We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode R.I.P. CFPB?

R.I.P. CFPB?

2025/2/11
logo of podcast The Journal.

The Journal.

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
B
Brian Schwartz
E
Elizabeth Warren
N
None
R
Russell Vogt
T
Tim Scott
Topics
Brian Schwartz: 作为记者,我认为特朗普政府正在采取行动削弱联邦政府机构,而消费者金融保护局(CFPB)成为了他们的目标。这个机构的设立是为了监督金融机构,并充当消费者权益的倡导者,但共和党多年来一直反对它。现在,特朗普政府已经下令CFPB停止工作,这引发了关于其未来的担忧。 Elizabeth Warren: 作为前哈佛法学教授和民主党参议员,我坚信CFPB的设立是为了监管银行,代表消费者利益。如果银行的利润不是来自欺骗,他们就不应该害怕这个机构。特朗普政府的行动是对那些希望欺骗家庭的富人的回报。 Tim Scott: 作为共和党参议员,我认为CFPB缺乏足够的国会监督。该机构的问责制并不高,并且在某些领导下偏离了其授权的任务。滥用执法权力、以政治驱动的规则制定以及缺乏监督,都会导致经济机会减少。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Over the weekend, the Trump administration continued taking a buzzsaw to the federal government. After largely dismantling USAID, a $40 billion agency focused on delivering foreign aid, President Trump's sights are now set on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB. It's an agency that was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

The CFPB, it's supposed to be this kind of oversight agency over financial institutions across the country. Bank of America, JP Morgan, and you name it. And what they're supposed to be doing is really being a consumer advocacy agency. They're supposed to be monitoring and supervising the financial firms for any sort of scams or anything of the like.

That's our colleague Brian Schwartz. He says Republicans have been railing against the agency for years. So this is clearly a big target, not just for the Trump administration, but for the banking industry at large.

And over the past few days, the agency ground to a halt. The Trump administration has ordered the Commercial Financial Protection Bureau to stop working effective immediately. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is closing its headquarters this week. Employees received an email from President Donald Trump's budget chief to stop all work. There is no word of how long this is going to last outside of this idea that the offices are only supposed to be closed for this week, but I'm highly skeptical of that.

They say that it's just for this week. Okay, great. What happens on Friday? We don't know. Welcome to The Journal, our show about money, business, and power. I'm Ryan Knudson. It's Tuesday, February 11th. Coming up on the show, is this the end of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? ♪

Do you own a business that's ready to thrive? It's time to let Intuit QuickBooks take things like unpaid invoices and tracking expenses off your plate so you can take things to the next level. Intuit QuickBooks is a powerful AI-driven all-in-one business platform that can help with day-to-day tasks like invoicing, expenses, and taxes. QuickBooks can help you unlock the growth in your business so you can get back to enjoying your business.

♪♪♪

After the 2008 financial crisis, now Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, who back then was a law professor at Harvard, led a push to create an agency that would serve as a consumer watchdog on financial institutions. In her view, there had to be some major regulator of the banks that specifically represented the consumer. You know, I say to the banking industry, if you're not making your profits on tricks and traps...

You have nothing to fear. If you are, you probably really won't like this agency. — In 2010, Democrats in Congress passed a suite of new regulations on the banking industry, without much Republican support, that included Warren's CFPB idea. And in 2011, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau got up and running. — So what has it been doing over the course of its life? How has it been regulating the banks?

Well, it's become this investigative body. So if a set of consumers, whether it's through the court system or through just tips to the CFPB, a consumer can say, I feel like I'm getting squeezed here by this financial institution, and here's why. And then the CFPB can go about investigating this, right? And eventually, in some cases, they would—the CFPB says that they've gone and found out various forms of malfeasance.

Over its roughly 14-year lifespan, the agency has passed a number of regulations aimed at protecting consumers and issued billions of dollars in fines.

For instance, in 2022, the CFPB reached a settlement with Wells Fargo that included a $1.7 billion fine and that required the bank to give $2 billion back to consumers after the agency said the bank wrongfully foreclosed on homes, illegally repossessed vehicles, and incorrectly charged fees and interest.

The CFPB says it's returned nearly $20 billion to consumers through things like principal reductions, canceled debts, and direct compensation to consumers. But pretty much ever since its founding, Republican lawmakers have expressed concerns about the agency and tried to get rid of it. What has been the criticism of the CFPB? That there is not enough congressional oversight of that agency. That is a big one.

There was supposed to be this kind of independent arm of the federal government, and they are going to go off and they're going to do their thing. And that's been the moves of that. Here's Republican Senator Tim Scott grilling the former head of the CFPB at a hearing in 2023. And yet the CFPB is no more accountable today than it was at its inception. And I fear under your leadership, the agency is straying even further from its mandated mission.

The abuse of enforcement powers, rulemakings driven by politics instead of policy, and a lack of oversight, which only leads to less economic opportunity, have become hallmarks under your leadership. And so Republicans in particular have thought, wait a minute here. If these guys are going to go after the big banks, if these guys are going to go after various firms, we should have some sort of oversight over that.

The CFPB doesn't get its funding from Congress. Its money comes from the Federal Reserve, meaning lawmakers aren't as easily able to influence it. Its critics have also said that it relies too heavily on enforcement actions rather than setting regulations, which creates uncertainty for the banking industry. Over the years, Republicans have introduced bills to limit the CFPB's power, but the agency has so far remained intact.

Until Trump appointed a man named Russell Vogt as acting director of the agency. Tell me about Russell Vogt. What's his background? Russell Vogt has been a longtime budget hawk in the Republican Party for years. Vogt served in Trump's first administration as the head of the Office of Management and Budget, a powerful agency that helps the president manage government spending. The two of them have been close for a while.

The two of them have been allied on this larger goal of dismantling the federal government.

has been extremely loyal to Trump. Keep in mind, you know, when you look back at Trump's first term in office post the 2016 election, Donald Trump reflects on a variety of people that were disloyal to him. One of the people he never mentions in the same breath as that sentence is Russell Vogt. And the reason is, is because Russell Vogt has done pretty much everything Donald Trump has asked him to do. I would argue he's probably done everything Donald Trump has asked him to do. And then post-2016,

the first term, Vote publicly stayed very, very much a vocal Trump supporter. — Vote was also one of the co-authors of Project 2025, a conservative plan for reshaping the federal government. Vote wrote a chapter on how the executive branch should have much more authority to control federal spending.

And this idea was that the Office of Management and Budget, as well as the executive authority that goes along with it, really should be route one to the presidency, that the presidency should have the ultimate authority of the OMB, not necessarily entirely Congress. And what does that mean? The OMB is responsible for various budget matters that really the parts of the power of the

purse should go through the executive branch, aka the OMB, and not Congress, and that's a critical difference there. And it's similar to what he has said before in other instances where he just thinks that the federal bureaucracy really needs to kind of be broken down and restarted to whatever vision Donald Trump has for it. And after Trump won the election, he put vote back in charge of the OMB.

And not only that, he also became the acting head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. That's after the break. Hey, you know what would make your customer service help desk way better? Dumping it and then switching to Intercom. But you're not quite ready to make that change. We get it.

That's why Finn, the world's leading AI customer service agent, is now available on every help desk. Finn can instantly resolve up to 80% of your tickets, which makes your customers happier and gets you off the customer service rep hiring treadmill. Finn by Intercom, the leading customer service AI agent, now available on every help desk.

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. When your fridge stops working, you don't sit around waiting for all your food to spoil. You find a solution. So why wait to hire the people your company desperately needs? Use Indeed's sponsored jobs to find great talent fast. It moves your job post to the top of the page, so it's the first thing relevant candidates see when they start searching. And it truly does make a difference. Sponsored by Indeed.

Sponsored jobs receive 45% more applications than non-sponsored jobs, according to Indeed data. Plus, with sponsored jobs, there are no monthly subscriptions or long-term contracts. You're only paying for results. There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed.

Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at Indeed.com slash journal. That's Indeed.com slash journal right now and support the show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com slash journal. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring? Indeed is all you need.

When Russell Vogt became acting head of the CFPB on Friday, employees there had already received a memo ordering them to pause ongoing investigations, litigation, and the implementation of new rules. And staffers from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, were inside the agency's internal computer systems. Around the time Vogt took over, Musk posted on X, CFPB RIP, with an emoji of a tombstone.

Once Russell Vogt became the interim chief of the CFPB, he put out a note that went a little bit further than that and called for CFPB officials to pause on their supervisory efforts. In other words, stop supervising the financial firms that you're supposed to be supervising. Do not do your work.

Stop all work. Stop doing your job. That's pretty wild, right? I mean, you get an email from somebody that just says, press pause on what you're doing and don't move. Clear warning signs that something is up with that agency, that they are clearly trying to do something to it. It's just a matter of what and when at this point.

And then, on Sunday, employees got another memo. So the third memo was calling on staff not to come into the office. It said, do not come to the D.C. office because we have closed the office, at least temporarily, for this week. So basically, at this point, the CFPB is an agency that is, like, frozen in place. It is not really doing anything. For right now, the CFPB is on total lockdown.

Boat also said in a post on X on Saturday that the agency would stop taking in money it had previously been allocated. Now, there's a 404 Page Not Found banner across the agency's website, and its X account has been deactivated. What has the response been so far to these actions against the CFPB? Democrats are up in arms. Senator Warren went on social media to crack right at him. Trump campaigned on helping working people, but now that he's in charge, they're...

This is the payoff to the rich guys who invested in his campaign and who want to cheat families and not have anybody around to stop them. The group that's going to be missing in this is Republicans. They control the House and the Senate. I don't see a single Republican raising their hand going, oh, we should keep the CFPB as is. Has not happened. In fact, a group of Republican lawmakers, led by Texas Senator Ted Cruz, proposed legislation last month that would effectively defund the CFPB.

So what do you think? I mean, ultimately, the CFPB was created with a vision to protect consumers, protect the little guy from the big banks. So if this agency gets largely diminished, what would that mean for consumers? You know, it's tough to say, right? Because if vote goes ahead and whittles this thing down, the supporters of the CFPB would say, well, there goes an institution that was really meant to help the little guy.

But on the other hand, you know, Republicans in Congress would say we already have agencies who can do this, right? That they have various entities who investigate the big banks, investigate financial firms. We don't really need a CFPB like this. So we have these two powerful Trump allies in Congress.

Elon Musk and Russell Vogt both working to dismantle parts of the federal government at Doge and the Office of Management and Budget. Can you help me understand how they're working together? What is the difference between them? Well, I don't know how much difference there is, to tell you the truth. I mean, I think that they're very similar. You know, Russell Vogt talks about partnering up with Doge. He said that in his testimony.

Here's Vogt a few weeks ago, talking about the work that Doge has been doing. We're going to be looking at ways that OMB can come along beside and ask the right questions, both on the management and the budget side. We have reporting that Vogt and Musk really started to establish this partnership shortly after the 2024 election in November, late November. So they know each other, at least from a distance.

And I feel like they are coming from the same world. It's loyalty to Trump, executing his vision, and making stringent cuts to a variety of agencies. I don't really see the daylight between them. And for any Democrats on the Hill, that's probably a scary thought, right? Because you've got two very, very powerful people. One is a billionaire. The other one is kind of this budget hawk nerd.

And, you know, that's a scary thought for Democrats in Capitol Hill. It is 100 percent. I want to go back to this fact about Russell Vogt and how he was one of the co-authors of Project 2025. Didn't Trump try to distance himself from Project 2025 during the campaign? And I recall The Wall Street Journal even reported that the administration was trying not to hire people who are connected to Project 2025.

Yeah, I mean, he said that the Project 2025 won't have much say in his administration, and maybe they don't have as much access as the Heritage Foundation, which who authored that piece, wishes they had. But the truth is, is that there are elements of Project 2025 in Trump's government. So technically, this action with the CFPB is a freeze. But how far could this go? Do you think this could be the end of the agency as we know it?

It seems it really depends on who you ask. I mean, if you ask Democrats in Congress, particularly Elizabeth Warren, you know, she's going to say, you know, he doesn't have really the authority to totally demolish the agency, which I think that's probably true. I don't think you can legally take out the whole thing. But I don't think there's any laws of saying you can slowly dismantle it. I don't think there's anything, but he's stopping him from doing that, which means you can dismantle

fire people. I don't think there's anyone saying somebody who runs an agency, that person can't fire people. I've never heard of that in my entire life. I mean, so less of something here. Russell Vogt can go in and he can systematically break down different pieces of CFPB.

On Sunday, the National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit against Vote, aiming to prevent the shutdown of the CFPB. The union said that, quote, "...Congress, not the president, has the power to create or destroy executive branch agencies."

If you follow what everything Trump is saying, Trump said that he has authorized Elon Musk to do everything that he's doing. It's the same thing, I bet, with vote. Russell Vogt wouldn't be going ahead and doing these things without the explicit approval of the White House.

People think these are like people just doing whatever they want. I'm telling you right now, that is not how this works. These guys, Musk and Vote aren't doing this in a vacuum. They're doing this with the clear authorization of Trump and the White House. Before we go, do you have any questions about what the Trump administration is up to? Please send us a voice note to thejournalatwsj.com. That's thejournalatwsj.com. We'll try to answer them in our special series, Trump 2.0, which comes out every Friday morning.

That's all for today. Tuesday, February 11th. The Journal is a co-production of Spotify and The Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Dylan Tokar and Ken Thomas. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.