amazon, right? So one of my big things that I pushed and I tried to get Kamala, but it was too esoteric, is all the knockoffs on Amazon.
Like a bunch of my Shark Tank companies, a bunch of Shark Tank companies, period, the shows on Shark Tank, they're already on Amazon, boom, in come the Chinese knockoffs. And you probably don't know this, but if you're a Chinese company and you want to sell on Amazon, you don't have to have any nexus in the United States.
Meaning there's no paperwork you have to fill out. You don't have to have a domestic location. You don't have, there's no proof that you filed taxes on anything you make. You can just come in and fuck over as many American companies as you want. So to your point that they're, you know, even in real life products,
There's scams left and right, and that's a whole lot more expensive than even the crypto. Just really quick, though. I hear you, and that's bad, and we should have rules against the Chinese knockoff guys. But it's the business person that's getting screwed over in that case. In the crypto coin case, it's the consumer. No, it's the people. No, no, no, no, no, no. The consumer is getting a product. No, it's Tim walking in and thinking he's buying Dude Wipes, one of my Shark Tank companies, and it says Dude E.
Oh, yeah, white with a three or whatever. And you don't know the difference. Okay, gotcha. Yeah, so you don't know the difference. So if they weren't selling anything... I thought you were saying they were just making a cheaper knockoff brand. No, they are. They're literally copying it. Yeah, they're literally copying it and making a knockoff. And they're getting... They're outselling the Shark Tank companies...
And some of those start-to-end bid companies have gone out of business, right? I did at least get my Chinese wipes, though, whereas the people invested in Melania coin just lost their fucking ass. But it's their lottery ticket, right? I hate meme coins. I hate them. I hate them, right? I think they're the scum of the crypto earth.
right? It's a problem. I don't think they should exist, but the people who love them look at it as a musical chairs lottery ticket that if you know how to play the game, you can make money out of it. But we've got rules on the lottery, man. Steve Wynn and those guys, you like to get in the casino business. You can't just like have a lottery where everybody loses. I agree with you.
I hate meme coins. That's what I just said. But we have rules, though. We got to have rules, right? I agree, right? I'd have no problem outlining meme coins. Now, the crypto people would hate me, right? And they do hate me because I'm not purely libertarian on it. But I think to evolve from the pure libertarian history of crypto to get it to where it's more mainstream and easy for grandma, which we've failed at miserably so far. Look, let me say it differently.
There's been things that have worked really well with crypto and things that have failed miserably. And things that should have worked well have failed miserably. Things like smart contracts on Ethereum to create applications that truly have utility. That should have been way further ahead than it is. And the reason it's not is because Gary Gensler made it impossible to follow the rules.
Now, that's not the same case in other countries. So a lot of companies left. But when you look at the grifts, like the meme coins, like the Melania and Trump coins, that's just a grift. And there's just no other way to put it. And either you pay a whole lot of tax to grift people that there's rules, there's regulations. I agree with you 100% there. Do you worry about paranoid Tim's coming in now? Do you worry about the teal, like the idea that they're trying to move us off of fiat currency altogether? Sure.
And the risk associated with that, does that worry you at all? Yeah, there certainly is risk, right? Because I forget the name of it, but I lost money 15 years ago with this, not a bond, but it was RI something that said it was backed by the dollar. And it would never break a dollar until it did.
right, in like 2008. And this was a regulated thing. So there is that risk for stable coins. The Genius Act was the first step, but it's not the last step. I don't think people are going to take it. You liked the Genius Act? I thought it was a good first step just so we can start making the point that crypto can be regulated.
because it won't be the last regulation. But to your point, is Thiel trying to undermine the U.S. dollar? I don't think so, right? I think he knows that there's too much- Are you 100% sure? No, I'm not. Obviously, nothing about Peter Thiel am I 100% sure about, right? You know, I've only met the guy once, but at the same time, that undermines the entire economy, and that does no good for anybody. That circles me back to the Trump point, I guess. This is my whole thing of the Trump point the whole time is like,
He obviously was going to be bad for the economy to me. Like it was like his stated plans were all very risky. I agree with you. Yeah, I agree with you. Right. I mean, all the things I said when I was out for Kamala turned out to be 100 percent true. Right. I was up. I bet it a hundred. And I would tell people this and they were like, but he didn't do it before.
He didn't do it before. It's my people. It's Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan's fault. It's my people for jamming through the traditional Chamber of Commerce Republican agenda and letting him brand it, you know, honestly. Yeah, I mean, you know, again, I'll say it again, character's destiny. Donald Trump is a great marketer, great salesperson. And like a lot of salespeople that I've dealt with, he cares more about closing the sale and saying he closed the deal than following through to make sure the service is delivered.
Cost plus drugs. How would you fix the healthcare system? Easy question. You have two minutes. Oh, I only got two minutes, right? Well, first, what is cost plus drugs? You go to costplusdrugs.com and you put in the name of your medication. Let's just say you have cancer and you need a matnup, right? If this was...
Four years ago, you'd walk into a big pharmacy and that would cost $2,000 plus. Now you go to costplusdrugs.com, you put it in, we show your actual cost. What we pay for, it shows up. We show you our markup. It's only 15%. If you want it via mail order, we have a pharmacist review it for $5 and $5 for shipping and handling. And that's it. And so you know exactly what it's going to cost you for any of your medications.
And we've helped millions of people and say, I don't even know how many lives and helps all over many families. So that's part one. Part two, how do you fix health care? Right. First is transparency. That's a big part of it. But part two is you look for the leverage points in health care because that's what fucks it all up. When you think about health care, it's really simple. Right. You go to the doctor. The doctor either says you need something or you don't. If you need something, then there's only two questions. What's it cost and how do you pay for it?
That's it. The problem with health care isn't the doctors or even the hospitals. It's what we charge and how we ask people to pay for it. And a big part of that problem is because of how the whole system is set up. If you think about health care plans, whether it's ACA, whether it's Medicare Advantage, whether it's Medicare Part D or for your company, right, you've got some insurance company that's saying, look, here's the plan. We're going to change it every year.
We're going to have one plan that has a low premium, high deductible, and another plan that has a high premium and low deductible. And young people, the people with less money, always choose the high deductible and hope they don't get sick, right? But what they don't tell you is...
One, they set the deductible so high, given that most of America can't afford $400. There ain't no fucking way they can afford to pay their deductible. Now, you know who loses that money when they can't afford to pay their deductible? It's not the insurance company. It's not the company that you're getting your insurance from. It's not the ACA plan. It's the fucking hospitals and doctors that they turned into
prime lenders, you know, the guys will have to take on any risk. And so because of the plans that the insurance companies have designed where they don't pay any attention or give a shit if the people can afford the deductibles that they sign up for and the government hasn't figured out yet that we've got to guarantee it. Like we can't do single payer right now. What are your feelings on single payer? No, insane. Like the idea that we could afford that.
I liked the old, there was a, I think it was Ryan Wyden. It was an old Paul Ryan thing, which will trigger some of the progressive listeners. But it was basically just like a public option for like low income. It's like a Medicaid thing. And it was scaled up and like the higher you go. And we got that right. We kind of got that with Medicaid. Sort of a scaled up version of it. Yeah.
Yeah. First thing, Medicare for all. If you read like from all JIPALs, Congressman JIPAL's Medicare for all proposal, the first thing it says is this shall be run and organized by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Insane. So RFK Jr. is running it? That's all you need to know. That's all you need to know, right? But here's the thing, right? If we introduce transparency, just say like cost plus, everything was transparent. Right.
Then you could have cities, states, counties and say, look, here's our budget. And if we know exactly what it's going to cost and we can use scientists to extrapolate the data to figure out what our annual budget should be, then it can start just like Canada started their care programs.
Because that's what Canada did. Like in 1947, Ottawa, one of the provinces just said, look, we know what it's going to cost. We think we can cover it. But you can't do that in the United States of America until you're transparent about all the costs. And if you start doing that, the two problems...
children are the insurance companies and the PBMs because they have all the leverage, right? The PBMs control the formularies for 250 million lives and the insurance companies that own the PBMs control the plans, the insurance plans for just as many lives.
And so they have all the leverage. If you, A, divorce formularies from PBMs, they lose that leverage and you don't need them for formulas anyways. And so it goes down to a direct cost. And if you're transparent on that and the same thing on health care, if you simplify the payment terms, all of a sudden you can get to single payer, but it's on a municipality, county employer or whatever.
Did I do that in two minutes? No, it was three, but that's okay. I'm making a hard turn. It was pretty good, man. Healthcare is the hardest one. You asked me, like, what do I think about the social? My honest opinion about healthcare is, like, it seems like our current system is the worst of both worlds. Like, a more free market system with a big safety net for, like, catastrophic would be better. But we don't have a free market system. Socialized would be better. Like, our system is, like, it's taking the worst of both of the combos. I'm making a hard turn into Blue Scott. Sure.
This started because you DMed me and you're like, why aren't you on Blue Sky? My response to you was like, number one, I like fighting, as you can tell right here. And I don't want to be in a bubble just because I enjoy fighting. And number two, like, bubbles feel toxic. And like the types of fighting that happen in bubbles is not the type I like. And like people are nitpicking me all the time. And I'd rather be going across.
you know, ideological perspectives. Yeah, for sure. And like, that's my issue with it. Two months later, because it's taken us a while to make this happen, you skeeted basically my critique of BlueScar. So where are you at? You welcome aboard, but where are you at on it right now? What's the solution? I'm disappointed, right? It didn't have to be that way. They took the path of not trying to bring in new users that have different viewpoints. They
They knew that there was, they had a big base in users that wanted ideological purity. They knew it, right? I've talked to them and they started to bring in a couple of verticals. Like the NBA has got a great vertical. Econ Sky is really good. Book Talk, Book Sky rather is really good, right? But they made no effort to go bring in other people. It's not too late. I actually just wanted to kick them in the ass, right? Because it's disappointing to your point. I want to fight with the people who disagree with me and I want to have in-depth
conversations to see if i can change their minds so they can change mine i don't want to have smarmy vice president jd vance going on just to be a dick about it really i did i did though why not he set himself up you liked that i love that yes you gotta he's really smarmy about it though right so much yeah so much but it doesn't just like i know it just doesn't like it's like oh like it's like it's it wasn't a real attempt to engage though no of course not
Yeah, of course. Of course. And I even quote tweeted him and quote squeated him and said, you're lying. Right. When he talked about pharmacies paying for I forget what it was. I just quote him said, you know, you're lying. Right. I don't believe you. And that's fine. I want that opportunity no matter what the platform, because, you know, if you do it on Twitter, you're just your replies are just going to get destroyed for a month.
All right, we're going to close with rapid fire MBA, but just first I have to do it. So I'm not going to ask you the obvious question, like, cause I know, I know you're going to duck it, uh, or the two obvious questions, but before I get to either of them, it's like, so what percent chance are you going to run for president?
I know you're not going to say you're going to. Is it zero? It's not zero. It's two percent. It's zero. Zero point zero. Nill. My family, my wife repeats that because like there was the Bloomberg article that just came out and asked the question and she she someone sent it to her and then she saw it. She's like, no. What was the dumb and dumber thing? You're not even going to like be like you're saying there's a chance. There's a chance. No.
Okay. So I'll say it's not 100% zero. If all of a sudden Trump was on the ballot for a third time, maybe that would do it. What if it's his kid? What if it's JD and Don Jr.? That's not enough to get you off the couch? No. All right.
I think you're lying. Here's why I think you're lying to me. I think you're an honest person, but you showed up at the dorkiest Never Trumper conference in DC where the Proud Boys came and protested us, made it kind of interesting. I love the principals first, guys. They are great. But I'm like, only someone who at least thinks they might run for president would show up to this. No, that wasn't it at all.
It was the exact opposite. It was like, these people have no idea how to sell. They have no idea how to convince people who don't agree with them. Right. It's easy to convince people in the church. Right. Praise the Lord. We all agree. It's hard to convince people that,
The reason you'd like to go to Twitter, because it's more fun, but it's harder, right? You have to find a path in order to do it. That's why I do these things. I've done it for the Mod Squad and all these other groups, right? Because you've got to be able to tell them you can't just because Trump, you can't just say no to everything Trump does. That is not
an approach, right? Maybe it's this stop clock is right twice a day, but you've got to be able to say, okay, he was right on this, he was right on this. And you can't call people who support Trump a cult. You know, they're just...
Sometimes the truth is the truth. No, but let's talk about that, right? So like one of my buddies, when Trump first ran, I was like telling him because I've known Trump for 25 years. And I'm like, Dan, you know, guys in the mid 50s, like, why? Let me tell you something, Mark. I've been voting for politicians my entire life. And you know what they've done for me? Nothing. You know, the definition of insanity? Not really true.
Well, his mind. That's all that matters, right? It's all that matters in the mind of the voter, right? So has he come around this since Trump's done nothing for him now? No, but let's talk about that. It seems like he's in a cult then. He hasn't come around yet? It's been nine years. What has Trump done for him? You're a white guy in New Orleans, right? So just a random white guy in New Orleans. You think that because of DEI, you or your brother, your uncle, your friend didn't get that promotion. I get it. Right? Yeah, sure, I get it. So he said he was going to do something about DEI in your mind.
He did it. You have a cousin that works construction, right? He's, you know, he thinks that he's not getting higher paid jobs. He's getting deported right now. Yeah, right. But he's thinking coming into all this, right? He's thinking, I'm not, you know, these guys are on the corner and I'm not getting that work because these immigrants, right? So I want the border closed. Did Trump do it? Yeah. Yeah.
Now I want those guys deported, so maybe my wages might be a shittier job, but my wages are going up because of it. Did Trump do it? Yeah. So now tariffs. It's going to cost you more money. Yeah, maybe. But you know what? Those first three things that were important to me, bam, bam, bam, Trump got it right. And so I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt on the fourth. I mean—
Mark, that sounds like a cult to me because it's like Barack. You could just be like Barack Obama got you out of the Iraq war. Is that you're not happy about that? We got, you know, what do you have a nephew that's gay? We got a gay marriage now. Joe, you got a tax cut from George W. Bush. Like, like you could do this spin for anybody.
Of course, of course, but this is the here and now, right? And that also is the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. The Democrats always extrapolate some anecdotal scenarios and say, see, he's done it this number of times, so he's going to do it all the time. I don't think Trump voters think that way. Trump voters look at it and say, this is me, this is now, this is what's affecting my life in a simple way, right?
The Iraq war, maybe I had some family there and they're out now. That's great. Maybe we had the great financial mess and Obama helped fix it. Yeah, but that was – I don't remember back that far. Particularly if I'm 70 years old, the average age of the Fox viewer is 75, the average age. I'm not hearing any of that shit from Fox, right? And if I'm going to an SEC school, if I'm going to LSU –
Right. I'm not hearing any of that shit, right? I'm hearing, you know, all the, you know, he fixed the EI, he, you know, took care of immigration, deporting the guys who are keeping my buddies, because I don't want to go to my buddies who don't want to go to college now. And so the point being is, you have to recognize that's the reality. Like, we did the Shark Tank thing, and I went to LSU.
knows Auburn. And it was like, oh my God, they were hating on me. Like they were like hating on me because of all the Trump stuff. You could handle it. You handled it. I don't give a shit. Right. But it's, you know, it was just interesting to know. And so I really, really think that if the Democrats are going to understand why Republicans haven't just turned on Trump, like it makes so much sense to us that he should, you have to realize that he's batting 750 for
for most, particularly for white guys under the age of, you know, 50, right, or 55, he's doing exactly what he said. Unless you realize that, you have no way to change their mind. All right, have your wife call me because I hear you on that. To Rapid Fire MBA, you realize that you leaving the Mavs caused a butterfly, flapped its wings. Think about all the people you hurt. Everyone in Dallas, everyone
every Lakers hater, every tanking team that wanted Cooper flag. The bus family is gone now. Jay Moore is a billionaire now because of you. Like think about all of the impacts of that decision. What do you ever reflect on that? I mean, how insane is what happened? I have one powerful motherfucker. Yeah.
That was insane. You should have stayed. It was crazy. You should have either stayed or been Kamala's vice president. In hindsight, I would have done it a lot differently, but it is what it is. Okay. I got to do nuggets, then we'll leave. We're in a pickle, man. I feel like we're like, on the one hand, we took Oklahoma City to seven. We're one player away from being NBA champions right now. On the other hand, they got the cap. They got no cap space.
They're stuck with all these. What do you do? And we don't have a GM. Well, A, isn't it insane? We don't have a GM. And B, if you became the GM, what would we do? Help save the nuggets.
- Well, first of all, your former GM was Calvin Booth, who hit one of the biggest shots in Mavericks history. Second, why are you a Nuggets fan? - I'm from Denver. I grew up in Denver. - Oh, okay. I thought you were from Louisiana. - Yeah, no, I live in Louisiana now. I grew up in Denver. - Okay, okay. So the challenge for all teams right now is we're transitioning from the old CBA to this new CBA with the second apron, which isn't a hard tap, but it's pretty damn close. And so teams have to all adapt.
The bad news is the good teams, it's going to be really hard to keep your good players. The good news is the bad teams are going to get better a lot faster because you're going to be able to get players for less and still stay under that second threshold. So I think for the Nuggets...
They're going to have to draft really, really well. They're going to have to keep Russell Westbrook. And they need one more score. You know, they need another score. Michael Porter Jr. for two quarters for a dollar. It was tough. He hurt his shoulder, man. You can't put it on Michael. MPJ. I'm not putting it on me. I'm just looking at our options. All right. I mean, Jokic is the best player in the NBA, right? Then we got a small window. Yeah, it's not close. Not close. Yeah. And you have a long window because it's not like he's super athletic.
So he'll be able to be really good until he's 35, 36, and he's only 30. It's so beautiful watching him. It's unbelievable. Oh, he's so amazing to watch. Unreal. It's really been a joy of my life over this horrific political decade. You know what? Basketball is that, right? Ball is, do you still hoop at all? I try. I'm not, you know,
I never was that good. I was always the nerd. I was the play-by-play guy for GW's college basketball team. So I was always more sidelines. Yeah, but I do love it. But still, that's not even the point. You don't have to be good, right? Just the feel of getting out there just solves all the world's problems. I get out there with my daughter a couple times a week. We go down to the park and it's awesome. My son is 15 now. Now he's taller than me. He could finally beat me one-on-one. And it's the worst part of life ever.
ever because he talks shit like he'll have a ball even if he doesn't have a ball he'll like do a spin move oh my god he's just killing me but well i'm gonna embrace it now because i'm still talking shit to my seven-year-old making her cry after i win in horse you know and i'm and i enjoy that it's good it's a good life lesson all right i'm not letting you win in horse but tell me if i'm wrong tell me if i'm wrong going out into the backyard of gym wherever and just making some shots and watching the ball go through the hoop as good as it gets
Solves everything. You're not wrong. Mark Cuban, I really appreciate you taking all the time, man. I really am. It was fun, Tim. I really enjoyed it. All right. Come back another time. Everybody else, we'll see you back here on Monday. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace.
Dirt on whiskey It's never getting money Niggas with me Never getting money Niggas with me Sipping on Texas Dirt on whiskey Sipping on Texas Dirt on whiskey 41 shots Dirt on whiskey Whole bunch of chickens In the city On my rich hood Niggas feel Pull out banana Get the pillar
15, Vick Carter on the wing 17, 5 for a wing Every time my fuckin' phone ring Asians in China speak Chinese That bitch is in the Ville, please 100 racks on my Jane Sneeze I'm sick, 40,000 risks Quick, I'll take your bitch Slide in that seat, go
It's not again, minding niggas with me. For sure. Not again, minding niggas with me. For sure. Sipping on Texas, dunk the whiskey. Sipping on Texas, dunk the whiskey. It's not again, minding niggas with me. For sure. Not again, minding niggas with me. For sure. Sipping on Texas, dunk the whiskey. Sipping on Texas, dunk the whiskey.
Raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, raps, r
I told your bitch take off her shoes before she jump in my car. Getting head count money, that's my favorite part. A million dollars worth of cars in the front yard. I keep real niggas with me everywhere I go. 24 hours back to back in a row. The Borg Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.