We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
TDS Time Machine | The Supreme Court
2025/6/27
The Daily Show: Ears Edition
D
Donald Trump
批评CHIPS Act，倡导使用关税而非补贴来促进美国国内芯片制造。
J
John Oliver
J
John Roberts
K
Ketanji Brown Jackson
M
Mary Miller
R
Rick Santorum
S
Samuel Alito
S
Steve Carell
V
Vance DeGeneres
主
主持人
专注于电动车和能源领域的播客主持人和内容创作者。
嘉
嘉宾
主持人：我认为最高法院的裁决值得关注，其庄严程度与国家对最高法院的尊重相符。然而，有些记者难以理解最高法院裁决的细节，戈尔认真研究最高法院的裁决，而布什则不以为然。
Steve Carell：我认为最高法院的裁决很复杂，显示出法院存在严重分歧。奥康纳大法官很容易地站在了保守派一边，而肯尼迪大法官则非常犹豫。法官们的大脑在审议期间存在分歧，难以判断。在肯尼迪大法官的枕叶问题上，双方都声称获胜。布什最终赢得了肯尼迪的枕叶，从而赢得了总统职位，但这并没有得到多少授权。
Vance DeGeneres：我认为法官应被视为公正的法律守护者。人们准备与对手合作，但认为法官是受偏见支配的党派棋子。
Deep Dive
This chapter analyzes the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court case, focusing on the legal arguments, the reactions of the candidates, and the dissenting opinions. It highlights the controversial nature of the 5-4 decision and its impact on the nation's confidence in the court's impartiality. The use of medical imagery to describe the justices' decision-making process adds a unique element to the analysis.
- Bush v. Gore Supreme Court decision
- 5-4 ruling
- Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent
- controversy surrounding the decision
- impact on the nation's confidence in the court
Shownotes Transcript