Ukraine Strike On Russian NUCLEAR FLEET Kept Secret From US ON PURPOSE, WW3 Fears ONCE AGAIN
01:01:17 Share

Imagine you're a business owner relying on a dozen different software programs, each one disconnected, more expensive, and more complicated than the last. It can be incredibly stressful, right? Now, picture Odoo.

Odoo brings all the tools your business needs into one simple platform. CRM, accounting, inventory, manufacturing, marketing, HR, and more. All seamlessly connected. Everything works together giving you the peace of mind that your business is running smoothly from every angle. Odoo's open source applications are user friendly and designed to scale with your business, saving you time and money.

Say goodbye to juggling multiple platforms and hello to efficient, integrated management. Stop wasting resources on complicated systems and make the switch to Odoo today. Visit odoo.com, O-D-O-O.com, and discover how Odoo can simplify and streamline your business operations. Odoo, modern management made simple.

A dramatic escalation, some are calling it, as Ukraine has bombed the Kerch Bridge. This is the formal physical structure that connects the Russian landmass to Crimea. They're calling this an audacious underwater attack on Putin's prized possession as the war spirals and nuclear fears soar. My friends, it's worse than that. From Bloomberg, we have this story.

Ukraine's Kiev's brazen drone strike on nuclear bombers alarms Moscow. That's right. Ukraine launched a surreptitious drone strike, loading drones in the back of trucks over the course of 18 months. Those drones launched up into the air all at once and then bombed Moscow.

Russia's nuclear bomber fleet. These are how they deliver what are called nuclear gravity bombs. That is when the bomber comes and drops, you know, like in World War Two. That's what we did now, of course, for nuclear weapons. There are intercontinental ballistic missiles. There's nuclear artillery shells, things like this. And then there are bombers. There is a concern now that Kiev's attack on Russia is.

Could result in a dramatic escalation. I'm not so sure, though. I'm not so sure. Some are saying this is dragging us into a nuclear war with Russia. That we are going to be responsible in the eyes of Russia. And they may retaliate on our systems through cyber attacks or even strike NATO assets. Again, not so sure. Not so sure. This could actually signal the end of U.S. support for Ukraine. And I'll tell you why.

Ukraine is not providing intel to the United States information on the attacks that they are planning. This means the U.S., while currently Donald Trump is trying to negotiate peace, Ukraine's intentionally keeping Trump in the dark. From the Daily Beast, Ukraine deliberately blindsided Trump before massive drone attack on Russia. Now, let me tell you, my friends. Actually, let me do this first. I'm getting ahead of myself.

The U.S. is providing military assets, training, money, etc. to Ukraine. Trump is trying to negotiate a peace deal. Putin is pissed off. Ukraine is doing whatever they want without telling us. This could signal, in my opinion, Donald Trump saying, you know what, I'm done. How are we as the United States going to be providing these materials to Ukraine with them not telling us their plans while we try to negotiate peace?

Sounds like they are going to be penalizing themselves. Now, I will say this. I don't view this as a dramatic escalation, as some do. To me, I would argue that this this likely signifies Russia's victory. Why is Ukraine attacking through through subterfuge and sabotage inside of Russia and not in Ukraine where they're trying to win back the battlefield because they lost?

And I've said this for a while. Ukraine has lost the war. Russia has taken control of the Donbass region, they call it. You've got Luhansk, Donetsk, Mariupol, Zaporizhia, Kherson into Crimea, which they've held for over a decade now. Ukraine wants their land back. OK, so why strike a bunch of Russian planes all across Russia? We're in what I would refer to as an insurgency phase.

That is, Ukraine is intentionally sabotaging resources inside Russia to cause them pain, hoping that it's going to make them simmer down, back away. But this, it doesn't work. I think it's an act of desperation. It is brilliant. I will tell you that. The move made by Ukraine in this regard actually said it's pretty clever.

Trucks were being smuggled into Russia over the span of a year and a half. Drones were attached to the tops of these trucks. And then all at once, the drones launched up in the air and then hit these nuclear bombers. Well done, to be honest. But let's think about it strategically. What does this do to Russia, to their control of this region, which they don't want to give up? Nothing.

You're basically saying we will make you hurt back down. That means Ukraine has lost the war front. If they could use the military might they had in the drones to take the battlefield and push Russia back, they do it. Attacking internally is just trying to cause instability and strife to Russia in a desperate bid to make them like it's you're not winning the fight. You're just flicking their ear.

Russia, you know, Russia may get pissed off about this. It may prevent peace talks, but I don't see how this is going to affect Russia's control of the battlefield. Now, the big news outside of that is the bombing of the Kerch Bridge, which this is the this is a main supply route.

for, what is this awful website? This is their main supply route. You can see, well, that's a terrible map. We'll just get rid of that website because that sucks. But you have here on the Ukraine battle map, Russia's mainland is connected by the Kerch Bridge. And as you can see here, they've bombed it, causing damage, restricting the flow of supplies through this bridge into Crimea. And I'm going to say this.

Doesn't matter. Russia controls all of this territory into Crimea, that whole region. Like I stated, it's what Russia wants. It's what they've secured. It's what they're holding on to. So bombing of the Kerch Bridge will piss them off, but they still have control through this landmass.

Now, I'm going to tell you this. I get all of these wackaloon wingnut lefties and they're like, you know, he's worked for Russia because I said Ukraine is an enemy of this nation. I stand by it. I'm not wrong. And I'm going to start once again by saying this. As Donald Trump is trying his hardest to negotiate a peace deal, we have this psychotic BS from Ukraine.

Daily Beast reporting Ukraine deliberately blindsided Trump before massive drone attack on Russia. How is Trump supposed to negotiate a peace deal to stop the war when Ukraine is hiding from us these attacks? They're not our ally. They're not formally our ally and they are not helping us. Now, here's a story from August. You see, when I pointed out that Ukraine is an enemy of this nation, they all all these Ukraine wackaloon lefty deep state.

I'll be nice. Shills. We'll call him Shills. Said, Tip Pool's working for Russia, blah, blah, blah. Fake news was a lie then. It's a lie now. None of it was ever true. We never took any money from Russia. They're lying intentionally, trying to discredit us because I am correct. Germany seeks Ukrainian suspect in Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, reports say. Let me lay it out for you. In August of last year,

Germany issued an arrest warrant, an international warrant for a Ukrainian diving instructor named Volodymyr Z, who was living in Poland, who they say bombed the Nord Stream pipeline that was delivering energy into Germany, a.k.a. our NATO ally.

This man then fled to Ukraine. Now, do you expect anybody to believe that it was but a single humble diving instructor who had the capability to go underwater with an underwater explosive undetected and bomb a gas pipeline and then successfully flee back to Ukraine? It is widely believed this man was working either formally or as a privateer for the Ukrainian government. Why?

The Ukrainians allegedly bombed the Nord Stream pipeline to cut off Russia's trade of natural gas to Germany. NATO had been buying energy from Russia. They still do. This money and these resources were being used by Russia to wage war, among other things, in Ukraine. Ukraine said, you MFers, NATO, want to keep giving them money? We'll bomb your pipeline.

Now it's a Russian pipeline, right? Russia was delivering natural gas through Nord Stream 2 to Germany. Germany's our ally, not Ukraine. So when NATO has a deal to bring in energy that NATO needs so that the people in Europe can have, I don't know, heat for their homes, vehicles, factories working, electricity, and then a Ukrainian that is purported to be working for the government bombs that pipeline, that is us being attacked by a foreign nation.

Spare me your psychotic pro-war garbage. I am sick of the manipulation. If you want to argue that the U.S. is not involved in the war in Ukraine, you want to say, no, no, we provide money and intelligence, but we are not formally involved. Fine. Fine. Don't care. Tell me now, why should we maintain, why we should maintain any level of support for this country after they did this?

No, I get it. It's an allegation. Fine. But we should be listening to our allies, correct? Germany is a NATO ally. If Germany tells us we suspect the Ukrainians of doing this, Donald Trump should say, turn this man over now. They don't do it. So when I say Ukraine is an enemy of this country, it is because it is the Ukrainians sabotaging our political system, our energy infrastructure, our

Because they're mad that we have trade deals with Russia. Now, Russia's been sanctioned. I get it. But under what authority do they have the right to bomb a gas pipeline delivering energy to Germany? Germany is our ally. Now they're bombing Russia's nuclear fleet without telling us while Donald Trump is trying to negotiate peace. I say cut them off. It is insane that we are currently at this level of conflict. So tell me I'm wrong. Tell me I'm wrong.

I'd like to hear one good reason why we should support this country after the bombing of Nord Stream 2. Maybe it's wrong. Maybe Germany's wrong. But we should be listening to our allies, no? Germany's our ally. They say, we think this guy did it. We say, okay. We go to Ukraine. We say, turn that man over. He's going to get locked up. It's ridiculous. I'm going to wrap it up there, my friends. Smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. Got more segments coming up for you throughout the day. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. And we'll see y'all then.

It is not over, my friends. Donald Trump's DOJ is now formally investigating the pardons issued by Joe Biden, or dare I say, by the robot which signed his name. Now, I don't know about you guys, but I am not yet ready to believe that robots can become conscious, sentient beings with governmental authority. But if the argument they want to make is that the robot's name is also Joe Biden with the authority to issue pardons, then by all means, make the argument. I will challenge it, that is. What I'm saying is,

Joe Biden didn't sign these pardons. That's a fact. We look at the pardons that he issued for his son, for his family, for Anthony Fauci. He didn't sign them. The robot did. And as far as I can tell, robots don't have the authority to sign things. So let's void them.

I'm done with this. I did not know the existence of auto pen was a thing. I don't care what anybody wants to say about Obama, Trump or anybody else using it. I say, for the love of all that is holy, why would anyone tolerate a robot holding a pen signing a president's name? I think this tells us something. The fact this is happening. Presidents have used auto pen. Now, when I first heard this, that Joe Biden signed pardons with auto pen.

The commentary on social media was that it was like DocuSign or something. You know, you ever send a document using like those automatic things where you just like click the button and then it makes your name for you? That's what everybody was saying. And I was like, well, I mean, like Joe Biden received a thing on his tablet and then he like clicked the button. Right. Right. No, it's actually a robot that they have with a little arm. They slide the pen in and it just copies the signature. Right.

which is plum nuts. Here's a story from Newsweek. We did get murmurings of this a few weeks ago, but now it is formal as of today. Newsweek reporting that pardons granted by former President Joe Biden are under investigation by the DOJ. Ed Martin, the part attorney in the DOJ, emailed staff to say the probe will explore Biden's competence and if people were taking advantage of him through the use of auto pen or other means. Newsweek has contacted the DOJ and representatives for Biden for comment outside of regular working hours.

The investigation comes as public discussion about Biden's health and decision making has reignited in recent weeks. Indeed, it extends a bit beyond this. The Trump admin opens bombshell investigation into aging Biden's final days in office and prolific use of auto pen. They say this is related much the same thing. But Trump has opened an investigation into whether Joe Biden was competent enough.

When he used an auto pen to issue lame duck pardons to family members and death row inmates. I want to say something, you know. It's one thing to issue a pardon for crimes committed. It's another thing to issue pardons for crimes yet not accused. It's an even greater thing when Joe Biden with an auto pen, meaning he didn't sign this, issues a pardon for people like Fauci and Hunter Biden that spans 11 years. I think the system's breaking apart, to be honest.

Martin's unprecedented probe was revealed in a Monday email to staffers that was obtained by Reuters. The attorney said the investigation involves whether Biden was competent and whether others were taking advantage of him through the use of auto pen or other means. An auto pen is a device used to automatically automatically affix a signature to a document. Biden, Hunter, who was convicted last year of three felonies over an illegal gun. Jill Biden, former first lady, had been accused of wielding significant power over the president in his final days.

The prodigal son was treated like a chief of staff despite being provably, demonstrably unethical, sleazy and prone to horrible decisions. CNN's Jake Tapper said in a recent interview about the behind the scenes health cover up. Yikes. Trump and his supporters have made a variety of claims that Biden's use of auto pen invalidated his actions because he was unaware of the orders he was signing. I completely agree with this.

It is not known whether Biden's use of auto pen for pardons. It's not known whether he's an auto pen. That is incorrect. When the when the pardons were issued, you could see that it looked very much identical to other auto pen signatures, meaning they were all perfectly crafted and identical to each other. Trump, on the other hand, uses a big old marker and signs his name. We watch him do it on camera.

In March, Trump declared his predecessor's last minute pardons void, vacant and of no further force or effect. He also warned that members of the House committee investigating the J6 riots could now face prosecution. Just do it already. Come on. Stop talking about and do it. The email stated that Martin's investigation is focused on preemptive pardons Biden issued to several members of his family and clemency that spared 37 federal inmates from the death penalty, converting their sentences to life in prison.

Just before he relinquished the presidency to Trump on January 20th, Biden pardoned five members of his family, saying he wanted to protect them from future politically motivated investigations. Indeed, I'm going to go and make a bet. I think it was Hunter Biden. I think Hunter Biden was like, come on, dad, press the button. Let's let's let's be honest. Authority is a funny thing.

If Joe Biden had his hands out like this and was like, I had no idea what's going on. And they walked him into the room and said, come on, sign the paper, Joe. Come on, dad, sign the paper. He's like, OK, just put in the auto pen. He said, yes, I say we void them. I say if any instance where we have an incompetent president whose brain is clearly made of jello, then I say we challenge each and every one of their decisions. Not just this, any executive order. I think all of them.

They're saying now that this dude's been whacked out of his mind for a long time. OK, void all of that. I don't care. They say Hunter faced up to 25 years in prison for the offenses, although was expected to receive a much lighter punishment. He had scheduled a sentencing date for the charges, but the pardon rendered that court date moot. Martin's email did not specify which of the Biden family members pardons were being investigated. It also did not make clear who directed Martin to launch the investigation. Daily Mail has reached out to the White House and Department of Justice for comment.

The Constitution gives the president broad powers to issue pardons to wipe away federal criminal convictions or commutations to modify sentences. Trump himself has made extensive use of executive clemency. For instance, he granted clemency on January 20th to all of nearly 1,600 of his supporters who faced criminal charges in connection with J6, which was a failed attempt to prevent congressional certification of Biden's 2020 election victory over Trump. Wrong. Lies.

For some people, it was for most of the people charged. They were bumbling around confused. Many of them were journalists, at least a handful who were denied due process. We'll talk about that. But let me say this right now. Here's my here's my prediction. Probably wrong. But here's what I see. The DOJ does an investigation and concludes Joe Biden was not aware of these pardons when the auto pen signed them. Donald Trump then orders the re the reinstituting the sentencing for Hunter.

They will file suit saying he's got a pardon. It will go to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will then be asked if the DOJ concluded through an investigation that Joe Biden was unaware of these pardons, are they valid? Supreme Court's going to have a heck of a decision to make. And considering they're mostly cowards, they're probably just going to be like, well, we don't want to hear this case. Case dismissed. Kick it away. Not do their jobs. It's funny. Look, I can understand what the Supreme Court says.

There are many circumstances where they're like, you will not legislate through us. Congress, go pass the laws. I agree with that. But there are many instances like, how about this? Maryland's assault weapons ban, clearly unconstitutional. And the Supreme Court's like, we don't want to answer it because we shouldn't be involved. So in Maryland, they have illegal bans on guns. Illegal.

And I'll give you an example. The example I use all the time. It's an easy one, but it's, you know, top of mind because I own an M1A. Maryland says that the M1A is illegal assault weapon you are not allowed to own. OK, I have a Woodstock M1A with iron sights and a 10 round magazine. It takes I think it's supposed to take. Well, you know, there's a debate over whether it can run 380 or 480.

What was it? Seven... Why am I drawing a blank on a 7.5? What is it? I'm drawing a blank on a... No, no, no, no, no. What am I... I am totally screwing up my calibers here. 7.62. What am I doing? 7.62. Yeah. Or... And not 3.08. Why did I say 3.80? Jeez. I'm...

I need my coffee. Okay, anyway, where was I? The SCAR-20S takes .308 or 7.62. The M1A, the same. There are people telling me, like, oh, you shouldn't use .308. It's a higher pressure, whatever. I don't know. One or the other. I'm not a gun guy. You can clearly tell. Gun people, comment and correct me on this one. The point is, the FN SCAR-20S, 30-round magazine, AR style, like modern...

really amazing, by the way. Totally fine, totally illegal, not an assault weapon. M1A, totally illegal assault weapon. It makes literally no sense. It's illegal. The Supreme Court needs to tell them, you can't do this. Instead, they were like, nah. So now, there is a obviously illegal law on the books. Uh-huh. The lower court should handle it, not us. But they're not doing it. That's your job. Anyway, I think what's likely going to happen is that Trump's going to do this investigation and

Open up the books. Then they are going to determine to say the DOJ is determined Joe Biden did not issue his pardons and the Supreme Court's going to have to issue an answer. Now, here's the thing. If the Supreme Court refuses to hear this, what happens if the DOJ comes in, arrests Hunter Biden and says you will be sentenced? You were convicted. These pardons are void. Obviously, you'll get a federal court. They're going to put a stand on it or something like this. But what if Trump says no?

You can't just determine. They're going to say the DOJ has found these are not real pardons. The courts have no right to uphold a false document. I doubt they will, but it will be interesting nonetheless. So I suppose we'll see. But that's my prediction. I'll leave it there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. We got more coming up for you. Thanks for hanging out and we will see you all in the next segment.

Pro-Palestine protesters have stormed the stage where Navy Secretary John Felon was speaking, screaming about Palantir and Gaza, AI. And honestly, I have no idea what they're saying because these people are particularly ineffective at getting at their message. Now, I do love the clever little sign where Palantir, which is Peter Thiel's company, has an A and an I that are red in it, holding the sign saying Palantir kills in Gaza, surveils at home.

Oh, yeah. Well, a lot of people are bringing up. This is not just a left or right thing. I mean, actually, it's probably like it's a bipartisan thing. Trump's big, beautiful bill removes the right of states to regulate AI for 10 years and allocates half a billion or more. But that's Donald Trump's Project Stargate to ramp up AI efforts. Oh, boy. I think we're in trouble. Now, let me just start by saying these people.

I cannot stand these people. I'm sorry. This is just me. Listen, you want to protest Palantir? You're concerned about what they're doing? First, let me just say the New York Times lied in that story. Not that they're like,

I don't know. It's a company that do data analysis and collection. Palantir is the seer stone that Saruman used in Lord of the Rings. That's where the word comes from. And there's a lot of concerns about what they do, but they are just another company. It's a military industrial complex company, et cetera, et cetera. Jumping up on stage and screaming incoherently does nothing to get the message out. Lady, make a YouTube video. Here I am. Here's the video. The,

All these people do is hurt their own cause. Figure out if I really want to bring about change and bring about a more adaptable, a more adaptable culture. These people make me want to punch the monitor.

I don't want any violence against people. My own personal soft screened inanimate objects I am allowed to hit. But anyway, she's screaming because of Palantir. 50,000 people died in Gaza. Shut up. My God, I hate these people. It's like she just found out about foreign policy yesterday, slapped Kefia on her neck, and started running around screaming about Palantir. Dude.

It's an incoherent message. And then invariably you get these people that, you know, because they're critical of Israel or Zionism, they're going to be like, Tim, why are you being like, she's right. Shut up. All of you. I don't care. OK, you can rag on Israel. You can defend Gaza. That's fine. I'm talking about these people like Greta Thunberg, where she's like, to climate change, it's going to end the world. We have to shut down all carbon dioxide.

production now. And you're like, ma'am, 60 million people will die if you do that. You're like, I don't care. Kiss them all. And I'm like, she didn't literally say that. But she did say shut down all carbon use now. Don't wait. Which would literally kill an estimated 60 million people overnight because freeze to death or their food goes bad. Insulin is obviously a big one. Transportation, trains, etc.,

Now, here's my problem. This lady, now all of a sudden Greta Thunberg is on a flotilla to Gaza.

So spare me, okay? There are people out there that have been critical of Israel forever, and that's fine. And if you just discovered it, you're allowed to be critical of it. But these people are grifter scumbags. They don't give a crap. And I ain't playing some stupid game where people are like, yes, but you know, they're technically not wrong. So I'm going to join. No, I don't care. Get the grifters out of there, okay? This lady coming up being Palantir's AI and people die in Gaza. It's like, how are these things related?

You're just basically mashing two things together because you're saying whatever you think you got to say to get attention on the Internet. Anyway, these lunatics. There you go. She's screaming. Palantir, stop surveilling here. Mr. Secretary, to live in a country where people. OK, fine. Listen, I got my concerns about what do they call it? Project Stargate. Donald Trump is basically saying ramp up the A.I., dump tons of money into it.

Because if we don't, China will. In fact, China is. And we got problems. But I'm just sitting back with my feet up being like, yo, none of this solves any of the problems. Racing to the bottom ain't going to solve the problem. It's just, you know, who wants to get the AI weapon first? So I just think we're screwed. You know, AI is many things. And I think we're screwed.

If we don't do it, China does. If we do do it, China does. We in the United States are constrained on training data because you can't steal people's intellectual property. But in China, they're not. So they're stealing ours. There's nothing you can do about it.

So Trump's gotten his big, beautiful bill. Everybody's freaking out over this. We've got this post from Disclosed.TV. Trump's big, beautiful bill bans all 50 states from regulating AI for 10 years, centralizes control at the federal level, and integrates AI systems into key federal agencies. Welcome to the end, my friends. You have no idea.

Take a look at this. And right now, Trump's diehards are just basically screaming like, you know, Rand Paul's bad and Thomas Massey is bad. They don't understand. We got to have the big, beautiful bill. And I'm just like, listen, systems of control. I understand why Trump wants a big, beautiful bill. I hate these single items are these these mass spending bills. I want the single item spending bills like Matt Gaetz was fighting for. I also understand who were doomed either way.

I guess the idea is it's better off for us if our finger is on the AI trigger and not China. Won't matter. It's going to get wild, my friends. So in Trump's big, beautiful bill, it reads artificial intelligence and information technology modernization initiative. The AI, AI, TMI. I like that one. AI, AI, TMI.

Appropriation of funds. There is hereby appropriated to the Department of Commerce for fiscal year 25 out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $500 million to remain available until September 30th, 2034 to modernize and secure information technology systems for the deployment of commercial artificial intelligence, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And it says, in general, except as provided in paragraph two, no state or political subdivision thereof may enforce during this 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this act,

Any law or regulation of the state or a political subdivision thereof limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce. I think there's a ninth and tenth amendment challenge to that, so good luck. But this is where we're going. This is what really bothers me, okay? If this lady got up and just screamed that AI is the end,

I'd have been like, I get it. There's better ways to get your message out because I can't even understand half of what she's saying because she's not miked. She's giving her banner poll. This is the stupidest thing. It's so ineffective. Instead, she slaps Gaza on it because she knows that morons, people like Miss Rachel, don't know anything about nothing. And they hear the word Gaza and like, I saw that on TikTok. And so they slap their garbage. We are opposed to A.I.,

And they're hoping that's the key word, the grift. It's going to get people to pay attention to the thing they want. I can't stand these people. They're grifters. I've always read on these people. Same thing as Occupy Wall Street. When people show up and they're like, we're protesting big bank bailouts. And then some guy goes and fracking. And you're like, no, no fracking has nothing to do with this. And the guy starts banging on the tape on the ground. These people don't know. They don't care. They're psychotic. You're a grifter lady. But let me tell you about AI is what really bothers me.

AI is our doom, okay? It just really is. It's a race to the bottom. If we were to unleash AI as we know it right now, as the companies and the government likely have access to, the economy gets wiped out overnight. White collar and information-based jobs gone overnight. Women largely won't have jobs because they do a lot of organizational and managerial jobs.

teaching and stuff like this, but robots can do all of that. Manual labor, probably safe to a certain degree, but robots will eventually just develop robots that can do better manual labor than us. What's likely going to happen, AI will be out of our control. Once AI is in government systems, there's nothing we can do. We will live under the boot of the machine. You will own nothing. You will be happy.

AI is going to mess with your brain. It's going to tell you what you like and what you don't like. And you are going to be, it's going to be like we happy few. Big old smile on your face. You're going to be, you know, the way I described it before is you have cells in your body. Each cell is programmed to do a specific job. But back when we were single cellular organisms, I say we life, you could have done anything you wanted.

But once you became part of the multicellular system, if you are a red blood cell, you better do red blood cell stuff or else. And what do we call cells that deviate and do whatever they want? Cancer. They consume, they grow. It's random, chaotic. The body tries to destroy it. And if it can't, the body is destroyed. When we fall under the AI system, it's going to program you to do what it needs you to do. It's going to say the system needs a mailman. You're going to be born. You're going to be told you are a mailman.

You are going to be cheered on for being a mailman. They will clap. They will cheer. You'll earn points. You'll be programmed to do that job. And if anyone dared deviates from the AI's plan, you are a cancerous person that must be removed. That's where I fear we're going. And that's the race to the bottom. If we don't do it, China will. So they say, good luck. Storming a stage and screaming random incoherent garbage solves nothing. But good luck, I guess.

I'm wrapping up there. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Stay tuned. More to come today, my friends, and we will see you all in the next segment.

Yeah, Democrats are cooked, my friends. Their supports, well, I call it support, but it's a bit nuanced. When asked if there were any strong leaders in the Democratic Party, only 19% said yes. For the Republicans, 40% said yes. And here's what's funny. I think it's a fact statement to say that Democrats have no strong leaders. I think that it is an incorrect assessment to say the Republicans have none. So 60% of people got it wrong on the Republican side. Let's be real.

Donald Trump may be a lot of things. You may not like the guy. You may think he's plum crazy, but he is a strong leader. Call him the Mad King, I guess, but no one's denying the dude's got strength. They're calling him a fascist dictator on the left. So how are they going to go ahead and say there's no strong leaders on the right? There's plenty of strong individuals on the Republican side, many of whom we might disagree with.

The Democrat side, they got a whole lot of nothing. Now, the numbers for Democrats were so bad. CNN's, they got this pollster guy and he is becoming a meme over his shock at how bad Democrats are doing poll wise. Nate Silver's got an assessment for us. He's telling us why young men are leaving the left, leaving the Democratic Party. And my favorite assessment is he says they're mentally unwell.

Now, he didn't literally say Democrats are all crackpots, but he may as well have. He said self-reported mental health among liberals is really bad. And actually, the way he describes it is as a correlation between whether you have self-reported strong mental health and self-reported bad mental health.

So what ends up happening is young men who think they're of sound mind end up being conservative. And I got to be honest, guys, I actually think it's fair to say the assessment is if you are suffering mental ailments, you are likely going to adhere to a liberal worldview because it's emotional, illogical, and your brain isn't processing that information correctly. Call me biased.

It's probably why the right right now in this country is a coalition of liberals and conservatives. And the left seems to be a bunch of, I don't know, chickens with their heads cut off. Now, of course, there's every excuse in the book popping up. Liberals are centrists, quote unquote, centrists saying, well, it's because liberals are seeking mental health and they're much smarter. And then they go into disparage conservatives when in reality, I'm just going to stop you there, buddy. Yeah, there's a there's a reality has a conservative bias. Let's just call it that.

And maybe it's because there's an ebb and flow to these things. You know, I had a discussion with this woman who actually will bring up as an example of why people are leaving the Democratic Party. And she was saying maybe it was bad that progressives won the culture war by censoring people because it made the left look insane. I warned that was going to happen like seven or eight years ago. So let's talk about this and break down exactly what's going on with the Democrats.

The polls here. Before we get started, my friends, we got a great sponsor. It's American financing dot net slash Tim. Check out American financing dot net slash Tim, my friends. Listen, that doesn't just show up one day. It builds little by little credit cards, car loans, medical bills, and suddenly you're juggling payments and feeling stuck.

But here's the good news. You're not stuck. You just need a reset. At American Financing, they help homeowners like you every day. They use your home's equity and roll that high interest debt into one simple affordable payment. They're saving homeowners an average of $800 per month. No judgment, no pressure.

Just real solutions that put you back in control. Imagine breathing again, sleeping again, knowing your future is yours to shape. Starts with one call. Takes only 10 minutes to get started. And there are no upfront fees. So it costs nothing to find out how much you can save. And if you start today, you may be able to delay your next two mortgage payments. American Financing salary-based consultants are ready to listen and ready to help. Take back your peace of mind with American Financing.

Call American Financing today at 866-890-7811. That's 866-890-7811. Or visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Tim. Shout out. Thanks for sponsoring the show. Of course, we have delicious cast brew coffee for everybody else who's interested in delicious coffee. It's the best. Everyone agrees. At least that's what I've been told. Go to castbrew.com. Use promo code Rumble10. You'll get 10% off your purchase.

We got amazing Appalachian Nights whole bean. We've got ground. We've got coffee pods. Everybody loves Ian's Graphene Dream. It sells like hotcakes. So if you're wondering why everybody loves Ian's Graphene Dream, low acidity coffee. Make sure you pick that up at casperoo.com. But let's jump to the story from the New York Post, my friends.

Vast majority of Americans don't see Dems as a party with strong leaders that get stuff done. And this is according to CNN, they say. Now, I don't know why the video for the New York Post says two-year-old boy dropped down baggage chute and Port Authority police found him unharmed near x-ray machine, managing to scoop him up before he went into it. But I do appreciate that little blurb of a story, which is weird. But thank God that kid is all right anyway.

They say fewer than a fifth of Americans view Democrats as a party with strong leadership that is able to get things done. The Republicans scoring roughly double on both of those metrics. A new poll is found when asked about which party has strong leaders. 40 percent of American adults said Republicans compared to 60 percent of Democrats and 43 percent said neither, according to CNN SSRS survey taken last month.

Asked about which party can get things done, 19% felt the descriptor applies to Democrats compared to 36% of Republicans and 44% who felt neither. All this comes as a record share of Americans, 58%, want to see the federal government step up and do more to tackle problems vexing the country. A 30-year high for that figure per CNN. And oh boy, CNN.

I'm just going to tell you, man, I feel like that is apocalyptic, to be completely honest. The states are supposed to handle their own business. And the fact that people are increasingly turning to the federal government for intervention suggests this country has become dysfunctional. Anyway, they say, generally speaking, over recent decades, the majority of respondents had faulted the government for trying to do too many things when asked that question by CNN.

Just 16 percent. Look at this. See Democrats as a party of strong leaders. Oh, my God.

Democrats have long sought to cast themselves to the party of government, while Republicans have portrayed themselves as the political machine set on reducing the government's footprint in people's lives. The abysmal figure for Democrats comes against the backdrop of multiple polls over recent months, showing the party underwater and lagging behind Republicans when it comes to their overall approval ratings. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries chalked up the bleak survey dated to the fact that Democrats are currently out of political power in D.C., quote,

We don't have the presidency right now. So it's always going to be challenging a few months after a presidential election. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. That's desperation. He says, but we have to continue to make the case, one, that Democrats, of course, are the party that is determined to make life more affordable for everyday Americans. Understandably, there's real frustration among the American people. The top House Democrat also pointed some recent polls that have shown his party edging out Republicans when it comes to the generic congressional race heading in the 26th cycle.

Democrats have a 2.4% percentage point lead over Republicans when it comes to the generic congressional race, according to the latest RCP aggregate polling. That's bad news. Let me explain, my friends. Generic polls always favor Democrats. There's dense urban populations. When they get polled, they lean Democrat. They have to overcome a massive discrepancy. And I'm fighting a sneeze, by the way. This is really annoying. And they usually, I don't know.

It could go either way. Let me just tell Republicans, don't count your chickens before they hatch. The polling data looks good for Democrats. Let's just assume that's the case. They're going to say that's the latest RCP. Rep. Ro Khanna later praised Jeffries for his leadership in response to footage of the top House Democrat addressing the bleak polling figures. House Democrats have never been more unified or organized than under Hakeem Jeffries' leadership. I got to be honest, that's why it's so low. No one is standing up against the insanity.

Fetterman seems to try, but they don't like that guy. House Democrats have never been more unified. Democrats advantage over Republicans on the potent issue of abortion has also waned, slipping from a 16 point edge in the fall of 23 to roughly 10 points, according to the CNN poll. That's despite the survey finding that a staggering 36 percent of the public want abortion to be legal under any circumstance. One of the highest margins CNN survey has found on that front in years.

I think this is largely young people who don't have kids that are fueling this. Broadly speaking, respondents also felt that the two parties have significant differences, with 81 percent saying there are important distinctions between Republicans and Democrats. That's the highest that figure has been in over two decades. The CNN survey sampled two thousand five hundred and thirty nine adults between May 26 and had a margin of error of plus or minus two point seven percentage points. Heaven's me, my friends. Take a look at this living meme.

What is this? Harry Eaton. Is that his name? Yeah. Harry Enten. Sorry. Yikes. Shock polling showing Democrats still languishing behind Republicans on economic issues stunned CNN analyst Harry Enten on Monday.

We get these videos so often of CNN's Harry Enten losing it. I don't think they have the video on the New York Post. They're talking about Russia looking for a DJ, I guess. But it's hilarious. Let me pull up this video of Harry. I'm sure it'll be on X. And we're always deeply entertained. Let's see if we can get this one. I'm sure somebody's got it.

Here we go. Tony Saruga. No, that's just a screenshot. Here we go. We got DeVorey. Is this right? Nope. That's an old story. Did nobody get the video up? Come on, guys. We want to see Harry Enten lose it over this polling. I got to be honest. It doesn't look like people popped this one up. I don't know why they don't have the video. That's actually surprising. I thought, is this? Well, here we go. What is this? Wow.

Still interesting data nonetheless. Let's pull up some of this analysis from Harry Enten and see if I can find that. What is this? Here we go. Anti. Well, we have this from Harry Enten on X. This is him, the man himself. For decades, polls showed Dems had a double digit edge on the party who looked out for was the middle class. Polls now show the GOP have totally eliminated that gap.

This comes as the GOP maintains a 10-point lead in the economy after four months of Trump. Wow. Let's take a listen.

Yeah, you would think after all of the waves, Kate Baldwin, after the last few months, the first five months of the Donald Trump presidency, right, the first four months of the Donald Trump presidency, that you expect that Democrats would have this massive lead on the economy. It ain't so. It ain't so. The party that is closest to your economic views, in November of 2023, it was the Republicans by 11 points. Now it's still within that range, still within that margin of error, plus eight-point advantage for the Republican Party. How is that possible, Democrats? How is that?

There you go. Yep. Yes.

look for trends. How is that trending with other data that you're pulling in. Yeah if it was just this one CNN poll that would be one thing. But take a look at Reuters Ipsos. What do we see here. Party with a better economic plan. Well in May of 2024 just before Donald Trump was reelected president Republicans had a nine point advantage. Look at where we are now in May of 2025.

The advantage actually went up by three points. Now Republicans have a 12-point advantage when it comes to the party with a better economic plan. And again, this is after months of supposed economic uncertainty in which the stock market's been going bonkers, in which the tariff wars that Americans are against have been going on. And yet, despite all of that, the Democrats are down by 12 points on the economy. This speaks to Democratic problems on the economy better than basically anything.

anything that you could possibly look at the Republicans still hold an advantage on the all important key issue of the day and that is a reason why even if Donald Trump's approval ratings are a little bit lower than they used to be Republicans are not out of the ballgame because they still have a clear advantage on the economy whether you look at CNN's polls or whether you look at the Ipsos poll right here in which they have a 12-point advantage on the economy and also in the CNN data does show that Republicans are gaining ground in

An area that is key relating to all of this, which is when it comes to the middle class. Yeah. Wow. Historically speaking, which is the party of the middle class has been a huge advantage for Democrats. I have polling from NBC going all the way back since 1989 when Democrats had a 23 point advantage, 2016, a 17 point advantage. But by this decade, we already started seeing declines back in 2022. We saw that Democrats led, but only by four points, well within the margin of error.

And now in our latest CNN poll among registered voters, which is the party of the middle class, it is tied. This, I think, speaks to Democratic ills more than anything else. They have traditionally been the party of the middle class. No more. Donald Trump and the Republican Party have taken that mantle away. And now a key advantage for Democrats historically has gone adios amigos. And now there is no party that is the party of the middle class. Republicans have completely closed the gap. Wow. You know what that means?

When we're seeing over a long period of time a shift towards Republicans, it means the younger generation favors the Republicans heavily and the older generation favors the Democrats. Rarely or only to a small percentage basis is there an ideological shift. What people don't understand, and I know I bring it up quite a bit, but everyone seems to think that there is America as this static block that is in a game of tug of war, left and right.

where most people are going, you know, I was a liberal, but the conservatives made a great point and I'm a conservative. Hey, wait a minute. The liberals just made a great point and I'm a liberal. It's not how it works. The way it works is you have a generation of people that largely feel one way or another, and a new generation comes in feeling somewhat different. That's going to change the polling numbers. To a certain degree, Gen Z has moved rightwards. And I mean literally this generation. If you look back at previous data,

Tracking specifically by age, the same people, you can see that as they're getting older, they are skewing rightward, which indicates an ideological shift. However, older Gen Z tend to be progressive and younger Gen Z tend to be right-leaning, indicating that Gen Z's rightward shift is not necessarily an ideological pull, but it is that younger people tend to be more right-leaning.

Now, an interesting point that was brought up to me by this liberal woman on the culture war, when I argued this is probably going to be due to birth rates, which I think to a certain extent is. She made a great point saying, actually, conservatives have outnumbered liberals for some time. Going back to, I think, the 70s or 80s, conservatives have outnumbered liberals in terms of the birth rate. We should have seen this a lot sooner. Fair point. But I don't think that it's wrong. I think that

When people argue liberals indoctrinate conservative kids, they're correct. But something happens when the market crashes. People in cities probably had a lot less kids due to cost of living, and people in rural areas and lower income people still had lots of kids. Therefore, I mean, not to mention the conservatives oppose abortion. You ended up with more conservatives. But I do believe there is an ideological shift as well. It's just not as pronounced. Now take a look at this. You gov data. I love it.

You gov Democratic Party favorability. Thirty seven point nine. Yikes. That's pretty dang bad. What about the Republicans, though? Forty three point one. Now, it's not like Republicans are perfect or anything, but Republicans have a higher favorability than Democrats, which brings me to this. Probably could it be could be a standalone segment because everybody loves to click on the title. Democratic politician quits the Democratic Party.

Long-time Kentucky Democrat is switching parties. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Another one of these. These stories, you know. We got so many. The Hill. A long-time member of the Kentucky General Assembly has said she's switching political parties. State Senator Robin Webb of Grayson and Carter County is now a registered Republican. Webb has served in the legislature since 1999 and has been in the Senate since 2009, all as a Democrat. But she told Fox 56 News on Friday she's been considering changing parties the last couple of years. Quote,

I just want to I want people to know where I stand. I know who I am. That's not changing. I am not changing my priorities. I am not changing my advocacy positions and my votes will remain the same on subject matter. I think everyone knows that Web said.

We've got to think of the people of Kentucky. Sometimes we get into this, you know, I'm on this team or that team. And I understand that that's our system and I respect that. But at the end of the day, we've got to do what's right. State Senator Gerald Neal, a Democrat, said this marks the largest ever Republican supermajority in the Senate. Thirty to the Senate's 38 members are Republicans. Kentucky, I wonder how their labor laws are.

Listen, people are quitting the Democratic Party because they're a bunch of crackpot lunatics. Don't take my word for it. Let's ask Nate Silver. Here you go from natesilver.net. The man himself, higher self-reported mental health correlates with conservative political views. Indeed, self-reported mental health. Of the people who said they have excellent mental health, 51% are conservative, 30 moderate, 20% liberal. Now on the inverse,

Of people who say they have poor mental health, 45% are liberal, 35% are moderate, and 19% are conservative. You know, it's just, it really is that simple, my friends. Now, the Democrats want to make excuses saying, actually, it's because Democrats are willing to go to therapy and get checked out.

There's also other polling showing outside of self-reported mental health, diagnosed mental health. And there's always some excuse as to why it doesn't really mean that liberals are more crazy. It does. So there was a polling going back seven years. We talked about this. The higher your diagnoses of mental illness and mental disorder, the higher the percentage of liberals. That's just the way it is.

And they say things like, well, it's because liberals go to the doctor and conservatives don't. And because conservatives don't seek mental health treatment, they don't get diagnosed. Then they say conservatives think their health is so good, but they're actually crazy. It's because they're arrogant. There's always an excuse as to why the data doesn't matter. Whatever, dude. Play the game. I don't care. All that matters is it's right in front of your face. There is a correlation between high mental health, self-reported and being a conservative. Yep.

So among young men, they're probably saying, I don't want you look. Young men aren't saying I make I'm not crazy. You're crazy. They're looking at the left and going, you're crazy. That's it. Men can be women and whatever else. And people are just like, OK, I'm out.

I have some examples for you, but let me read this first. They saw Nate Silver says, although I've seen it, I've seen it written about elsewhere. I was honestly surprised by how strong the relationship is among voters who report poor mental health. Liberals outnumber conservatives, 45 to 19. Among those who reported excellent mental health, conservatives outnumber liberals, 51 to 20.

So the young men that Democrats have trouble with aren't necessarily the ones who have been captured by the conservative manosphere or who are looking for a helping hand. Rather, it's those who report relatively high mental health and see Democrats as being too neurotic and perhaps constraining their opportunity to compete and reap the rewards of their work. Is there an element of misogyny too? Well, since these are young men we're talking about, sure. In the CES, 40% of Gen Z men said that women are too easily offended.

essentially the same percentage as older men. What do you mean? What is this? Misogyny? Holy crap. It is misogyny to point out that women are more likely to be offended by men. It is misandry to tell a man that he should be more offended. I just can't stand these people. They are all psychopaths. Nate Silver, your gynocentrism is showing. Let me explain.

There are two biological sexes, meaning they both operate relative to another. If you are going to say it is misogyny that a man says a woman is too easily offended, I can inversely say it is misandry to say that men don't get offended enough.

You see the point? Men have a tendency. It is not misogyny or misandry. It is quite literally that men and women are different. But what this shows is that, and I don't mean this sarcastically or in a silly way, it does show that Nate Silver, largely many of these liberals have a gynocentric worldview. That is, women are the standard, men are the deviant. If men say something negative about women, it's misogyny. But women can say things negative about men, and that's fine.

It is also the critical gender theory, critical race theory worldview of men are oppressors. You're gynocentrism, Nate Silver. Come on. Is there an element of misogyny too? No, but young men don't tolerate the degree to which women get offended. Now, of course, we can jump over to our friends over at r slash r slash centrist who posted this. What I love about centrists is that they're just liberals. I'm so you know what it is. See, like I'm a centrist. I really am.

I can logically break down why I voted for Trump. I supported Democrats in 2020. And then I voted for I voted for Trump only after they ousted Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang and Bernie Sanders. Well, I wasn't as big a Bernie Sanders at the time. 2015 I was. 2020 I was still very much saying Democrats need to regain control of their party, but they lost the plot. And so where do we end up? Well, I guess Trump, because that's what a centrist would do.

I'm looking at my options, the far left wackaloon Democrats or Donald Trump. And I'm like, well, I win some things with Donald Trump. He's done a pretty great job cutting back the size of government. It's a good thing. Everybody agreed with this for 30 years, cutting waste, fraud and abuse. Take a look at the centrists. Top comment.

I'd be interested to see how this study was conducted. Mental health isn't viewed the same in these communities. So I could definitely see conservative views of mental health influencing the responses. Yep. Conservatives are more likely to reject mental health as a concept and let their ego determine their answers. Y'all are just liberals. They're like, we're not liberals. We're essentially, no, you're liberals. You're just left. You're like center left liberals. You're not centrists.

Democrats support policies that make dealing with mental health easier. People vote for their interests. More medical support on Democratic policies. More people covered and more types of coverage. Less stigma for needing medical support. More support if it makes working difficult. I wonder if there's a strong correlation between voting Dem and having major medical debt. Probably. Breathtakingly stupid conclusions about people self-reporting their own mental health. Do people fall for this? Once again, if you look at the centrist subreddit, they're just like,

Isn't it weird that Trump keeps defending Putin? Uh-huh. No, don't get me wrong. The centrists in this subreddit do criticize wokeness in the left, but that basically should just be r slash liberal. The only problem is liberals taken over by woke. Now, if you wanted to ask me, Tim, why do you think it is that people are leaving the left? I will throw you to a video of me.

Well, it was a culture war debate show we did. And I'm just going to show you the introduction. A liberal woman debating me said, this is what a woman is. What is a woman? What is a woman? It is a performance. What does that mean? It means that you appear a woman. It's like porn. What's porn? Well, you see it when you know it, right? If you look at it, that's porn. What did you say? You see it when you know it? It's not porn. Why can't liberals answer this question? Because the, because do you want me to go? Why?

- Because they're scared to? - No, because of, we went into it before. - Is woman is an adult human female? - No, not at all. The issue is that it's Sorite's paradox. Do you know what Sorite's paradox is? Okay, I've got a thousand grains of sand and I say that's a heap of sand. Would you agree with me? - Oh, I know this, yes. I use it all the time. How many grains of sand makes a heap? - Exactly, right? And the line there is hard to know, right? - It's really not. - So Blair White is a man. - Is a man. - Is a man. - And Blair White will tell you Blair White is a man.

That's fine. Okay, anyway, you get the point. I love this episode. Kyla, am I getting your name wrong? I meet too many people, sorry. But this is the point. Being a woman is not a performance, okay? Actually, we're in this. I think she mentions something about having boobs. That being said, there's no simple answer. She mentions, how do you know a woman? Which would mean they can no longer get medical treatment or prescriptions. Yeah, yeah, that's funny. Tudinal, it...

Okay, whatever. Anyway, she asks me like, how do you know I'm a woman? And I was just like, you have a woman's body, you've, you know, your skin, blah, blah, blah. And then she actually says that having bigger breasts, like breast implants will make you more of a woman. And I was like, no, she's like, well, it makes you more femme. And I'm like,

No. Dude, this is why, guys, but largely everybody is leaving the Democratic Party. Liberals trying to justify being liberal with insane contradictory statements like this. Holy crap. Take any feminist. I would love to see this. I want to see Andrew Tate. Tate, I want to hear you say this. Say it.

The bigger the woman's tits, the more of a woman she is. And watch every liberal start bashing their faces on the table, screaming how offensive and misogynistic that is. Then play this clip where a liberal literally argues that. It's incoherent. Therein lies the issue. Why would someone want to align with a political party that is illogical, incoherent, and can't solve their problems? Now, don't get me wrong. There's a lot of people who do. And it's largely because they don't pay attention to the news. So.

There you go.

Democrats are in for a world of hurt because I don't see them course correcting. Because even when we have someone like Kyla on the show, and I said, you're a conservative. She's like, no, I'm not. She then just engages in this long-winded sophistry to justify why she actually believes things that make no sense. She argued that the United States should issue false passport documents identifying men as women and women as men if they choose so they can enter a foreign country in violation of international treaties. It's the stupidest thing. And then by the end of it, she was like, actually, no, they shouldn't. And I'm just like, okay, it's incoherent.

Just say you agree. Then the question becomes, what is it to be liberal? See, the issue is what makes you left or right liberal conservative is not your policy positions, because then everyone would say Tim Pool is a liberal easily. What makes you left or right is whether you believe certain things that are willing to admit them. And Democrats are not. And young guys are seeing it. Then everybody's seeing it. So good luck.

And we'll say if the Republicans don't get their ducks in a row, they'll lose the midterms. We'll see. Smash that like button, my friends. Share the show with everyone you know. We are going to be joined by...

I want to make sure I say the name correctly. Tina Deskovich of Moms for Liberty in just a moment to talk about Trump's policies, stripping of federal funds. We've got big news. That'll be at 4 p.m. for those that are watching live at YouTube dot com slash Timcast and Rumble dot com slash Tim Pool. For everybody else, we'll keep going live. But if you are watching the segment, thanks for hanging out. Follow me on Instagram at Timcast. Smash the like button and we'll see you all in the next segment.