TikTok Ban Is A TROJAN HORSE For Mass Online Government Censorship! w/ Dr. Robert Malone
01:00:21 Share

♪

Hey, come see us do a live stand-up show. We're going to be in Stockholm, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, London, Oslo, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, Cortland, New York, Oakmont, Pennsylvania, El Paso, Texas, San Antonio, Texas, Edmonton, Alberta, Vancouver, British Columbia, and Denver, Colorado. Go to JimmyDore.com for a link for those tickets. Hey, this is Jimmy. Who's this? Jimmy, this is Senator Chuck Schumer of New York. Hi, Senator. Thanks for calling. What can we do for you?

Absolutely nothing. You serve no purpose for me. But I still thought I'd call you a little show and let you know what we in the Senate are up to or might be up to. What's that? Making TikTok illegal. Literally banning TikTok.

That really might happen, Jimmy. Isn't that something else? The House already did it. Biden said he'll sign it. So it's really just up to the Senate. It's crazy. Insane, even. Do you think the Senate will vote to ban it?

It's hard to say. Of course, publicly, I said I want to work with the proper committees to see what exactly the right path here is, to see if TikTok really is the national security threat some people seem to think it is. But between you and me, of course, I want to ban fucking TikTok. Why? Because it's annoying. Yeah.

Everything about it, what's on it, first of all, that annoying little gloop sound at the end, all the dancing, it's stupid. You can't just ban something because it's frivolous. Well, it turns out you can, actually. Yep. Especially if it's feeding our stupid directly to the Chinese Communist Party. Okay. Also, TikTok has created the most annoying type of human beings yet known to man. Okay, I see.

What the hell type of person feels the urge to look into their phone and lecture strangers about whatever's on their mind and then develop TikTok hands from it? - What's TikTok hands? - It's a specific form of one-handed gesticulation that all these TikTok lecturers picked up and nobody realizes they're even doing it.

I'm friends with one of these women and she does it all the time. Just in person. I say, what's with the hand thing? She's like, what do you mean what's with the hand thing? I'm like, how can you not see what your hand is doing, you stupid bitch? Anyway, you know it if you saw it. Okay, I'll take your word for it. And TikTok brainwashes people. How?

jimmy a young person can spend one single solitary afternoon on tick tock and suddenly decide they're non-binary in the past that same young person would have to watch years and years of anime to experience the same media induced effect the human mind has been melting for some time now jimmy tick tock just turned up the gas i can't say i can't say i have an argument against that i guess

So anyway, obviously we're going to have a parade of TikTok influencers lobbying on behalf of TikTok and their dumb little accounts. We're going to have the biggest assembly of freaks speaking before Senate committees that we've ever seen, and that's saying a lot. I see. Thanks to TikTok, I'm rich because I taught my miniature poodles how to dance. Well, you know, that shouldn't have happened in the first place. You shouldn't be rich because of that. Okay.

I'm a drag queen. I need TikTok in order to reach out to children and teach them about drag. No, you don't. We're pulling the plug, Glenda. Sorry to tell you. I'm a stand-up comedian and people see my shows live because of my TikToks and I'm 21 years old. Yeah, that's the worst stand-up people have ever seen. In a normal world, you wouldn't even get a guest set at these clubs. Don't you think that, I mean, that's true, but don't you think that there is a free speech issue here?

Jimmy, there have always been legal limitations to free speech, as you are well aware. For various reasons, I'm adding another reason. If the speech is stupid, so stupid that it poses problems for civilization. Well, you feel very strongly about this, Chuck. This seems oddly personal for you.

You bet it is. I never got any followers on that piece of shit app. Other senators have millions. Do you have a TikTok account? Of course. And I tried everything in the kitchen sink to go viral. Singing show tunes with my granddaughter. Nothing. Tried cooking traditional Jewish recipes. Nicks. I tried doing impressions of other senators and lost followers. What do these people want? I'm sorry to hear that, buddy.

So, yeah, if I don't get to be famous on TikTok, nobody does. We're pulling the plug. Better move all your shit to Instagram, asshole. I'm way ahead of you. Oh, by the way, while you're at it, can you do something about the YouTube demonetization of my videos for no reason? Because some of us do rely on that money.

Hmm. Is China involved somehow? I don't believe so. Well, then you're shit out of luck. Okay, goodbye, Jimmy. I have to go. Some freak show named Delicioso Divine Madame has somehow obtained a meeting with my office, and I have to go get her out with a push broom. It's going to be a long week. I said goodbye. Okay, good day, sir. Good day, sir.

So you know something about, you know, I warn people when I used to work at the Young Turks before they took the $20 million from...

uh dnc donors and became msnbc light and lied to you about everything from russiagate to ukraine war to the syrian war and i and and censorship they're pro-censorship at the young turks and i warned them that

uh you know it starts with alex jones and it's going to come for you well it's not going to come for them because they're never going to go against the establishment but it's going to come it came for people it went from alex jones and then it went to leading doctors and scientists like yourself it went to leading journalists and then it went to former presidents of the united states so they can ban anybody

and take away your freedom of speech. And of course I was right. And so now they're doing this thing with TikTok.

And of course, they're doing it. They're doing it under that. Now, you know something about being censored. So I want to get your input on this story. Now, they're doing this on TikTok and they're saying that they're doing this for national security reasons, which is what every dictator always says when he censors. I'm doing this to keep you guys safe. And so I just want to tell you, Congressman Massey is blowing the lid off this. It's not what you think it is. This isn't by what this isn't just about TikTok.

So the so-called TikTok ban is a Trojan horse, says Congressman Massey. He says the president will be given the power to ban websites, not just apps. The person breaking the new law is deemed to be the U.S. or offshore Internet hosting service or app store, not the foreign adversary. So, yeah.

Let me just, by the way. What we're going to have is the hosting services are now going to become censors. Yes. And so you're, so the hosting services now, not just the Twitter or Facebook or your website. GoDaddy. GoDaddy is going to become your local neighborhood censor. That's right. And so, and they're going to give the president of the United States censors.

ability to decide who is a foreign adversary and who isn't. And I wouldn't give this current president the remote for an oscillating fan, let alone the cookie. I mean, the guy doesn't know if he's looking at a painting or the weather outside his own window. Somehow he's going to be able to decide what should be censored and what shouldn't. So here it is. He is just a paper cutout. He's just a surrogate. And it's ISA that's going to be running

this. And they've already showed their true colors. What they're going to do is use this to censor opposition. That's exactly what this is about. And so too many people... And by the way, I've met Massey in person. You probably have too. And I just want to give a shout out

He is a well-trained technical expert in his area. He's extremely intelligent. He's not some wackadoogle crackpot. This is, as I recall, he's MIT trained. This is a serious engineer intellect who is looking at what's going on as a patriot in his country,

and is speaking against the approved narrative, and it's costing him, and he still has the courage to continue speaking out. I think we need to... So that's why I'm doing it. I'm explicitly recognizing the courage and fortitude and intellect of Mr. Massey because I respect him deeply. I respect him also. He's consistent. I have certain political differences with him, but I never have to worry about...

He is consistent and he does have integrity and especially around things like this and war, which is a big thing. He answers questions. And he answers questions. He doesn't run from questions. And so here is the bill, H.R. 7521, and it says to protect the national security of the United States from the threat posed by foreign adversary controlled applications such as TikTok and any successor application or service.

And any other application or service developed or provided by ByteDance Limited or any entity under the control of ByteDance Limited. But listen to this.

So when they say foreign, the term foreign adversary controlled application means a website, a desktop application, a mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application that is operated directly or indirectly, including through a parent company, subsidiary, or affiliate. Right.

So that means any website. That's what, so that means anything, anywhere at any time. It's like Grand Theft Auto with no rules. Yeah. Go ahead. Pushback is going to be, this is restricted narrowly. That's the way it's being sold is this is one of the most narrowly written bills ever because it's restricted to what was it? By dance, the parent company. Yeah. But then it has this other language in it. This is just the same kind of nefarious stuff that,

they're doing with the international health regulations and the World Health Organization pandemic treaty right now is they'll have language in there that can cut two ways. And they'll focus on the more benign explanation. But then, you know, as soon as this kind of stuff passes, they're going to flip right around and take the more extreme interpretation and implement it.

Of course. We can't trust them. At all. That's the problem with the destruction of trust that's happened over the last four years and beyond, is we now know that we can't give these people an inch because they'll take a mile. There's a carve out in that. Do you know about that? There's more to this. So...

Um,

Providing services to distribute, maintain or update such foreign adversary controlled application by means of a marketplace, including an online mobile application store through which users within the land or maritime borders of the United States may access, maintain or update such applications. Providing Internet hosting services.

to enable the distribution. So anybody and anything, and here's what Massey says. He says, if you think this isn't a Trojan horse and will apply only to TikTok and foreign adversary social media companies, then...

Then contemplate why someone thought it was important to get a very specific exclusion for the internet-based business written into the bill. And here's the cutout that you're talking about. You know who it's for? They say the term covered company does not include an entity that operates a website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented immersive technology application whose primary purpose is to allow users to post product reviews, business reviews, or

or travel information and reviews. So why do they need to have that cut out? - It's not for Yelp. It's for Amazon to get into that business. Did you know that? - That's right. That's for Amazon. That's what that's for. - They're about to launch their thing where you could do all the stuff the other ones do. - So this guy says, so here, Thomas Massey, this guy says,

But the bill opens with, by foreign adversary controlled applications such as TikTok and any successor application or survey. And it says, bite dance. How is this broader? This guy asked Thomas Massey. Thomas Massey says, that is window dressing, as they say. Title, description, whereas clauses are not the operable portions of the bill. The operable portions of the bill begins with section two. So...

So exactly as you just explained and described, doctor, is that that's not the part of the bill they're going to use when they go to shut you down. They're going to use the other- They do the same trick with the international health regulation modifications and the WHO pandemic treaty. The precise exact same trick is they throw the happy talk into the preamble and then they get down to business and it's not so pretty.

And they're going to get away with anything that we aren't paying attention to. So the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. And a lot of people just go to sleep because they think, well, I mean, the people at The New York Times and CNN, if there was a problem, they would let me know. Of course not.

Of course they wouldn't. Of course they all want... By the way, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Fox, and MSNBC, they all want TikTok banned. Why do they want TikTok banned? Because it's a competitor. Just because they want YouTube shut down and they have suppressed independent news on YouTube because we're a competitor. And that's exactly why they want... One out of three people in the United States watches TikTok for 90 minutes a day. And they're getting their news from TikTok. Exactly.

But this is a world in which there are multiple truths all at the same time. There's no question that TikTok is a China propaganda tool, is a CCP propaganda tool. It's incredibly powerful. And so we've got a situation of half-truths and mixtures of good and bad, conflicts of interest, all as a great big broth.

And there's no, in my mind, there's no question that TikTok is a weapon that is training our youth. And it is extremely powerful technology. Is this really what we need to think about how this is being deployed, who it's having an impact on? The problem is...

is serious, but as soon as you can see it, as soon as anybody tries to make a good faith effort, assuming this was good faith, to address one problem, it all gets twisted and transformed and exploited to advance a variety of corporatist interests. We're right back at the same place we started.

So I would push back on you about TikTok. Now, I've been kicked off TikTok. We've been completely censored, as has Glenn Greenwald, as have you. So I didn't get kicked off because I was criticizing China. I got kicked off because I was criticizing the United States policy in Ukraine and the United States policy in Israel-Gaza. So who got me kicked off? China doesn't give a shit. Who got me kicked off was the CIA. Yeah.

and the intelligence community in the United States, which TikTok has bent over backwards to accommodate. And why is that? Because TikTok is run by a guy from Singapore who went to Harvard Business School, and he wants to keep his business inside the United States. So he went to the intelligence community in the United States, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, and they said, we'll censor anything. They're the most censored. They're worse than Facebook.

and YouTube over at TikTok. And so they're like, we'll censor anybody at any time for you. And to say, and so that's what's actually happening. So it's the CIA that's running TikTok. I wouldn't be so worried about the Chinese government because if they wanted to get information on United States citizens, they can buy it from all the other apps, which is what the government does anyways, the United States government. So they can get all that data online.

They could just pay for it if they wanted. So this idea that TikTok's getting unique data that other people don't have, it's not that that's, I don't, I think that's propaganda. What are they going to send a balloon to my house? What are they going to do with my data in China that my government isn't doing to me way worse? Way worse already. So that's right. So every email. Fair argument. So, so that would be my pushback on that. And so I wouldn't, so, um,

and I don't, I don't, and by the way, if China is such an enemy of us, why is it that the United States manufacturers have sent all our manufacturing to China? I can't wait to see when they, if they, these maniacs who trying to start a war with Russia, V visa V Ukraine. I can't wait to these maniacs actually start a war with China. And then we can't have anything in America anymore because we don't make anything in America. How do you,

go to war with the country that makes everything that's necessary for your country to run including our viruses now including our viruses making viruses with them and not to mention real estate and our nutraceuticals and our exactly exactly and they make our medicine right that's what nutraceuticals are

Absolutely. Yeah. So, and if they really were afraid of the Chinese, why wouldn't they ban Chinese billionaires from buying real estate in the United States and artificially inflating the prices of our real estate here in the United States so it's out of reach for most home people, regular people right now to buy a home? Millennials can't afford to buy a home. Why? Because they artificially inflate because they let

billionaires buy all the land they want, all the property they want. And those, by the way, those properties sit empty, right? So if I was, I would be for banning foreign ownership of real estate in the United States. Of course, you're never going to get that because the real estate industry has another corporate capture of our governments and they want it, right? Because it provides, everybody makes more money.

So anything. Well, I really appreciate you making time for us today. Anything. Any last words you'd like to say about the censoring regime that's happening in America and how I'm just blown away that I grew up and I thought I was a lefty Democrat and the Democrats have completely flipped. They've become pro-war. They've become pro-war.

They've become pro-censorship, anti-free speech, and they're not even for bodily autonomy. They're not pro-choice anymore. The Democrats are anti-choice. What they say is they're pro-abortion. First of all, nobody's pro-abortion, okay?

People are for keeping the government out from in between a doctor and a patient. And when an abortion has to happen, it has to happen. Nobody's pro that happening. But that's what they're left with now, Kurt, because they can't say pro-choice because they all flipped on their value when it came to COVID and mandates and they took your choice away. And so now they can say, oh, I'm only for pro-abortion, but I'm not pro-choice because they're not pro-choice. Would you agree with that, doctor?

I would. And I have really, let's say, evolved in my position on abortion also. I'm convinced that abortion is morally wrong. I'm convinced that, particularly after the second month, that this is a practice which takes the life of a human being. But I, like you, have gone on this journey of discovery and discovery

and revealing things which I never suspected and realizing that much of what I've been taught throughout my entire life, including one of the first things that I ever encountered as a young person when I was conscious, which is the assassination of JFK. I have, as a California native born in Palo Alto, raised in the central coast of California,

I've gone on a similar journey as you have, as have many people across this country. And that's the hope of RFK Jr. right now, is that many of us that once thought of ourselves as Democrat voters have found ourselves betrayed at the core, that the party has left us. And much of what, speaking for myself,

What I've found is that what I truly believe, my core belief system, is aligned with what many people now call constitutional conservatism. The belief that this constitutional document carries with it core wisdom and belief and structures that can protect ourselves, protect us from government overreach and from all sorts of forms of authoritarianism.

And I the other day, let me just share an anecdote. I was approached by Cheryl Gay Stolberg. You know, Cheryl is New York Times reporter, hardcore, did a lot of their reporting in the medicine field. And I was at the Ron Johnson testimony recently when she approached me. She's taken a leave of absence from New York Times to write a book.

And frankly, as soon as I know her and as soon as I saw her, my guard went up immediately. But one of the first things out of her mouth was that many Democrats that she knows are now completely alienated from the party and feel that the party has left them. And they're now searching for a new political home, much like what you're suggesting. And that's when I when you first asked me to come on.

That's what I was told was Jimmy Dore is somebody who has always represented a center left position. And yet he's willing to discuss what has gone on with the COVID crisis in the jab. And I was really enthusiastic about coming on because you were another one of those people who is moving through this transition and recognizing that a lot of the stories that you've been told

were falsehoods. And now we're to this point, you and I, and many, many other people across the country, particularly of our age group, we're over a certain age, the two of us, and we've come to realize that we've been sold a pack of lies for a lot of our lifetime. And it's being actively deployed through this, what we now call censorship industrial complex. And it is deep and broad.

And what I hear from SOCOM, special ops people, former PSY ops colonels, as I've toured the country and talk about PSY war is that they're pissed off. They're pissed off because a lot of the technology that they worked on for offshore combat has been turned against the American public. And that's, that's the thing that I think matters the most right now is we're in the grips of a,

a new industry. As Mike Benz puts it, they're mercenaries. They will work for the highest bidder and the technology is incredibly powerful, particularly with the influence of the internet. They can control everything that you think, feel, believe. And in that environment, when the government is willing to deploy that technology on its citizens,

The idea of fair and free elections and all the discussion about early voting and electronic ballot machines becomes moot. It's completely irrelevant because it's been proven. Google can swing undecided voters by 20 points. We are in deep shit right now.

And we, the majority of Americans, don't control their own mind and thoughts. They're not even aware of how deeply manipulated they are. And it's become normal. It has become the norm. It's been normalized. And this administration has taken it to a whole new level. God save us what's going to happen over the next year with the elections coming up.

Jimmy, I just want to point out, most normal people do not want to have an abortion, even if they maybe need to have one. That is true to a degree, but don't discount. And this is old. I remember this from years ago. Hashtag shout your abortion. There is a collection of maniacs who are very influential. They go to colleges. They get jobs in tech. And no, they want there to be abortions.

in a psychotic way that you wouldn't think is real, they openly say it. I just watched a clip of someone who, it was a trans woman who wanted to have a uterus transplanted so she could have an abortion with it. Trying to be the first trans person. That's on South Park. That's a South Park bit. Really? That happened in real life? Mr. Garrison wanted to have, it's unbelievable. That's right. They're doing things that were jokes. No, that's a real thing. When people go, like for instance, just for a,

A superficial example, when people see a movie and it's horrible, they call it an abortion.

Nobody goes, oh, no, I'm pro that. I'm pro horrible. Nobody. Nobody's pro abort. So that's the that's the pretzel that these people have had to twist themselves in. They want to still can think of themselves as being on the left when they're really authoritarian fascists and their cows and and and and they go along with mandating experimental medical treatments on their and their neighbor. And then they get mad at their neighbor. My whole thing is.

You know, the media is controlled by six companies, which means it's controlled by about 15 to 20 billionaires, the same billionaires that control the WEF, that control the WHO, which control Congress, which control your president, right? And so people in journalism no longer come from blue-collar backgrounds like they used to when I was a kid and when you were a kid. They all come from elite universities, right?

and they're class loyal, and they all know that they have to serve one or a handful of billionaire companies. And so they self-censor, they get censored, they're pro-censorship, and that's why journalism sucks so much, and that's why people have to come to places like this to get their news. And people like Russell Brand and this show, and, well, The Gray Zone, they actually do, they're real journalists, and Glenn Greenwald.

And so so they and they get then the billionaires get their journalists, quote unquote, journalists to report every story in a way that makes Americans turn on their neighbor and and get distracted by hatred for their neighbor instead of getting angry at the billionaire oligarch class that actually is creating all the problems and controlling them. I wrote an essay about this yesterday on Substack.

Go ahead, I'm sorry. I got my dogs having a little bit of a problem. I completely agree with you. We are seeing synthetic controversies, was the title of the substack. We're seeing weaponized controversy designed to fragment the body politic, specifically targeted as a weapon, as a cywar weapon. These synthetic controversies designed to drive people apart from each other.

And it's being done on a daily basis in a world in which truth and facts are entirely subjective, where whatever you feel is most important and can define reality. It becomes child's play to craft synthetic truths and synthetic controversies that can be used to splinter opposition. Just as you say, it has become so trivial.

And it is being done on a daily basis. I think that this new controversy about Christian nationalism is one of those. You see the left media talking about beating the drum about Christian nationalism and what a threat it is to democracy and freedom. And what that is, is people who are patriots who happen to also believe in God. That's the definition.

Well, also, hold on. They like to trot out these prop Christian nationalists. You ever saw that? We played it that America first kid. That's like some weird gay cult. Not even a threat to anyone except the sad young men in that group.

It's how happens them and they bring them out. Yeah, they get them off online. You trot them out Oh another Osama bin Laden. No, it ain't they've been building this fake stuff up. You said cywar I noticed you've read that thing to the memo about we need to stop psyops and do cywar Do you I'm talking about? Where we we're we're in the last stages of editing and a significant book of

on "Cywar Sovereignty and Rogue Government." That's the title. And we've been investigating the Cywar technology. NATO calls it hybrid warfare. There's a whole Cywar manual. I sent it to Jimmy. That was signed off by our current Secretary of Defense. There are divisions, Cywar divisions across the United States.

Have you ever heard of the 77th Brigade? I've dealt with them repeatedly in the UK. They're a formal branch of the British military that are basically paid trolls.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Goes to the machine commercial here is the same kind of thing. That sidewall memo. You talk about the one from 2006 that came out and it was written. I can't remember the other guy, the colonel who's on Fox News all the time back then. Now he's painted as a QAnon guy. It was him and a major Colonel Michael Aquino from the Temple of Set who was in good standing with the U.S. military. The two of them wrote this report.

PsyOps are corny and people can see through it. But PsyWar is where you give people the impression we're definitely going to win. You know how they're trying to do with Ukraine? Yeah. We're going to win. We're going to win. And they've been following this the whole time. So do yourself a favor. Don't use Google. Use one of the other browser search engines and search NATO and hybrid warfare. It is now the NATO policy position that hybrid warfare is the future.

the mixture of cywar cognitive warfare and kinetic warfare that is the official nato policy position and once you do once you go down that rabbit hole you're going to find all and i cited it in that uh in one of my recent sub stacks again uh i pulled quotes from the one that i was talking about just a moment ago uh synthetic controversy uh

The NATO strategists are talking openly in great detail about this technology and what they need to do with it and how it needs to be used. The thing is, as I mentioned, it's pissing off a hell of a lot of retired PSYOPs personnel from DoD, is that this has now been deployed against the U.S. citizens.

It's deployed against domestic population. As soon as that happens, then the whole concept of individual sovereignty and autonomy becomes completely irrelevant because the tech is so powerful. And by the way, the people that are most susceptible to this tech are the highly educated. Yeah.

They've been trained to follow authority, to respect authority, and to just go along with whatever they're told.

Well, being in debt will do that for a bullshit degree. Being 80 grand in debt, you got a lot invested in making those expertise credentials solid for all time. I completely agree. I don't have any debt. Everything on my farm is completely paid for. I couldn't have done what I've done over the last four years if I had been indebted. It sets you free. Otherwise, you're an indentured servant.

So, okay, I have a mortgage. Thanks for that. And, but, so is this, does this go back to the Smith-Montes?

Oh, yeah. And then they repealed that, right? It was called the Smith-Munt Modernization Act. Modernization. Ostensibly because it was technically illegal that we were sending baseball signals to Cuba. And we just want them to be able to have baseball. And that's why they... And it was technically illegal. Like, America would give a shit if that's illegal. And Obama signed that. And then it deployed...

I did a deep dive and did real journalism on that one also. It isn't quite that way. A lot of the folks on the right pitched this. Newsweek said it in 2011. That's the article I'm going after. But if you go in and read the CIA charter as it currently exists, the CIA has always had the authority to

under presidential direction and the director of the CIA, to engage with domestic populations. Really? Yeah. And the DOD has the authority to, the way that they are allowed to technically, without transgressing anything, they're allowed to serve in an advisory role with their side war divisions against the

Civilian populations, they're not technically supposed to deploy against civilian populations But they can invite advise other parts of the government about how to do it. No the deployment That's what was in the article. He deployed 70,000 online troops That was the big thing was deploying an actual group that goes so this is a long time ago when they were allowing this Always done it. Yeah vomit is at the center of this. Yeah, absolutely. I

which is why he gave that speech. And if it's slipped into your forgetting, go back and look at the speech that he gave at Stanford, at the Hoover, where he defended the need to censor in order to preserve democracy. And so, and they also...

In 2011 around, I think it was in that National Defense Authorization Act Section 1021 where they repealed habeas corpus, meaning all they have to do is say that you're a terrorist. And if they're now they could just say you're working for a foreign adversary, which would make you a terrorist. And so and then if you and Jimmy, if you're spreading misdismal information.

You are defined as a domestic terrorist by Mayorkas and by DHS. So anybody who says anything online that goes against the establishment, they'll say that's misinformation or malinformation. That makes you a terrorist. That means that they can now put you in jail without a trial, without a charge for indefinite detention. Pull you out of the line at the airport.

They can give you the dreaded 4S designation on your card. I mean, I'm constantly amazed every time I go back and forth between Europe that I'm not stopped.

Yeah, me too. I'm going to Europe on April 1st. By the way, we'll see you in Oslo. We're still tickets available in Oslo. We've added a second show in London. Go to JimmyDore.com for those tickets. But I'm also, in all seriousness, I'm with you on that. I'm surprised because I know they got into my phone using Pegasus, so that had to be a state actor. Oh, you are on it. I had a group that wanted me to go talk in British Columbia.

And British Columbia has legislation pending right now that would authorize fine or imprisonment of medical professionals that speak against the narrative concerning COVID. And I'm not going to go there. I'm wary. I'm really wary of crossing the border in Canada now. They have a similar bill in, it's passed the legislature in France. It's like 40,000 bucks and up to two years, as I recall.

for medical misinformation uh and it just hasn't been signed yet it hasn't been formally executed but it's passed the legislator twice that's that's where we're going just like the banking the central bank digital currency and the digital ids and the digital passports and all that stuff it's all part of the same matrix and they are criminalizing free speech for sure

And they got half the country to go along with it. They're lapping up. It's absolutely necessary to preserve democracy. Yeah, to preserve democracy, we have to do the most undemocratic things in the world. We have to censor. We have to censor dissent. I mean, it's the exact opposite of what democracy is. They project again and again and again. They project onto us that which they are guilty of.

But this is one of the fundamental principles of Sun Tzu. Yeah, of course. Oh, do you mean the art of war? Yes. Yeah. What is that? Use your enemy that of which you're guilty of. Yes. Also, it's not, you know, conservatives that you would think would, you know, that seem to get a lot of this stuff.

Friends of mine, they're all like, hey, the Quran, huh? The Quran, all the violence in the Quran. Are you shitting me? Remember we made fun of them because you couldn't just draw their profit and they seemed real primitive, but now you got to worry about going to Canada or...

or saying women shouldn't cut their tits off as kids. Yeah. Are conservatives crazy to pull that Koran shit at this point? They have more freedom in Koran countries now. They could certainly say that women don't have penises. You don't have to ask them what a woman is. It's the one in the burka. It's real simple. There's no surgery. They got an elegant solution that we couldn't come up with. Yes.

All right. Go ahead. So mis, dis, and mal information is going to be with us until we're in our grave, I fear. We got to fight against it. And again, this isn't a left-right fight. This is us against them. And that's what people need to realize today, that people from the left and people who consider themselves on the left and right have way more in common right now than the establishment media wants you to think.

and we all want the same things. We all want to end the wars, invest that money back here. We all want healthcare that doesn't bankrupt us. We all want freedom of speech and we all want a living wage and we all want a orderly border. And our children, we want our children safe and well-educated in fundamental principles of ethics, right and wrong, and basic principles

Truths, mathematics. How to use butt plugs. Yeah. No, I mean, you know, we... Go ahead. Yeah. So we have the WHO saying that children should be sexualized at age nine. What wording do they use? I believe you, but I mean, how do they say it? Like that? It's pretty darn close to that. And Tedros was confronted about that. Tedros?

And he said he was asked what data do they have to support that position? And he admitted they had no data.

This is just opinion. This is, again, this is another one of those things we feel this way, and therefore, that's the truth. Why would that guy be weighing in? So, by the way, Tedros, if people don't know, isn't even a medical doctor, and he's a terrorist, right? I mean, and I don't use that word there. It's loosely. It's an accurate description, well-documented. He was third down within his terrorist organization in Africa.

And he was part of the terrorist organization that the United States happened to back in Ethiopia. And so who whoops, who's now the head of the WHO? That guy. So that's if you if you care where your medical dictates are coming from. It's coming from a guy who was a number three in a terrorist organization, isn't even a medical doctor. Does that make sense? But he is a Marxist.

And well, I would think, by the way, that these dumb shit celebrities after the we are the world fiasco that directly harmed Ethiopia and did not help at all where the money went to his dumb shit organization so they could kill more people or just the Dalai Lama. When all the celebrities were the Dalai Lama, the CIA bullshit thing that he sucks. So they don't bring him up no more.

it's like they're perennially full. Like Neil Young, how long has that guy been alive? Well, the white helmets. Or the white helmets. The white helmets was completely, there was complete psyop. That was an intelligence operation, the white helmets. They do a documentary on him. Hollywood gives him an Academy Award. Same thing happened with this guy who did the Ukraine documentary. If you're at the Oscars, you are in dumb shit.

You don't know anything. The 20 days of whatever. Same thing. And that guy, they give him an Academy Award. Of course, because it's all... By the way, let's remember the Academy Awards booed Michael Moore when he started, when he talked against the Iraq War. That's who these people are. So don't forget it. And

So that's where your medical dictates are coming from. And by the way, we still listen to Bill Gates. Bill Gates, who is not only a megalomaniac, it doesn't take a genius to see that he's a megalomaniac monopolist, but he's also a homicidal maniac, which RFK Jr. proved because of all the vaccines he wants to give to people in Africa, which anyway, I don't even have time to go into it, but

And he's not a doctor. Why does the news media go to a billionaire who didn't even finish college? They censor Malone and let him talk. They censor Robert Malone, but they let Bill Gates yap his brain off. He didn't even finish college.

I'm sorry. Do you want to say something about that? It's because of money. That's right. It's all about the bucks. That's right. Okay. Well, again, Dr. Robert Malone, I appreciate you coming on. I appreciate your courage and your work. I'm glad you don't have debt. What's the book called? I'm glad you don't have... The old one, the one that came out a half ago is The Lies My Government Told Me and The Better Times Ahead or Better Times Coming. The new one

Is Cywar sovereignty and rogue government? I'm writing it down. Okay, I'm sorry I don't have that loaded in the program so I could show. I'm going to have to spank my producer for not having those things for you. That's okay. You forced me to announce a few things here, so good on you. Okay, all right, no problem. All right, well, Dr. Robert Malone, always welcome on the show. I know YouTube will suppress this, but Rumble won't.

So thanks again. One of our most popular videos of all time, 800,000 views, even with them suppressing it on YouTube. Dr. Robert Malone, you have to go off Google to look it up. You can't look it up on YouTube. You have to literally go find an outside search engine. Let me give a shameless plug, Jimmy. Tonight is another episode dropping of Fallout.

with Jan Jekielek, where we do a half-hour segment on Epoch Times every week, talking about all this kind of stuff that you and I have just had a good chat with. Although, with Epoch Times, I have to be a little more careful about my sources. Okay, so now tell me, where can people find that? So you have to go to Epoch Times and Epoch TV, and it's Fallout is what it's called, with Robert Moore and Jan Jekielek. And tonight's segment drops at 9.30, I think.

Nine o'clock. I just got corrected. Eastern time, western time? Eastern time. Okay. All right. Everybody check that out. And can people find a link to that at your Twitter page? I have posted. I always post on Friday the links. So, yeah, you can see that on Twitter, Gab, Getter, and True Social. Okay. Fantastic.

Dr. Robert Malone, always, thank you very much. Thanks for your work. Thanks for your courage. Thanks for taking time with us today. And we hope you come back soon. People are learning. Otherwise, why would they have to suppress you? That's right. If people weren't waking up, they wouldn't have to do this. I just think it's because they're mean. Okay. All right. So, Jim, thanks a lot for having me on. And continue to be healthy and strong.

Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member. We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show. You can do it by going to JimmyDoreComedy.com, clicking on Join Premium.

It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards. Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member, and if you haven't, you're missing out. We give you lots of bonus content. Thanks for your support. ♪

Totally tis.

So just try Take and Bake for $12 every Tuesday at Papa Murphy's. Change the way you pizza. I had a run-in on Twitter a couple of weeks ago, maybe a month ago,

the british medical journal bmj right uh they're putting together uh a series and it's about what we learned from covid right right lessons learned and lessons learned and so appointed i i just casually caught this like i wasn't looking you know i wasn't doing a deep dive or an investigative look i just noticed this that

One of the guys who was tweeting about how he was appointed as an editor for this project, this series, sponsored and published by the British Medical Journal, BMJ, was one of the guys who used to call people like me and you a conspiracy theorist because we said that the virus came from the Wuhan lab. And...

I said, so this is the guy that the British Medical Journal is? I go, has he apologized for calling other scientists conspiracy theorists yet? And of course he didn't. He doubled down. But worse than that, the editor of the British Medical Journal then tweeted that Jimmy Dore is a conspiracy theorist. And he said there's a lot of problems with medical journals now.

But being bought by Big Pharma isn't one of them, because that's what I said. I go, these guys are just bought by Big Pharma and they'll lie and tell you anything. And now the people who are lying at the behest of Big Pharma are now being put in as editors on what we know. So the reason why he was able to ding you is because you used words that are fundamentally true. You spoke truth as you understand it, but you didn't use the right words, Jimmy.

Because pharma is very clever. They don't own the journals. The journals are owned by extremely large transnational corporations that belong to the WEF, that are controlled by the usual investment arms, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, et cetera. And as, you know, right at the beginning of this, Brett Weinstein and Steve Kirsch and myself, as you may recall, sat down and had a chat.

And it destroyed all three of our careers in many ways, but we knew that was going to happen going in and we still did it. One of the things that Brett said, if you go back to that, is he speculated that what's going on here is that we think of these corporations, including media, as separate financial entities, as separate corporate entities, but they aren't.

They're all owned and controlled by these very large investment funds, transnational investment funds. And they all function not as separate corporations, but as separate divisions of one corporation. And so you end up with the big publishers controlled by these, the same money interests, part of these same consortiums. And they act consistent with the interests of their little corporations.

cabal cabal and it's so far my it's not that pharma owns the journals although as Bobby has pointed out pharma has a bunch of nefarious tricks up their sleeve like they'll buy large numbers of copies of a given edition of a journal if it has a favorable paper

So, you know, if you're the editor, it's wink, wink, nod, nod, publish a favorable article and your revenue sheet will suddenly improve. And so what's happening, and we talked about it at the very beginning of this segment before you switched over, we talked about corporatism.

We talked about its true name, fascism, or public-private partnerships is the nice euphemism they like to use. And that's what's going on is we're seeing the evidence, the breadcrumbs, the little droppings that are left that the likes of you and I perceive from time to time because we're busy looking.

And then we say, oh look, we found another little fragment that proves the core thesis and we get attacked because, oh no, that can't possibly be true. That must be a conspiracy theory. But in fact, it is absolutely what's going on is that this has all become integrated into globalist structures and these are not independent corporations. The hospitals are not independent.

The insurance companies are not independent. They're all dependent on capital. And capital, right, this is the, I like to say, this is the new golden rule. Those with the gold make the rules. And that's- Sounds like the old one too. Yeah. That's what's really going on behind the scenes in all this. It's not that necessarily pharma owns the journals. It's that pharma is owned by the same people that own the journals. Also, we pointed out,

that they actually take direct advertising from pharmaceutical companies. In many cases, that's true. The British Medical Journal certainly does, and they tried to bury that information, but we found it. It wasn't hard to find. And yes, so they're not only taking advertising from big pharma, but they're also owned by the same companies that own the pharma.

And they do this little trick of having very large numbers of copies, paper copies, and they're at high prices that are purchased by pharma when they have some favorable article. And then pharma can take it into the doctor's offices and pass it out. And it's all wink, wink, nod, nod on the square. It's all okay.

Because then pharma's not advertising directly to the doctor. They're just giving the doctor the latest edition of the New England Journal of Medicine. Yeah, of the British Medical Journal. They're just giving you, hey, look, this is a third party. We don't have anything to do with it except that we just gave them $50 million when we bought all these paper editions of their thing that nobody else would read.

Hey, you know, that's the trick that Scientology used with L. Ron Hubbard's books where they'd buy a huge amount. He's on the bestseller list. Oh, yeah, yeah. Yeah, it's all the same trick. That's common in the publishing industry. That's another industry that's just gone to L&A. All of them. They're all the goddamn same. If fly-by-night supplement companies pull this shit, what do you think really rich companies do that are transnational? You don't think they'd do it much better on a much larger scale?

Well, the other thing that they have going for them is when you get to a certain size, regulatory burden becomes your friend. Right. Because it excludes your competition. And you're the one, you've got to be of a certain size to be able to tolerate and sustain all the stuff that the gubbies throw at you. But can you give me a for instance? It's classic in what happens at the FDA. Okay.

You know, in the case of pharmaceutical industry, well, here's a great example. You mentioned a moment ago the supplements industry. The supplements industry came to floor because there was a law passed, I think in 95, that empowered supplements and basically forced them to be treated as food. And since then, in the United States, the supplements industry has exploded.

Pharma doesn't like that very much because there are things going on in nutraceuticals that are threatening the pharma's new growth sector, which is biopharmaceuticals, because there's a fine line between an engineered plant that's making a protein and a purified recombinant protein that's made in, say, bacteria or yeast.

okay so from pharma's standpoint the nutraceutical industry is a growing threat to their market shares and their their their growth opportunities they want to have more control and so what pharma's doing is they're oh so gently suggesting to congress through their various uh lobbyists

that there just needs to be more regulation, that this nutraceutical industry is out of control now. They really need to have more oversight to ensure the purity and potency of their products. And basically, they're trying to force them into a pharmaceutical industry model.

in which they'll have to do clinical trials, they'll have to have drug dossiers on their products, and then most of these little players that produce these nutraceuticals can't afford the $10 million to $100 million to billions of dollars necessary to support all of this documentation. And so suddenly they go out of business and big pharma is there to lap them up.

Because big pharma has pockets. They have the deep pockets and the infrastructure necessary to run the clinical trials, to run the regulatory dossiers and support that and those submissions, maintain them, etc. So for them, basically regulations becomes a backdoor to monopolistic practices.

which is what the folks like Javier Millie are all hot on, the anarcho-capitalists that, you know, Millie has said repeatedly, he said it again at CPAC, there are no monopolies unless the government gets involved.

Monopoly, as we see it, is either a good thing when it occurs because it's because a corporation is producing goods and services that are superior to its competitors. And it's a bad thing when the government intervenes and creates structures, rules, and regulations that enable monopolistic practices and enable monopolistic corporations to thrive at the expense of consumers by being the ones that are able to

provide the necessary documentation and compliance. I saw this in the biodefense industry, in the military industrial complex, when I used to do contracting and contract oversight there. Well, what I saw again and again was companies that were able to support all the compliance requirements were the ones that would win the big contracts, not the companies that had the best tech.

the companies that were best able to comply with the government's requirements and regulations.

That's how this game works. And that's how it's evolved right now. So you asked for some examples. I've given you two, one from the military industrial and from one from nutraceuticals and farm. Remember we covered about the new electric leaf, electric leaf blowers. You can't have a gas powered leaf blower. It's going to run all the landscapes out of business, but you'll be able to get Amazon's home leaf blowing service because they'll be complying. That's a big example. Yeah. Yeah. Great. Perfect example. Yeah.

Hey, become a premium member. Go to JimmyDoreComedy.com. Sign up. It's the most affordable premium program in the business. All the voices performed today are by the one and only, the inimitable Mike McRae. He can be found at MikeMcRae.com. That's it for this week. You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.

Do not freak out.