Biden Has TERMINAL CANCER, Democrats COVERED UP Illness, Biggest SCANDAL In US History
01:12:49 Share

Joe Biden has stage four cancer. It is prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone. This is typically considered to be terminal. And they are claiming now that he has just been diagnosed. But let's not mince words. This is an advanced aggressive form of prostate cancer that's already in his bones. Meaning, well, according to various sources in my research, could take a decade to reach that level.

More importantly, if it was particularly aggressive, it would take at least a couple of years. I've done a little bit of cursory research. My friends, with the routine exams a president gets, it is beyond unlikely. That's an understatement. It is inconceivable that they missed this cancer.

Now, Joe Biden in the past, several years ago, said that he had cancer. And we kicked off Tim Kast IRL that night with that lead story. Joe Biden says, quote, I have cancer. Well, he said I and so many others have cancer. The immediate response in the media was he's talking about skin lesions. They're lying. They were lying then. They're lying now, my friends. This may be one of the biggest scandals in U.S. history, if not the biggest. I'll tell you why.

The likely scenario is that this man was incapable of doing his job, was dealing with an aggressive form of cancer that's now in his bones, was incapable of signing these documents, signing these pardons of doing the job they claimed he was doing. They tried to pass him off. They wanted him to run again. They wanted him to be president right now. But I will tell you, based on the information that we have,

It seems entirely plausible that Joe Biden was diagnosed with cancer before entering office in 2021. It's currently 2025. And if this is if we're going to average out the basic data, he could have had this cancer and it could have been known about for five or six years. That's if we're just averaging out the time span for what they what the sources say.

And I mean, cursory Internet searches. I'm not a doctor. I'm not a doctor. I'm just saying I look up the average data and here's what it says. It could be 10 years to metastasize to the bones. This means they probably knew the whole time. Now, there have been reports in the past year or so. I'm sorry, a couple of years about Joe Biden suffering medical emergencies being rushed to the hospital. The man has an aggressive form of cancer in his bones and prostate. And again, it is considered terminal.

This is it's insane. I think their plan was Joe Biden would run again. They would campaign off of Trump is bad. That's the only thing they have. And then they expected Joe Biden to pass away from this terminal illness. And Kamala Harris would then become the president. But he couldn't make it. They had no choice but to swap him out and try Kamala at the last minute. They were hoping Biden was going to make it through to the end. But, you know, make it through to this next election. I don't.

I'm at a loss for words as to how insane this story really is. We had no president. This was a coup, some kind of coup. I don't know. But Joe Biden clearly was not running the ship. How can he be? Maybe that's why people thought Jill was. Let's read the news and I'll break this down for you. ABC News reports former President Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis. What does a Gleason score of nine mean? It means catastrophic. That's what I'll tell you what it means. Eight, nine or 10 means catastrophic.

aggressive. Former President Joe Biden is battling an aggressive form of prostate cancer, his office announced on Sunday. Adding his condition is characterized by a Gleason score of nine. His office also said Biden's diagnosis included metastasis to the bone. Biden's cancer diagnosis comes after a small nodule was found in the former president's prostate after a routine physical exam on Tuesday. The discovery of the nodule necessitated further evaluation.

In February of 23, while the now 82-year-old former president was serving the White House, Biden had a lesion removed from his chest that was cancerous, according to a former White House physician. Additionally, before entering office, Biden had several non-melanoma skin cancers removed with Mohs surgery. As the world reacts to Biden's medical news, ABC News has broken down what his condition means and what possible treatments can be done. My friends,

I think those are all lies. I think they knew very well. And I'll show you. I'll show you. Let's start here. Excuse me. We have this video that Nick Sorter has resurfaced. I'd like to play for you first. And because it was a four lane highway that was accessible, my mother drove us and rather than us be able to walk. And guess what? The first frost, you know what was happening?

It had to put on your windshield wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window. That's why I had so damn many other people. I grew up, have cancer and why can't for the longest time. Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation. He outright said I and so many others have people I grew up, have cancer. That's why I had so damn many other people. I grew up, have cancer, have not had cancer.

They claimed he got lesions removed. That explains it. They're lying. Nobody believes it. I don't think any sane, rational person could believe it. This was their excuse to say that when he said, I have cancer, no, no, no, no. He meant he had cancer. They removed it. No.

Dr. Drew says, to be fair, beginning with the finding of a nodule and then discovering advanced disease does not pass the sniff test. Someone not receiving adequate or routine health care. This would make some sense, but does not fit the level of medical supervision given to POTUS from Dr. Drew. He's a doctor. Now, you may be saying, but he is but a TV doctor.

Take a look at this. Chris Bray tweets a year ago, Jennifer Van Laar provided detailed evidence that Joe Biden had a medical emergency in Las Vegas. Today, we hear that Biden has advanced cancer, which can't possibly be new. He's been sick for years. In this tweet, going back to August 9th, breaking Las Vegas police recordings released from Biden's medical event and code three transport to airport. We have this from Carly Bonn.

The doctor on Morning Joe today said Bush, Obama and Trump all had their this prostate test and it was reported. But Joe Biden did not. Why is that? Are we supposed to believe that Joe Biden was the only president in recent history who said I'm not going to get a prostate exam? No, he likely got it. And what did they find? Advanced cancer.

It's hard to know, we're speculating here. I would say in an abundance of caution, probably be holistic and comprehensive. That would make sense. It is interesting to note that President Trump's, President Obama's, and President Bush's second, in their most recent physicals, in their terms of office, obviously 2025 for President Trump, did comment

on their PSA levels. And so they got screened while in office and they commented on it. It's not easy to access the most recent ones from President Biden. You can read summary articles. I couldn't access it on the archives set in the White House just before it came on. But according to those that were able to, there is not a report of a PSA test on the most recent physical that was read out for President Biden's last year in office. And so I

It's to say what was done, what was not done. You and I would be speculating. But the other three most recent occupants of the White House had it drawn and it was reported out in the case of President. And there it is. That's from a guest on MSNBC. I believe let's get the doctor's name. I think it's important. What is his name? I think it's Dr. Gupta. Dr. Vin Gupta. Laura Loomer.

Watch Biden's brother, Frank, just said he looks forward to spending, quote, whatever time we have left with Joe Biden. And this post is from twenty twenty four.

July of 24. He is a genuine had a brief conversation with Frank Biden, one of President Biden's two younger brothers. And here's what he told us. He said, I'm incredibly proud of my brother. Selfishly, I will have him back to enjoy whatever time we have left. He is a genuine hero.

Country over self. It sounds corny in our cynical political environment, but he nor I are cynical. The goal remains the same. Defeat Trump and continue the work that Joe has done. Whatever time we have left. Now, some have said, well, it's because they had an excuse for everything. Well, Biden's old. I mean, he's past the average life expectancy. What time do they have left? Seriously? They expected us to believe that? We've got a lot more. Here's a photo I posted.

Everyone knew. Here's an image of Joe Biden holding up his hand with what appears to be a puncture wound on his hand over a vein. Now, I posted that picture into our good old French at GPT and said, what is this? And it said an elderly man with a close up on his hand showing a puncture wound from IV medication. Yeah. And then, of course, we have this one. Andrew at Don't Walk Run in 2023 posting the images of Joe Biden with a strange mark on his face that they said was from his CPAP machine.

Joe Biden suffering from skin cancer. What does he got? He's got a chest lesion, skin melanomas. He's got sleep apnea. He's got a stutter, man. Maybe he was just dying of cancer. He was wearing an oxygen mask because he was dying of cancer and still is. They claimed that Joe Biden was just sleeping with a CPAP machine for sleep apnea. It's no big deal. Everybody's got it. It's a common thing. The mark is still on his face when he's giving an interview.

How long does that last on your skin? 15 minutes? That means he literally walked out of the room after having something strapped to his face. And they said it was a CPAP machine. So he was sleeping right before this interview. I went to our friend Chet G.P.T., not because I believe AI is always right, but because I want to show you the general answers you get when you ask about this degree of cancer. What I find interesting about Chet G.P.T. in this regard is that while it does hallucinate, they call it, get things wrong.

CHPT is essentially aggregating the data on these questions. And this is the internet generic view. I asked, what stage of cancer is prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone? It responded, prostate cancer that is metastasized to the bone is classified as stage 4, specifically stage 4B under the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System. It means the cancer is spread to distant parts of the body, such as bones, lungs, liver, or distant lymph nodes.

This is considered advanced or metastatic prostate cancer and typically requires systemic treatment like hormone therapy, chemotherapy, or newer targeted therapies. I asked, is it terminal? Yes. Metastatic or metastatic prostate cancer to the bone is considered incurable and often terminal.

But it's not always immediately fatal. You can live with proper treatment. It is treated as a chronic disease in many cases with the goal of slowing progression. Median survival can range from two to five years, but some patients live longer. I then asked, do presidents get routine prostate exams?

Yes, U.S. presidents typically undergo routine prostate evaluations as part of their annual physical examinations. These evaluations often include a digital rectal exam and may involve prostate specific antigen PSA blood testing, especially if the individual is within the age group at high risk for prostate issues. For instance, during his presidency, Obama did this. Similarly, former President Joe Biden's recent diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer followed the discovery of a small nodule. Indeed, indeed. Well, there's more.

Would these routine exams discover prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone? Yes. Routine prostate exams can detect prostate cancer before it metastasizes to the bone if done regularly and properly. I then said, how long does it take to advance to this stage? Prostate cancer typically takes years, often a decade or more, to progress from early stage to metastatic bone disease. But the timeline varies greatly depending on the cancer's aggressiveness.

They mentioned high risk, a Gleason score of eight to 10 may spread to the bones in as little as one to three years without treatment. Meaning a year ago, this man was president. They didn't give him an exam. He didn't get a prostate exam. They didn't check for this stuff. That's the argument they're making. They're saying, well, you know, because he's so old, they figured that it was pointless to do. That's literally one of the arguments they're making. I said, would a president typically undergo exams that would catch this early? Yes. And this is me basically asking twice.

A president would typically undergo regular exams that are designed to catch prostate cancer before it metastasizes. And then I asked, do you think a regular person would believe that a diagnosis like this was only just discovered in the president who just left office? No. And this is funny. This is an opinion statement. Chat GPT says, no, most regular people would likely be skeptical if a president was diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer right after leaving office, especially if it spread to the bone.

Presidents receive frequent, detailed medical exams, often annually or more. Metastatic prostate cancer doesn't usually develop suddenly. It typically shows signs years before metastasis. The public expects transparency, a serious condition being kept secret until after leaving office raises suspicions of intentional concealment. Bone metastases usually signal years of undetected or untreated cancer. It strains belief.

that this would only be found days or weeks after a president steps down unless the disease was aggressively fast-growing, rare, or information was withheld until politically convenient. And there it is. Most people would likely assume that cancer had been developing and possibly known well before the public was informed. But to be fair, my friends, it had to put on their windshield wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window. That's why I and so damn many other people I grew up with have cancer. This was in 2023, I believe he said it.

Alex Berenson tweeted, Welp, Welp, Biden's cancer and a screenshot. Biden's cancer is a little convenient, don't you think? Weird to believe they just found it and it's already in his bones. My dad had prostate cancer, took 12 years to get to his bones. Someone responded, not the right time for this dude. Apparently someone from, I think, Mediate maybe.

to which Alex said, apparently it is the right time. People are beyond sick of the media feeding them idiotic lies and then telling them they're mean or immoral if they point out they've been lied to. Enough! We all knew this, and I am sick of them lying and claiming we are crazy. You know, right now, I'm a big fan of Cash and Dan, so we're going to see what's going on, but they came out and they said Epstein took his own life. The reaction from the internet is nice try.

Doesn't matter who you are. Ain't nobody buying it. Now, I don't know why they'd say that, but part of me thinks maybe Epstein really did. I mean, to be honest, crazy guy, end of his rope and said, this is the end. I'm out. Especially considering they have tens of thousands of videos of him with kids. That's crazy. Maybe he was like, I'm out. But nobody believes it. And nobody will believe it. Sorry. We are sick of it. Every single time, what have we found? That the wisdom of the crowd has been correct. That the regular people...

challenging these narratives have been correct. And the media has lied about everything. Literally everything calmed down. But all of these major narratives, there's always some convenient excuse. We just missed terminal stage four cancer until now, a few months after he leaves office. Absolutely, absolutely not.

They were trying to pass off a terminally ill man and get him to run, get him to win. And then when he passed, Kamala would be president. That was the game plan. The question then is, as we move forward in this narrative, who signed those pardons? Who did it? Who signed those pardons? Who signed anything that he did? The man is infirm. He can barely speak. And he's presumably had serious cancer for a long time.

And it appears that they're struggling to treat it, despite claims to the inverse. Considering that it's likely been this long, I'm sick of the lies. The fact that we had a terminally ill president concealed to the American people who was incapable of doing his job calls into question everything that he's done. Everything. It puts it all up for challenge for legal review. The DOJ, they're already, there's a pardon attorney is already reviewing the pardons. I believe, uh,

I'll pull it up in a second. I have it all pulled up for the next segment. They're arguing that the pardons are illegitimate because Biden clearly didn't sign them. And now with the book coming out showing that his brain was fried and the news report that he was terminally ill, did anything that he had done is anything that he's done legal? I think it could be challenged and easily thrown out. If a nation cannot answer these questions,

and has serious, reasonable doubts as to whether or not the man was actually serving as president. If that is the case and we do nothing, what precedent do we set? The president is a figurehead who does nothing? No, I think now we open investigations, bring people in, subpoena them. I think we should subpoena the doctor of Joe Biden, grant him immunity so that he can't plead the fifth, and then hear what he has to say about this. Because you know what? His career is over.

How did you miss advanced prostate cancer? You must be a bad doctor. I'm going to leave it there, my friends. Smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. We got a lot to break down today, so stay tuned, and we'll see you all in the next segment. In an exclusive interview, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino stated unequivocally, Jeffrey Epstein did, in fact, take his own life.

And in the furthest reaches of the left, the anti-establishment, anti-government types, as well as the general MAGA base, nobody believes it. There is this middle-of-the-road, corporate-centrist, uniparty-loving space that's like, you know, the liberals going see conservatives. You're being humbled. You finally got your guys in, and what do they do? They tell you what we told you the whole time Epstein took his own life. But Alex Jones is pushing back.

Many others are saying, no, no, no, this doesn't add up. Based on what we know about this case, it does not make sense that he took his own life. And I got to tell you, it is jarring and strange to see someone like Dan Bongino say that, you know, he's been on the questioning Epstein the whole time on his show. Now, all of a sudden saying, I've read the files and Epstein took his own life. Listen, my friends, I got a lot to say on this. I do trust Kash Patel and Dan Bongino.

And sometimes you just don't want to believe what may actually be the case. But there's a lot to break down in this. So I'm not going to sit here and tell you one way or another I know anything about what Epstein did or didn't do. I know there's a lot of people who say based on the story about the guards falling asleep, the camera stopped working, footage gets lost, all that stuff. They're like, ain't no way. Dude took his own life. Maybe.

Or maybe he did. I mean, even when all of this stuff was going down, the point I made was, look, this guy, he's got all these videos with kids, the stuff that he was involved in. Yeah, he might have been like, I got to get out. Like, I'm taking the easy way out. You know what I mean? Maybe that's not the right way to describe it, but I think it's certainly plausible. Just hard to believe. You know what I mean? But let me do this. Let me break down exactly what exactly what they said.

You can hear it for yourselves. And then Dan Bongino has a tweet. You said Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. People don't believe it. Well, I mean, listen, they have a right to their opinion, but as someone who has worked as a public defender, as a prosecutor who's been in that prison system, who's been in the Metropolitan Detention Center, who's been in segregated housing, you know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was. He killed himself. Again, you want me to... I've seen the whole file. He killed himself.

There's a little bit more to it than that. But I want to stress this. I don't think Cash and Dan are liars. And I think something that people don't want to accept. Again, I am not asserting whether I know or do not know that Epstein took his own life. And I lean towards Epstein probably didn't do it. Whatever. But what I do want to say is I think there's a possibility a lot of people just don't want to accept that when Cash and Dan finally got in, they were like, oh, he did take his own life. I mean, I'll put it this way.

You're hoping, you're begging, you pray, thinking, man, when Dan Bongino gets in there, this dude is going to spill the beans. He's going to drop the proof. Then Dan gets in there and goes, oh, yeah, he killed himself. And people are like, no, Dan, I don't trust you. I don't believe it. I'm like, wait, wait, wait, hold on. Come on, guys. I understand there are biases. And I'm not saying you have to believe that Epstein really did take his own life. I'm saying at least consider that Dan Bongino is

is your avatar. Not everybody's. I'm saying the people who are like, we need someone like Dan in the FBI. He is your avatar. You chose him. You said we need you. Do you think he is corruptible? I don't. I don't. And so that leads me to say, when I look at this, I go, did Epstein actually take his own life? Okay, well, I'll consider it. The issue is this. When I'm trying to figure out what's going on with Epstein, I'm hoping that we will get a cash in a Dan in.

And my trust in them is not corrupted by the fact they're telling me something I don't want to hear. It doesn't mean I completely blindly believe them. It makes me go, interesting. Interesting. I don't see. I'm going to say it again. Guys, say whatever you want about Dan coming out and saying this. Dan Bongino is not going to throw away a what is what is he what is he rocking?

He got eight figure company in revenue throwing away the biggest live show in the country so he could go in and then just ruin his name and do nothing. That's just not reality. OK, Dan goes in. And what I see is a guy that I trust that I want to be in comes in and says, no, it was it was a suicide. And then I go, OK, OK.

Well, all right. I mean, I still don't know if I completely believe that. I believe maybe the documents show that. Maybe the evidence doesn't mean it's I believe it. My point is this. Who would you believe? Who would you believe it actually turned out Epstein took his own life? Come on, guys. I know people don't want to believe that he did, but there is a plausible path towards why he why he did, because there's tens of thousands of videos and with children and he got caught and he's like, he can't handle it. We talked about what happened.

Again, I still find it hard to believe. I still lean towards, I don't know, man. And that is to say something about, I don't know if I completely believe what Dan is saying here, but let me show you what Dan actually said. He put out this tweet. He said, I haven't done any media interviews to this point because I want to keep the attention on the work. I don't work for myself anymore. I work for you. But it's important to relay to you what we're doing, and the media can be a tool for that. That's why we chose a long-form interview with Maria Bartiromo for our first interview. I hope you saw it. Dan, cash. Come on.

You can choose to come on TimCast IRL. We'll have you. I hope you saw it if you missed it. Here are some of the questions that were asked and answered. Yes, we are moving FBI headquarters out of the Hoover Building. The process has already begun. Stay tuned for updates on the details and timelines. I was asked about some details surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. I've reviewed the case. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. There's no evidence in the case file indicating otherwise. I'm not asking you to believe me or not. I'm telling you what exists and what doesn't. If new evidence surfaces, I'm happy to reevaluate. I'm going to pause right there.

What he said here and what he said there, kind of different. Understand this. There's no evidence in the case file indicating otherwise. I said this when Cash first came out and said that, you know, Epstein took his own life. He's relaying the official FBI position. That's it. They are not acting unprofessionally and coming out with speculative information on things they don't have. I think if you talk to Dan in private, he might be like, yeah, I still don't believe it, but we don't have any evidence. He's saying...

You look at the files. You look at the evidence that we have. It's a suicide. There may be other evidence. He'll reevaluate. Okay. I don't think it's that big a deal. You know what I mean? Like, we want more information. We want accountability. I don't know we're ever going to get it, but, you know...

He goes on to say, I was challenged on accountability. It's a fair question. I aggressively responded because the director and I have been working tirelessly to uncover bad actors. We cannot get into HR specifics, and this creates an information vacuum. Unfortunately, bad actors looking to tell you a story, not the story, want you to believe we haven't taken harsh and decisive action against rogue employees. That's absolutely false, and the bad actors know it. Right. Dan can't come out and be like, here's all the people we fired. Listen, I got people who work here.

When people no longer work here, I just shut up about it and leave them to their own business. Now, if someone like, I don't know, did some weird, crazy, like, like, I don't know, killed a cat and threw on the floor or something. Yeah, we say that we'd be like, this person was let go for killing small animals. That's never happened. Usually it's like a disagreement how the job's getting done and how to move forward. And then we part ways. And I say, let them do their thing. I don't, you know, we don't want to, we don't want beef. We don't want to fight. It just didn't work out for them.

You got legal issues as the head of these departments and what you can and can't do legally. You can't come out and be like this guy. Here's what we did. Now you want to charge him with a crime. That stuff can go public. He was going to say we were asked about FBI priorities. The director and I told Maria that the president, attorney general director, and I are absolutely committed to getting your FBI back to its roots. We'll make a community safer. Illegal immigrant ops, child sex crimes, investigations, seven, six, four cases in violent criminal fugitive apprehensions are all on our expanding radar.

And while America isn't enjoying the summer, we were already planning a massive operation to clean up your streets. The counterterror and counterintel missions are critical. Yeah. I'd like to know about what you're doing with these rogue Democrats. I'd like to know what the Civil Rights Division. I'd like to know what the DOJ is doing with these criminal prosecutions against Trump, his lawyers. Now, they're not going to come out and just say it, but fine. Alex Jones issued a statement.

Says, overall, I think Cash and Dan are doing a great job, but on this claim that Epstein's death is not a cover-up, I call BS. Epstein confirmed a suicide question. Question mark. Murray sits down with FBI's Cash Patel and Dan Bongino, who claim Epstein did, in fact, commit suicide. Now let's get into why people don't believe this story. Number one, Maureen Comey, former disgraced FBI Director Comey's daughter, was in charge of Epstein's actual investigation, which isn't a good start. And Maureen allegedly lost the jailhouse CCTV tapes as a result of a technical error.

Then on top of the loss of race tapes through technical error, both guards fell asleep. Who were supposed to be watching Epstein sell? Who was on 24-hour surveillance for suicide watch, which is standard procedure in every jail? There are rumors, and if you can search, which claims nitrous oxide was used to knock the guards out, which then Epstein was taken out by another individual. Other claims the guards were paid not to talk. I don't know. That's pretty grandiose.

Either way, for the tapes to mysteriously go missing or erased and to have not one but two guards both fall asleep coincidentally, the odds of both of these happening to occur at the same time in the same place are astronomical. We know Comey's are corrupt. James Comey was sent out a dog whistle to have the president assassinated. Why do you think he would do that? You know what's really crazy, guys? 8,647 days after 9-11, James Comey posts 86-47.

It's really weird. It's really weird that he did. Like, we live in a simulation or these people do these things on purpose. So I don't know, man. But people are pretty pissed. Catherine Brodsky tweeted Dan Bongino quote. I was asked about the details surrounding the Epstein case. I've reviewed the case. Epstein killed himself. This quote, I think the reason why Kat's posting it and why it's being highlighted in that statement.

And the reason I'm highlighting is many people have done the same thing. I'm not saying Kat's doing it, but I'm seeing a lot of people post this. They're saying, look at what he is and is not saying. Now, I don't know. I think it might be wishful thinking. They're saying he's telling you what's in the files. He's not telling you a thing happened they don't have evidence of. He's giving you the official position of the FBI. I think it's possible that Dan's telling you the truth. I don't know. I believe. I mean, I kind of agree with Alex to a great degree, but I'm going to say this again.

If not Dan Bongino, who would you trust? Like, who would you trust? Dan Bongino. Everyone's like, we need Dan in. He's going to spill. He's going to expose it all. He gets in and goes, guys, I looked at the files. It was a suicide. They're like, no, now I don't trust Dan Bongino. He's a liar. That's literally Twitter is filled. X. Filled people saying, I don't trust Dan anymore. I'm like, what? You want to believe something so bad that the guy you wanted to go in, you don't believe? And people are saying he's got a metaphorical gun to his head. Nah, he'd quit.

Bro, he can turn around and go back to making eight figures on the internet. If he was really being obstructed, he'd walk out. That's silly, silly. Look, I don't know. I'm not going to pretend to know. I just do think it's silly not to trust Dan and Cash. Maybe there's a deep state. Maybe the deep state's got them at metaphorical gunpoint. Or maybe they're telling you what the information they have is. Comment below. Let me know what you think. I'll leave it there.

Smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. We got more segments coming up. We'll see you in a little bit. A terrifying story involving a bombing of a fertility clinic. The individual suspected was an antinatalist, anti-pro-life. He thought people should stop having kids. I'm not going to waste time and I'm not going to cut anyone the benefit of the doubt. This is

explicitly a left liberal ideological point. This is what they push and what they believe. The right is very much pro baby. When Elon Musk started shifting rightward, one of his key talking points was have more babies on the right. They have more babies on the left. They don't. Prominent liberal organizations have routinely argued people should not have children. And in fact, just the other day,

We have the story. Hillary Clinton criticizes pro-birth policies, says immigrants are the key to U.S. growth. Malthusian, call it whatever you want. When an individual bombs a fertility clinic and has writings criticizing people who have children, it is apparent that this is leftist ideology. Here's the story from the AP.

A 25-year-old man the FBI believes was responsible for an explosion that ripped through a Southern California fertility clinic left behind anti-pro-life writings before carrying out an attack investigators called terrorism.

Guy Edward Bartkus of the 29 Palms of 29 Palms, California, was identified by the FBI as a suspect in the apparent car bomb detonation Saturday that damaged the clinic in the upscale city of Palm Springs in the desert east of Los Angeles. His writing seemed to indicate antinatalist views, which hold that people should not continue to procreate.

The blast gutted the American Reproductive Center's fertility clinic and shattered the windows of nearby buildings along a palm tree-lined street. Witnesses described the loud boom followed by a chaotic scene, with people screaming in terror as glass strewn along the sidewalk and street. Investigators said, is it Barctus? Because I think they have a typo in the, they put Barctus in the beginning, but then Barctus later.

A senior FBI official called possibly the largest bombing scene that we've had in Southern California. A body was found near a charred vehicle outside the clinic. Bartkis attempted to live stream the explosion and left behind writings that communicated nihilistic ideations that were still being examined to determine his state of mind, said Akil Davis, the assistant director in charge of the FBI's L.A. field office.

They said, quote, this was a targeted attack against the IVF facility. Make no mistake, we are treating this, as I said yesterday, as an intentional act of terrorism. The bombing injured four other people, though Davis said all embryos of the facility were saved. Good guys won, bad guys zero, he said. Authorities were executing a search warrant in 29 Palms, a city of 28,000 residents west of Palms, is it east of Palm Springs? Northeast of Palm Springs.

Thank God today happened to be a day we have no patients. Dr. Mar Abdullah, who leads the clinic, told the AP in a phone interview said, interestingly, one of the immediate narratives was that this was actually pro-lifers. This guy was probably right wing because pro-life individuals don't like IVF facilities because they create embryos life and then destroy them, or at least they get destroyed in the process. But no, take a look at this.

Hillary Clinton criticizes pro-birth policies as immigrants are key to U.S. growth. As I posted the other day, this very blatant effort to basically send a message, most exemplified by Vance and Musk and others, that, you know, what we really need from you women are more children.

And what that really means is you should go back to doing what you were born to do, which is to produce more children. And they are talking about cash benefits for the more children you have. This has been tried, by the way, in other countries and it has not worked. That's true. Or medals if you have six children. Well, they are...

contemplating cutting Medicaid while they have no interest in paid family leave or funding quality childcare, they're cutting Head Start. I mean, you go down the list of all the programs that support

child rearing and the care of children and create some safety net for women who are in the workforce, the formal workforce as well as raising children.

So this is another performance about concerns they allegedly have for family life. But if you had read the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, despite Trump saying he knew nothing about it, if you had read it, it's all in there. It's all in there. Return to the family, the nuclear family, return to being a Christian nation, return to producing a lot of children.

which is sort of odd because the people who produce the most children in our country are immigrants and they want to deport them. So none of this adds up. But it does. It's called maintaining the American way of life, the moral tradition and the views of the founding fathers. Hillary Clinton is evil. You know, one of the reasons why our economy did so much better than comparable countries

advanced economies across the world is because we actually had a replenishment because we had a lot of immigrants legally and undocumented who had a legally and undocumented. You see how they do this? You see how she does this? It's illegally and illegally, ma'am. A, you know, larger than normal by American standards family. So

This is just another one of their, you know, make America great again by returning to the lifestyles and the economic arrangements of not just the 1950s. I mean, let's keep going back as far as we can and, you know, see what happens.

It's funny because, you know, Alex Jones is actually arguing that's what they want to do. He mentioned that book. I think it's called Ishmael about the psychic gorilla. That's like there are too many humans. I don't know how the gorilla actually talked, but I will do that. And it's typically people like Hillary. They don't have kids, don't support America, don't go back to when a time was good. That's what they say. Make America great again.

What they want to do is stop those of the American tradition from having babies. You can see it in the ideology on CNN and various other networks where they say things like, if you take a look at the South Africa refugee thing, go back to your home country. They say it with Israel. It's really, really fascinating. You and I love about this. Let's just piss everybody off. Did you know that Kiev used to be the capital of Russia?

And then I don't know a lot about the history of how that broke apart, but Ukraine ended up becoming separate from Russia, but it was the capital. So you'd think these leftists would want Russia to return to their ancestral homeland. That's what they call it. That's how I describe it. So when you have illegal, but really, let's be fair, like there's no logic in what they're proposing. Why deport illegal immigrants to maintain a system of laws, society, democracy?

So when people come here illegally, we send them home. We don't just say have as many babies as you want and then we make them all citizens because it actually is really simple what happens after the fact. The new citizens will vote for non-citizens. That's what Hillary Clinton wants. It's what many of these people wanted. They want the United States to be the global nation, the world police. They want it to be an open economic zone for anyone in the world to operate in.

And they're mad that Saudi Arabia is building the line where they want to create an international city. The U.S. wanted to do it. They want to create a global country. And I think, you know, the idea would be that you'd effectively have a one world government over the United States functioning as the police. Look at look at the strategy here. If you create a system like this where let's say right now the United States is operating controlled by various international interests.

Individual countries may not be part of the global governance, but they'll certainly be under the boot of a global governing authority in the United States as the world police and as a global citizenry. What I mean is they want people who are from India, China, Guatemala, Honduras, Venezuela to vote in their interests for their families and their views in America. This is what we get all the time. And they know it.

There was a famous image. I can't remember where it was from, but it showed the percentage of white people in the United States slowly dropping every decade. It was like 1960, 1970, and the number was going down.

The idea that these people have, and they know it, is that if you bring in an illegal immigrant, let's say you bring in two illegal immigrants, they have a kid. That kid's going to grow up and be offered a chance to vote as an American citizen. And he's going to say, I want what's best for my parents. I love my parents. People do. But his parents aren't citizens. So what will he vote for? He'll vote to extract the resources of this country and send it back to his home country or to extend public benefits to his illegal parents. Slowly over time, they'll vote to give their illegal immigrant parents protection.

protected status, voting rights, whatever it may be, until after 40 years of this, you can literally walk in the door day one and say, I vote, and that will transform America into something else. That's what Hillary Clinton wants. So that's why they push these ideologies, which I believe ultimately result in this. I'm going to leave it there. Stay tuned, my friends. We do have more segments coming up for you throughout the day. Thanks for hanging out. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast, and we'll see you on the next bit. My friends.

We may be seeing now the biggest scandal in U.S. history, and I think it's fair to say. You've had the Russiagate hoax. They accused the president, the sitting president, of being a traitor to his nation. That old thing probably was bigger than Watergate. When you do a quick Google search or when you ask the AI bots, what's the biggest scandal? They tell you Watergate was. I think we've well, we've since surpassed that degree of scandal.

I want to show you just this headline as we begin. Doctor who worked with Biden says he had cancer while he was president. In fact, this top oncologist who actually worked with the former president said he probably had the cancer before he even got into office. We have the video, of course, from 2022, where Joe Biden says that I and so many others have cancer.

But it's not just the cancer. We knew that he was ill. Stories had been circulating. The scandal, my friends, is when you look at the big picture. Criminal actions of Joe Biden. Did they prosecute? No. Why? Because of his mental state. The audio leaks and we now know exactly what Biden was saying and what he was asked. Now, we had the transcript, of course. So we knew that they had Joe Biden dead to rights, right?

He broke the law. No criminal charges. They likely knew he had cancer. Most of these people probably knew that he had terminal stage four or five, whichever. It's stage four. If you ask the Internet, then you take a look at how the media covered everything up every time. What I love about what the media does with Joe Biden.

And they did this during his presidency is that when he says something as nonsensical as Trinidad and Chabot of Pressure. Let me try that again. Trinidad and Chabot of Pressure. It's an actual quote from Joe Biden. Instead of actually quoting him, they paraphrase. So if Joe Biden appeared on the show and said something like, you know, we got the kids and got to go to school because, you know, anyway, instead of quoting that incoherent garbled nonsense.

They would simply say during the interview, Joe Biden expressed frustration with schools being poor and children needing access. Because if you actually tried to quote him, you'd know that the dude was speaking gibberish. Let's say, my friends, the media knew they were lying. They covered up for the president. The White House administration, his family and his doctors lied and covered up for the president and prosecutors who were supposed to hold him to account.

lied and covered it up in every major facet of organization of this country. The president was infirm, incapable and criminal, and it was covered up. Dare I say, I cannot think of a greater scandal in U.S. history than the fact that an entire four years of presidency may have been fraudulent. Let me say that again.

Doctor who worked with Biden said he had cancer while he was president and it did not just develop. In fact, he may have had it before entering office. They knew from the beginning. Now the question is, with the her tapes leaking, questions of whether or not Joe Biden was engaged in criminal activities before becoming president and whether he should be charged, and he can be, questions about whether or not he actually signed these pardons and what did he actually sign.

It may be void. Already, we're hearing from Ed Martin, who's to be Trump's new pardon attorney, that they're investigating the auto pen pardons because we don't think Joe Biden actually authorized or signed those. Now, there have been several times throughout history. Perhaps we could have questioned the mental state of a president, Reagan. For one, we knew that he was losing it towards the end of his presidency. But right now, I can speak for the present. I am calling on the Republicans to launch the Biden infirmity committee.

And beginning, they should begin to subpoena, investigate and issue criminal charges for anyone who helped cover this up. And I'm talking about the forging of documents, a crime specifically. I'm not referring to the fact that they just try to withhold information. They do that all the time. But anywhere that criminal activity took place, it should be exposed. And then we'll have to go through and void what may not have actually been decisions from Joe Biden.

Pertaining to policy, of course, Trump can do all of that if it's simple policy. But what if the judges are blocking Trump from removing a Biden executive order?

This must be investigated. My friends, we're going to get into all this before we do, of course, smash the like button, share the show with everyone. Shout out to Steven Crowder and the Mug Club for shouting us out. Welcome to the Rumble Morning Lineup. Of course, this is your noon hour. I'm your host, Tim Pool. As we bring you into the afternoon, you can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. So we're going to get into all of that. Let's start right now with a story from the New York Post. Doctor who worked with Biden says he had cancer while he was president.

did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days. A top oncologist who once worked for former President Joe Biden claimed Monday that his old boss must have had prostate cancer long before Sunday's public announcement of the diagnosis and suggested the oldest president may have even had the disease for a decade. Dr. Ezekiel Manuel, a former member of Biden's transition team who helped craft the Obama era Affordable Care Act, stunned MSNBC's left leaning morning, Joe.

with his analysis that the 82-year-old likely had cancer while serving as president. He's had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading. Emanuel told the Biden supporting host early Monday he did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days. He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency in 2021. Yes, I don't think there's any disagreement about that.

The Sunday announcement from the former president's office came two days after he learned of the diagnosis. That is a lie. And no sane person believes it. Now, we've got a lot to bring up here. Exclusive prosecutors audio shows Biden's memory lapses. This past week, I actually joined Jesse Waters on Fox and discussed this very issue. The media, largely Alex Thompson himself, who published this, said we missed the story.

How did we miss the story on Joe Biden, he asked. Interesting. Missed it. They didn't miss it. They covered it up intentionally. So I want to know what they knew. I want the Republicans to do exactly what the Democrats did with J6 and with Russiagate. They brought in journalists. No, no, hold on, hold on. I don't want Republicans posting the private information and messages of journalists like the Democrats did. That's illegal.

But they can issue subpoenas and bring these people in and get them on the record. Don't worry, you'll be granted immunity. We just need to know what you knew and why you did or did not tell the American public. Alex Thompson spoke at the White House Correspondents Dinner and said, we missed it. Now, the audio leaks Biden's memory lapses, they call it. This man likely the whole time was incapable of functioning. So, again, I'll stress this. We need a review.

We need to know who was actually running the show because Joe Biden wasn't. Autopen was signing documents. And I'm going to say this. I'm sick of this. I don't care about Autopen garbage anymore. I don't care if Trump did it. I don't care if Biden did it. I don't care if Obama did it. I don't care if Bush did it. It should be illegal. You should not be allowed to have a machine forge your signature on presidential documents.

These people are scumbags. They are evil. It is a machine state and your elections mean oh so little. But how about now we do something about it? Now I'm going to tell you, you got this viral video, Cash Patel and Dan Bongino saying that Jeffrey Epstein took his own life. And a lot of people don't believe it. Well, I can tell you one thing. The machine takes you. It's always been the case. I trust Cash and Dan, so we'll see. But I'll tell you this.

There's always going to be some fear over national security and some fear of fallout as to why you can't reveal the truth. It's reminiscent of Watchmen. Great, great graphic novel, by the way. In the end, after a false flag is perpetrated by the villain to end the Cold War, that's the graphic novel. One of the characters says, I don't care. The people must know the truth. That's Rorschach. And so Dr. Manhattan, another character, kills him.

It's a comic. I know it's fiction, but it presents an interesting conundrum for us, for you and for anybody who gets into office. What say you if you got into office and you said, I will expose the truth and I will help the American people. And then you found out what Joe Biden was really doing. And he's a bad guy, real bad guy. But you also knew that if you exposed the truth of what was going on with Biden, you could destroy the fabric of this nation. Would you do it? See, most people are going to say no.

That's the game. It's always been the game. It will always be the game. Because people, when it comes down to brass tacks, they get into office, they get into the administration, they say, I want to do good. I want to do good. And then they come across this, the infirm. And they say, if you reveal to the world that Joe Biden is dying of terminal cancer, that his brain is jello and he cannot talk. I know people can see it, but if you confirm it, doctor.

Our enemies will attack. The petrodollar will collapse. 401ks will get wiped out overnight. You will destroy the fabric of this economy. Is that really who you want to be? And they say no. So they lie. They cover it up and they wait until it doesn't have as big of an impact. And now they'll review the whole time. This man was incapable. Take a look at this from Mike Benz.

He says the DOJ used Biden's mental state as a shield to not charge him for the exact felony crimes they were actively charging Trump for. And therein lies the problem. This is the line for me. You know, again, Cash and Dan in office and they're saying or in the FBI, you know, Epstein took his own life, perhaps, perhaps.

But I wonder how much of this is them really saying if we were to actually reveal what's in those files could destroy this country. I honestly don't know. I'd love to ask them. What I can tell you is it's a little bit easier for me. If I got in, if I was involved in government in any capacity, and I will stress the never going to happen. And that's why. That's why we don't see this stuff. You think you can cover up Joe Biden's illness and mental state while prosecuting Donald Trump for the same crime?

I'll blow the whistle on all of it. I will come out and say Joe Biden has terminal cancer and they'll say, but the 401ks and I'll be like, that's your fault. The damage that arises from the illegal actions of Democrat uniparty thugs going after Trump's lawyers. It's on them and not on me or anyone else for exposing Trump.

that they staged effectively a soft coup with a terminal cancer patient who couldn't think straight and then forged his signatures. Again, probably one of the biggest scandals in American history, if not the biggest. Miranda Devine says...

Seriously, has anyone listened to the whole her audio? The establishment takeout. This is just about Joe Biden having pudding for brains is lazy and misses the deeper point, which is that the prosecutors had him cold on processing on possessing classified documents. He had no right to keep Biden lies and dissembles and dissembles and filibusters and goes vague and mumbly at all crucial points. Without a lawyer, Bob Bauer, who interrupts every time Joe might incriminate himself and laughs like a hero when Joe gets feisty.

Roll tape. So during this time, we were living in Chambers Road and there were documents related to the Penn Biden Center or the Biden cancer shot for your book. Where did you keep papers that related to those things that you were actively working? Well, I don't know. This is what

Either has been deployed. Let's go back. What was asked of him? This is a deeply evil man. I don't care if he's troubled. I don't care if he's sick. He's an evil guy. The Burisma scandal. Come on. 10% for the big guy.

Flights on Air Force Two to China for equity investments, private equity, mind you, with his son. This is a man who is deeply corrupt and evil. And it's just fascinating when he's asked about the illegal activities that he was engaged in for the purpose of personal profit. He goes, but my son, but my son was dying around this time. I don't remember when, mind you, too old. And he was sick and they covered it up. This calls into question everything he's done.

Ed Martin says the DOJ will review Biden's last minute pardons. Indeed, they say. Outgoing acting U.S. attorney for D.C., Ed Martin, said Tuesday the DOJ is reviewing several of former president's final hour pardons, vowing that his new office will scrutinize whether clemency was used correctly or politically. Martin, whose nomination to D.C. collapsed last week after key Senate Republicans pulled support, confirmed that Trump had reassigned him to two new high profile roles.

director of the Office of the Pardon Attorney and head of the DOJ's recently established weaponization working group. Quote, I do think the Biden pardons need some scrutiny. Martin said at a press conference announcing the transition. We want pardons to matter, to be accepted and to be something that's used correctly. So I do think we're going to take a hard look.

Among the Biden pardons that have drawn sharp criticism from Republicans were the preemptive grants to clemency to former White House COVID-19 advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci, former Wyoming GOP rep Liz Cheney, and several members of the House J6 committee. GOP lawmakers and Trump allies have railed against the moves as excessive and self-serving, with some accusing Biden of using the pardon power to insulate political allies from future investigations with a form of immunity.

Martin did not specify which pardons were under review, but his remarks suggest the Trump administration could challenge or investigate the legality of someone by Biden's final clemency decisions before leaving office in January. While presidential pardons are historically difficult, if not impossible to reverse, Biden's use of preemptive pardons for people not yet charged with crimes has raised new constitutional questions. Martin's tenure in Washington, D.C.'s prosecutor office was brief and contentious. This we understand. Now we're going to be looking into this.

Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ part attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons, as we should. Nick Sorter with The Post the other day, quote, The integrity of the American partisan requires that we examine the Biden pardons and who did what. We will get to the bottom of it. Count on us. Joe Biden did not issue those pardons. I would I would bet I'd bet a lot. Put that way. It was auto pen. I believe that auto pen should be illegal and legal.

The Supreme Court needs to issue that ruling saying outright, you can't do this. We cannot tolerate any president of any political faction putting a pen in a robot arm to forge a signature. That's what it is. It's a forged signature. Now, I'm fine with this. I'm fine with this. We're going to scrutinize the Biden admin, his pardons, his documents, because because he was infirm.

medically disposed. So we don't know who actually authorized that. So let's get those hearings. Let's subpoena some individuals and bring them in and find out what's going on. As for Trump, Obama, Reagan, anybody else who used the auto pen, I say from now on, we're going to say OK to that. We realize they were auto penning. But from this point forward, auto pen should be unconstitutional. It should be illegal. And I think it already is.

The idea that a president could have his signature forged by a machine and they say, but even the founding fathers used an auto pen device. Don't care. The idea that a president would allow his signature on documents from a machine is insane. It opens the door to literally anybody doing anything they want, especially when you have a president who is in front. Now, I'll say it like this. When you got Donald Trump using the auto pen,

Well, OK, that's bad. But at least Donald Trump is of sound mind. No more auto pen. Joe Biden was not with it. The leaked tapes reveal that. And this cancer diagnosis also reveals it. He was he's infirm and medically disposed. The question that is, who did sign off on these pardons? Who authorized them? The challenge is going to be, of course, Biden could simply just say it was me. End of story. Under oath. And then what do you do?

Unless you can find some hard evidence, audio, video or otherwise, Biden can just say, I told him to do it. Now, what if Biden can't testify to that? What if he is unwell? What if others can testify that? No, that's not possible, because at the time, Joe Biden was indisposed. I think we should void them. The Democrats like to say, you know, you can't do that. You can't void these these documents. And I say, hogwash, hogwash. We are humans. We exist in a human society, my friends.

It is not math. OK, it is a decision made by the judgment of men. And we can choose to or not to the argument they want to make every single time. This is the Democrats do. But the Constitution and we say we agree. We like that. Then they break the law and we say, but the Constitution, they go, we're allowed. It was it was fine when we did it. So I don't play that game.

I think it is entirely constitutional to challenge the pardon power because the Constitution vests the pardon power in the president and nobody else. And so what we're challenging is whether or not that power was abused by somebody else. And I think the answer is probably yes. So we'll see, my friends. This is a tremendous scandal, a tremendous, tremendous scandal, the biggest in U.S. history, I believe. But there's questions about anything else he may have signed, anything else he may have done.

I'm going to wrap this first segment up there. We are going to be joined in just a minute by Dr. Stephen Quay, who's going to break down for us this diagnosis and, as a doctor, talk about what it means for this cancer. So smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know. Check out the interview. It'll be up at 4 p.m. at youtube.com slash timcast. Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all then. Well, I can't say that I'm surprised the Krasensteins got a visit from the Secret Service because they had posted 8647.

For those that aren't familiar, we did a big breakdown on 86 and what it means. And it's typically used to refer to get rid of something, to explain that something's not readily available. Or in mafia urban legend, it means eight miles out and six feet under or 80 miles out and six feet under. Either way, you're far away and you're dead.

So the Krasensteins, in response to the story about former FBI Director Comey, came out, made these posts, and then got a visit from the Secret Service. Now, the funny thing is, these guys are posting, this is what Adolf Hitler did. He sent his Gestapo to go and arrest people for daring to question him. Indeed. You're right. You're right.

Utah man suspected of threatening President Joe Biden shot and killed as FBI served warrant. Would you like to try again, liberal Krasenbros? Because this didn't happen to you. This happened to those that threatened Joe Biden. An armed Utah man accused of making violent threats against Joe Biden was shot and killed by FBI agents hours before the president landed in the state Wednesday. Special agents were trying to serve a warrant on the home of Craig DeLue Robertson in Provo when the shooting happened at 615 a.m.

He was armed at the time, according to law enforcement. Now let me just tell you guys, okay? This guy was morbidly obese and elderly. I mean, he was a threat to nobody. He wasn't going anywhere. You shouldn't make these threats. You should be arrested. And I don't know how else this would have played out. The guy clearly didn't want to be arrested. But we can't have people making these threats because how do they track? If everybody is doing it, it's going to make it sifting, trying to find a needle in a haystack when someone actually really does mean it.

They say this guy was planning on digging out a camouflage suit and begin cleaning the dust off his M24 sniper rifle, a post that came after months of graphic online threats against public figures. Robertson referred to himself as a MAGA Trumper, make America great again, blah, blah, blah. Neighbors described Robertson as a frail, elderly man, 74 years old, who walked with the aid of a hand-carved stick. Though he regularly carried guns, they said he didn't seem a threat.

There's no way that he was driving from here to Salt Lake City, setting up a rifle and taking a shot at the president. One hundred percent. No way. Now, what they could have done is they could have instead of killing the guy, waited for the elderly man to come out for food and then arrested him and said, bro, you don't make threats against presidents. I don't like Biden, but you don't do that. So Krasenbross, 86, 47 may not always be a threat, but it can be. Here's a post from Defiant L's.

This guy said, fun fact, the Secret Service is going to pay you a visit. And Brian Krasinski said, fun fact, no, they aren't. And then a day later, breaking, the Trump admin just sent the U.S. Secret Service to Ed Krasinski's home because he tweeted a number that meant impeachment. These people are scumbags, bro. You're liars. OK, you know that it is a threat. Not always, but doesn't matter. What if you said to curb a guy? Right. You know what I mean?

Curb could mean throw them to the curb or it could mean stomp them to death. Like just because you think sometimes the word isn't a threat doesn't mean you get to make a threat. They said that he released a video, which he can be heard saying that he would never, ever call for violence against anyone. So moments ago, the Trump admin just had Secret Service come to my house. You might be wondering why, because yesterday I made a post that said 86 47, which means get rid of Trump as an impeach Trump. No, he didn't say that.

He said, Trump wants to be a dictator and I will not be intimidated into not voicing my opinions or my dissent against him. Yeah, I want to stress the Secret Service has jurisdiction here and I doubt Trump is involved in the day to day. So moments ago, the Trump administration just had the U.S. Secret Service come to my house. You might be wondering why. Because yesterday I made a post that said eight, six, four, seven, which means if you look it up,

Get rid of Trump, as in impeach Donald Trump. No. As in 25th Amendment Donald Trump. That's not what it says. As in vote Trump out of office. Nope. Why, you may ask? You can't vote Trump out of office. He's on his final term. He's gone no matter what at the end of this term. He's lying. Because last night on the news, Donald Trump made the claim that 86-47 means assassinate him, which it doesn't.

I would absolutely never, ever call for violence against anyone, let alone the president of the United States. So the Secret Service agents were extremely friendly. They were like, yeah, we understand. It's just something we have to do because Washington told us to. Washington told them to come give me a visit. That's what he said. Trump wants to be a dictator, and I will not be intimidated into not voicing my opinions or my dissent. Oh, it's so cringey.

Bro, you knew exactly what was going to happen when you did it. That's why you were blasting it out there. They say Comey had been interviewed by Secret Service on Friday about his post on social media. You want to know what's really crazy? The post he made, 8647, was exactly 8,647 days since 9-11. And I don't know how people decided to look that up, but I checked several times and it's true. 8,647 days after 9-11, Comey writes 8647.

People were then claiming that this was a sign that they were planning a false flag or something. They're going to mention that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed the next that Comey had been interviewed. She said that she would take all measures necessary to ensure the protection. Now, here's the problem. Comey wrote cool shell formation on the beach and it's at 86 47. 86 can mean get rid of somebody or it can mean to kill them. Here's the issue. Comey says this.

Krasenstein say it. They are trying to normalize the use of the phrase. They are trying to intentionally expand the ability to call for the assassination of Trump through stochastic terrorism. Here's the idea. The Krasenstein say 86, 47 over and over again and go, it just means to impeach. It just means to impeach, despite knowing that it actually does imply in some context possibility for murder.

A crazy person online sees everybody spam blasting 8647, and he does not interpret it as just impeach him. He interprets it as take action. So he does. And that's the problem. Then he does. That's the oh, won't someone rid me of this priest moment. So spare me.

When Joe Biden had his FBI literally kill a man, an old man who couldn't walk. Now, I'm going to say it again. Old man, I don't care if you're old. I don't care if you're young. Don't be posting threats against presidents. We don't want that kind of instability. We want I'll tell you the world I envision. The world that I want is me sitting in a lounge chair, flipping through the news with the big old thing of chicken wings. And there's the president saying something marginally disagreeable.

We have a unified culture for the most part. We disagree on minor policies, kind of like how it used to be. The president comes on and says, I'm going to be pushing for salt deductions. We want this. And I'm going to go, oh, come on. That basically means blue states with high taxes are going to be taking money out of the pocket of the federal government. So the red states got to cover the rest. Yeah, I get it that the federal government gives grants and everything. But no, no, no, it's not that imbalanced. And then I'll say, did you guys order the pizza? Because the worst thing we have to care about

is whether or not we're getting taxed too much or too little that's a great vision for our country and so i'll tell you this i hope for a presidency where he's doing things that people are largely like yeah it's okay oh i can't stand it when he does this that or otherwise but you know i'll vote for the next guy and that's that's about as mad as you get and then you vote and the changes will be i don't know not too different my point is we want a unified culture

We want political disagreements because we want people to try and find the best solutions forward. So they're not going to agree on everything. We want that competition. What we don't want is for people to make these threats. Like this guy, he should not have gotten killed. This guy making this threat, what happens? It emboldens other people. They start making threats. Then you have 50,000 people all making crazy threats and you don't know which ones are real or fake. That's why they go after people and say, don't do it. Zero tolerance. Now, I think the Krasensteins should get a slap on the wrist.

I think they should get like a $50 fine or something. Not because I think that it's the end of the world. I think they need to say there's going to be a deterrence. We don't want you doing this. Now, I know these people have called out Jack Posobiec for posting 8646. What these people don't get or what they do and they're lying about. First, I don't think Jack should have posted that. Jack, it would appear, was posted as in response to them saying 8647.

86-47 has been something they've said a lot. And it is a veiled threat. And when it comes from Comey, it's more alarming because scale matters. I don't care who you are if you're on the right. Don't post 86 somebody. But now they're trying to claim, yeah, well, he did this. And I said, OK. I tweeted eight miles out, six feet under. And then one of these guys responds, yeah, well, what does this mean? And it was Jack Posobiec saying 86-46. And I responded, eight miles out and six feet under. I don't think you get it.

They want to play these games. They act like everybody on the right or everybody's always going to be just like, I am allowed to do it, but you're not. But I'll add the context. Jack was probably posting it because the left was posting it about Trump. So he said, OK, I'll post it about you. You want to play that game? Jack is the kind of guy who initiates these things and they don't understand that or they don't care. They want to rope you in and then blame you for what they started. I'm going to wrap it up there, my friends. Stay tuned.

Tim Kessler, well, tonight's going to be massive. Follow me on Instagram. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all then.